Jeffrey Epstein

289,439 Views | 2707 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Cal88
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Cal88 said:

Boy oh boy.

Trump vetoed a bill to bring water to Colorado because Rep. Boebert signed to petition to expose the Epstein ring.



Look for Adelson and Singer to throw more millions trying to oust Massie now, can't have that kind of straight talk in their Congress.

Thomas Massie, financed by pro-Islamists outside the state of Kentucky, goes on Tucker's show, who previously denied calling Trump the Antichrist to talk about Epstein water....Maybe it will catch on?



That is a bald-faced lie and a typical example of zionists projecting. Absolutely disgraceful.

The main reason Singer, Adelson and Paulson are throwing millions into a small rural Kentucky district is because a principled local Congressman dared go against AIPAC and criticize Israel, and you know it.


Principled "local" congressman with 95% of his donations from outside Kentucky.


Mostly from first time small donors, average donation around $100. The astroturfed empty suit who they run against Massie got most of his donations from three oligarchs working for a foreign lobby.

This is a prime example of how twisted and disgustingly fake your argumentation is.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Thomas Massie, financed by pro-Islamists outside the state of Kentucky, goes on Tucker's show, who previously denied calling Trump the Antichrist to talk about Epstein water....Maybe it will catch on?



That is a bald-faced lie and a typical example of zionists projecting. Absolutely disgraceful.

The main reason Singer, Adelson and Paulson are throwing millions into a small rural Kentucky district is because a principled local Congressman dared go against AIPAC and criticize Israel, and you know it.


Principled "local" congressman with 95% of his donations from outside Kentucky.


Paul Singer is from NY, John Paulson from Florida, and Miriam Adelson from Nevada.



Super PAC Targeting Massie Funded By Three Israel-Backing Billionaires | The Liberty Beacon
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Cal88 said:

Boy oh boy.

Trump vetoed a bill to bring water to Colorado because Rep. Boebert signed to petition to expose the Epstein ring.



Look for Adelson and Singer to throw more millions trying to oust Massie now, can't have that kind of straight talk in their Congress.

Thomas Massie, financed by pro-Islamists outside the state of Kentucky, goes on Tucker's show, who previously denied calling Trump the Antichrist to talk about Epstein water....Maybe it will catch on?



That is a bald-faced lie and a typical example of zionists projecting. Absolutely disgraceful.

The main reason Singer, Adelson and Paulson are throwing millions into a small rural Kentucky district is because a principled local Congressman dared go against AIPAC and criticize Israel, and you know it.


Principled "local" congressman with 95% of his donations from outside Kentucky.


Mostly from first time small donors, average donation around $100. The astroturfed empty suit who they run against Massie got most of his donations from three oligarchs working for a foreign lobby.

This is a prime example of how twisted and disgustingly fake your argumentation is.


You can spin it however you want but my argumentation isn't fake, if it was then you would have refuted it with facts stating otherwise. My post remains true, 95% of his funding is from outside of Kentucky. I said nothing about his opponent, just that it's interesting such a local boy isn't getting much local funding
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Cal88 said:

Boy oh boy.

Trump vetoed a bill to bring water to Colorado because Rep. Boebert signed to petition to expose the Epstein ring.



Look for Adelson and Singer to throw more millions trying to oust Massie now, can't have that kind of straight talk in their Congress.

Thomas Massie, financed by pro-Islamists outside the state of Kentucky, goes on Tucker's show, who previously denied calling Trump the Antichrist to talk about Epstein water....Maybe it will catch on?



That is a bald-faced lie and a typical example of zionists projecting. Absolutely disgraceful.

The main reason Singer, Adelson and Paulson are throwing millions into a small rural Kentucky district is because a principled local Congressman dared go against AIPAC and criticize Israel, and you know it.


Principled "local" congressman with 95% of his donations from outside Kentucky.


Mostly from first time small donors, average donation around $100. The astroturfed empty suit who they run against Massie got most of his donations from three oligarchs working for a foreign lobby.

This is a prime example of how twisted and disgustingly fake your argumentation is.


You can spin it however you want but my argumentation isn't fake, if it was then you would have refuted it with facts stating otherwise. My post remains true, 95% of his funding is from outside of Kentucky. I said nothing about his opponent, just that it's interesting such a local boy isn't getting much local funding


Keep obfuscating the fact that Massie's astroturfed opponent is funded by three Israel first oligarchs.

Your point above about Massie not getting local funding is also false propaganda, Massie has far broader support within Kentucky than his oligarch funded stand-in:



Thanks, and have a good day.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Cal88 said:

Boy oh boy.

Trump vetoed a bill to bring water to Colorado because Rep. Boebert signed to petition to expose the Epstein ring.



