What political opposition?OaktownBear said:I'll pose an additional question. With red states getting slammed with new cases, will political opposition to wearing masks go down on November 4?blungld said:
Like Trump himself, it has become a pattern with right media and posters to pronounce antagonistic one-liners that either just dissipate with time or become replaced by the next talking point when the first is shown to be either a lie or falsehood. Just move onto the next smug signal of tribalism without ever acknowledging they were wrong. No introspection about why their information sources are incorrect so often or why they repeat inaccurate information.
So, I'd like to revisit one of these mantras and NOT have it just slip away. For the past six months many posters here backed the president's claim that COVID was no worse than the flu, was essentially a hoax or political act by Dems to take down the president, and the specific proof of this was that COVID would disappear on Nov 4th.
Now that we are close to that date, who is willing to clearly make that assertion now and then return to this thread after the election and say either "I told you so" or "I was wrong"?
I will go one better. I will say on record that COVID will not disappear on Nov 4th, that it will get worse after Nov 4th, that the lame duck Trump will do very little to combat the virus, and that the transitional Congress and President-elect will start to take clear and decisive action at the Federal level to help flatten the curve of this non-hoax worse than the flu disease. Oh, and the economy and our "freedoms" will take a temporary hit as we Americans finally act responsibly with a national coordinated response owing to having to clean up Trump's mess and Biden will be attacked for doing the right and necessary short term things that will lead us to faster recovery long term. Grown ups are about to be in charge again, and maybe we will all take some pride in civic responsibility and caring for one another?
Exactly.Bear With Me said:What political opposition?OaktownBear said:I'll pose an additional question. With red states getting slammed with new cases, will political opposition to wearing masks go down on November 4?blungld said:
Like Trump himself, it has become a pattern with right media and posters to pronounce antagonistic one-liners that either just dissipate with time or become replaced by the next talking point when the first is shown to be either a lie or falsehood. Just move onto the next smug signal of tribalism without ever acknowledging they were wrong. No introspection about why their information sources are incorrect so often or why they repeat inaccurate information.
So, I'd like to revisit one of these mantras and NOT have it just slip away. For the past six months many posters here backed the president's claim that COVID was no worse than the flu, was essentially a hoax or political act by Dems to take down the president, and the specific proof of this was that COVID would disappear on Nov 4th.
Now that we are close to that date, who is willing to clearly make that assertion now and then return to this thread after the election and say either "I told you so" or "I was wrong"?
I will go one better. I will say on record that COVID will not disappear on Nov 4th, that it will get worse after Nov 4th, that the lame duck Trump will do very little to combat the virus, and that the transitional Congress and President-elect will start to take clear and decisive action at the Federal level to help flatten the curve of this non-hoax worse than the flu disease. Oh, and the economy and our "freedoms" will take a temporary hit as we Americans finally act responsibly with a national coordinated response owing to having to clean up Trump's mess and Biden will be attacked for doing the right and necessary short term things that will lead us to faster recovery long term. Grown ups are about to be in charge again, and maybe we will all take some pride in civic responsibility and caring for one another?
That's what I figured.OaktownBear said:Exactly.Bear With Me said:What political opposition?OaktownBear said:I'll pose an additional question. With red states getting slammed with new cases, will political opposition to wearing masks go down on November 4?blungld said:
Like Trump himself, it has become a pattern with right media and posters to pronounce antagonistic one-liners that either just dissipate with time or become replaced by the next talking point when the first is shown to be either a lie or falsehood. Just move onto the next smug signal of tribalism without ever acknowledging they were wrong. No introspection about why their information sources are incorrect so often or why they repeat inaccurate information.
So, I'd like to revisit one of these mantras and NOT have it just slip away. For the past six months many posters here backed the president's claim that COVID was no worse than the flu, was essentially a hoax or political act by Dems to take down the president, and the specific proof of this was that COVID would disappear on Nov 4th.
Now that we are close to that date, who is willing to clearly make that assertion now and then return to this thread after the election and say either "I told you so" or "I was wrong"?
I will go one better. I will say on record that COVID will not disappear on Nov 4th, that it will get worse after Nov 4th, that the lame duck Trump will do very little to combat the virus, and that the transitional Congress and President-elect will start to take clear and decisive action at the Federal level to help flatten the curve of this non-hoax worse than the flu disease. Oh, and the economy and our "freedoms" will take a temporary hit as we Americans finally act responsibly with a national coordinated response owing to having to clean up Trump's mess and Biden will be attacked for doing the right and necessary short term things that will lead us to faster recovery long term. Grown ups are about to be in charge again, and maybe we will all take some pride in civic responsibility and caring for one another?
