Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson keeps saying it's his first time having In-N-Out, but he's posted the same claim three times.

Details here: https://t.co/E70snhwI7Z pic.twitter.com/yxBa7sPQ7Q

— TMZ (@TMZ) December 29, 2023

Hail storm wipes out giant solar farm in 5 minutes.

One heck of a story by Cal Bear Emily:

Family honors Steven McCreary, whose bones were found at UC Berkeley


https://www.berkeleyscanner.com/2023/12/29/uc-berkeley-crime/uc-berkeley-bones-steven-mccreary-family/

*Perfect story line for British show Unforgotten.

Today in Ventura:

#HighSurf - Watch when a rogue wave hits the beach at the end of Seward Ave in the City of Ventura. This occurred during the high surf advisory at high tide. Because of this wave eight people were transported to local hospitals. Currently the beaches are closed in Ventura County… pic.twitter.com/VlRlgRLhpn

— VCFD PIO (@VCFD_PIO) December 29, 2023

https://www.facebook.com/colin.hoag.9/videos/339998562146021/

okaydo said:

---

Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson keeps saying it's his first time having In-N-Out, but he's posted the same claim three times.

Details here: https://t.co/E70snhwI7Z pic.twitter.com/yxBa7sPQ7Q

— TMZ (@TMZ) December 29, 2023

---

Maybe he has an early form of dementia.

movielover said:

---

Hail storm wipes out giant solar farm in 5 minutes.

---

And how much of this farm was financed by the US government (us taxpayers)?

of course, you have no idea either way.
how much of your healthcare is on the public dole?

concordtom said:

---

of course, you have no idea either way.
how much of your healthcare is on the public dole?

---

Government hands off my Social Security!

dimitrig said:

---

concordtom said:

---

of course, you have no idea either way.
how much of your healthcare is on the public dole?

---

Government hands off my Social Security!

---

I watched a Chris Christie TownHall in Epping NH last night.

At 19:15, first audience question, social security solvency and his proposal.

https://www.youtube.com/live/9_WCKWUJZ90&t=19m10s

Hmmm, these links aren't working, I guess because it was a Live video.
Well, it's definitely available in YouTube.

Just search for "Chris Christie Epping" and you'll get it. Then go to 19:15.

If you click on Transcript you can read along.

Maybe it's time for Obama and Dubya to run again.

I think Senator Collins has a point. President Obama (who is barred from running by the obscure 22nd amendment) should be the Democratic nominee in 2024- never mind the constitution - let the voters decide ! https://t.co/zXelvq3Jlw

— @StevenStrauss (@Steven_Strauss) December 29, 2023

https://www.yahoo.com/news/woman-sues-l-says-her-120034503.html

Woman sues L.A., says her husband sent nude photos of her to co-workers. He's a cop. So is she.


An officer has accused the department of failing to protect her from fallout after her spouse, also a cop, shared sexually explicit images.

One year after a Los Angeles police officer was charged with six misdemeanor counts for allegedly sending sexually explicit photos and videos of his wife to LAPD colleagues and other men, the woman, also a police officer, is suing the city of Los Angeles.

The woman's lawsuit, filed Wednesday, charges the department with sexual harassment, whistleblower retaliation and failure to take all reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment and retaliation. She seeks unspecified damages.

A representative of the city attorney's office did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

The plaintiff's husband, Brady Lamas, is awaiting trial on six counts of disorderly conduct by distributing a private intimate image, according to a criminal complaint filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court last December.

The complaint alleges that Lamas, 46, passed "around sexually explicit photographs and sexually explicit videos" of his wife to other LAPD officers.

"My own husband is a predator, and he preyed on me. I would have preferred that he punched me in the face," she wrote when applying for a restraining order against Lamas.

His actions, she claims, led to her being sexually harassed by other officers in the department, behavior that she alleges has continued over the last year.

Her suit alleges that two officers made harassing comments and were not transferred, and that the LAPD did nothing to ensure that the images would no longer be shared by any of the officers who had obtained them.

"The department simply did not care enough to do all that was necessary to protect plaintiff," the suit states, thereby encouraging a hostile work environment and damaging the plaintiff's career.

