I believe the Congressman named was a prominent Democrat.

"Context"

CNN: JPMorgan reaches $290 million settlement with Jeffrey Epstein victims June 12, 2023

"It's hard to say how many victims will ultimately benefit from the settlement funds, but more than 100 women are expected to seek compensation. Many women who filed a claim with Epstein's estate through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program are likely to be included in the two pending bank settlements, Boies said.

"The lawyers representing the victims issued their own statement, calling the settlement "life changing and historic...."

"...Victims of Epstein had previously reached a $75 million settlement with Deutsche Bank. There is expected overlap of victims eligible to file a claim in the settlements with both banks, according to Boies."

https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/12/investing/jpmorgan-epstein-victims-settlement

Jes Staley

"The bank continues to pursue its case against Jes Staley, a former JPMorgan executive and ex-Barclays CEO who the suit said is largely responsible for JPMorgan's 15-year financial relationship with Epstein...."

"In the past, he has donated money to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Staley has also reportedly been a big advocate for diversity since discovering that his brother Peter Staley had been diagnosed with HIV. He helped push the diversity agenda at J.P. Morgan."

https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/08/business/jp-morgan-chase-jes-staley

If Clinton, Autopen, or Harris had tectonic oppo research on Trump, they would have used it. It doesn't exist.

Why didn't the women just out the names today?

Are they trying to leverage for more money?

Eh, sorry but this is goofy. Why doesn't each victim just start by saying, "Hi, my name is XXX and I had sex with XXX".

No need for lists, just say who you had sex with. https://t.co/XLOSTZpQym

— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) September 3, 2025

At even $400 million and 150 victims (estimates), that's $2.6 million each.

Did you work at JP Morgan, Barclays, or Deutsche Bank?

Asking for a friend.

movielover said:

---

Did you work at JP Morgan, Barclays, or Deutsche Bank?

Asking for a friend.

---

No.

But I did get paid about $70,000 one year for some technical work that I did for the #2 derivatives trader at Deutsche back in the late 90's by the name of Mike Goodwin.

Wall Street trader's assistant had to clean sofas after 'orgies' at boss's $21 million NYC townhouse: lawsuit | The Independent

Re the Epstein victim news conference today.

We are 6 years past his death, and 20 years past the opening of the investigation of him in Florida.

And the victims show up today represented by lawyers.

Lawyers representing women who claim they were victims of Epstein's… pic.twitter.com/9SptKKVZPl

— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) September 3, 2025

Deflecting from radical Democrats being on the wrong side of virtually every major 80 / 20 issue.

This is the most important video on X right now:

Attorney for the Epstein victims standing outside of a Florida Courthouse CONFIRMING that Donald Trump was the ONLY high-profile figure who HELPED him prosecute Epstein:

"The only thing I can say about President Trump is that he… pic.twitter.com/UkTWkPv9Mm

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) September 3, 2025

Go get them Marj!



Marjorie Taylor Greene stands with Epstein victims: 'It's not a hoax'
Georgia congresswoman appears on Capitol Hill with several victims of Jeffrey Epstein, defying President Donald Trump.

https://www.ajc.com/politics/2025/09/marjorie-taylor-greene-stands-with-epstein-victims-its-not-a-hoax/

Cal88 said:

---

Marjorie Taylor Greene stands with Epstein victims: 'It's not a hoax'
Georgia congresswoman appears on Capitol Hill with several victims of Jeffrey Epstein, defying President Donald Trump.

https://www.ajc.com/politics/2025/09/marjorie-taylor-greene-stands-with-epstein-victims-its-not-a-hoax/

---

Wait, is anyone saying the Epstein crimes are a "hoax?" Seems like the debate is over how much Trump was involved.

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

Marjorie Taylor Greene stands with Epstein victims: 'It's not a hoax'
Georgia congresswoman appears on Capitol Hill with several victims of Jeffrey Epstein, defying President Donald Trump.

https://www.ajc.com/politics/2025/09/marjorie-taylor-greene-stands-with-epstein-victims-its-not-a-hoax/

---

Wait, is anyone saying the Epstein crimes are a "hoax?" Seems like the debate is over how much Trump was involved.

