More TARIFFS

166,239 Views | 1266 Replies | Last: 5 days ago by smh
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:

Not sure why my ECONOMY THREAD got locked so I will put this in the Tariff thread.

You know exactly why that thread got locked. It's because you and SBGold cannot control yourselves.




Sadly, you're terribly mistaken.

I was posting economic data, charts, and analysis while others were off-topic with their personal pettiness.
In fact, I started this thread in February 2025 and it had over 284,000 views and over 2,800 replies.

It was a great thread because it lacked the typical political BS that we see dominate this forum.
It clearly wasn't your cup of tea.


The Economy | Bear Insider





It was entirely full of political BS. I'm not sure what thread you were participating in.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/125946/replies/2691257

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/125946/replies/2691263
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I believe the last topic I was discussing was the Labor Force Participation Rate.

But for some reason, someone else was talking about the Trump, Obama, Bush, and Clinton Administrations.
Politics.

So I guess you'd be right.



DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump now rebuilding his Tariff Wall citing forced labor.

Follow the bouncing ball.





Free link for those who care:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-03/us-proposes-broad-tariffs-of-at-least-10-citing-forced-labor?accessToken=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzb3VyY2UiOiJTdWJzY3JpYmVyR2lmdGVkQXJ0aWNsZSIsImlhdCI6MTc4MDUwMjA5NSwiZXhwIjoxNzgxMTA2ODk1LCJhcnRpY2xlSWQiOiJURjhOTVlLSkg2VjcwMCIsImJjb25uZWN0SWQiOiI0QTE0NjgyRTVEQjI0RDgyOEVGOTIxMzA1M0U4NzhDMiJ9.s-fEvoUnWEWq5fsvKIPUHbz6P9J71h_Y0lpUUMLyKuA
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Forced labor" in Canada, Finland, Germany etc?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Can they wait a longer time for not-top-shelf equipment? Can they maintain two separate fleets and training?

Why agree to trade deals, and then welch? Is it worth it for us to maintain a huge trade deficit, and pay for their defense, for MIC orders?


Can you provide a source for this trade deal that is non-American (and I don't mean amuse who is probably not American, but a bonafide source). Not saying it didn't happen, I'd just like to know what the perspective of the agreement was from the other side. Our side is not trustworthy.
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is so stupid. We aren't punishing anyone but ourselves. If there were ever an arbitrary means by which to impose these penalties this is it. He's so hell bent on these tariffs despite zero current evidence of their success, rather quite the contrary. Watch as he loses in the courts on this as well. He's on a major losing streak.
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

This is so stupid. We aren't punishing anyone but ourselves. If there were ever an arbitrary means by which to impose these penalties this is it. He's so hell bent on these tariffs despite zero current evidence of their success, rather quite the contrary. Watch as loses in the courts on this as well. He's on a major losing streak.

just imo the only thing T cares about is getting his beak wet.
[ arguably meaningless to folks of our age ] # knee jerk reaction
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.