BearNIt said:

---

The big Cheeto has advised that he will look into a pardon for the child molester Ghislaine Maxwell. He will forever be known as The Pedo President, The Protector of Pedophiles.

---

Oh, "what was the name?"

Gee, that's a name I haven't heard in a long time.
-yeah, right!

90 PHOTOS RELEASED

SURE LOOKS LIKE LAW ENFORCEMENT DIDNT EVEN BOTHER TO INVESTIGATE A MURDER.
JUST A SUICIDE.

In cell where Jeffrey Epstein died, a scene of disarray that never underwent thorough inspection, experts said - CBS News




THIS WAS FOUND IN AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT ROOM THAN THE CELL WHERE EPSTEIN'S BODY WAS FOUND. HMMMMM....

Rogan: The Democrats were pushing to release the Epstein files. The Republicans fought against it. They just voted along party lines, so they're probably told to do this. So what the fuck's in there, man? The government's shut down right now. If they get back, this is the first… pic.twitter.com/XZg7TA6GOm

— FactPost (@factpostnews) October 9, 2025

sycasey said:

---

Rogan: The Democrats were pushing to release the Epstein files. The Republicans fought against it. They just voted along party lines, so they're probably told to do this. So what the fuck's in there, man? The government's shut down right now. If they get back, this is the first… pic.twitter.com/XZg7TA6GOm

— FactPost (@factpostnews) October 9, 2025

---

Meanwhile the entire economy is being held hostage for this fat orange flock!

Does Mike Johnson not want Adelita Grijalva sworn in so that she can become the 218th signature added to the discharge petition, thereby forcing a vote to release the Epstein Files?

Arizona says it will sue Mike Johnson if he does not swear in new rep and likely trigger release of the Epstein files

movielover said:

---

BREAKING: Deputy AG Todd Blanche Is Actively Covering Up The Democrat Party's Involvement In The Epstein Files, Warns Former Trump Lawyer Robert Barnes

Blanche Represents The Ultimate Deep State Trojan Horse Inside The Trump Admin & Is Bill Barr 2.0!@barnes_law pic.twitter.com/WzHn1AflFk

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) October 15, 2025

---

lol, ok, sure

That's the barrier here!

chazzed said:

---

WATCH - @jonkarl: “Why haven’t you sworn in @AdelitaForAZ?”@SpeakerJohnson: “I’m following the Pelosi precedent with @RepJuliaLetlow.”

KARL: “But that was the date Letlow requested.”

JOHNSON: 🤷🏼 #EpsteinTrumpCoverUp pic.twitter.com/4h4xw8kMmm

— The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller) October 19, 2025

---

"No no no, let me give you some more examples!" after he's exposed as being completely disingenuous with his leading example. These are not good people.

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

Just got an Epstein binder

— King Poso ⚔️ (@JackPosobiec) February 27, 2025

Epstein files Phase 1 were pre-released to a number of people today. AG Bondi confirmed there are thousands more Epstein File documents being secretly held in the Southern District NY court and will be delivered to the DOJ in DC by tomorrow, February 28.

---

Phase 1 sure is a protracted phase.

UK journalist claims Andrew and Sarah closer to Epstein, more coming.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQBq5GVD42C/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

movielover said:

---

UK journalist claims Andrew and Sarah closer to Epstein, more coming.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQBq5GVD42C/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

---

If your daddy Donald would have allowed for the release of the unreacted files, we'd already have everything out there. Unfortunately, it seems like he's too busy protecting people and/or using it as leverage. You see, your daddy Donald is the new Epstein.

It's day 241 of Patel's tenure, day 258 of Bondi's and day 273 of Trump's term!

Any news on the promised immediate release of the COMPLETE and UNREDACTED Epstein files?

Everything needs to be out there or something is being covered up by those currently in power. Truthfully, we can't really accept anything released now as being comprehensive.

MAGA!

Virginia Giuffre couldn't name names, so I will.

