Official Trump / Vance Administration Thread

309,653 Views | 4309 Replies | Last: 53 min ago by PAC-10-BEAR
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 1:15a, 10/20/25
sycasey said:
Aunburdened said:
sycasey said:
Aunburdened said:
sycasey said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
What a bunch of crybaby snowflakes


Glad you finally properly identify the No Kings Protestors for what they are.

I know a lot of people who attended the protests and for the most part they are decent people with good jobs and families. There's no need to insult these folks.

I found a picture of them at the "protest."


You know how you folks complain about how Democrats are constantly looking down on rural voters or poor white voters or whatever? This is that, from the other side. Unbelievably smug.

You were already looking down on those people in your post.

No I really was not, but the fact that you think so says everything about your mentality. Useless person.

There's zero reason to mention that your brave "protester" friends have good jobs without implying that those who don't have good jobs are "less than."

Trust me friendo, you're not clever and you're terrible at hiding your biases.



Reply Quote
1
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aunburdened • 7:14a, 10/20/25
Aunburdened said:
sycasey said:
Aunburdened said:
sycasey said:
Aunburdened said:
sycasey said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
What a bunch of crybaby snowflakes


Glad you finally properly identify the No Kings Protestors for what they are.

I know a lot of people who attended the protests and for the most part they are decent people with good jobs and families. There's no need to insult these folks.

I found a picture of them at the "protest."


You know how you folks complain about how Democrats are constantly looking down on rural voters or poor white voters or whatever? This is that, from the other side. Unbelievably smug.

You were already looking down on those people in your post.

No I really was not, but the fact that you think so says everything about your mentality. Useless person.

There's zero reason to mention that your brave "protester" friends have good jobs without implying that those who don't have good jobs are "less than."

No, that's just you putting words in my mouth yet again. That's your bias, not mine.
Reply Quote
4
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:28a, 10/20/25
Reply Quote
5
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:50p, 10/20/25


Reply Quote
3
1 edit
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 2:53p, 10/20/25
movielover said:




It's more like 5 to 10 years than 25 years, Gao is wrong. Countries like Australia and Canada that have a lot of minerals have a lot of expertise in mining technology, they won't need 25 years to catch up with China if they have the proper resources and policies in place.
Reply Quote
1
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 3:04p, 10/20/25
Cal88 said:
movielover said:




It's more like 5 to 10 years than 25 years, Gao is wrong. Countries like Australia and Canada that have a lot of minerals have a lot of expertise in mining technology, they won't need 25 years to catch up with China if they have the proper resources and policies in place.


Dwags88 said it takes a million years for a mineral mine to go online. You are saying it is only 5-10?
Reply Quote
4
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 3:33p, 10/20/25
We supposedly have deposits in the Artic National Refuge ready to be tapped.

California could exploit the Salton Sea, but it will take decades.

BREAKING:

Federal Appeals Court Overturns Lower Court Ruling President Trump Can Deploy National Guard to Portland
Reply Quote
4
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:05p, 10/20/25
Reply Quote
3
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:12p, 10/20/25
Another Portland business owner describes stress, violence.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQA9LRsjTNi/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
Reply Quote
2
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:57p, 10/20/25
Reply Quote
3
BearNIt
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 3:38a, 10/21/25
movielover said:
PT declassified his docs.


There is an official process for the President to declassify classified docs and it isn't waving your hand and farting into the wind like the big Cheeto seems to believe that's the proper procedure. He had classified documents and to say otherwise is not a serious statement .
Reply Quote
3
BearNIt
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 3:48a, 10/21/25
PAC-10-BEAR said:
BearNIt said:
Does the big Cheeto not realize he did the same thing that Bolton is accused of with the storing of classified documents with the highest classification in a country club bathroom? Is the irony not blaring an air siren for everyone to hear and see?

Thank you for confirming that leftists don't have the ability to recognize differences between illegal vs legal immigrants, men vs. women, and someone with authorization to declassify classified documents like the President of the United States and John Bolton.

Attacking me won't change the fact that there is an official procedure to declassify classified documents which in this case were found in boxes with the highest classification designation placed on the classified documents. Your assertion that POTUS doesn't have to follow the official procedure e to declassify classified documents is wrong.
Reply Quote
3
cal83dls79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:53a, 10/21/25
Michelle Goldberg: " A similar giddy nihilism has long surrounded the president and his devotees, who often treat his unlikely ascension as a world-historical feat of trolling"

Lots of seriously giddy trumpsters just on this board alone. Getting super excited about national guard visits Portlandia. Can't contain their excitement!
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
Reply Quote
4
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cal83dls79 • 7:26a, 10/21/25
Safe streets, safe women and children, dangerous felons, drug dealers, and drug users (aka homeless) off public streets. Sounds pretty basic.

