The Midterm Elections

48,826 Views | 731 Replies | Last: 6 mo ago by dajo9
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Big C said:

tequila4kapp said:

Big C said:

tequila4kapp said:

This election is over but for some counting and Georgia's run-off.

The underlying fundamentals were so skewed toward Rs that I am suspicious there's something more fundamental at play rather than anti-trump, abortion, etc. It has to be something like Ds on the ground get out the vote game developed during the Covid shutdown were leveraged to great effect. It's the most logical explanation to me, but we will learn in time.

In the meantime, Ds get some time to rightly gloat and Rs still have a solid path to quietly capturing the House and Senate. TBD.

How, in your opinion, were "the underlying fundamentals... so skewed toward Rs"?

For me, the one thing that comes to mind is the way that the midterms have tended to go against the President that has just taken office two years prior, which, in this case, happens to be away from the Dems, toward the Republicans.
Biden massively underwater. 75-80% of people saying country is going in the wrong direction. Very high number of people saying inflation was their major issue. Historical trend of party in power losing seats. This will be 1st ever party in power with underwater president has over 195 seats.

If that's true that "75-80% of people saying country is going in the wrong direction", how, specifically, did they pin that on ol' Joe?

It's like inflation, how, specifically, is that Biden's fault? Sure, the Republicans tried to pin it on him, but I didn't sense that they had their own plan to counter it, did they? Do they?

Everybody hates inflation and it's an aspect of the economy that everybody sees, firsthand, all the time. But I feel like, in general, the economy's in decent shape.

Americans (and, heck, people everywhere) like to gripe and blame things on the politicians in office, but when push came to shove and people looked at alternatives, they were like, "Biden? He's doing okay."


We've gone over this before, didn't you pay attention?

1. Added over $4 Trillion+ in spending, on top of orevious stimulus spending.
2. Green NewcDeal / Build Back Better / WEF - restricting new oil and NG leases, shutting down new pipelines, and negative market news.
3. Signed Paris Accord
4. 2 & 3 lead to big jumps in energy prices, which lead to big jumps in food prices
5. Proxy war w Ukraine
6. Could have fired the Fed chair
7. Extended Lockdowns, which leads to a host of problems, including more $$$ chasing fewer goods

If you posted it, no, I didn't pay attention.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Unit2Sucks said:

Big C said:

tequila4kapp said:

Big C said:

tequila4kapp said:

This election is over but for some counting and Georgia's run-off.

The underlying fundamentals were so skewed toward Rs that I am suspicious there's something more fundamental at play rather than anti-trump, abortion, etc. It has to be something like Ds on the ground get out the vote game developed during the Covid shutdown were leveraged to great effect. It's the most logical explanation to me, but we will learn in time.

In the meantime, Ds get some time to rightly gloat and Rs still have a solid path to quietly capturing the House and Senate. TBD.

How, in your opinion, were "the underlying fundamentals... so skewed toward Rs"?

For me, the one thing that comes to mind is the way that the midterms have tended to go against the President that has just taken office two years prior, which, in this case, happens to be away from the Dems, toward the Republicans.
Biden massively underwater. 75-80% of people saying country is going in the wrong direction. Very high number of people saying inflation was their major issue. Historical trend of party in power losing seats. This will be 1st ever party in power with underwater president has over 195 seats.

If that's true that "75-80% of people saying country is going in the wrong direction", how, specifically, did they pin that on ol' Joe?

It's like inflation, how, specifically, is that Biden's fault? Sure, the Republicans tried to pin it on him, but I didn't sense that they had their own plan to counter it, did they? Do they?

Everybody hates inflation and it's an aspect of the economy that everybody sees, firsthand, all the time. But I feel like, in general, the economy's in decent shape.

Americans (and, heck, people everywhere) like to gripe and blame things on the politicians in office, but when push came to shove and people looked at alternatives, they were like, "Biden? He's doing okay."
Exactly, most democrats think that Trumpism and the fascists have done and continue to do damage to our country. SCOTUS is taking our country in a direction that a lot of people don't want it to go. The Dobbs decision was one of the most unpopular decisions we've seen, and there were more than a few other decisions that rubbed a lot of people the wrong way. There are other fundamental rights that have been implicated as well with the recent jurisprudence. How you interpret "going in the wrong direction" is pretty important.

I do think that t4k is correct however that the fundamentals favored the GOP. Inflation is a huge problem and correcting it is very likely to cause a recession. The duration and impact of that inflation is of course yet to be known. The general fear around what's coming for us with the economy is a pretty huge headwind.
It seems pretty clear that at least some of Joe Biden's low approval rating is from people who think he's not doing ENOUGH to stop the Republicans.