Look for Adelson and Singer to throw more millions trying to oust Massie now, can't have that kind of straight talk in their Congress.

Thomas Massie, financed by pro-Islamists outside the state of Kentucky, goes on Tucker's show, who previously denied calling Trump the Antichrist to talk about Epstein water....Maybe it will catch on?



That is a bald-faced lie and a typical example of zionists projecting. Absolutely disgraceful.

The main reason Singer, Adelson and Paulson are throwing millions into a small rural Kentucky district is because a principled local Congressman dared go against AIPAC and criticize Israel, and you know it.


Principled "local" congressman with 95% of his donations from outside Kentucky.


Mostly from first time small donors, average donation around $100. The astroturfed empty suit who they run against Massie got most of his donations from three oligarchs working for a foreign lobby.

This is a prime example of how twisted and disgustingly fake your argumentation is.


You can spin it however you want but my argumentation isn't fake, if it was then you would have refuted it with facts stating otherwise. My post remains true, 95% of his funding is from outside of Kentucky. I said nothing about his opponent, just that it's interesting such a local boy isn't getting much local funding


Keep obfuscating the fact that Massie's astroturfed opponent is funded by three Israel first oligarchs.

Your point above about Massie not getting local funding is also false propaganda, Massie has far broader support within Kentucky than his oligarch funded stand-in:



Thanks, and have a good day.


You seem to be taking this personally, are you from Kentucky or related to Massie?

You're conflating my statement. There was no comparison made or avoided, my point was simple and factual. Massie is largely funded by donations outside of Kentucky. Yes 5% of his donations are local, 95% aren't. My original post still holds true.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Thomas Massie, financed by pro-Islamists outside the state of Kentucky, goes on Tucker's show, who previously denied calling Trump the Antichrist to talk about Epstein water....Maybe it will catch on?



That is a bald-faced lie and a typical example of zionists projecting. Absolutely disgraceful.

The main reason Singer, Adelson and Paulson are throwing millions into a small rural Kentucky district is because a principled local Congressman dared go against AIPAC and criticize Israel, and you know it.


Principled "local" congressman with 95% of his donations from outside Kentucky.


Paul Singer is from NY, John Paulson from Florida, and Miriam Adelson from Nevada.

In 2025, pro-Israel billionaire, Jeff Yass, gave $7.5 million to the Protect Freedom PAC. That PAC then transferred $1 million to the Kentucky First PAC, a new super PAC that ran pro-Massie advertising in his district.

Jeff Yass resides in Pennsylvania.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Thomas Massie, financed by pro-Islamists outside the state of Kentucky, goes on Tucker's show, who previously denied calling Trump the Antichrist to talk about Epstein water....Maybe it will catch on?



That is a bald-faced lie and a typical example of zionists projecting. Absolutely disgraceful.

The main reason Singer, Adelson and Paulson are throwing millions into a small rural Kentucky district is because a principled local Congressman dared go against AIPAC and criticize Israel, and you know it.


Principled "local" congressman with 95% of his donations from outside Kentucky.


Paul Singer is from NY, John Paulson from Florida, and Miriam Adelson from Nevada.

In 2025, pro-Israel billionaire, Jeff Yass, gave $7.5 million to the Protect Freedom PAC. That PAC then transferred $1 million to the Kentucky First PAC, a new super PAC that ran pro-Massie advertising in his district.

Jeff Yass resides in Pennsylvania.


You're willfully misleading here, Protect Freedom PAC is a libertarian, conservative-leaning PAC, not a zionist PAC, with headliners like Ron and Rand Paul.

In fact they are funding candidates who are firmly against the zionist takeover of US foreign policy like Joe Kent and Tom Massie. Jeff Yass is apparently much more of a liberatarian than a zionist.

https://www.protectfreedompac.com/


Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Cal88 said:

Boy oh boy.

Trump vetoed a bill to bring water to Colorado because Rep. Boebert signed to petition to expose the Epstein ring.



Look for Adelson and Singer to throw more millions trying to oust Massie now, can't have that kind of straight talk in their Congress.

Thomas Massie, financed by pro-Islamists outside the state of Kentucky, goes on Tucker's show, who previously denied calling Trump the Antichrist to talk about Epstein water....Maybe it will catch on?



That is a bald-faced lie and a typical example of zionists projecting. Absolutely disgraceful.

The main reason Singer, Adelson and Paulson are throwing millions into a small rural Kentucky district is because a principled local Congressman dared go against AIPAC and criticize Israel, and you know it.


Principled "local" congressman with 95% of his donations from outside Kentucky.


Mostly from first time small donors, average donation around $100. The astroturfed empty suit who they run against Massie got most of his donations from three oligarchs working for a foreign lobby.

This is a prime example of how twisted and disgustingly fake your argumentation is.