- Ehud Barak
- Glenn Dubin
- Thomas Pritzker
- Leon Black
- Bill Richardson
- George Mitchell pic.twitter.com/NoPJrLBMtp

— Kim Iversen 🇺🇸 (@KimIversenShow) October 22, 2025

> UK journalist claims Andrew and Sarah closer to Epstein, more coming
> PSA: please don't show videos of her again; It's not the message or the person, I'm sure she's lovely company, it's the face.

seconded, umm, and/or (a bridge too far) for extra-credit, not reposting *anything* from alleged movielover
signed, so far have rated >9K flicks on imdb
https://www.imdb.com/user/ur0352242/ratings/?ref_=hm_nv_rat

Does anyone other than her father question the ruling of Suicide by Epstein victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre?

A ghost-written autobiography has been written by her interviewer, released mere days ago.

concordtom said:

---

The government is shut down.
When it opens, Speaker John MUST seat the duly elected Arizona congresswoman. She will be the deciding vote on releasing the Epstein Files, which will potentially incriminate Donald Trump as a perverted pedophile rapist.

Is it possible that Trump is waiting for one of the Democrats to suddenly die? Or one of the few flipping republican congressmen to flip?

And that the government shutdown is entirely because Trump fears what is inside the Epstein Files?

Speculation? Yes.
But sometimes there are Things That Make You Go Hmmmm.

Enjoy this summary of Jeffrey Epstein, and consider how compromat may be at work in this case.

---

She will be the deciding vote on releasing the Epstein Files, which will potentially incriminate Joe Biden and Bill Clinton as perverted pedophile rapists.

Speculation? Yes.
But sometimes there are Things That Make You Go Hmmmm.

You are a clucking idiot.
Thanks for confirming prior conclusion.
And for the laughter.






Short answer: No credible evidence of a personal or social relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Joe Biden has been found.

Quick summary of the facts:
There are no verified photos or flight-log entries showing Biden socializing with Epstein; images that circulated claiming to show them together have been debunked as doctored.
Jeffrey Epstein did give money to some Democratic committees and candidates over the years (he appears in historical donor records), but that is not the same as a personal relationship with Joe Biden. Donation records show Epstein gave to party committees and other recipients.
In 20242025 congressional oversight activity, House Republicans subpoenaed DOJ records and have sought documents mentioning many public figures (including requests for communications involving the Biden White House). Subpoenas and document requests are not proof of wrongdoing or a personal tie they are part of an investigative process.
Independent fact-checkers and major news organizations have repeatedly found that claims tying Biden personally to Epstein rely on altered images, innuendo, or misinterpreted documents rather than verifiable evidence.

If you want, I can:
Pull up the specific donor records showing Epstein's donations to Democratic committees (OpenSecrets) and explain what they do and don't imply; or
Show the fact-checks that debunk the doctored images and the context around recent subpoenas and releases.

You're like the Germans who saw trains with people passing by, heard the rumors, had the ashes land on their street, and still say "you can't prove anything! Those outsiders are burning down our precious forest to stay warm."

And as I and others have said earlier, we don't care WHO is implicated. Bring it. Put it all out there for the public to see. Transparency NOW.

Corn Pop was a bad dude.

concordtom said:

---

The government is shut down.
When it opens, Speaker John MUST seat the duly elected Arizona congresswoman. She will be the deciding vote on releasing the Epstein Files, which will potentially incriminate Donald Trump as a perverted pedophile rapist.

Is it possible that Trump is waiting for one of the Democrats to suddenly die? Or one of the few flipping republican congressmen to flip?

And that the government shutdown is entirely because Trump fears what is inside the Epstein Files?

Speculation? Yes.
But sometimes there are Things That Make You Go Hmmmm.

Enjoy this summary of Jeffrey Epstein, and consider how compromat may be at work in this case.

---

democrats rejected a clean shutdown ending bill 12 times. What are they hiding?

concordtom said:

---

You are a clucking idiot.
Thanks for confirming prior conclusion.
And for the laughter.




