Jeffrey Epstein

118,230 Views | 1462 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by BearlySane88
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

bearister said:

The key terms:

Spoliation of evidence

Open criminal investigation precludes disclosure





I think you're onto something here!

But maybe the people will ultimately see his ruse.


You're so sure you're right. What happens when you're wrong?


So far, so good, with my prediction, Clyde:

On November 19, 2025 Attorney General Pam Bondi indicated she could not fully detail certain aspects of the Epstein files because they are related to an active federal investigation she recently ordered into Jeffrey Epstein's associates.

During a news conference, when asked about the release of files, Bondi committed to "follow the law with maximum transparency" but noted some material may be withheld to protect ongoing investigations and victim identities. The recently passed legislation forcing the release of the files includes exceptions for documents that would jeopardize an active federal investigation.


Bondi pledges 'maximum transparency' if DOJ is required to release Epstein files https://www.scrippsnews.com/politics/the-president/bondi-pledges-maximum-transparency-if-the-doj-is-compelled-to-release-epstein-files

Bondi's demeanor and memorized singular talking point to "follow the law with maximum transparency," made her press conference as bizarre as one conducted by Karoline Leavitt.

Bondi looks like she wants to throw up, which means there is still a conscience in there somewhere slowing being suffocated.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Old news genius.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Old news genius.

True, Peedocrat collusion has been happening for a long time apparently.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

Old news genius.

True, Peedocrat collusion has been happening for a long time apparently.


Why did your boy Trump just sign legislation tonight that he spent months blocking?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

Old news genius.

True, Peedocrat collusion has been happening for a long time apparently.

Why did your boy Trump just sign legislation tonight that he spent months blocking?

Why did your boys Obama and Biden never mention Epstein?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

Old news genius.

True, Peedocrat collusion has been happening for a long time apparently.

Why did your boy Trump just sign legislation tonight that he spent months blocking?

Why did your boys Obama and Biden never mention Epstein?


Have you ever noticed that you ALWAYS answer a simple question with another question?

You're a joke.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

Old news genius.

True, Peedocrat collusion has been happening for a long time apparently.

Why did your boy Trump just sign legislation tonight that he spent months blocking?

Why did your boys Obama and Biden never mention Epstein?


Have you ever noticed that you ALWAYS answer a simple question with another question?

Have you ever noticed that you're NOT looking for answers but just TROLLING?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

Old news genius.

True, Peedocrat collusion has been happening for a long time apparently.

Why did your boy Trump just sign legislation tonight that he spent months blocking?

Why did your boys Obama and Biden never mention Epstein?


Have you ever noticed that you ALWAYS answer a simple question with another question?

Have you ever noticed that you're NOT looking for answers but just TROLLING?


Have you ever noticed that you post 50 times a day and its nothing but screenshots of tweets and memes with never an original thought from your brain?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

Old news genius.

True, Peedocrat collusion has been happening for a long time apparently.

Why did your boy Trump just sign legislation tonight that he spent months blocking?

Why did your boys Obama and Biden never mention Epstein?


Have you ever noticed that you ALWAYS answer a simple question with another question?

You're a joke.



Can you answer his question though?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

Old news genius.

True, Peedocrat collusion has been happening for a long time apparently.

Why did your boy Trump just sign legislation tonight that he spent months blocking?

Why did your boys Obama and Biden never mention Epstein?


Have you ever noticed that you ALWAYS answer a simple question with another question?

Have you ever noticed that you're NOT looking for answers but just TROLLING?

Have you ever noticed that you post 50 times a day and its nothing but screenshots of tweets and memes with never an original thought from your brain?

I have noticed that you read all of my posts and also count them.

Are you not entertained?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russell Crowe reportedly lost 50 pounds. Part of it was a reduction in booze.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

Old news genius.

True, Peedocrat collusion has been happening for a long time apparently.

Why did your boy Trump just sign legislation tonight that he spent months blocking?

Why did your boys Obama and Biden never mention Epstein?

Didn't Maxwell get prosecuted and put in prison by Biden admin? The same Maxwell Cheeto will probably pardon.
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

Epstein's party pal and fellow child rapist, Trump, made Pam Bondi his Attorney General. Bondi did not investigate Epstein when she was AG in Florida. Now Bondi has appointed Jay Clayton to investigate Trump enemies in regards to Epstein. Jay Clayton recently worked for Trump billionaire ally Leon Black who paid Epstein $170 million.

The Trump Epstein cover up continues.


There is no proof Trump is a child rapist. The rest of this post doesn't matter after you make that claim.


Trump is a kiddie ****er


Dajo is a kiddie diddler. See how easy that is?


