Now that Elon will own twitter on Friday or Monday..

173,657 Views | 1716 Replies | Last: 5 days ago by bear2034
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AunBear89 • 5:23p, 4/24/23
Except Musk helped prove vast government censorship in collaboration with MSM (Twitter Files).
Reply Quote
4
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 5:26p, 4/24/23
movielover said:
Except Musk helped prove vast government censorship in collaboration with MSM (Twitter Files).


Translation - Musk helped push out a bunch of gobbledygook to give me fuel to keep hollering about my priors
Reply Quote
8
okaydo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:27p, 4/26/23
Reply Quote
2
dimitrig
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to okaydo • 11:42p, 4/26/23
okaydo said:


Very stable genius at work


Reply Quote
Eastern Oregon Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:53p, 4/27/23
New York City's Metropolitan Transit Authority, North America's largest transportation network, suspended the use of Twitter for service alerts Thursday, saying the "reliability of the platform can no longer be guaranteed." The MTA's access to Twitter through its API was involuntarily interrupted twice in the last two weeks, on April 14 and again April 27.


NYC MTA discontinues the use of Twitter for service alerts

Reply Quote
3
1 edit
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:12a, 4/28/23
Will Tucker partner w Elon?

Reply Quote
4
AunBear89
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 11:26a, 4/28/23
movielover said:
Will Tucker partner w Elon?


Yeah. They can tan their tiny little scrotums together.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
Reply Quote
3
BearHunter
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:18p, 4/28/23



Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
Eastern Oregon Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearHunter • 12:27a, 4/29/23
BearHunter said:



Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?
Reply Quote
7
MinotStateBeav
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Eastern Oregon Bear • 2:33a, 4/29/23
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearHunter said:



Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?


You literally just what about'd on 2 guys talking about about how speech censorship effect both sides, eventually they'll come for you.
Reply Quote
3
BearHunter
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Eastern Oregon Bear • 11:24a, 4/29/23
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearHunter said:
Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?


What about those violent, radical legislators?
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
dimitrig
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearHunter • 8:30p, 4/29/23
BearHunter said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearHunter said:
Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?


What about those violent, radical legislators?


In Tennessee they are all considered radical and violent if they are black.


Reply Quote
7
BearHunter
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dimitrig • 12:44a, 4/30/23
dimitrig said:

In Tennessee they are all considered radical and violent if they are black.

They're insurrectionists.
Reply Quote
3
2 edits
MinotStateBeav
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dimitrig • 3:46a, 4/30/23
dimitrig said:
BearHunter said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearHunter said:
Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?


What about those violent, radical legislators?


In Tennessee they are all considered radical and violent if they are black.



You almost did it, just call the whole state racist..we know you want to.
Reply Quote
3
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearHunter • 3:56a, 4/30/23
BearHunter said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearHunter said:
Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?


What about those violent, radical legislators?


The driver of the car is who should have been arrested
Reply Quote
1
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 4:07a, 4/30/23
dajo9 said:
BearHunter said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearHunter said:
Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?


What about those violent, radical legislators?


The driver of the car is who should have been arrested


Wow, just wow. That's incredible that you believe people can stop, threaten drivers, and assault drivers, and a driver should be arrested for trying to safely get past the situation. Insanity.
Reply Quote
3
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 4:54a, 4/30/23
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
BearHunter said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearHunter said:
Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?


What about those violent, radical legislators?


The driver of the car is who should have been arrested


Wow, just wow. That's incredible that you believe people can stop, threaten drivers, and assault drivers, and a driver should be arrested for trying to safely get past the situation. Insanity.
They were engaged in non-violent civil disobedience stopping traffic, which is a police issue. Nobody threatened or assaulted the driver UNTIL the driver assaulted them with his vehicle by moving forward into the group. That is when the incident turned dangerous. The driver should be arrested.
Reply Quote
3
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 7:17a, 4/30/23
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
BearHunter said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearHunter said:
Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?


What about those violent, radical legislators?


The driver of the car is who should have been arrested


Wow, just wow. That's incredible that you believe people can stop, threaten drivers, and assault drivers, and a driver should be arrested for trying to safely get past the situation. Insanity.
They were engaged in non-violent civil disobedience stopping traffic, which is a police issue. Nobody threatened or assaulted the driver UNTIL the driver assaulted them with his vehicle by moving forward into the group. That is when the incident turned dangerous. The driver should be arrested.


Is that in the DMV handbook or some other code? The only assault that happened was when the protesting nutjob threw a traffic cone into the vehicle.
Reply Quote
4
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 10:39a, 4/30/23
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
BearHunter said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearHunter said:
Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?


What about those violent, radical legislators?


The driver of the car is who should have been arrested


Wow, just wow. That's incredible that you believe people can stop, threaten drivers, and assault drivers, and a driver should be arrested for trying to safely get past the situation. Insanity.
They were engaged in non-violent civil disobedience stopping traffic, which is a police issue. Nobody threatened or assaulted the driver UNTIL the driver assaulted them with his vehicle by moving forward into the group. That is when the incident turned dangerous. The driver should be arrested.