San Francisco has over 600 fentanyl deaths per year. Major cities have areas that look like dystopia zombielands with people twisted like emaciated pretzels. Depraved, sick.
Reply Quote
5
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearNIt • 7:43a, 10/21/25
BearNIt said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
BearNIt said:
Does the big Cheeto not realize he did the same thing that Bolton is accused of with the storing of classified documents with the highest classification in a country club bathroom? Is the irony not blaring an air siren for everyone to hear and see?

Thank you for confirming that leftists don't have the ability to recognize differences between illegal vs legal immigrants, men vs. women, and someone with authorization to declassify classified documents like the President of the United States and John Bolton.

Attacking me won't change the fact that there is an official procedure to declassify classified documents which in this case were found in boxes with the highest classification designation placed on the classified documents. Your assertion that POTUS doesn't have to follow the official procedure e to declassify classified documents is wrong.

The thing that keeps getting lost in this discussion is that all Trump had to do was give the documents back once he was asked. Then there would probably have been no prosecution (as for Biden and Pence). The fact that he didn't is what triggered the raid.
Reply Quote
4
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 8:27a, 10/21/25
He did. Attorneys had ongoing discussions.

The alternate inside baseball view is that the DOJ / FBI feared Trump had evidence of their Russiagate hoax illegal activities, and wanted to throw a bag over it.
Reply Quote
3
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 8:44a, 10/21/25
oski003 said:
Cal88 said:

It's more like 5 to 10 years than 25 years, Gao is wrong. Countries like Australia and Canada that have a lot of minerals have a lot of expertise in mining technology, they won't need 25 years to catch up with China if they have the proper resources and policies in place.


Dwags88 said it takes a million years for a mineral mine to go online. You are saying it is only 5-10?


Once again, your reading comprehension is stuck at the 6th grade level.
Here, let me help you again . . .

I said that COPPER MINES in the United States take nearly 29 years on average to get to the point of production.

You're not the sharpest tool in the shed.

Copper Mines: Average Time from Discovery to Production is 17.9 Years
Reply Quote
3
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:46a, 10/21/25
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:35a, 10/21/25
Pardons are going great!



Reply Quote
4
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 10:39a, 10/21/25
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
Cal88 said:

It's more like 5 to 10 years than 25 years, Gao is wrong. Countries like Australia and Canada that have a lot of minerals have a lot of expertise in mining technology, they won't need 25 years to catch up with China if they have the proper resources and policies in place.


Dwags88 said it takes a million years for a mineral mine to go online. You are saying it is only 5-10?


Once again, your reading comprehension is stuck at the 6th grade level.
Here, let me help you again . . .

I said that COPPER MINES in the United States take nearly 29 years on average to get to the point of production.

You're not the sharpest tool in the shed.

Copper Mines: Average Time from Discovery to Production is 17.9 Years


What kind of kindergarten math turns 18 years into 29? You are about as sharp as a butter knife.
Reply Quote
4
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 10:52a, 10/21/25
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
Cal88 said:

It's more like 5 to 10 years than 25 years, Gao is wrong. Countries like Australia and Canada that have a lot of minerals have a lot of expertise in mining technology, they won't need 25 years to catch up with China if they have the proper resources and policies in place.


Dwags88 said it takes a million years for a mineral mine to go online. You are saying it is only 5-10?


Once again, your reading comprehension is stuck at the 6th grade level.
Here, let me help you again . . .

I said that COPPER MINES in the United States take nearly 29 years on average to get to the point of production.

You're not the sharpest tool in the shed.

Copper Mines: Average Time from Discovery to Production is 17.9 Years


What kind of kindergarten math turns 18 years into 29? You are about as sharp as a butter knife.


Once again, your READING COMPREHENSION is stuck at the 6th grade level.
No wonder why you are easily duped by Trump and his Maga minions.

Lmfao.
Reply Quote
2
3 edits
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 12:26p, 10/21/25
sycasey said:
Anyway, on the "not starting wars" front:


It reminds me of something from a past administration, what was it?

Oh yeah. It was this.



IOIYAD!
Reply Quote
2
BearNIt
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 1:16p, 10/21/25
sycasey said:
BearNIt said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
BearNIt said:
Does the big Cheeto not realize he did the same thing that Bolton is accused of with the storing of classified documents with the highest classification in a country club bathroom? Is the irony not blaring an air siren for everyone to hear and see?

Thank you for confirming that leftists don't have the ability to recognize differences between illegal vs legal immigrants, men vs. women, and someone with authorization to declassify classified documents like the President of the United States and John Bolton.

Attacking me won't change the fact that there is an official procedure to declassify classified documents which in this case were found in boxes with the highest classification designation placed on the classified documents. Your assertion that POTUS doesn't have to follow the official procedure e to declassify classified documents is wrong.

