Jeffrey Epstein

162,149 Views | 1796 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by BearlySane88
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ironically enough, the main aspect of QAnon is being Trump groupies, which is what you are being here.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

bearister said:

"I thought MTG and Massie had all the names and were going to read them on the House Floor?"

Perhaps they are addicted to oxygen and didn't want to end up found hung somewhere.


By the Clintons?


MTG had threats sent to her targeting her son. When she told Trump about it, he told her that it was her fault and asked her to take a hike.

She didn't resign because she was bored.




You're using a "pizzagate" conspiracy theorist as evidence of what?

Lmao this source is laughable. Not saying it's not true, I have no idea, but this isn't someone you want to bank on being credible

You're not QAnon are you?


Lol, did Sycasey hack into your account?

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

Ironically enough, the main aspect of QAnon is being Trump groupies, which is what you are being here.


How lol. I called you out for posting someone who posts about Pizzagate every other tweet.

The main QAnon aspect is being weird conspiracy theorists
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

bearister said:

"I thought MTG and Massie had all the names and were going to read them on the House Floor?"

Perhaps they are addicted to oxygen and didn't want to end up found hung somewhere.


By the Clintons?


MTG had threats sent to her targeting her son. When she told Trump about it, he told her that it was her fault and asked her to take a hike.

She didn't resign because she was bored.




You're using a "pizzagate" conspiracy theorist as evidence of what?

Lmao this source is laughable. Not saying it's not true, I have no idea, but this isn't someone you want to bank on being credible

You're not QAnon are you?


Lol, did Sycasey hack into your account?


Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

Ironically enough, the main aspect of QAnon is being Trump groupies, which is what you are being here.


How lol. I called you out for posting someone who posts about Pizzagate every other tweet.

The main QAnon aspect is being weird conspiracy theorists


You think the personal threats against MTG and her son's life are a weird conspiracy theory?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

bearister said:

"I thought MTG and Massie had all the names and were going to read them on the House Floor?"

Perhaps they are addicted to oxygen and didn't want to end up found hung somewhere.


By the Clintons?


MTG had threats sent to her targeting her son. When she told Trump about it, he told her that it was her fault and asked her to take a hike.

She didn't resign because she was bored.




You're using a "pizzagate" conspiracy theorist as evidence of what?

Lmao this source is laughable. Not saying it's not true, I have no idea, but this isn't someone you want to bank on being credible

You're not QAnon are you?


Lol, did Sycasey hack into your account?




You're next!
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

Ironically enough, the main aspect of QAnon is being Trump groupies, which is what you are being here.


How lol. I called you out for posting someone who posts about Pizzagate every other tweet.

The main QAnon aspect is being weird conspiracy theorists


You think the personal threats against MTG and her son's life are a weird conspiracy theory?


No clue, don't put words in my mouth. I think your source was a weird choice as I said.

You still haven't denied being QAnon which is also weird.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

bearister said:

"I thought MTG and Massie had all the names and were going to read them on the House Floor?"

Perhaps they are addicted to oxygen and didn't want to end up found hung somewhere.


By the Clintons?


MTG had threats sent to her targeting her son. When she told Trump about it, he told her that it was her fault and asked her to take a hike.

She didn't resign because she was bored.




You're using a "pizzagate" conspiracy theorist as evidence of what?

Lmao this source is laughable. Not saying it's not true, I have no idea, but this isn't someone you want to bank on being credible

You're not QAnon are you?

Probably 85% of the authoritative sources quoted around here have been laughably wrong about other subjects. There are no standards of accuracy and reliability on OT.


Im glad to hear we finally have bipartisan agreement that Jack Posobiec is an untrustworthy troll and not to be trusted on any matter


Interestingly enough, Jack Posobiec is a favorite of the Trumper community.

And he's been one of the most highly referenced "authoritative" sources here that has been PROVEN TO BE WRONG.

A terribly untrustworthy troll indeed.
The depth of hypocrisy of the MAGAts knows no bounds.

[url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/maga-voter-fraud-fanatic-jack-posobiecs-own-suspicious-voting-revealed/][/url]





"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He likes polka.
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Epstein is over, wait for the movie
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How does Bill Clinton feel knowing no one is talking about him?
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

Epstein is over, wait for the movie

PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

^The real answer is simple enough, many Democrats were also compromised, as were many of their big donors, and Israel is central in this pedo honeypot blackmail operation. That is a third rail for both parties.


This is it. As much as some people seem to want this to be about one side, it's not.