Is that in the DMV handbook or some other code? The only assault that happened was when the protesting nutjob threw a traffic cone into the vehicle.


The assault was when the nutjob driver drove straight at people
Reply Quote
3
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 11:16a, 4/30/23
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
BearHunter said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearHunter said:
Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?


What about those violent, radical legislators?


The driver of the car is who should have been arrested


Wow, just wow. That's incredible that you believe people can stop, threaten drivers, and assault drivers, and a driver should be arrested for trying to safely get past the situation. Insanity.
They were engaged in non-violent civil disobedience stopping traffic, which is a police issue. Nobody threatened or assaulted the driver UNTIL the driver assaulted them with his vehicle by moving forward into the group. That is when the incident turned dangerous. The driver should be arrested.


Is that in the DMV handbook or some other code? The only assault that happened was when the protesting nutjob threw a traffic cone into the vehicle.


The assault was when the nutjob driver drove straight at people


He turned right to avoid the nutjobs. That was when your guy assaulted the driver with a cone.
Reply Quote
4
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 12:30p, 4/30/23
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
BearHunter said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearHunter said:
Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?


What about those violent, radical legislators?


The driver of the car is who should have been arrested


Wow, just wow. That's incredible that you believe people can stop, threaten drivers, and assault drivers, and a driver should be arrested for trying to safely get past the situation. Insanity.
They were engaged in non-violent civil disobedience stopping traffic, which is a police issue. Nobody threatened or assaulted the driver UNTIL the driver assaulted them with his vehicle by moving forward into the group. That is when the incident turned dangerous. The driver should be arrested.


Is that in the DMV handbook or some other code? The only assault that happened was when the protesting nutjob threw a traffic cone into the vehicle.


The assault was when the nutjob driver drove straight at people


He turned right to avoid the nutjobs. That was when your guy assaulted the driver with a cone.
The nutjob driver was at a complete stop. Then he drove straight forward right at people before stopping inches from them. The people there have a right to stand their ground and defend themselves.
Reply Quote
2
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 2:11p, 4/30/23
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
BearHunter said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearHunter said:
Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?


What about those violent, radical legislators?


The driver of the car is who should have been arrested


Wow, just wow. That's incredible that you believe people can stop, threaten drivers, and assault drivers, and a driver should be arrested for trying to safely get past the situation. Insanity.
They were engaged in non-violent civil disobedience stopping traffic, which is a police issue. Nobody threatened or assaulted the driver UNTIL the driver assaulted them with his vehicle by moving forward into the group. That is when the incident turned dangerous. The driver should be arrested.


Is that in the DMV handbook or some other code? The only assault that happened was when the protesting nutjob threw a traffic cone into the vehicle.


The assault was when the nutjob driver drove straight at people


He turned right to avoid the nutjobs. That was when your guy assaulted the driver with a cone.
The nutjob driver was at a complete stop. Then he drove straight forward right at people before stopping inches from them. The people there have a right to stand their ground and defend themselves.


A person's right to protest ends when it infringes on the rights of others.

A public roadway belongs to everyone, for the purpose it was built forto facilitate transportation for all citizens and guests of this country lawfully admitted.

Protestors do not have a right to hold another person hostage.
Reply Quote
4
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 3:26p, 4/30/23
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
BearHunter said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearHunter said:
Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?


What about those violent, radical legislators?


The driver of the car is who should have been arrested


Wow, just wow. That's incredible that you believe people can stop, threaten drivers, and assault drivers, and a driver should be arrested for trying to safely get past the situation. Insanity.
They were engaged in non-violent civil disobedience stopping traffic, which is a police issue. Nobody threatened or assaulted the driver UNTIL the driver assaulted them with his vehicle by moving forward into the group. That is when the incident turned dangerous. The driver should be arrested.


Is that in the DMV handbook or some other code? The only assault that happened was when the protesting nutjob threw a traffic cone into the vehicle.


The assault was when the nutjob driver drove straight at people


He turned right to avoid the nutjobs. That was when your guy assaulted the driver with a cone.
The nutjob driver was at a complete stop. Then he drove straight forward right at people before stopping inches from them. The people there have a right to stand their ground and defend themselves.


A person's right to protest ends when it infringes on the rights of others.

A public roadway belongs to everyone, for the purpose it was built forto facilitate transportation for all citizens and guests of this country lawfully admitted.

Protestors do not have a right to hold another person hostage.


Nobody was held hostage. Enough histrionics. A path was blocked. Illegally. It is called civil disobedience and it has a long history in this country as a means of engaging in non-violent protest. It is for the police to deal with. It does not legalize assault on those engaged in civil disobedience.

When the driver went from a stop to driving right at the protesters he threatened them with deadly force. That's the biggest crime.
Reply Quote
5
2 edits
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 3:48p, 4/30/23
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
BearHunter said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearHunter said:
Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?


What about those violent, radical legislators?


The driver of the car is who should have been arrested


Wow, just wow. That's incredible that you believe people can stop, threaten drivers, and assault drivers, and a driver should be arrested for trying to safely get past the situation. Insanity.
They were engaged in non-violent civil disobedience stopping traffic, which is a police issue. Nobody threatened or assaulted the driver UNTIL the driver assaulted them with his vehicle by moving forward into the group. That is when the incident turned dangerous. The driver should be arrested.


