You mean, we might be in a different situation now, with a vaccine rolling out, than we were 9 months ago? What a shocking scandal!hanky1 said:
Well well well. Watch the media and liberals praise Cuomo for this comment from now until the end of time. By the way...it's the same thing I've been saying for 9 months that you guys bash me about. 'But but but what about my grandma'?!?!?
sycasey said:You mean, we might be in a different situation now, with a vaccine rolling out, than we were 9 months ago? What a shocking scandal!hanky1 said:
Well well well. Watch the media and liberals praise Cuomo for this comment from now until the end of time. By the way...it's the same thing I've been saying for 9 months that you guys bash me about. 'But but but what about my grandma'?!?!?
Covid is raging because too many people refused to lockdown when asked, wear masks when asked, or forgo Holiday celebrations when asked.hanky1 said:sycasey said:You mean, we might be in a different situation now, with a vaccine rolling out, than we were 9 months ago? What a shocking scandal!hanky1 said:
Well well well. Watch the media and liberals praise Cuomo for this comment from now until the end of time. By the way...it's the same thing I've been saying for 9 months that you guys bash me about. 'But but but what about my grandma'?!?!?
This is what we should've been doing the ENTIRE time. There is nothing different now vs 9 months ago except liberals have finally noticed all the livelihoods they've destroyed for zero benefit: seriously what did the lockdown accomplishment? Nothing. COVID is still raging AND small businesses are ruined.
Nice job liberals.
hanky1 said:
There is nothing different now vs 9 months ago
The sad thing about you advancing this idiotic argument is that there is some stuff going on right now that you could LEGITIMATELY drag Cuomo and some other liberal governors for, which is an unacceptably slow rollout of the vaccine, in part thanks to overly bureaucratic rules about how it's distributed. Cuomo and New York are perhaps the poster child for this.hanky1 said:sycasey said:You mean, we might be in a different situation now, with a vaccine rolling out, than we were 9 months ago? What a shocking scandal!hanky1 said:
Well well well. Watch the media and liberals praise Cuomo for this comment from now until the end of time. By the way...it's the same thing I've been saying for 9 months that you guys bash me about. 'But but but what about my grandma'?!?!?
This is what we should've been doing the ENTIRE time. There is nothing different now vs 9 months ago except liberals have finally noticed all the livelihoods they've destroyed for zero benefit: seriously what did the lockdown accomplishment? Nothing. COVID is still raging AND small businesses are ruined.
Nice job liberals.
Except for mortuaries have a backlog, the morgues are filled and have no space for the bodies, hospitals are having to rent refrigeration trucks, the bodies have to stacked so the oldest are on the top and not on the bottom, and the staff is just worn out. This is the reality that the cavalier and ignorant don't get to see. You can't benefit from or enjoy the economy if you are not around or people keep dying.hanky1 said:The election's over.BearForce2 said:
No need to destroy the economy and ruin people's lives anymore to win an election.
I don't think that's even it. It seems more like they want an internet participation trophy. I blame their parents.Unit2Sucks said:
Cuomo sucks but also lol @hanky1 pretending like people like him wanted to do anything "smartly." Far too many just want everything open and without any social distancing or other precautions.
Are you still cheerleading for tRump?LMK5 said:
Interesting article detailing a study from the European Journal of Clinical Investigation that shows that lockdowns aren't very effective: https://www.newsweek.com/covid-lockdowns-have-no-clear-benefit-vs-other-voluntary-measures-international-study-shows-1561656
Would this study have been able to be released before Biden won?
BearChemist said:
I don't know. Would Tyler Swift dated me if your stupid post didn't exist?
BearChemist said:
I don't know. Would Tyler Swift dated me if your stupid post didn't exist?
LMK5 said:
Interesting article detailing a study from the European Journal of Clinical Investigation that shows that lockdowns aren't very effective: https://www.newsweek.com/covid-lockdowns-have-no-clear-benefit-vs-other-voluntary-measures-international-study-shows-1561656
Would this study have been able to be released before Biden won?