This is very true, especially if you talk to anyone under 30. They are not happy at all about the Green New Deal not being passed, for example. It's not even an issue of Republicans blocking it, but it didn't even get the support it needed from Democrats. So far under Biden's Presidency things look a lot like they did under Trump except worse in some ways. That has more to do with Congress and the Supreme Court than the President, but Biden isn't proving to be an exceptional leader who resonates with... well, anyone. His biggest positive was that he's not Donald Trump and that's still true today. I think people were hoping for more and instead there is still an orange stench wafting from Mar-A-Lago and into American politics. This country won't be able to move together in the right direction until that man is dead or incapacitated.









movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tucker Carlson calls out GOP leadership... to find new jobs.

dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looking more and more like a 51-49 Dem Senate (I'm assuming Warnock wins easily in a runoff in which Dems already won the Senate) and a House controlled either way by just a couple seats.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?









dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo said:











Corporate media is pro Republican
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

tequila4kapp said:

Big C said:

tequila4kapp said:

This election is over but for some counting and Georgia's run-off.

The underlying fundamentals were so skewed toward Rs that I am suspicious there's something more fundamental at play rather than anti-trump, abortion, etc. It has to be something like Ds on the ground get out the vote game developed during the Covid shutdown were leveraged to great effect. It's the most logical explanation to me, but we will learn in time.

In the meantime, Ds get some time to rightly gloat and Rs still have a solid path to quietly capturing the House and Senate. TBD.

How, in your opinion, were "the underlying fundamentals... so skewed toward Rs"?

For me, the one thing that comes to mind is the way that the midterms have tended to go against the President that has just taken office two years prior, which, in this case, happens to be away from the Dems, toward the Republicans.
Biden massively underwater. 75-80% of people saying country is going in the wrong direction. Very high number of people saying inflation was their major issue. Historical trend of party in power losing seats. This will be 1st ever party in power with underwater president has over 195 seats.

If that's true that "75-80% of people saying country is going in the wrong direction", how, specifically, did they pin that on ol' Joe?

It's like inflation, how, specifically, is that Biden's fault? Sure, the Republicans tried to pin it on him, but I didn't sense that they had their own plan to counter it, did they? Do they?

Everybody hates inflation and it's an aspect of the economy that everybody sees, firsthand, all the time. But I feel like, in general, the economy's in decent shape.

Americans (and, heck, people everywhere) like to gripe and blame things on the politicians in office, but when push came to shove and people looked at alternatives, they were like, "Biden? He's doing okay."
If one party controls all levels of government it gets credit and blame. You are arguing it shouldn't be that way. I'm saying it has been that way forever, which makes it a component of the underlying factors that favored Rs
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

tequila4kapp said:

This election is over but for some counting and Georgia's run-off.

The underlying fundamentals were so skewed toward Rs that I am suspicious there's something more fundamental at play rather than anti-trump, abortion, etc. It has to be something like Ds on the ground get out the vote game developed during the Covid shutdown were leveraged to great effect. It's the most logical explanation to me, but we will learn in time.

In the meantime, Ds get some time to rightly gloat and Rs still have a solid path to quietly capturing the House and Senate. TBD.
The bigger picture is that this country doesn't trust Trump or the extremists controlling the GOP. According to exit polls, Democrats won independents nationwide (49-47) which is crazy in a midterm with economic challenges and Biden's approval numbers. Dobbs can only count for so much. The GOP lost with moderates 56-41. Let that sink in. Losing the middle by 15 points in a midterm with these fundamentals should be ringing alarm bells. But for gerrymandering, the GOP would be dead in the water. This was a repudiation of the modern GOP.

I don't think this is just about ground game or get out the vote. The GOP always does a great job turning out its voters but they are fundamentally selling an unpopular product. At some point the GOP will have to reckon with the fact that the GOP has consciously decided to serve only a fraction of its potential base.


I have never hidden my conservative bias and disdain for liberal fiscal policies. If the party of election deniers has lost my vote and has caused someone like me who hates the failed liberal fiscal policies with a passion and believes in strong law and order to nonetheless commit never to vote for a dishonest individual who promotes election lies, the party has to move on from Trump and populism and get back to responsible governing. Hopefully this gives them the courage to get back to focusing on promoting ideas and not on tribal wars and Trump appeasement.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Tucker Carlson calls out GOP leadership... to find new jobs.



Republican Leadership should can MotherDucker Carlson, as he keeps the party posture aligned with Nasty Trump. The party needs to get back to civility and policy, and drop the snark, the misinformation, the terrible attitude - all of which describe Carlson.
He's in the HoF for GOP jerks!
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lol.

concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

dajo9 said:

Dear Baby Boomers,
Meet your new overlords

Thankfully I will only have to live with the idiocy of people like this guy for a couple of decades before I'm pushing up daisies. Too bad I may not be around to see the pendulum swing the other way when their stupid ideas fail.


Which ideas of theirs are stupid?
(I'm not following, so not a rhetorical question.)
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:


I like MH a lot but she misses the boat here. The correct question is how do Rs convince unmarried women their positions are better? Or how do they find solutions which meet unmarried W needs? Just like with Hispanics X number of years ago…you don't cede a demographic group to your opponent, you do what I suggest above.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

movielover said:

Tucker Carlson calls out GOP leadership... to find new jobs.