Is that in the DMV handbook or some other code? The only assault that happened was when the protesting nutjob threw a traffic cone into the vehicle.


The assault was when the nutjob driver drove straight at people


He turned right to avoid the nutjobs. That was when your guy assaulted the driver with a cone.
The nutjob driver was at a complete stop. Then he drove straight forward right at people before stopping inches from them. The people there have a right to stand their ground and defend themselves.


A person's right to protest ends when it infringes on the rights of others.

A public roadway belongs to everyone, for the purpose it was built forto facilitate transportation for all citizens and guests of this country lawfully admitted.

Protestors do not have a right to hold another person hostage.


Nobody was held hostage. Enough histrionics. A path was blocked. Illegally. It is called civil disobedience and it has a long history in this country as a means of engaging in non-violent protest. It is for the police to deal with. It does not legalize assault on those engaged in civil disobedience.

When the driver went from a stop to driving right at the protesters he threatened them with deadly force. That's the biggest crime.


He may have threatened the illegal blocking protestors with force by moving a car 5 mph towards them, and then they could EASILY move out of the way of the car and let him go about his business. The driver gave them a third chance to move aside, but the childish nutjobs stood right in front of his bumper. When they walked to one side of his bumper, he turned the OTHER direction but the illegal protestors moved in front of where he turned. That is when the biggest nutjob attacked him through his window with a large traffic cone.

I don't know how many cars were behind the driver, such that he could avoid the illegal blocking trespassers by himself illegally reversing in the middle of the road to escape the hostile situation. Blocking a public road is asinine. Remind me to use your logic and defend school shootings because they have a long history in this country.
Reply Quote
2
2 edits
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:15p, 4/30/23
Remember when conservatives used to be against cancel culture? LOL. Now that some young black leftists are about to become national superstars, it's time to pull out all the stops to cancel one of them for past behavior.
Reply Quote
6
Big C
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 4:18p, 4/30/23
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
oski003 said:
dajo9 said:
BearHunter said:
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
BearHunter said:
Two old-school liberals that have previously been cancelled by liberals had a discussion about free speech and a libertarian who left Fox News in front of a liberal studio audience.
Speaking of free speech and cancelling, how about those state legislatures in Tennessee and Montana?


What about those violent, radical legislators?


The driver of the car is who should have been arrested


Wow, just wow. That's incredible that you believe people can stop, threaten drivers, and assault drivers, and a driver should be arrested for trying to safely get past the situation. Insanity.
They were engaged in non-violent civil disobedience stopping traffic, which is a police issue. Nobody threatened or assaulted the driver UNTIL the driver assaulted them with his vehicle by moving forward into the group. That is when the incident turned dangerous. The driver should be arrested.


Is that in the DMV handbook or some other code? The only assault that happened was when the protesting nutjob threw a traffic cone into the vehicle.


The assault was when the nutjob driver drove straight at people


He turned right to avoid the nutjobs. That was when your guy assaulted the driver with a cone.
The nutjob driver was at a complete stop. Then he drove straight forward right at people before stopping inches from them. The people there have a right to stand their ground and defend themselves.

"Nutjobs" have the right to assemble, just like radical-left Socialists: What if he was running late to a Proud Boys meeting or something?
Reply Quote
3
BearHunter
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:03p, 4/30/23


The Tennessee insurrection was only about a month ago.
Reply Quote
3
AunBear89
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearHunter • 11:20p, 4/30/23
You Righteous Righties are so cute with your false equivalencies. You never disappoint.

Liars, hypocrites, and morons.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
Reply Quote
3
BearHunter
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:27p, 4/30/23
Tennessee was way worse than 9/11.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Eastern Oregon Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearHunter • 1:10a, 5/1/23
BearHunter said:
Tennessee was way worse than 9/11.
Yeah! A half dozen hurt feelings and 5-10 minutes of legislative disruption are far, far more important than 3,000 deaths that mostly weren't Republicans anyway.
Reply Quote
1
2 edits
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearHunter • 4:44a, 5/1/23
BearHunter said:
Tennessee was way worse than 9/11.


This is a good tweet when read as preposterous sarcasm
Reply Quote
2
dimitrig
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 8:44a, 5/1/23
dajo9 said:
BearHunter said:
Tennessee was way worse than 9/11.


This is a good tweet when read as preposterous sarcasm


It's not?
Reply Quote
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dimitrig • 8:50a, 5/1/23
dimitrig said:
dajo9 said:
BearHunter said:
Tennessee was way worse than 9/11.


This is a good tweet when read as preposterous sarcasm


It's not?


It may be. I'm not sure. I read it that way and then looked up and saw it came from bearhunter. So I don't know.
Reply Quote
okaydo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:04p, 5/2/23
Reply Quote
1
dimitrig
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to okaydo • 8:28p, 5/2/23
okaydo said:


Go for it. Also assign @TheRealNPR and @TheRealRealNPR and @NationalPublicRadio while you are at it.
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.