tequila4kapp said:
Your body your choice...except for vaccine mandate
Do you really think these things are equivalent or is that you just thinking you are being clever and have unlocked a logical inconsistency?
You have so many false narratives embedded into that equation that is hard to unpack the idiocy.
In the case of a pregnant woman, what she is carrying is not a human being by any biological definition for the vast majority of abortions. So the decision she makes is completely autonomous. It is her exercising a decision and right for herself and her future. This is not a social issue and it has no "harm" implications for society. Religious claims on abortion should be a non-starter and criminal claims of "murder" are tenuous and would lead to whole host of prosecutions that I think no one would advocate for. So, simply, this is her decision for her life with no effect on another human being (even if define a fetus as a human being, no human being has the right to use another body, there is no special set of rights for a fetus to use another human being).
In the case of the vaccine (and I don't remember being forced to get injected), this is a decision we make as a society to protect the society at large. Your individual decision DOES have consequences for others.
And this puts aside that a woman forced to childbirth has been forced to potentially risk her own life where as a person "forced" to get a vaccine is having their life potentially saved.
Your "argument" is really as disunited and incoherent as: "Your car your choice to drive...except seatbelts." Because we let people self-determine their life in balance with the effects of those choices on society at large. There is no hypocrisy, it's exactly what we do when we establish rights and make laws.
I am sure on the right wing twitter loop, this sentiment scores points, but where there are thinking persons, it is a real stinker.