Republican Leadership should can MotherDucker Carlson, as he keeps the party posture aligned with Nasty Trump. The party needs to get back to civility and policy, and drop the snark, the misinformation, the terrible attitude - all of which describe Carlson.
He's in the HoF for GOP jerks!
The problem is the American people hate the Republican agenda of cutting taxes on the wealthy, starving out social security and healthcare, letting the environment go to rot, and closeting people with different identities.

That's not a Trump problem.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?

2028: Democrats win > 1988: Republicans win
2024: Democrats win > 1984: Republicans win


2020: Democrats win (Biden) > 1980: Republicans win (Reagan)
2016: Republicans win (Trump) > 1976: Democrats win (Carter)
2012: Democrats win (Obama) > 1972: Republicans win (Nixon)
2008: Democrats win (Obama) > 1968: Republicans win (Nixon)
2004: Republicans win (Bush) > 1964: Democrats win (Johnson)
2000: Republicans win (Bush) > 1960: Democrats win (Kennedy)
1996: Democrats win (Clinton) > 1956: Republicans win (Eisenhower)
1992: Democrats win (Clinton) > 1952: Republicans win (Eisenhower)
1988: Republicans win (Bush) > 1948: Democrats win (Truman)
1984: Republicans win (Reagan) > 1944: Democrats win (Roosevelt)
1980: Republicans win (Reagan) > 1940: Democrats win (Roosevelt)


concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

I don't know anything about Kenneth Mejia, but at some point us boomers need to step aside and let the younger generations take over. Some will prove to be mistakes but some will likely have some good ideas. Certainly us old fogies haven't been spectacularly good and we're all getting older and older.


Dude. Are you sane, or what?
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

tequila4kapp said:

This election is over but for some counting and Georgia's run-off.

The underlying fundamentals were so skewed toward Rs that I am suspicious there's something more fundamental at play rather than anti-trump, abortion, etc. It has to be something like Ds on the ground get out the vote game developed during the Covid shutdown were leveraged to great effect. It's the most logical explanation to me, but we will learn in time.

In the meantime, Ds get some time to rightly gloat and Rs still have a solid path to quietly capturing the House and Senate. TBD.
The bigger picture is that this country doesn't trust Trump or the extremists controlling the GOP. According to exit polls, Democrats won independents nationwide (49-47) which is crazy in a midterm with economic challenges and Biden's approval numbers. Dobbs can only count for so much. The GOP lost with moderates 56-41. Let that sink in. Losing the middle by 15 points in a midterm with these fundamentals should be ringing alarm bells. But for gerrymandering, the GOP would be dead in the water. This was a repudiation of the modern GOP.

I don't think this is just about ground game or get out the vote. The GOP always does a great job turning out its voters but they are fundamentally selling an unpopular product. At some point the GOP will have to reckon with the fact that the GOP has consciously decided to serve only a fraction of its potential base.


I have never hidden my conservative bias and disdain for liberal fiscal policies. If the party of election deniers has lost my vote and has caused someone like me who hates the failed liberal fiscal policies with a passion and believes in strong law and order to nonetheless commit never to vote for a dishonest individual who promotes election lies, the party has to move on from Trump and populism and get back to responsible governing. Hopefully this gives them the courage to get back to focusing on promoting ideas and not on tribal wars and Trump appeasement.
I said something similar. If T has lost people like me…his window has closed. I disagree about Rs needing abandon populism. The emerging coalition of working class, Hispanics and African Americans is the demographic future of the party (+finding a way to appeal to suburban and single women).

Re women, see Michigan's constitutional amendment re Abortion. Abortion is a fundamental right, never allowed to ignore health of the mom BUT the government CAN "regulate" from the point of viability. Uh…that's a position huge swaths of Rs would have been on board with pre-Dobbs but today that's sold as a D win. Time for conservatives to wake up.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

movielover said:


I like MH a lot but she misses the boat here. The correct question is how do Rs convince unmarried women their positions are better? Or how do they find solutions which meet UW needs? Just like with Hispanics X number of years ago…you don't cede a demographic to your opponent you do what I suggest above.

Jesse Waters (Foxnews - The Five) was pushing this stat about married women, and told his male audience to help the R party simply by stepping up to the plate, and putting a ring on it. I laughed, and then changed the channel.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?


concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

calbear93 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

tequila4kapp said:

This election is over but for some counting and Georgia's run-off.

The underlying fundamentals were so skewed toward Rs that I am suspicious there's something more fundamental at play rather than anti-trump, abortion, etc. It has to be something like Ds on the ground get out the vote game developed during the Covid shutdown were leveraged to great effect. It's the most logical explanation to me, but we will learn in time.

In the meantime, Ds get some time to rightly gloat and Rs still have a solid path to quietly capturing the House and Senate. TBD.
The bigger picture is that this country doesn't trust Trump or the extremists controlling the GOP. According to exit polls, Democrats won independents nationwide (49-47) which is crazy in a midterm with economic challenges and Biden's approval numbers. Dobbs can only count for so much. The GOP lost with moderates 56-41. Let that sink in. Losing the middle by 15 points in a midterm with these fundamentals should be ringing alarm bells. But for gerrymandering, the GOP would be dead in the water. This was a repudiation of the modern GOP.