You can make any allegation about me you want. I dont care and I won't cry about civility or anything like that.

Anybody who isnt a kool-aid drinker knows what i say about Trump is true. That is why people are so bothered by it.


No people are bothered by it because there's no evidence to back it up and it's another thing in a long line of TDS attacks with no basis or evidence. If you could provide evidence, I will listen. Telling me everyone knows it's true doesn't make it any more true.


Uh, dearie, I think that's why everyone wants the files released. There are thousands of pages of "evidence, perhaps, contained therein.

This is not just a story about Trump, Epstein, and young girls/women.

It's been thus far hidden from you.


Don't demean me. You say you support women and your daughters and then you drop a "dearie" on me? That's some sexist old school talk there. Don't do that if you really respect women as you so claim
so instead of dearie perhaps piggy? I mean the POTUS is cool with it.
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:




…or one of Trump's closest advisors.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

Aunburdened said:

SBGold said:

Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:



Gonna be funny as hell when this gets released redacted to hell and the Biden voters don't get the result they wanted from it.

Yeah, we will chalk you up as thinking the trafficked women are not worthy of justice, rather they are to be laughed at. Pure evil

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

GO Bears Forever


I'm not laughing at the victims. I'm laughing at all of you who thought all of this performative BS was going to result in Trump going down or anybody suffering real consequences.

You put all your eggs in this basket and you're going to get nothing from it.


Actually, we have a thousand baskets on Trump. One of them will eventually crash land on him.


So yall keep claiming….


Want me to bring up Jan 6 again
Are you deaf? Blind? Other?
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

Epstein's party pal and fellow child rapist, Trump, made Pam Bondi his Attorney General. Bondi did not investigate Epstein when she was AG in Florida. Now Bondi has appointed Jay Clayton to investigate Trump enemies in regards to Epstein. Jay Clayton recently worked for Trump billionaire ally Leon Black who paid Epstein $170 million.

The Trump Epstein cover up continues.


There is no proof Trump is a child rapist. The rest of this post doesn't matter after you make that claim.

No proof because of the cover up

The rest has been reported a lot today all over and is very valid

Go launder the gym shorts

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


Show me proof and I'll condemn the man. All I'm asking for is proof, not conjecture/heresay.


I recognize before you said you needed him to be found guilty in a criminal court (11 unanimous jurors).

Now you need "proof".


Yes, said proof would find him guilty in court. If there was any proof

He will never be tried in a court of law, as a matter of process because of his position.
You know that, right?

Your requirement can never be met.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

BearNIt said:

BearlySane88 said:

BearNIt said:

President Pedo continues to protect the men that abused children. That will be his legacy due to the fact that he continues to deny and prevent the full disclosure of the facts in the Epstein files. It's like quicksand as the more he struggles to prevent full disclosure after promising such, the more he becomes trapped by the Epstein file, and the stronger the calls for transparency and full disclosure are.

The coverup is always worse than the crime.


Why didn't Biden and the dems release the files? Please someone explain this to me. If they didn't release the files, they all must be covering up for President Pedo Biden. Add that to Biden's dumpster fire of a legacy

Tell the guy who was friends with Epstein, who was a member of his Mar lago club, to release the files or is he going to change his mind or hide behind law concerning ongoing investigations and the release of information?


I have… that doesn't answer my question about Biden though. Thanks for trying


I can think of MANY reasons.
I'd be interested to read which you come up with.


Well give me some of the many reasons then.


No. You seem to think there's a reason why Biden didn't release. You're intrigued by that.
So you tell me why the intrigue.

Do you think Biden was banging Epstein's girls?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

Have you ever noticed that you post 50 times a day and its nothing but screenshots of tweets and memes with never an original thought from your brain?

I have noticed that you read all of my posts and also count them.

Are you not entertained?


I had a good day today.
How did you do?

Did your boy Trump make you lots of money?
Keep you entertained with his flip-flop?


oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

Epstein's party pal and fellow child rapist, Trump, made Pam Bondi his Attorney General. Bondi did not investigate Epstein when she was AG in Florida. Now Bondi has appointed Jay Clayton to investigate Trump enemies in regards to Epstein. Jay Clayton recently worked for Trump billionaire ally Leon Black who paid Epstein $170 million.

The Trump Epstein cover up continues.


There is no proof Trump is a child rapist. The rest of this post doesn't matter after you make that claim.

No proof because of the cover up

The rest has been reported a lot today all over and is very valid

Go launder the gym shorts

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


Show me proof and I'll condemn the man. All I'm asking for is proof, not conjecture/heresay.


I recognize before you said you needed him to be found guilty in a criminal court (11 unanimous jurors).

Now you need "proof".