---

False. Democrats policies failed, war w Ukraine failed, Cuomo and Harris are incompetent, septegenarian leadership feeble, and their leading candidate helped destroy California in a dozen ways.

President Trump is succeeding on an FDR level, so they're trying to drive up his negatives as they hope to pull out the midterms - flipping the House - while concurrently, Trump plans a new census to remove millions of illegal immigrants and redistricting a half-dozen states.

Epstein is red meat for the base, right now they have nothing else. But something will pop up, that's life. MAGA is on the right side of every 80 / 20 issue.

sycasey said:

---

movielover said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

Marjorie Taylor Greene stands with Epstein victims: 'It's not a hoax'
Georgia congresswoman appears on Capitol Hill with several victims of Jeffrey Epstein, defying President Donald Trump.

https://www.ajc.com/politics/2025/09/marjorie-taylor-greene-stands-with-epstein-victims-its-not-a-hoax/

---

Wait, is anyone saying the Epstein crimes are a "hoax?" Seems like the debate is over how much Trump was involved.

---

False. Democrats policies failed, war w Ukraine failed, Cuomo and Harris are incompetent, septegenarian leadership feeble, and their leading candidate helped destroy California in a dozen ways.

President Trump is succeeding on an FDR level, so they're trying to drive up his negatives as they hope to pull out the midterms - flipping the House - while concurrently, Trump plans a new census to remove millions of illegal immigrants and redistricting a half-dozen states.

---

I don't know what any of this has to do with what I said. A glitch in the programming?

---

The machine is making no sense and is at odds with its previous programming. It's struggling and nobody here is joining it, nor is it sowing any additional division in this thread. Anyway, back on ignore it goes. Join me in ignoring!

Bots are Bots. Can't be hidden much longer.

Are the NDAs enforceable? Why would the next $200 million buy silence?

Sure, go for it... will we know if our Congress forks over $100 million in hush money?

It's called whataboutism

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever

It's funny how this thread attracted a certain type of poster that primarily posts only in this thread. lol.

• 2005: Epstein story breaks
• 2015: it becomes a national news story
• 2025: Trump threatens to primary Thomas Massie over a spending bill
• four months later: Massie mentions Epstein for the first time and makes it his personal crusade

Funny how that timeline works... https://t.co/Kv73wuICUp

— Michael Knowles (@michaeljknowles) September 4, 2025

Just going off that 2005, 2015, 2025 sequence, so what happens in 2035? Trump finally pays for what he did?

Gosh, my champagne is not going to taste very good by then.
Oh well, I wasn't planning on drinking it!

I think this all boils down to a simple issue and a few questions.

Whatever one thinks about somebody's motivation for releasing the files, whatever somebody thinks the "sides" involved, whatever the perceived timeline of events is…

Why, today on September 4th 2025, would anybody oppose the full release of the unredacted Epstein files and financial information? What is the motivation for NOT releasing the files? What would the rationale be for attacking somebody who was working to make this happen? Why would supporting the release of the files be considered a hostile act? Why would somebody who was all on board with everything being released when they started a thread like this oppose their initially stated desire?

The answers to these questions can't be honorably met with a response of "why now?" or an attack on those looking to release the files.

We all know why. The deflectors know why.

Its DC rumored (open secret) that Thomas Massey and Christina Pushaw are a couple. No one ever asks them about it.

If accurate, Massies slide deeper into anti-Trumpism then takes on a context that makes sense. pic.twitter.com/GVyDfHPXVZ

— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) September 4, 2025

Can anyone explain to me how releasing the complete Epstein files is anti-Trump?

movielover said:

---

Its DC rumored (open secret) that Thomas Massey and Christina Pushaw are a couple. No one ever asks them about it.

If accurate, Massies slide deeper into anti-Trumpism then takes on a context that makes sense. pic.twitter.com/GVyDfHPXVZ

— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) September 4, 2025

---

Mud! Incoming!

Though I'm not sure why I'm supposed to be outraged that two Republicans are attracted to each other.