I don't think this is just about ground game or get out the vote. The GOP always does a great job turning out its voters but they are fundamentally selling an unpopular product. At some point the GOP will have to reckon with the fact that the GOP has consciously decided to serve only a fraction of its potential base.


I have never hidden my conservative bias and disdain for liberal fiscal policies. If the party of election deniers has lost my vote and has caused someone like me who hates the failed liberal fiscal policies with a passion and believes in strong law and order to nonetheless commit never to vote for a dishonest individual who promotes election lies, the party has to move on from Trump and populism and get back to responsible governing. Hopefully this gives them the courage to get back to focusing on promoting ideas and not on tribal wars and Trump appeasement.
I said something similar. If T has lost people like me…his window has closed. I disagree about Rs needing abandon populism. The emerging coalition of working class, Hispanics and African Americans is the demographic future of the party (+finding a way to appeal to suburban and single women).

Re women, see Michigan's constitutional amendment re Abortion. Abortion is a fundamental right, never allowed to ignore health of the mom BUT the government CAN "regulate" from the point of viability. Uh…that's a position huge swaths of Rs would have been on board with pre-Dobbs but today that's sold as a D win. Time for conservatives to wake up.

Wow, you guys are speaking sensibly!
To paraphrase, Trump is a complete lying jerk. Glad we can agree on basic things.

We might actually have a future!
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

dajo9 said:

Dear Baby Boomers,
Meet your new overlords

Thankfully I will only have to live with the idiocy of people like this guy for a couple of decades before I'm pushing up daisies. Too bad I may not be around to see the pendulum swing the other way when their stupid ideas fail.

How was he able to beat his opponent by so much?
















Meanwhile, his opponent hasn't called to concede.





This dude would even tweet the salaries of LAPD officers. Like this guy Cory Palka made $401,461 in salary and benefits in 2020, the year before he retired.













concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:






That's interesting because Dems typically win the popular vote in presidential elections (despite losing the electoral college count).
And sad/funny that the conclusion is a call to focus more on gerrymandering. That's actually a really bad idea, as gerrymandering needs to be stopped by all everywhere, not taken to further extreme.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo said:

tequila4kapp said:

dajo9 said:

Dear Baby Boomers,
Meet your new overlords

Thankfully I will only have to live with the idiocy of people like this guy for a couple of decades before I'm pushing up daisies. Too bad I may not be around to see the pendulum swing the other way when their stupid ideas fail.

How was he able to beat his opponent by so much?
















Meanwhile, his opponent hasn't called to concede.





This dude would even tweet the salaries of LAPD officers. Like this guy Cory Palka made $401,461 in salary and benefits in 2020, the year before he retired.









1st, he's the Comptroller. Since when does a candidate for that position have enough money to have a slick website, including some very smart graphical information, and the ability to have billboards all over the city? Call me conspiratorial but this smells of Soros backed nonesense.

2nd, his website DID have some smart stuff. The interactive maps that showed where affordable housing exists.

BUT this billboard goes to my point. He's actually just got a lot of vague liberal "stuff" - not really concrete policies and certainly no authority to make policy change. A couple of years ago when conservatives complained about lifeguard captains making the same kind of money as a means of showing state government was bloated it was pooh-poohed. This guy does it with cop salaries and it works.

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:



BUT this billboard goes to my point. He's actually just got a lot of vague liberal "stuff" - not really concrete policies and certainly no authority to make policy change. A couple of years ago when conservatives complained about lifeguard captains making the same kind of money as a means of showing state government was bloated it was pooh-poohed. This guy does it with cop salaries and it works.



Anyone can look up the salaries of State and Local Employees.
It's easily accessible and you dont even have to be connected to George Soros.

Transparent California


"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

tequila4kapp said:

This election is over but for some counting and Georgia's run-off.

The underlying fundamentals were so skewed toward Rs that I am suspicious there's something more fundamental at play rather than anti-trump, abortion, etc. It has to be something like Ds on the ground get out the vote game developed during the Covid shutdown were leveraged to great effect. It's the most logical explanation to me, but we will learn in time.

In the meantime, Ds get some time to rightly gloat and Rs still have a solid path to quietly capturing the House and Senate. TBD.
The bigger picture is that this country doesn't trust Trump or the extremists controlling the GOP. According to exit polls, Democrats won independents nationwide (49-47) which is crazy in a midterm with economic challenges and Biden's approval numbers. Dobbs can only count for so much. The GOP lost with moderates 56-41. Let that sink in. Losing the middle by 15 points in a midterm with these fundamentals should be ringing alarm bells. But for gerrymandering, the GOP would be dead in the water. This was a repudiation of the modern GOP.

I don't think this is just about ground game or get out the vote. The GOP always does a great job turning out its voters but they are fundamentally selling an unpopular product. At some point the GOP will have to reckon with the fact that the GOP has consciously decided to serve only a fraction of its potential base.