Short answer: No credible evidence of a personal or social relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Joe Biden has been found.

Quick summary of the facts:
There are no verified photos or flight-log entries showing Biden socializing with Epstein; images that circulated claiming to show them together have been debunked as doctored.
Jeffrey Epstein did give money to some Democratic committees and candidates over the years (he appears in historical donor records), but that is not the same as a personal relationship with Joe Biden. Donation records show Epstein gave to party committees and other recipients.
In 20242025 congressional oversight activity, House Republicans subpoenaed DOJ records and have sought documents mentioning many public figures (including requests for communications involving the Biden White House). Subpoenas and document requests are not proof of wrongdoing or a personal tie they are part of an investigative process.
Independent fact-checkers and major news organizations have repeatedly found that claims tying Biden personally to Epstein rely on altered images, innuendo, or misinterpreted documents rather than verifiable evidence.

If you want, I can:
Pull up the specific donor records showing Epstein's donations to Democratic committees (OpenSecrets) and explain what they do and don't imply; or
Show the fact-checks that debunk the doctored images and the context around recent subpoenas and releases.

---

lol getting a rise out of you is way too easy. My point was, why didn't Biden release the files? Why won't Trump? The answer is probably the same

sonofabear51 said:

---

And as I and others have said earlier, we don't care WHO is implicated. Bring it. Put it all out there for the public to see. Transparency NOW.

---

I've said the same thing so idk what your point is

concordtom said:

---

You're like the Germans who saw trains with people passing by, heard the rumors, had the ashes land on their street, and still say "you can't prove anything! Those outsiders are burning down our precious forest to stay warm."

---

Wow another Nazi reference? Shocking. The brainless left at it again. You get that doesn't work right? You claim to be so smart yet you haven't figured out that we don't care what you call us anymore. It's the same over and over and over.

Is that supposed to be mamdani?
I don't know much about him, so I looked up

Quote:

---

Mamdani was born in Kampala, Uganda on October 18, 1991, and moved to New York City with his family when he was around 7 years old.
He is the son of academics/creatives: his father is Mahmood Mamdani, a noted scholar, and his mother is Mira Nair, a film-maker.
He graduated from the Bronx High School of Science, then earned a bachelor's in Africana Studies from Bowdoin College.

He is a member of the New York State Assembly representing the 36th District in Queens (Astoria, DitmarsSteinway, etc.).

Mamdani is the Democratic nominee for mayor of New York City in the 2025 election.
He won the Democratic primary by defeating former governor Andrew Cuomo via rankedchoice voting, officially capturing the nomination in July 2025.
Polls show him with a strong lead among the candidates, sometimes by double-digit margins.

If elected, Mamdani would be the first Muslim mayor of New York City and the first person of his particular immigrant background to hold the role in the city's history.
His victory in the Democratic primary was seen by many as a sign of shifting dynamics within the Democratic Partybetween progressive and establishment wings.

There is no credible evidence that Zohran Mamdani lied about his U.S. citizenship status. In fact:
Mamdani was born in Kampala, Uganda, in 1991.
He moved with his family to New York at the age of seven.
He became a naturalised U.S. citizen in 2018.
Accusations have been made (by some Republican politicians) that his citizenship should be revoked, or that he mis-represented something when naturalising.
But legal analysts and media outlets note that the calls for revoking his citizenship are not based on verified proof of lying, and Mamdani's naturalisation record appears to show he legally became a citizen.

---

My take is this, as I listen to the 36 hour biography Frederick Douglass by David Blight:

First they tried to say they were superior due to skin color.
Then they tried to say it was because of religion.
Now they are trying to say it is because they don't have proper papers explaining that their parents haven't been here long enough.


It's all the same psychological game:
US
vs
THEM

Tribalism


Thomas Jefferson famously wrote All Men Are Created Equal. Yet, even he could not escape hypocrisy and immorality.