Yes, said proof would find him guilty in court. If there was any proof

He will never be tried in a court of law, as a matter of process because of his position.
You know that, right?

Your requirement can never be met.


Didn't all these alleged crimes happen years before he became POTUS? Moreover, it isn't like evidence implicating Trump in some previously unknown crime came to light since he recently became president. His requirement could have been met, but it wasn't
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

Epstein's party pal and fellow child rapist, Trump, made Pam Bondi his Attorney General. Bondi did not investigate Epstein when she was AG in Florida. Now Bondi has appointed Jay Clayton to investigate Trump enemies in regards to Epstein. Jay Clayton recently worked for Trump billionaire ally Leon Black who paid Epstein $170 million.

The Trump Epstein cover up continues.


There is no proof Trump is a child rapist. The rest of this post doesn't matter after you make that claim.


Trump is a kiddie ****er


Dajo is a kiddie diddler. See how easy that is?


You can make any allegation about me you want. I dont care and I won't cry about civility or anything like that.

Anybody who isnt a kool-aid drinker knows what i say about Trump is true. That is why people are so bothered by it.


No people are bothered by it because there's no evidence to back it up and it's another thing in a long line of TDS attacks with no basis or evidence. If you could provide evidence, I will listen. Telling me everyone knows it's true doesn't make it any more true.


Uh, dearie, I think that's why everyone wants the files released. There are thousands of pages of "evidence, perhaps, contained therein.

This is not just a story about Trump, Epstein, and young girls/women.

It's been thus far hidden from you.


Don't demean me. You say you support women and your daughters and then you drop a "dearie" on me? That's some sexist old school talk there. Don't do that if you really respect women as you so claim
so instead of dearie perhaps piggy? I mean the POTUS is cool with it.


I don't care about piggy but when you use words that are clearly sexist in tone then yes I have issue
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

Aunburdened said:

SBGold said:

Aunburdened said:

DiabloWags said:



Gonna be funny as hell when this gets released redacted to hell and the Biden voters don't get the result they wanted from it.

Yeah, we will chalk you up as thinking the trafficked women are not worthy of justice, rather they are to be laughed at. Pure evil

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

GO Bears Forever


I'm not laughing at the victims. I'm laughing at all of you who thought all of this performative BS was going to result in Trump going down or anybody suffering real consequences.

You put all your eggs in this basket and you're going to get nothing from it.


Actually, we have a thousand baskets on Trump. One of them will eventually crash land on him.


So yall keep claiming….


Want me to bring up Jan 6 again
Are you deaf? Blind? Other?


Yes bring it up
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

Epstein's party pal and fellow child rapist, Trump, made Pam Bondi his Attorney General. Bondi did not investigate Epstein when she was AG in Florida. Now Bondi has appointed Jay Clayton to investigate Trump enemies in regards to Epstein. Jay Clayton recently worked for Trump billionaire ally Leon Black who paid Epstein $170 million.

The Trump Epstein cover up continues.


There is no proof Trump is a child rapist. The rest of this post doesn't matter after you make that claim.

No proof because of the cover up

The rest has been reported a lot today all over and is very valid

Go launder the gym shorts

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


Show me proof and I'll condemn the man. All I'm asking for is proof, not conjecture/heresay.


I recognize before you said you needed him to be found guilty in a criminal court (11 unanimous jurors).

Now you need "proof".


Yes, said proof would find him guilty in court. If there was any proof

He will never be tried in a court of law, as a matter of process because of his position.
You know that, right?

Your requirement can never be met.

Can't be met because there is no proof
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

BearNIt said:

BearlySane88 said:

BearNIt said:

President Pedo continues to protect the men that abused children. That will be his legacy due to the fact that he continues to deny and prevent the full disclosure of the facts in the Epstein files. It's like quicksand as the more he struggles to prevent full disclosure after promising such, the more he becomes trapped by the Epstein file, and the stronger the calls for transparency and full disclosure are.

The coverup is always worse than the crime.


Why didn't Biden and the dems release the files? Please someone explain this to me. If they didn't release the files, they all must be covering up for President Pedo Biden. Add that to Biden's dumpster fire of a legacy

Tell the guy who was friends with Epstein, who was a member of his Mar lago club, to release the files or is he going to change his mind or hide behind law concerning ongoing investigations and the release of information?


I have… that doesn't answer my question about Biden though. Thanks for trying


I can think of MANY reasons.
I'd be interested to read which you come up with.


Well give me some of the many reasons then.


No. You seem to think there's a reason why Biden didn't release. You're intrigued by that.
So you tell me why the intrigue.

Do you think Biden was banging Epstein's girls?


Nah Biden liked younger
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.