I have never hidden my conservative bias and disdain for liberal fiscal policies. If the party of election deniers has lost my vote and has caused someone like me who hates the failed liberal fiscal policies with a passion and believes in strong law and order to nonetheless commit never to vote for a dishonest individual who promotes election lies, the party has to move on from Trump and populism and get back to responsible governing. Hopefully this gives them the courage to get back to focusing on promoting ideas and not on tribal wars and Trump appeasement.
Unfortunately for this country, you and t4k hold a minority view within the GOP. Trump represents the bigger view. People like movielover may be a minority conservative view on BI (now that so many Trump nuts have been banned) but it's definitely the majority view in the party. Obviously I don't see eye to eye with either wing of the GOP (although I *used* to be pretty close to your fiscal view) but I think it's a worthwhile POV to be represented. Unfortunately it requires too much 'splaining and most of the GOP doesn't really care so the party leaders doubled own on white grievance and culture wars and that led to people no longer caring about traditional GOP values. Now all that's left is culture war and white grievance and it is what it is. The GOP will be wrecked for a while.

concordtom said:





That's interesting because Dems typically win the popular vote in presidential elections (despite losing the electoral college count).
And sad/funny that the conclusion is a call to focus more on gerrymandering. That's actually a really bad idea, as gerrymandering needs to be stopped by all everywhere, not taken to further extreme.
They still aren't done counting the votes. Now a 6M vote lead isn't something I expect to evaporate but I do think it'll shrink by at least a few million votes.

I do think that this is largely a combination of both gerrymandering and the fact that more GOP senate seats were up this year than Dem seats. In a midterm, senate seats drive turnout.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

calbear93 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

tequila4kapp said:

This election is over but for some counting and Georgia's run-off.

The underlying fundamentals were so skewed toward Rs that I am suspicious there's something more fundamental at play rather than anti-trump, abortion, etc. It has to be something like Ds on the ground get out the vote game developed during the Covid shutdown were leveraged to great effect. It's the most logical explanation to me, but we will learn in time.

In the meantime, Ds get some time to rightly gloat and Rs still have a solid path to quietly capturing the House and Senate. TBD.
The bigger picture is that this country doesn't trust Trump or the extremists controlling the GOP. According to exit polls, Democrats won independents nationwide (49-47) which is crazy in a midterm with economic challenges and Biden's approval numbers. Dobbs can only count for so much. The GOP lost with moderates 56-41. Let that sink in. Losing the middle by 15 points in a midterm with these fundamentals should be ringing alarm bells. But for gerrymandering, the GOP would be dead in the water. This was a repudiation of the modern GOP.

I don't think this is just about ground game or get out the vote. The GOP always does a great job turning out its voters but they are fundamentally selling an unpopular product. At some point the GOP will have to reckon with the fact that the GOP has consciously decided to serve only a fraction of its potential base.


I have never hidden my conservative bias and disdain for liberal fiscal policies. If the party of election deniers has lost my vote and has caused someone like me who hates the failed liberal fiscal policies with a passion and believes in strong law and order to nonetheless commit never to vote for a dishonest individual who promotes election lies, the party has to move on from Trump and populism and get back to responsible governing. Hopefully this gives them the courage to get back to focusing on promoting ideas and not on tribal wars and Trump appeasement.
I said something similar. If T has lost people like me…his window has closed. I disagree about Rs needing abandon populism. The emerging coalition of working class, Hispanics and African Americans is the demographic future of the party (+finding a way to appeal to suburban and single women).

Re women, see Michigan's constitutional amendment re Abortion. Abortion is a fundamental right, never allowed to ignore health of the mom BUT the government CAN "regulate" from the point of viability. Uh…that's a position huge swaths of Rs would have been on board with pre-Dobbs but today that's sold as a D win. Time for conservatives to wake up.


I agree with you. I should have been clearer. I don't want George Wallace / Trump form of populism that appeals to the baser or racist side of Americans. I would want an inclusive Republican Party that focuses on the appeal of fiscal responsibility, encouragement of market competition and robust legal immigration while enforcing borders, less regulation and strong law and order. We would win every election in purple states if we just focused on strong candidates with strong conservative principles. Instead, the party resorts to Qanon / Dixiecrats who would have been popular democrats in the south 60 years ago. Hope this wakes up the party because I think we would have better ideas and appeal on economic issues alone.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump allies privately plot next steps after 2022 midterms disaster


https://www.axios.com/2022/11/10/trump-2024-presidential-campaign-republicans-desantis-midterms
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

tequila4kapp said:

calbear93 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

tequila4kapp said:

This election is over but for some counting and Georgia's run-off.

The underlying fundamentals were so skewed toward Rs that I am suspicious there's something more fundamental at play rather than anti-trump, abortion, etc. It has to be something like Ds on the ground get out the vote game developed during the Covid shutdown were leveraged to great effect. It's the most logical explanation to me, but we will learn in time.