AunBear89 said:
LMK5 said:
Interesting article detailing a study from the European Journal of Clinical Investigation that shows that lockdowns aren't very effective: https://www.newsweek.com/covid-lockdowns-have-no-clear-benefit-vs-other-voluntary-measures-international-study-shows-1561656
Would this study have been able to be released before Biden won?
The real problem is that you won't criticize any public health measures, even if science refutes them. You give politicians way too much rope that they haven't earned. I'm confident one day you'll wake up. California's so-called public health measures, the strictest in the nation, have resulted in our state being the epicenter of Covid in America. We're also in the caboose as far as vaccine administration. We'll wait patiently for your thorough explanation of the situation which I'm sure includes glowing praise for our state government.Unit2Sucks said:LMK5 said:
Interesting article detailing a study from the European Journal of Clinical Investigation that shows that lockdowns aren't very effective: https://www.newsweek.com/covid-lockdowns-have-no-clear-benefit-vs-other-voluntary-measures-international-study-shows-1561656
Would this study have been able to be released before Biden won?
Even by your usually low standards this is an idiotic question.
By the way, the "voluntary" measures cited are considered too stringent for many of the "reasonable and intelligent people" that you love to talk about. But that didn't factor into your decision to post since, like hanky, you will post any article that makes any statement that criticizes any public health measures.
LMK5 said:The real problem is that you won't criticize any public health measures, even if science refutes them. You give politicians way too much rope that they haven't earned. I'm confident one day you'll wake up. California's so-called public health measures, the strictest in the nation, have resulted in our state being the epicenter of Covid in America. We're also in the caboose as far as vaccine administration. We'll wait patiently for your thorough explanation of the situation which I'm sure includes glowing praise for our state government.Unit2Sucks said:LMK5 said:
Interesting article detailing a study from the European Journal of Clinical Investigation that shows that lockdowns aren't very effective: https://www.newsweek.com/covid-lockdowns-have-no-clear-benefit-vs-other-voluntary-measures-international-study-shows-1561656
Would this study have been able to be released before Biden won?
Even by your usually low standards this is an idiotic question.
By the way, the "voluntary" measures cited are considered too stringent for many of the "reasonable and intelligent people" that you love to talk about. But that didn't factor into your decision to post since, like hanky, you will post any article that makes any statement that criticizes any public health measures.
B.A. Bearacus said:LMK5 said:The real problem is that you won't criticize any public health measures, even if science refutes them. You give politicians way too much rope that they haven't earned. I'm confident one day you'll wake up. California's so-called public health measures, the strictest in the nation, have resulted in our state being the epicenter of Covid in America. We're also in the caboose as far as vaccine administration. We'll wait patiently for your thorough explanation of the situation which I'm sure includes glowing praise for our state government.Unit2Sucks said:LMK5 said:
Interesting article detailing a study from the European Journal of Clinical Investigation that shows that lockdowns aren't very effective: https://www.newsweek.com/covid-lockdowns-have-no-clear-benefit-vs-other-voluntary-measures-international-study-shows-1561656
Would this study have been able to be released before Biden won?
Even by your usually low standards this is an idiotic question.
By the way, the "voluntary" measures cited are considered too stringent for many of the "reasonable and intelligent people" that you love to talk about. But that didn't factor into your decision to post since, like hanky, you will post any article that makes any statement that criticizes any public health measures.
Please tell me that you understand what population means. CA is 25th in Covid cases per 100K people.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1109004/coronavirus-covid19-cases-rate-us-americans-by-state/
B.A., you're looking at cumulative data from the beginning of the pandemic till now. Since about November, California has become "the epicenter of Covid in America" as coined by NBC News and others. This is because of our recent infection rates, not our overall rate: https://calmatters.org/commentary/2021/01/california-covid-19-infections-deaths-surge-epicenter/B.A. Bearacus said:LMK5 said:The real problem is that you won't criticize any public health measures, even if science refutes them. You give politicians way too much rope that they haven't earned. I'm confident one day you'll wake up. California's so-called public health measures, the strictest in the nation, have resulted in our state being the epicenter of Covid in America. We're also in the caboose as far as vaccine administration. We'll wait patiently for your thorough explanation of the situation which I'm sure includes glowing praise for our state government.Unit2Sucks said:LMK5 said:
Interesting article detailing a study from the European Journal of Clinical Investigation that shows that lockdowns aren't very effective: https://www.newsweek.com/covid-lockdowns-have-no-clear-benefit-vs-other-voluntary-measures-international-study-shows-1561656
Would this study have been able to be released before Biden won?
