Jeffrey Epstein

122,774 Views | 1515 Replies | Last: 58 min ago by concordtom
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:50a, 11/20/25
Reply Quote
1
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 6:56a, 11/20/25
True.
And Pam Bondi will be legally liable if she doesn't release within 30 days.

Well done!

Reply Quote
4
1 edit
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 6:59a, 11/20/25
Yes, kudos to Khanna, Massie and MTG, most principled bunch in Congress.
Reply Quote
1
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 7:27a, 11/20/25
Cal88 said:
Yes, kudos to Khanna, Massie and MTG, most principled bunch in Congress.

MTG, lol. Yeah right
Reply Quote
2
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 7:30a, 11/20/25
SBGold said:
Cal88 said:
Yes, kudos to Khanna, Massie and MTG, most principled bunch in Congress.

MTG, lol. Yeah right


Yes, absolutely, no question she was instrumental in forcing Trump to release the Epstein files. You'd have to be a total partisan robot to not see that.
Reply Quote
1
cal83dls79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 7:39a, 11/20/25
I give her partial credit but deeming her "principled" is well…..I can only be partially non robotic here. The release of the Epstein files constitutes about 2% of her overall rating. If I saw her today I'd say "thanks piggy".
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
Reply Quote
3
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cal83dls79 • 7:54a, 11/20/25
Me as well, she's a con artist
Reply Quote
2
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 12:18p, 11/20/25
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Are you not entertained?


Yes, I am.

Reply Quote
1
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 12:30p, 11/20/25
SBGold said:
Me as well, she's a con artist

The 2-party system is the biggest con here, because there is a whole lot more common ground than what you are led to believe, and when there is a positive bipartisan effort like this one, it's a reason to celebrate, as opposed to ragging on those who were courageous enough to face the establishment.
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
cal83dls79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 12:35p, 11/20/25
Well, even the NYT acknowledged that this "wasn't on dems bingo card". So there is that.
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
Reply Quote
2
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:48p, 11/20/25
So, Reid Hoffman is many things. He's an Epstein associate, Democrat mega-donor, and the guy who bankrolled E. Jean Carroll's bogus rape case against President Trump.
Reply Quote
5
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:50p, 11/20/25
Reply Quote
4
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 1:25p, 11/20/25
PAC-10-BEAR said:
So, Reid Hoffman is many things. He's an Epstein associate, Democrat mega-donor, and the guy who bankrolled E. Jean Carroll's bogus rape case against President Trump.

Didn't Carroll win? How was that bogus?

How do you know a rape didn't occur?

Reply Quote
4
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 1:42p, 11/20/25
Cal88 said:
SBGold said:
Me as well, she's a con artist

The 2-party system is the biggest con here, because there is a whole lot more common ground than what you are led to believe, and when there is a positive bipartisan effort like this one, it's a reason to celebrate, as opposed to ragging on those who were courageous enough to face the establishment.

MTG has been principled on this one issue (Epstein), absolutely. We'll see about the rest.
Reply Quote
3
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 1:43p, 11/20/25


Reply Quote
4
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:59p, 11/20/25
Reply Quote
2
cal83dls79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:37p, 11/20/25
Two things can be true at the same time. Happens all the time
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
Reply Quote
3
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 6:29p, 11/20/25
Cal88 said:

Reply Quote
2
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:03p, 11/20/25


And I didn't think this could get any funnier.

Reply Quote
4
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aunburdened • 6:48a, 11/21/25
Aunburdened said:


And I didn't think this could get any funnier.


Coincidence?

Reply Quote
5
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:06a, 11/21/25
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Reply Quote
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:36a, 11/21/25

Larry Summers was asking someone with an egg-shaped micro-***** for sex advice.
Reply Quote
1
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:42a, 11/21/25

Republicans served prison time for this.
Reply Quote
4
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 12:03p, 11/21/25
sycasey said:
Aunburdened said:


And I didn't think this could get any funnier.


Coincidence?


The Daily Beast is left-wing agitprop. I give zero credence to anything they write.

But perhaps even more importantly, a simple Google search reveals that Bezos didn't hire the single reporter than Vance recommended to him which makes your post quite lame.
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aunburdened • 12:18p, 11/21/25
Aunburdened said:
But perhaps even more importantly, a simple Google search reveals that Bezos didn't hire the single reporter than Vance recommended to him which makes your post quite lame.