In the meantime, Ds get some time to rightly gloat and Rs still have a solid path to quietly capturing the House and Senate. TBD.
The bigger picture is that this country doesn't trust Trump or the extremists controlling the GOP. According to exit polls, Democrats won independents nationwide (49-47) which is crazy in a midterm with economic challenges and Biden's approval numbers. Dobbs can only count for so much. The GOP lost with moderates 56-41. Let that sink in. Losing the middle by 15 points in a midterm with these fundamentals should be ringing alarm bells. But for gerrymandering, the GOP would be dead in the water. This was a repudiation of the modern GOP.

I don't think this is just about ground game or get out the vote. The GOP always does a great job turning out its voters but they are fundamentally selling an unpopular product. At some point the GOP will have to reckon with the fact that the GOP has consciously decided to serve only a fraction of its potential base.


I have never hidden my conservative bias and disdain for liberal fiscal policies. If the party of election deniers has lost my vote and has caused someone like me who hates the failed liberal fiscal policies with a passion and believes in strong law and order to nonetheless commit never to vote for a dishonest individual who promotes election lies, the party has to move on from Trump and populism and get back to responsible governing. Hopefully this gives them the courage to get back to focusing on promoting ideas and not on tribal wars and Trump appeasement.
I said something similar. If T has lost people like me…his window has closed. I disagree about Rs needing abandon populism. The emerging coalition of working class, Hispanics and African Americans is the demographic future of the party (+finding a way to appeal to suburban and single women).

Re women, see Michigan's constitutional amendment re Abortion. Abortion is a fundamental right, never allowed to ignore health of the mom BUT the government CAN "regulate" from the point of viability. Uh…that's a position huge swaths of Rs would have been on board with pre-Dobbs but today that's sold as a D win. Time for conservatives to wake up.


I agree with you. I should have been clearer. I don't want George Wallace / Trump form of populism that appeals to the baser or racist side of Americans. I would want an inclusive Republican Party that focuses on the appeal of fiscal responsibility, encouragement of market competition and robust legal immigration while enforcing borders, less regulation and strong law and order. We would win every election in purple states if we just focused on strong candidates with strong conservative principles. Instead, the party resorts to Qanon / Dixiecrats who would have been popular democrats in the south 60 years ago. Hope this wakes up the party because I think we would have better ideas and appeal on economic issues alone.
Joe Biden already occupies that space
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

okaydo said:

tequila4kapp said:

dajo9 said:

Dear Baby Boomers,
Meet your new overlords

Thankfully I will only have to live with the idiocy of people like this guy for a couple of decades before I'm pushing up daisies. Too bad I may not be around to see the pendulum swing the other way when their stupid ideas fail.

How was he able to beat his opponent by so much?
















Meanwhile, his opponent hasn't called to concede.





This dude would even tweet the salaries of LAPD officers. Like this guy Cory Palka made $401,461 in salary and benefits in 2020, the year before he retired.









1st, he's the Comptroller. Since when does a candidate for that position have enough money to have a slick website, including some very smart graphical information, and the ability to have billboards all over the city? Call me conspiratorial but this smells of Soros backed nonesense.

2nd, his website DID have some smart stuff. The interactive maps that showed where affordable housing exists.

BUT this billboard goes to my point. He's actually just got a lot of vague liberal "stuff" - not really concrete policies and certainly no authority to make policy change. A couple of years ago when conservatives complained about lifeguard captains making the same kind of money as a means of showing state government was bloated it was pooh-poohed. This guy does it with cop salaries and it works.


Gen Z is going to run circles around the old guard
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

calbear93 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

tequila4kapp said:

This election is over but for some counting and Georgia's run-off.

The underlying fundamentals were so skewed toward Rs that I am suspicious there's something more fundamental at play rather than anti-trump, abortion, etc. It has to be something like Ds on the ground get out the vote game developed during the Covid shutdown were leveraged to great effect. It's the most logical explanation to me, but we will learn in time.

In the meantime, Ds get some time to rightly gloat and Rs still have a solid path to quietly capturing the House and Senate. TBD.
The bigger picture is that this country doesn't trust Trump or the extremists controlling the GOP. According to exit polls, Democrats won independents nationwide (49-47) which is crazy in a midterm with economic challenges and Biden's approval numbers. Dobbs can only count for so much. The GOP lost with moderates 56-41. Let that sink in. Losing the middle by 15 points in a midterm with these fundamentals should be ringing alarm bells. But for gerrymandering, the GOP would be dead in the water. This was a repudiation of the modern GOP.

I don't think this is just about ground game or get out the vote. The GOP always does a great job turning out its voters but they are fundamentally selling an unpopular product. At some point the GOP will have to reckon with the fact that the GOP has consciously decided to serve only a fraction of its potential base.


