Do you see a problem? What should be done?

22,043 Views | 269 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by going4roses
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some 20% of police officers are veterans. The idea that this qualifies one to do police work- indeed they are often given preferences- is part of the problem. Waging war against combatants or occupying a hostile nation is not police work, although that is the mentality often at work here

. The Justice Department and the International Association of Chiefs of Police put out a 2009 guide for police departments to help with their recruitment. The guide warned: "Sustained operations under combat circumstances may cause returning officers to mistakenly blur the lines between military combat situations and civilian crime situations, resulting in inappropriate decisions and actionsparticularly in the use of less lethal or lethal force."

Limited data supports this.

https://www.themarshallproject.org/2017/03/30/when-warriors-put-on-the-badge
GBear4Life
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

It seems like somewhere along the way, we started training cops to primarily look out for their own safety.
This has always been the case. And nobody should ask law enforcement to put the lives of a suspect before their own (assuming they're a reasonable threat)
GBear4Life
How long do you want to ignore this user?
resisting arrest, or not surrendering to an officer who by definition is armed with a weapon and backed by the powers of the U.S. government, is the most fascinating phenomena given its relative stupidity and high risk zero reward dynamic. Murder in the heat of passion I detest but understand. I don't understand committing suicide, so to speak, and pretending that you didn't.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GBear4Life said:

sycasey said:

It seems like somewhere along the way, we started training cops to primarily look out for their own safety.
This has always been the case. And nobody should ask law enforcement to put the lives of a suspect before their own (assuming they're a reasonable threat)

Who's talking about before? How about equally? Especially if you're not sure the "suspect" actually did anything.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?

okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:



Reminds me of this:


going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
law enforcement officers qualifications should be to have a 4 year degree
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
GBear4Life
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

law enforcement officers qualifications should be to have a 4 year degree
lol 911 dispatchers won't have anybody to dispatch out to the scene.

A 4 yr degree would be about as useless a gatekeeper to LE as it gets.
GBear4Life
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:


this is so dumb. A high number of police present to apprehend a suspect decreases the likelihood of lethal force having to be used.

Anybody know what he was suspected of, and what was it based on? That would be useful as to determining the merit of how that arrest was handled. As opposed to proclaiming the militarization of police, a ridiculous term whose meaning has been rendered absolutely meaningless.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GBear4Life said:

going4roses said:


this is so dumb. A high number of police present to apprehend a suspect decreases the likelihood of lethal force having to be used.

Anybody know what he was suspected of, and what was it based on? That would be useful as to determining the merit of how that arrest was handled. As opposed to proclaiming the militarization of police, a ridiculous term whose meaning has been rendered absolutely meaningless.

I agree. I see no problem with usiing all those officers and throwing down a guy who clearly surrendered to the ground for fare evasion.

We need to scare people from evading the fare.


going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In 2015 about 70% of people jumping turnstiles were given summonses, 30% were arrested. 92% of those arrested for jumping turnstiles in 2015 were people of color https://nydailynews.com/new-york/nypd-arrests-people-color-fare-beating-stats-article-1.2528320 "Only recidivists, including chronic fare evaders, wind up arrested." Unless you're black.
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
Another Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

law enforcement officers qualifications should be to have a 4 year degree
Any education would a good requirement. I'm also for standardized licenses backed by bond and insurance, and continued education requirements. This helps the cops but also if a cop does something illegal the license can be revoked. Bond and insurance could be used for victims.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/2480305001?__twitter_impression=true
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whoa
What would be fair and just punishment for the cops and the DA ?
Fair compensation for the repo driver ?

Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/11/12/editorial-california-must-stop-coddling-guilty-police-officers/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
GBear4Life
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

law enforcement officers qualifications should be to have a 4 year degree
you'd be shocked to learn that's not the answer to EVERYTHING (or even most things)
GBear4Life
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo said:

going4roses said:



Reminds me of this:



Was the point of that video to show an example of LE human error? It implies there is some malevolent motivating factor there, which of course the media ate up with a spoon.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GBear4Life said:

okaydo said:

going4roses said:



Reminds me of this:



Was the point of that video to show an example of LE human error? It implies there is some malevolent motivating factor there, which of course the media ate up with a spoon.

I agree. Law enforcement should beat the sh*t out of anybody who isn't being aggressive to them, even your mom.
GBear4Life
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo said:




I agree. Law enforcement should beat the sh*t out of anybody who isn't being aggressive to them, even your mom.
So police should do their best to avoid apprehending the wrong guy?

HOW NOVEL OF YOU.

But you're not pointing that out, you're using an instance of human error to craft a narrative as a form of self-affirmation. Weak stuff.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://reason.com/2016/05/04/little-girl-detained-by-police-after-try/?amp&__twitter_impression=true

Don't know if this one is true ....

What's a good fact checking websites
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbearinamaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

https://reason.com/2016/05/04/little-girl-detained-by-police-after-try/?amp&__twitter_impression=true

Don't know if this one is true ....

What's a good fact checking websites
bearinsider.com
If you believe in forever
Then life is just a one-night stand
If there's a rock and roll heaven
Well you know they've got a hell of a band
Another Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:


Jesus Fccking Christ. Well his shirt is brown or close.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GBear4Life said:

okaydo said:




I agree. Law enforcement should beat the sh*t out of anybody who isn't being aggressive to them, even your mom.
So police should do their best to avoid apprehending the wrong guy?

HOW NOVEL OF YOU.

But you're not pointing that out, you're using an instance of human error to craft a narrative as a form of self-affirmation. Weak stuff.

No, the police shouldn't initiate violence. Period.

You think that's fine, but you're thinking is dumb.

It's costly and it makes the community less trustful of police, which will lead to less cooperation.

going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
230 million /6,700+ cases but how many more cases weren't resolved. Seems like any self described conservative would be livid at that amount of wasted money. Not to mention other costs. With that amount of cases there are a lot of bad cops.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2019/11/14/mta-will-spend-249m-on-new-cops-to-save-200m-on-fare-evasion/

???
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Why are police departments incubators for racist/ws?
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Sicking.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If there is no equity in justice...

oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

If there is no equity in justice...


What did the cops do wrong here, exactly?
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Out of control sissy's throwing punches on children? Is that ok ? History... optics = not a good look
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To put your statement into English, you are saying the following:

1) The cops are out of control

No, they are not.

2) The cops are sissies

No, they are not.

3) The cops punched children

No, they did not, unless you are simply stating that the perpetrators are not legal adults, which is correct but completely fails in this context.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you cant control yourself and throw punches like you are in fight club your a sissy. Using a badge to be a bully is weak
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.