Even by your usually low standards this is an idiotic question.
By the way, the "voluntary" measures cited are considered too stringent for many of the "reasonable and intelligent people" that you love to talk about. But that didn't factor into your decision to post since, like hanky, you will post any article that makes any statement that criticizes any public health measures.
Please tell me that you understand what population means. CA is 25th in Covid cases per 100K people.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1109004/coronavirus-covid19-cases-rate-us-americans-by-state/
LMK5 said:The real problem is that you won't criticize any public health measures, even if science refutes them. You give politicians way too much rope that they haven't earned. I'm confident one day you'll wake up. California's so-called public health measures, the strictest in the nation, have resulted in our state being the epicenter of Covid in America. We're also in the caboose as far as vaccine administration. We'll wait patiently for your thorough explanation of the situation which I'm sure includes glowing praise for our state government.Unit2Sucks said:LMK5 said:
Interesting article detailing a study from the European Journal of Clinical Investigation that shows that lockdowns aren't very effective: https://www.newsweek.com/covid-lockdowns-have-no-clear-benefit-vs-other-voluntary-measures-international-study-shows-1561656
Would this study have been able to be released before Biden won?
Even by your usually low standards this is an idiotic question.
By the way, the "voluntary" measures cited are considered too stringent for many of the "reasonable and intelligent people" that you love to talk about. But that didn't factor into your decision to post since, like hanky, you will post any article that makes any statement that criticizes any public health measures.
LMK5 is a broken record that repeats the same right wing crap over and over. He supports incompetent politicians like tRump, little Marco Rubio, and DeSantis, politicians that could not give a rats ass about the general public and only care about enriching themselves. Unit2Sucks you are way more patient than I am dealing with this idiot.Unit2Sucks said:LMK5 said:The real problem is that you won't criticize any public health measures, even if science refutes them. You give politicians way too much rope that they haven't earned. I'm confident one day you'll wake up. California's so-called public health measures, the strictest in the nation, have resulted in our state being the epicenter of Covid in America. We're also in the caboose as far as vaccine administration. We'll wait patiently for your thorough explanation of the situation which I'm sure includes glowing praise for our state government.Unit2Sucks said:LMK5 said:
Interesting article detailing a study from the European Journal of Clinical Investigation that shows that lockdowns aren't very effective: https://www.newsweek.com/covid-lockdowns-have-no-clear-benefit-vs-other-voluntary-measures-international-study-shows-1561656
Would this study have been able to be released before Biden won?
Even by your usually low standards this is an idiotic question.
By the way, the "voluntary" measures cited are considered too stringent for many of the "reasonable and intelligent people" that you love to talk about. But that didn't factor into your decision to post since, like hanky, you will post any article that makes any statement that criticizes any public health measures.
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about and the more you post on this topic the more obvious that becomes.
So the real problem is that Unit2Sucks won't criticize Newsom? Is that why SoCal has a raging COVID problem whereas my city and region is doing comparatively quite well? If you look at my posting history instead of relying on your foggy comprehension, you will see that I regularly criticize all manner of politicians. I criticized Newsom when he ate at TFL and I believe he was weak to cave to the SoCal anti public health brigadiers this summer. Unfortunately, Newsom and public health officials can't save SoCal from themselves.
Unfortunately you don't appear to process any of this information so you conclude that public health measures are ineffective because SoCal can't follow the rules. Maybe if you saw how successful places that follow the rules are, you would feel differently? Who am I kidding, you know the answer without even looking at the problem.