I'm using the standard set during the Biden Administration, which is that the government merely talking to media outlets constitutes censorship or undue influence.
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:31p, 11/21/25
Liberals: Epstein said Trump's name in an email - IMPEACH HIM

Also Liberals: we just textin' (literally) with Epstein, stop freakin'
Reply Quote
3
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 12:35p, 11/21/25
PAC-10-BEAR said:
Liberals: Epstein said Trump's name in an email - IMPEACH HIM

Also Liberals: we just textin' (literally) with Epstein, stop freakin'

Uh no, look at Summers this week.

Repugs look the other, Dems take action based on morality

Don't get it twisted, we ain't buying your schlock

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever
Reply Quote
4
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 1:59p, 11/21/25
SBGold said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
Liberals: Epstein said Trump's name in an email - IMPEACH HIM

Also Liberals: we just textin' (literally) with Epstein, stop freakin'

Uh no, look at Summers this week.

Repugs look the other, Dems take action based on morality

Don't get it twisted, we ain't buying your schlock

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


Dems take action based on morality? I needed a good laugh, thank you
Reply Quote
3
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 4:08p, 11/21/25
BearlySane88 said:
SBGold said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
Liberals: Epstein said Trump's name in an email - IMPEACH HIM

Also Liberals: we just textin' (literally) with Epstein, stop freakin'

Uh no, look at Summers this week.

Repugs look the other, Dems take action based on morality

Don't get it twisted, we ain't buying your schlock

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


Dems take action based on morality? I needed a good laugh, thank you

Why haven't you blocked me yet? Please feel free to do so.

Reply Quote
3
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 5:25p, 11/21/25
SBGold said:
BearlySane88 said:
SBGold said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
Liberals: Epstein said Trump's name in an email - IMPEACH HIM

Also Liberals: we just textin' (literally) with Epstein, stop freakin'

Uh no, look at Summers this week.

Repugs look the other, Dems take action based on morality

Don't get it twisted, we ain't buying your schlock

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


Dems take action based on morality? I needed a good laugh, thank you

Why haven't you blocked me yet? Please feel free to do so.



What, no unity?
Reply Quote
4
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 6:19p, 11/21/25
SBGold said:
BearlySane88 said:

Dems take action based on morality? I needed a good laugh, thank you

Why haven't you blocked me yet? Please feel free to do so.



Because you give him life.

Reply Quote
3
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 6:43p, 11/21/25
sycasey said:
Cal88 said:
SBGold said:
Me as well, she's a con artist

The 2-party system is the biggest con here, because there is a whole lot more common ground than what you are led to believe, and when there is a positive bipartisan effort like this one, it's a reason to celebrate, as opposed to ragging on those who were courageous enough to face the establishment.

MTG has been principled on this one issue (Epstein), absolutely. We'll see about the rest.

Okay maybe she actually was standing on business here.

Reply Quote
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 6:51p, 11/21/25
DiabloWags said:
SBGold said:
BearlySane88 said:

Dems take action based on morality? I needed a good laugh, thank you

Why haven't you blocked me yet? Please feel free to do so.



Because you give him life.



Barf.
Reply Quote
3
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 6:53p, 11/21/25
sycasey said:
sycasey said:
Cal88 said:
SBGold said:
Me as well, she's a con artist

The 2-party system is the biggest con here, because there is a whole lot more common ground than what you are led to believe, and when there is a positive bipartisan effort like this one, it's a reason to celebrate, as opposed to ragging on those who were courageous enough to face the establishment.

MTG has been principled on this one issue (Epstein), absolutely. We'll see about the rest.

Okay maybe she actually was standing on business here.



She lost her support base after going against Trump, right or wrong. She sees the writing on the walls and is gonna get into tv. My guess is she's a very vocal thorn In Trump's side for the next three years
Reply Quote
3
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 6:57p, 11/21/25
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
sycasey said:
Cal88 said:
SBGold said:
Me as well, she's a con artist

The 2-party system is the biggest con here, because there is a whole lot more common ground than what you are led to believe, and when there is a positive bipartisan effort like this one, it's a reason to celebrate, as opposed to ragging on those who were courageous enough to face the establishment.

MTG has been principled on this one issue (Epstein), absolutely. We'll see about the rest.

Okay maybe she actually was standing on business here.



She lost her support base after going against Trump, right or wrong. She sees the writing on the walls and is gonna get into tv. My guess is she's a very vocal thorn In Trump's side for the next three years

My guess: the thing that made her kind of a nutjob before (actually believing in all the weird Pizzagate/QAnon style conspiracies about protecting kids from pedophiles) has made her weirdly principled later, as she learns that Trump and most of the party never really believed any of it and were just using it for political expediency, which got jettisoned as soon as they got into power (covering up the Epstein stuff, the clearest real-world example of a powerful man harming kids). Hence her going scorched-earth after that.
Reply Quote
2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.