Identified in the original charging document by her first name and last initial, she has worked for the LAPD for 14 years and in the course of her career has received numerous commendations and awards.

She originally came upon the explicit images in January 2021 when she saw a group chat on her husband's phone in which Lamas shared nude photos and videos with a man she didn't know.

The discovery, she wrote, helped explain sexually harassing comments that had been directed toward her, which she did not understand. At the time, the comments seemed "unusual" but she did not know about the images Lamas had sent by text message, WhatsApp and the messaging app Kik.

Upon discovering the images on Lamas' phone, she felt "frozen and in fear," she wrote in the filing. The images had left her humiliated. Lamas was a "predator" whose actions were "tantamount to a sexual assault."

She alleged that he had surreptitiously taken photos of her body during several visits to a doctor's office after she had breast augmentation surgery. She claimed he then shared the images with other men, referring to them as "before and after pics," according to the filing.

Some of the male LAPD employees who had received the explicit images would approach her at work, staring at her "intently" and making comments such as "Brady is a lucky man" and "He doesn't know how good he has it," according to the filing.

She reported Lamas to her supervisor, filed a report with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department station in Santa Clarita and was interviewed by the Internal Affairs Division.

At the time, the LAPD issued a statement saying it was cooperating with the Sheriff's Department and the district attorney's office and was "troubled by the officer's alleged off-duty conduct which does not reflect the values of the Los Angeles Police Department."

Yet she said she was afraid to return to work and predicted that the harassment would continue.

"What is worse is this humiliation will keep repeating, perhaps forever, because the private pictures and graphic videos are now in the hands of strangers and multiple co-workers at the LAPD," she wrote.

The case is the latest in a series of explicit-photo-sharing scandals to rock the department in recent years.

The city paid out $1.5 million in 2020 to settle a lawsuit by an LAPD detective who accused a fellow officer of beating her and threatening to share sexually explicit images he had secretly taken if she tried to end their relationship.

And in September, a jury awarded an LAPD captain $4 million in damages after she sued the city over a nude photograph that was doctored to look like her and shared around the department.

Lol, Trump only hires and surrounds himself with the worst people

oski003 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Lol, Trump only hires and surrounds himself with the worst people

---

He hasn't worked for Trump in five years. He has, however, been working for Biden's government agencies since that time.

---

Really? What payroll is he on?

---

The pardon plan.

---

So your previous cooment was bs but I'll play along.

Pardon for what?

dajo9 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Lol, Trump only hires and surrounds himself with the worst people

---

He hasn't worked for Trump in five years. He has, however, been working for Biden's government agencies since that time.

---

Really? What payroll is he on?

---

The pardon plan.

---

So your previous cooment was bs but I'll play along.

Pardon for what?

---

That's so funny.

My reactions to the two comments were exactly the same.
What payroll?
Pardon for what? He already served time, something that still awaits Trump.

I hope dopey understands that Cohen served time for a crime that was done for benefit of and at direction of Trump, punished by Trump's DOJ.
No wonder Cohen has vengeance on his mind!!!

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-crime-new-york-manhattan-campaigns-3a0413202e80ab99c9f6377f97d07c04

Trump handed out pardons like they were Halloween candy. Many of them were quid pro quo arrangements. Basically payment to the pardoned for services rendered to the Mango Mussolini. Don't recall karen003 saying anything about those.


As we know, and as hallmonitor003 proclaims every day,




IOIYAR!

Modern day setup?

AunBear89 said:

---

Just a question: why are conservatives generally judgmental arses that want to tell everyone how to live, while pretending to be champions of small government?

Interested to see the projection filled attempts at whataboutism …

---

The Democrat Party comprises progressives and Joe Manchin. The Republican Party comprises traditionalists, libertarians, nationalists, populists, disaffected liberals, etc. The right-wing coalition is less coherent and therefore less stable. https://t.co/wLaqokezbU

— Michael Knowles (@michaeljknowles) December 28, 2023

So, the answer to my question is: "Because we are *******s, capable only of intolerance and projection."


So noted..

Someone should tell Knowles that there is no such thing as "Democrat Party."