The thing that keeps getting lost in this discussion is that all Trump had to do was give the documents back once he was asked. Then there would probably have been no prosecution (as for Biden and Pence). The fact that he didn't is what triggered the raid.

That was my original thought, just give them back, but because he is a broken and flawed person he just couldn't do it. He decided that the classified documents were his, like a petulant two-year old would. He refused to give them back and then attempted to move and coverup what is a federal crime. The coverup was so comical the feds had insiders who would testify so he got himself a judge who would run legal interference. Things were so bad Cannon got the equivalent of a ***** slap from the 11th circuit.
Reply Quote
1
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aunburdened • 1:16p, 10/21/25
Aunburdened said:
sycasey said:
Anyway, on the "not starting wars" front:


It reminds me of something from a past administration, what was it?

Oh yeah. It was this.



IOIYAD!

This was something that was supposed to stop with Trump, right? The anti-war candidate?
Reply Quote
2
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 2:29p, 10/21/25
movielover said:
Safe streets, safe women and children, dangerous felons, drug dealers, and drug users (aka homeless) off public streets. Sounds pretty basic.

San Francisco has over 600 fentanyl deaths per year. Major cities have areas that look like dystopia zombielands with people twisted like emaciated pretzels. Depraved, sick.


Libs would argue things were better in S.F. when Newsom was mayor.
Reply Quote
1
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 3:09p, 10/21/25
movielover said:
Safe streets, safe women and children, dangerous felons, drug dealers, and drug users (aka homeless) off public streets. Sounds pretty basic.

San Francisco has over 600 fentanyl deaths per year. Major cities have areas that look like dystopia zombielands with people twisted like emaciated pretzels. Depraved, sick.


How could you possibly want safer streets? How dare you!
Reply Quote
4
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 3:11p, 10/21/25
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
Cal88 said:

It's more like 5 to 10 years than 25 years, Gao is wrong. Countries like Australia and Canada that have a lot of minerals have a lot of expertise in mining technology, they won't need 25 years to catch up with China if they have the proper resources and policies in place.


Dwags88 said it takes a million years for a mineral mine to go online. You are saying it is only 5-10?


Once again, your reading comprehension is stuck at the 6th grade level.
Here, let me help you again . . .

I said that COPPER MINES in the United States take nearly 29 years on average to get to the point of production.

You're not the sharpest tool in the shed.

Copper Mines: Average Time from Discovery to Production is 17.9 Years


What kind of kindergarten math turns 18 years into 29? You are about as sharp as a butter knife.


Once again, your READING COMPREHENSION is stuck at the 6th grade level.
No wonder why you are easily duped by Trump and his Maga minions.

Lmfao.


The links title is very misleading then.
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:37p, 10/21/25
Reply Quote
3
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:48p, 10/21/25
Trump Effect.



Reply Quote
3
1 edit
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 4:16p, 10/21/25
movielover said:
Trump Effect.


The Japanese are imitating Obama's policies.
Reply Quote
2
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:53p, 10/21/25
Japan has never needed any pushes from America to be anti-immigration.
Reply Quote
1
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 4:57p, 10/21/25
sycasey said:
Japan has never needed any pushes from America to be anti-immigration.


Their last administration was becoming more and more open on that front
Reply Quote
2
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:38p, 10/21/25
Reply Quote
5
Eastern Oregon Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 5:41p, 10/21/25
sycasey said:
Aunburdened said:
sycasey said:
Anyway, on the "not starting wars" front:


It reminds me of something from a past administration, what was it?

Oh yeah. It was this.



IOIYAD!

This was something that was supposed to stop with Trump, right? The anti-war candidate?
I'll point out that drones are much cheaper than sending fighter jets and risk fewer soldiers.
Reply Quote
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 5:44p, 10/21/25
BearlySane88 said:
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
Cal88 said:

It's more like 5 to 10 years than 25 years, Gao is wrong. Countries like Australia and Canada that have a lot of minerals have a lot of expertise in mining technology, they won't need 25 years to catch up with China if they have the proper resources and policies in place.


Dwags88 said it takes a million years for a mineral mine to go online. You are saying it is only 5-10?


Once again, your reading comprehension is stuck at the 6th grade level.
Here, let me help you again . . .

I said that COPPER MINES in the United States take nearly 29 years on average to get to the point of production.

You're not the sharpest tool in the shed.

Copper Mines: Average Time from Discovery to Production is 17.9 Years


What kind of kindergarten math turns 18 years into 29? You are about as sharp as a butter knife.


Once again, your READING COMPREHENSION is stuck at the 6th grade level.
No wonder why you are easily duped by Trump and his Maga minions.

Lmfao.


The links title is very misleading then.


Sounds like Oski was unable to read the second sentence.
Perhaps a middle school teacher like yourself can help him with his reading comprehension?
lol


Reply Quote
1
First Page Last Page
Page 122 of 124 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.