blungld said:
bearlyamazing said:
You don't have to take my word for it. The corruption is being slowly unraveled with actual investigative documentation that will be coming out in the coming months that no one will be able to talk and obfuscate their way around. Oh, you and they will try but it won't work this time.
Will this be one of the sections of this coming bombshell report? Is this "actual" investigation or is this fake? Once Barr doctors it or calls it into question will it THEN become real?
No evidence
Wishful thinking on the part of the leftist WaPo. Zero chance Durham finds, as WaPo's headline reads: "Barr's handpicked prosecutor tells inspector general he can't back right-wing theory that Russia case was U.S. intelligence setup."
The story also said this:
"The draft, though, is not final. The inspector general has yet to release any conclusions, and The Washington Post has not reviewed Horowitz's entire report, even in draft form. It is also unclear whether Durham has shared the entirety of his findings and evidence with the inspector general or merely answered a specific question."
Tell me the truth: You and all the other tin foil hat accusers don't even know most of the players in this story beyond Papadapoulos and Page, do you? Mifsud? Halper? Azra Turk? Glenn Simpson? Svetlana Lokhova? Olga Veselnetskaya? Brennan's role and how he got the whole thing started with his briefings with Obama and retired senator Harry Reid? How the Comey meeting with Trump talking only about the "salacious details" like the golden showers crap and nothing else was used as a predicate for BuzzFeed to release the sham dossier, etc? These are all open facts and players, not denied by even the democrats. The rest of the details are in dispute but it's all unraveling for the dirty players, day by day. And unless you've followed the case in detail, either from the left's side, the right, or both, casting lame aspersions with tin foil hat memes is beyond lame and intellectually dishonest.
The Horowitz Report probably won't be a big deal. It will likely point to wrongdoing, as his earlier report did that recommended Comey for prosecution for his leak. But it will probably be inconclusive on if there was an adequate predication for the FBI investigation, largely because the scope of an IG inquiry is limited in a way that Durham's and Barr's isn't. That's the nature of IG reports. They can't investigate the CIA, either, and Brennan's role is central to this whole setup sham.
Rest assured, Barr and Durham won't leave out the CIA's role. And the accusation of Barr "doctoring" results is laughable. He'd spend the rest of his life in prison if he tried to pull that nonsense.