The censorship thread

112,462 Views | 965 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by oski003
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Choose kindness.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd say that lower IQ leftover MAGA that are still enabling Trump have pulled way ahead of liberal women in terms of being the most destructive demographic, clearly.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C3 trying to post something intelligent,

A swing and a miss

Choose Kindness C3, whoever the f you are
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

I'd say that lower IQ leftover MAGA that are still enabling Trump have pulled way ahead of liberal women in terms of being the most destructive demographic, clearly.


Young women's greater natural empathy and naivete makes them more susceptible to nefarious propaganda spouted by the media and schools.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

According to the great Michael Savage, liberalism is a mental disorder.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Cal88 said:

I'd say that lower IQ leftover MAGA that are still enabling Trump have pulled way ahead of liberal women in terms of being the most destructive demographic, clearly.


Young women's greater natural empathy and naivete makes them more susceptible to nefarious propaganda spouted by the media and schools.


It's pretty clear that people who lack empathy and are also naive are just as susceptible to being propagandized.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Cal88 said:

I'd say that lower IQ leftover MAGA that are still enabling Trump have pulled way ahead of liberal women in terms of being the most destructive demographic, clearly.


Young women's greater natural empathy and naivete makes them more susceptible to nefarious propaganda spouted by the media and schools.

You're basically saying young women are too young to know better as compared to young males.

You keep bringing this up, do you distrust women? To me, it appears that way
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

You're basically saying young women are too young to know better as compared to young males.

You keep bringing this up, do you distrust women? To me, it appears that way

Younger females and males are in general, more naive than their elders.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Young women's greater natural empathy and naivete makes them more susceptible to nefarious propaganda spouted by the media and schools.

It's pretty clear that people who lack empathy and are also naive are just as susceptible to being propagandized.

People with no empathy are psychopaths.

People can also have empathy with no regard for the truth. Thus, the term, "suicidal empathy".
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

C3 trying to post something intelligent,

A swing and a miss

Choose Kindness C3, whoever the f you are


SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

SBGold said:

C3 trying to post something intelligent,

A swing and a miss

Choose Kindness C3, whoever the f you are


Choose kindness.

I don't get that X post either, made as much sense as C3's nonsensical post.

Why are you spamming with nonsensical X posts ?

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:


According to the great Michael Savage, liberalism is a mental disorder.

Try these 5 steps to stop being Democrat and more like Strong Republican:

1) Take a hard look in the mirror.
2) Stop being WEAK internet pervert! Cal not weak internet pervert.
3) Toughen up your thinking. Be more like Strong Republican, less like you.
4) Start being STRONG! Like Cal. Cal STRONG!
5) Now that you strong, go make others STRONG!
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

SBGold said:

You're basically saying young women are too young to know better as compared to young males.

You keep bringing this up, do you distrust women? To me, it appears that way

Younger females and males are in general, more naive than their elders.

Based on ? What you want to believe?

We all have a responsibility to not mislead, whether we like it or not.

I wish you would cite things that are credible and can be fact checked.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:


According to the great Michael Savage, liberalism is a mental disorder.

Again, Claude with evidence, notes that this is not credible and not peer-reviewed:

"The specific "four times more likely" claim doesn't appear to come from a credible peer-reviewed study. Here's what the actual research landscape looks like:
What legitimate research does show:
There is a genuine and well-documented finding that self-reported mental health tends to be worse among Democrats/liberals than Republicans/conservatives. Gallup polling found that 58% of Republicans report having excellent mental health, compared to 43% of independents and 38% of Democrats a gap that persists across income, age, gender, and education levels. A peer-reviewed study published during the COVID-19 pandemic also found a clear partisan distress gap, with Democrats consistently reporting worse mental health than Republicans. GallupPubMed Central
But the "4x" figure is not supported:
A Johns Hopkins study found that 25.2% of Democrats screened positive for depression compared to 20.5% of Republicans a modest gap that was not even statistically significant. Nobody in the credible literature is finding a fourfold difference. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
A major caveat the research highlights:
The stigma surrounding mental health among conservatives is likely inflating their self-reported evaluations conservatives may view mental illness as a sign of weakness, and in describing their own mental health, may want to reinforce separation from those with mental illnesses. When researchers substituted "overall mood" for "mental health" in survey questions, the ideological gap disappeared entirely. Tufts UniversityNewsweek
Bottom line: The "four times" figure sounds like it may have originated from partisan commentary or social media misrepresentation of real but much more modest survey findings. There is no credible peer-reviewed study supporting that specific claim."

MISLEADING!!!!!!
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

SBGold said:

C3 trying to post something intelligent,

A swing and a miss

Choose Kindness C3, whoever the f you are


Choose kindness.

I don't get that X post either, made as much sense as C3's nonsensical post.

Why are you spamming with nonsensical X posts ?

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN


Just because you don't get something, it doesn't make it nonsensical. You seem to not understand a lot of things that don't align with your preconceived views. Would you like an explanation of the tweet?
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:


According to the great Michael Savage, liberalism is a mental disorder.

LOL, disagree. Lots of people on the right are still living in the past, when it was a stigma to be suffering from a mental or emotional illness.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:


According to the great Michael Savage, liberalism is a mental disorder.

LOL, disagree. Lots of people on the right are still living in the past, when it was a stigma to be suffering from a mental or emotional illness.

This could mean that more liberals have mental illness or it could mean that more liberals are willing to SAY that they have one or to get diagnosed with one.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sure, explain the Spirit airplane, the road, the random people and maybe Lis Warren swinging something. I guess a dumb Pocahantas reference? So clever by the MAGAs
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

Sure, explain the Spirit airplane, the road, the random people and maybe Lis Warren swinging something. I guess a dumb Pocahantas reference? So clever by the MAGAs


The central idea is that Elizabeth Warren was key in blocking the Jet Blue acquisition of Spirit which would have prevented the bankruptcy that just happened; hence, she appears to be destroying the Spirit Plane with an imaginary hammer. This image is imposed upon the background of folks standing around a road.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

SBGold said:

Sure, explain the Spirit airplane, the road, the random people and maybe Lis Warren swinging something. I guess a dumb Pocahantas reference? So clever by the MAGAs


The central idea is that Elizabeth Warren was key in blocking the Jet Blue acquisition of Spirit which would have prevented the bankruptcy that just happened; hence, she appears to be destroying the Spirit Plane with an imaginary hammer. This image is imposed upon the background of folks standing around a road.

My explanation made more sense
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

Sure, explain the Spirit airplane, the road, the random people and maybe Lis Warren swinging something. I guess a dumb Pocahantas reference? So clever by the MAGAs


The central idea is that Elizabeth Warren was key in blocking the Jet Blue acquisition of Spirit which would have prevented the bankruptcy that just happened; hence, she appears to be destroying the Spirit Plane with an imaginary hammer. This image is imposed upon the background of folks standing around a road.

My explanation made more sense


Lol.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.