I have never hidden my conservative bias and disdain for liberal fiscal policies. If the party of election deniers has lost my vote and has caused someone like me who hates the failed liberal fiscal policies with a passion and believes in strong law and order to nonetheless commit never to vote for a dishonest individual who promotes election lies, the party has to move on from Trump and populism and get back to responsible governing. Hopefully this gives them the courage to get back to focusing on promoting ideas and not on tribal wars and Trump appeasement.
Unfortunately for this country, you and t4k hold a minority view within the GOP. Trump represents the bigger view. People like movielover may be a minority conservative view on BI (now that so many Trump nuts have been banned) but it's definitely the majority view in the party. Obviously I don't see eye to eye with either wing of the GOP (although I *used* to be pretty close to your fiscal view) but I think it's a worthwhile POV to be represented. Unfortunately it requires too much 'splaining and most of the GOP doesn't really care so the party leaders doubled own on white grievance and culture wars and that led to people no longer caring about traditional GOP values. Now all that's left is culture war and white grievance and it is what it is. The GOP will be wrecked for a while.

concordtom said:





That's interesting because Dems typically win the popular vote in presidential elections (despite losing the electoral college count).
And sad/funny that the conclusion is a call to focus more on gerrymandering. That's actually a really bad idea, as gerrymandering needs to be stopped by all everywhere, not taken to further extreme.
They still aren't done counting the votes. Now a 6M vote lead isn't something I expect to evaporate but I do think it'll shrink by at least a few million votes.

I do think that this is largely a combination of both gerrymandering and the fact that more GOP senate seats were up this year than Dem seats. In a midterm, senate seats drive turnout.


If you are right, the party is done. I think there is a fairly large base that just want fighters on conservative policies but don't care for the divisiveness of Trump or election deniers. And I suspect a big portion of the former republican base left to be independent and some socially conservative democrats became Trumpian republicans. I think most Americans are moderately conservative on economic issues but I may be wrong. If we cater to those folks, I don't care if we lose the Dixiecrats.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

tequila4kapp said:



BUT this billboard goes to my point. He's actually just got a lot of vague liberal "stuff" - not really concrete policies and certainly no authority to make policy change. A couple of years ago when conservatives complained about lifeguard captains making the same kind of money as a means of showing state government was bloated it was pooh-poohed. This guy does it with cop salaries and it works.



Anyone can look up the salaries of State and Local Employees.
It's easily accessible and you dont even have to be connected to George Soros.

Transparent California



That isn't the point. Billboards cost money. Comptroller candidates don't usually have money.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

calbear93 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

tequila4kapp said:

This election is over but for some counting and Georgia's run-off.

The underlying fundamentals were so skewed toward Rs that I am suspicious there's something more fundamental at play rather than anti-trump, abortion, etc. It has to be something like Ds on the ground get out the vote game developed during the Covid shutdown were leveraged to great effect. It's the most logical explanation to me, but we will learn in time.

In the meantime, Ds get some time to rightly gloat and Rs still have a solid path to quietly capturing the House and Senate. TBD.
The bigger picture is that this country doesn't trust Trump or the extremists controlling the GOP. According to exit polls, Democrats won independents nationwide (49-47) which is crazy in a midterm with economic challenges and Biden's approval numbers. Dobbs can only count for so much. The GOP lost with moderates 56-41. Let that sink in. Losing the middle by 15 points in a midterm with these fundamentals should be ringing alarm bells. But for gerrymandering, the GOP would be dead in the water. This was a repudiation of the modern GOP.

I don't think this is just about ground game or get out the vote. The GOP always does a great job turning out its voters but they are fundamentally selling an unpopular product. At some point the GOP will have to reckon with the fact that the GOP has consciously decided to serve only a fraction of its potential base.


I have never hidden my conservative bias and disdain for liberal fiscal policies. If the party of election deniers has lost my vote and has caused someone like me who hates the failed liberal fiscal policies with a passion and believes in strong law and order to nonetheless commit never to vote for a dishonest individual who promotes election lies, the party has to move on from Trump and populism and get back to responsible governing. Hopefully this gives them the courage to get back to focusing on promoting ideas and not on tribal wars and Trump appeasement.
Unfortunately for this country, you and t4k hold a minority view within the GOP. Trump represents the bigger view. People like movielover may be a minority conservative view on BI (now that so many Trump nuts have been banned) but it's definitely the majority view in the party. Obviously I don't see eye to eye with either wing of the GOP (although I *used* to be pretty close to your fiscal view) but I think it's a worthwhile POV to be represented. Unfortunately it requires too much 'splaining and most of the GOP doesn't really care so the party leaders doubled own on white grievance and culture wars and that led to people no longer caring about traditional GOP values. Now all that's left is culture war and white grievance and it is what it is. The GOP will be wrecked for a while.

concordtom said:





That's interesting because Dems typically win the popular vote in presidential elections (despite losing the electoral college count).
And sad/funny that the conclusion is a call to focus more on gerrymandering. That's actually a really bad idea, as gerrymandering needs to be stopped by all everywhere, not taken to further extreme.
They still aren't done counting the votes. Now a 6M vote lead isn't something I expect to evaporate but I do think it'll shrink by at least a few million votes.

I do think that this is largely a combination of both gerrymandering and the fact that more GOP senate seats were up this year than Dem seats. In a midterm, senate seats drive turnout.