You can spin it however you want but my argumentation isn't fake, if it was then you would have refuted it with facts stating otherwise. My post remains true, 95% of his funding is from outside of Kentucky. I said nothing about his opponent, just that it's interesting such a local boy isn't getting much local funding


Keep obfuscating the fact that Massie's astroturfed opponent is funded by three Israel first oligarchs.

Your point above about Massie not getting local funding is also false propaganda, Massie has far broader support within Kentucky than his oligarch funded stand-in:



Thanks, and have a good day.


You seem to be taking this personally, are you from Kentucky or related to Massie?

You're conflating my statement. There was no comparison made or avoided, my point was simple and factual. Massie is largely funded by donations outside of Kentucky. Yes 5% of his donations are local, 95% aren't. My original post still holds true.


I don't take anything from you personally, only understand that your compulsive tendency, with that quip being a prime example, is to annoy people, get under their skin and waste their time doubling down on inane positions like trying to swiftboat Massie as the astroturfed candidate.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Thomas Massie, financed by pro-Islamists outside the state of Kentucky, goes on Tucker's show, who previously denied calling Trump the Antichrist to talk about Epstein water....Maybe it will catch on?



That is a bald-faced lie and a typical example of zionists projecting. Absolutely disgraceful.

The main reason Singer, Adelson and Paulson are throwing millions into a small rural Kentucky district is because a principled local Congressman dared go against AIPAC and criticize Israel, and you know it.


Principled "local" congressman with 95% of his donations from outside Kentucky.


Paul Singer is from NY, John Paulson from Florida, and Miriam Adelson from Nevada.

In 2025, pro-Israel billionaire, Jeff Yass, gave $7.5 million to the Protect Freedom PAC. That PAC then transferred $1 million to the Kentucky First PAC, a new super PAC that ran pro-Massie advertising in his district.

Jeff Yass resides in Pennsylvania.

You're willfully misleading here, Protect Freedom PAC is a libertarian, conservative-leaning PAC, not a zionist PAC, with headliners like Ron and Rand Paul.

In fact they are funding candidates who are firmly against the zionist takeover of US foreign policy like Joe Kent and Tom Massie. Jeff Yass is apparently much more of a liberatarian than a zionist.

So Jeff Yass is a Jew that you like? His Israel-related giving has drawn criticism from progressive and left-leaning groups for things like backing settlement expansion in Israel.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Cal88 said:

Boy oh boy.

Trump vetoed a bill to bring water to Colorado because Rep. Boebert signed to petition to expose the Epstein ring.



Look for Adelson and Singer to throw more millions trying to oust Massie now, can't have that kind of straight talk in their Congress.

Thomas Massie, financed by pro-Islamists outside the state of Kentucky, goes on Tucker's show, who previously denied calling Trump the Antichrist to talk about Epstein water....Maybe it will catch on?



That is a bald-faced lie and a typical example of zionists projecting. Absolutely disgraceful.

The main reason Singer, Adelson and Paulson are throwing millions into a small rural Kentucky district is because a principled local Congressman dared go against AIPAC and criticize Israel, and you know it.


Principled "local" congressman with 95% of his donations from outside Kentucky.


Mostly from first time small donors, average donation around $100. The astroturfed empty suit who they run against Massie got most of his donations from three oligarchs working for a foreign lobby.

This is a prime example of how twisted and disgustingly fake your argumentation is.


You can spin it however you want but my argumentation isn't fake, if it was then you would have refuted it with facts stating otherwise. My post remains true, 95% of his funding is from outside of Kentucky. I said nothing about his opponent, just that it's interesting such a local boy isn't getting much local funding


Keep obfuscating the fact that Massie's astroturfed opponent is funded by three Israel first oligarchs.

Your point above about Massie not getting local funding is also false propaganda, Massie has far broader support within Kentucky than his oligarch funded stand-in:



Thanks, and have a good day.


You seem to be taking this personally, are you from Kentucky or related to Massie?

You're conflating my statement. There was no comparison made or avoided, my point was simple and factual. Massie is largely funded by donations outside of Kentucky. Yes 5% of his donations are local, 95% aren't. My original post still holds true.


I don't take anything from you personally, only understand that your compulsive tendency, with that quip being a prime example, is to annoy people, get under their skin and waste their time doubling down on inane positions like trying to swiftboat Massie as the astroturfed candidate.


We've been asked not to engage with personal attacks so I won't respond to the first part of your post which clearly breaks board rules.

My only point, which I reiterated several times, is that Massie is largely funded by people he doesn't represent. That's been proven. Whatever else you took from what I posted is your own personal feelings, not mine.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:




If he's seen or knows something that isn't public, he should feel free to share it
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In case you havent noticed, he is.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.