Anyway, I'm sure the unredacted files will be released at any moment.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

Anarchistbear said:

Epstein is over, wait for the movie


The sideshows took over just before they had to resort to an excuse letter from Epstein's mother.

If I make an allusion to a 50 year old sitcom starring a very young John Travolta, you know I'm showing my age.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Epstein allegedly visited Clinton's White House 17 times.

Now Bill and Hillary Clinton are refusing to testify to the House Oversight Committee?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump called a "pedophile protector" responds by telling the person "**** you" and flips them off

PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Epstein allegedly visited Clinton's White House 17 times.

Now Bill and Hillary Clinton are refusing to testify to the House Oversight Committee?

Shouldn't they be arrested and imprisoned in the same way Trump advisors, Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon were?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Trump called a "pedophile protector" responds by telling the person "**** you" and flips them off

Based.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is it time to for Bill Clinton to make another convenient overseas trip again? He visited Puerto Rico the last time.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sounds like a judge has given the DOJ until Friday to respond to claims that it is covering up the Epstein files

https://www.courthousenews.com/judge-demands-response-after-lawmakers-accuse-doj-of-dragging-feet-with-epstein-files/
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Sounds like a judge has given the DOJ until Friday to respond to claims that it is covering up the Epstein files

https://www.courthousenews.com/judge-demands-response-after-lawmakers-accuse-doj-of-dragging-feet-with-epstein-files/

Grok is having trouble redacting incriminating info. In fact, it's adding pedophilic and white nationalist images to the files.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fyi (ymmv).. ;o
https://bsky.app/profile/rickylongthread.bsky.social/post/3mcf2ypjo4s2m
FUNK TRUNK !
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"At least five Republican House membersKevin McCarthy, Jim Jordan, Scott Perry, Andy Biggs, and Mo Brooksdefied subpoenas from the January 6th Committee in 2022, refusing to testify about their roles, with the committee referring some for potential ethics violations, though the House Ethics Committee took little to no action against them. This defiance highlights a trend where some GOP lawmakers have historically resisted congressional oversight requests, though the exact number of all instances across different committees and times is harder to pin down.

Key Instances:
January 6th Committee (2022): The committee issued subpoenas to these five Republicans, who generally cited political legitimacy concerns or executive privilege claims, though they were not compelled to appear.

House Ethics Referrals: The committee referred McCarthy, Jordan, Perry, and Biggs for potential punishment by the House Ethics Committee, but the bipartisan panel ultimately didn't act on these referrals.
AI Overview
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"At least five Republican House membersKevin McCarthy, Jim Jordan, Scott Perry, Andy Biggs, and Mo Brooksdefied subpoenas from the January 6th Committee in 2022, refusing to testify about their roles, with the committee referring some for potential ethics violations, though the House Ethics Committee took little to no action against them. This defiance highlights a trend where some GOP lawmakers have historically resisted congressional oversight requests, though the exact number of all instances across different committees and times is harder to pin down.

Key Instances:
January 6th Committee (2022): The committee issued subpoenas to these five Republicans, who generally cited political legitimacy concerns or executive privilege claims, though they were not compelled to appear.

House Ethics Referrals: The committee referred McCarthy, Jordan, Perry, and Biggs for potential punishment by the House Ethics Committee, but the bipartisan panel ultimately didn't act on these referrals.
AI Overview

Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro would like a word

Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:



BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

BearlySane88 said:






Such a joke of a statement to make.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"While there is no official single tally of every minute Hillary Clinton has spent in every legislative hearing, public records and news reports confirm she has spent at least 20 to 25 hours testifying under oath in high-profile legislative investigation hearings."
AI Overview

*All Republican investigations that were bridges to nowhere and that cost the taxpayers millions.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"While there is no official single tally of every minute Hillary Clinton has spent in every legislative hearing, public records and news reports confirm she has spent at least 20 to 25 hours testifying under oath in high-profile legislative investigation hearings."
AI Overview

*All Republican investigations that were bridges to nowhere and that cost the taxpayers millions.

Is it really testifying when you say I "do not recall" or I " have no personal knowledge" over and over and over again? When her brain was wiped clean, was it "like with a cloth or something?".
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"While there is no official single tally of every minute Hillary Clinton has spent in every legislative hearing, public records and news reports confirm she has spent at least 20 to 25 hours testifying under oath in high-profile legislative investigation hearings."
AI Overview

*All Republican investigations that were bridges to nowhere and that cost the taxpayers millions.


Hillary Clinton is now a victim? Maybe the investigation into her private email server went nowhere because James Comey is a corrupt deep state actor? Comey made up his mind not to charge Hillary before his investigation.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.