If you are right, the party is done. I think there is a fairly large base that just want fighters on conservative policies but don't care for the divisiveness of Trump or election deniers. And I suspect a big portion of the former republican base left to be independent and some socially conservative democrats became Trumpian republicans. I think most Americans are moderately conservative on economic issues but I may be wrong. If we cater to those folks, I don't care if we lose the Dixiecrats.
This is a fundamental disagreement. I think most Americans are financially irresponsible and don't expect our government to be any different. Even the traditional "fiscal conservatives" in the GOP far more about cutting taxes than they do about making smart spending decisions - see how the military is always overfunded to the point of waste, and it's never enough for the GOP.

I suspect if you ask America whether they would add $1 to the federal debt in exchange for $1 in their pockets, close to 95% would say yes.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mike Bonin is an outgoing Los Angeles City Council member>














tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

calbear93 said:

tequila4kapp said:

calbear93 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

tequila4kapp said:

This election is over but for some counting and Georgia's run-off.

The underlying fundamentals were so skewed toward Rs that I am suspicious there's something more fundamental at play rather than anti-trump, abortion, etc. It has to be something like Ds on the ground get out the vote game developed during the Covid shutdown were leveraged to great effect. It's the most logical explanation to me, but we will learn in time.

In the meantime, Ds get some time to rightly gloat and Rs still have a solid path to quietly capturing the House and Senate. TBD.
The bigger picture is that this country doesn't trust Trump or the extremists controlling the GOP. According to exit polls, Democrats won independents nationwide (49-47) which is crazy in a midterm with economic challenges and Biden's approval numbers. Dobbs can only count for so much. The GOP lost with moderates 56-41. Let that sink in. Losing the middle by 15 points in a midterm with these fundamentals should be ringing alarm bells. But for gerrymandering, the GOP would be dead in the water. This was a repudiation of the modern GOP.

I don't think this is just about ground game or get out the vote. The GOP always does a great job turning out its voters but they are fundamentally selling an unpopular product. At some point the GOP will have to reckon with the fact that the GOP has consciously decided to serve only a fraction of its potential base.


I have never hidden my conservative bias and disdain for liberal fiscal policies. If the party of election deniers has lost my vote and has caused someone like me who hates the failed liberal fiscal policies with a passion and believes in strong law and order to nonetheless commit never to vote for a dishonest individual who promotes election lies, the party has to move on from Trump and populism and get back to responsible governing. Hopefully this gives them the courage to get back to focusing on promoting ideas and not on tribal wars and Trump appeasement.
I said something similar. If T has lost people like me…his window has closed. I disagree about Rs needing abandon populism. The emerging coalition of working class, Hispanics and African Americans is the demographic future of the party (+finding a way to appeal to suburban and single women).

Re women, see Michigan's constitutional amendment re Abortion. Abortion is a fundamental right, never allowed to ignore health of the mom BUT the government CAN "regulate" from the point of viability. Uh…that's a position huge swaths of Rs would have been on board with pre-Dobbs but today that's sold as a D win. Time for conservatives to wake up.


I agree with you. I should have been clearer. I don't want George Wallace / Trump form of populism that appeals to the baser or racist side of Americans. I would want an inclusive Republican Party that focuses on the appeal of fiscal responsibility, encouragement of market competition and robust legal immigration while enforcing borders, less regulation and strong law and order. We would win every election in purple states if we just focused on strong candidates with strong conservative principles. Instead, the party resorts to Qanon / Dixiecrats who would have been popular democrats in the south 60 years ago. Hope this wakes up the party because I think we would have better ideas and appeal on economic issues alone.
Joe Biden already occupies that space
I really appreciate that we've had about 24 hours of civil discussion. In that spirit I'll offer the opinion that saying Biden is pro law and order, pro border security, pro market competition, pro fiscal responsibility would be about the equivalent to me saying Trump is pro-women's rights.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

DiabloWags said:

tequila4kapp said:



BUT this billboard goes to my point. He's actually just got a lot of vague liberal "stuff" - not really concrete policies and certainly no authority to make policy change. A couple of years ago when conservatives complained about lifeguard captains making the same kind of money as a means of showing state government was bloated it was pooh-poohed. This guy does it with cop salaries and it works.



Anyone can look up the salaries of State and Local Employees.
It's easily accessible and you dont even have to be connected to George Soros.

Transparent California



That isn't the point. Billboards cost money. Comptroller candidates don't usually have money.

tequilla4kapp said:

Call me conspiratorial but this smells of Soros backed nonesense.


Yes, this must make him a Soros front man.

A bright young Filipino American runs a grass roots Green Party campaign that put up some billboards.
That costs money therefore it must have bee Soros backing him.
Brilliant logic.

Did it ever occur to you that some wealthy Filipino American businessmen in Los Angeles thinks that he's a rising star and might want to invest in him as a representative of their community?

Or do you just naturally gravitate towards the typical right-wing GOP conspiracy theory?

"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.