Title: Idaho has deadliest day yet and reports second-most COVID-19 cases in single dayUnit2Sucks said:
1/3 of a million infected and 4k dead since Tuesday. Sure we're rounding the corner and it will be gone on Tuesday. I get that there are a bunch of Trump dead enders, but are people really that obtuse to what is happening out there?
peer pressure sucks, big time {copyright BB}AunBear89 said:
Because dipshyte morons like you refuse to wear masks, or wear them on your chin. Masks work when everyone wears one correctly, practices social distancing, and washes their hands thoroughly and regularly. Are YOU doing any of that?
I love it when people ask a question, give the answer, and then say you can't use that answer.LMK5 said:
Cases up in America and Europe--simultaneously. Figure that one out. Cases up in ... wait for it ... Iceland! Masks don't seem to be as effective as some thought. If they were, why would we have more daily cases than way back in the pre-mask-wearing days? Don't say it's due to more testing because when Trump says that it gets shot down by the experts.
The virus will continue to do what it wants: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/30/coronavirus-strain-from-spain-accounts-for-most-uk-cases-study
BearNIt said:
80,000 new cases in the last 24 hours which is another new record. With more positive cases comes more hospitalizations which leads to more deaths. 1000 Americans died yesterday and Captain Catastrophe says we are rounding the corner, BULLSHYTE!
I have been tested twice and luckily I have been negative both times. Being tested takes a toll on you and your family as you wait for your results.
Maybe if your buddy Trump spent half as much time trying to defeat COVID as he does manufacturing dirt on Hunter Biden and forcing federal agencies to use taxpayer dollars to produce Leni Riefensthal-esque campaign propaganda we wouldn't be in such bad shape.LMK5 said:
Cases up in America and Europe--simultaneously. Figure that one out. Cases up in ... wait for it ... Iceland! Masks don't seem to be as effective as some thought. If they were, why would we have more daily cases than way back in the pre-mask-wearing days? Don't say it's due to more testing because when Trump says that it gets shot down by the experts.
The virus will continue to do what it wants: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/30/coronavirus-strain-from-spain-accounts-for-most-uk-cases-study
AunBear89 said:
Because dipshyte morons like you refuse to wear masks, or wear them on your chin. Masks work when everyone wears one correctly, practices social distancing, and washes their hands thoroughly and regularly. Are YOU doing any of that?
dimitrig said:AunBear89 said:
Because dipshyte morons like you refuse to wear masks, or wear them on your chin. Masks work when everyone wears one correctly, practices social distancing, and washes their hands thoroughly and regularly. Are YOU doing any of that?
Also, people are out and about a lot more now. Malls are open. Restaurants are open. My employer is talking about bringing back some of the remote workforce (volunteers only) in November. Judging by the traffic on the freeway, lots of other people are back at work. Plus, kids are back in school, too. It's not surprising that cases would be rising right now.
What I find surprising is how many people are still wearing cotton masks when good quality KN95 masks are now in plentiful supply. Also, I carry hand sanitizer everywhere I go (always have) but lots of people don't and they are touching everything (like doorknobs) and then pulling down their masks to, say, eat or even just to readjust them. The mask is less effective if you are covering it in germs from your hands.
I would also think by now a lot more retailers and employers would be doing temperature checks. My own employer asks us to self-certify that we don't have a fever. Visitors do get their temperature checked. I don't understand why they don't just check everyone's temperature. I have been to a couple of stores which were VERY serious about limiting the number of people inside and checking everyone's temperature upon entrance, but that's rare. I would have thought that would be more common by now.
I'm not talking about politics. I'm wearing a mask as we speak. Mask wearing is widespread. For instance, here in California there isn't a facility you can walk in to without wearing a mask, yet, our cases are rising. In the US, the vast majority in our largest population centers are wearing masks, yet those cases are also up. My niece lives in the UK where restrictions are tight, yet, cases are up. How are cases going up in the US and Europe simultaneously? It used to be that a wave hit in one place then made its way to the other.OaktownBear said:I love it when people ask a question, give the answer, and then say you can't use that answer.LMK5 said:
Cases up in America and Europe--simultaneously. Figure that one out. Cases up in ... wait for it ... Iceland! Masks don't seem to be as effective as some thought. If they were, why would we have more daily cases than way back in the pre-mask-wearing days? Don't say it's due to more testing because when Trump says that it gets shot down by the experts.
The virus will continue to do what it wants: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/30/coronavirus-strain-from-spain-accounts-for-most-uk-cases-study
C'mon man. I've seen your posting. You are a lot smarter than this.
The science behind mask wearing has been clear since April.
Cases have always been a problematic number because of the difference in detecting those cases. We know we had a lot more cases in March, April and May than we were finding because back then you pretty much only got a test if you were in the hospital.
Yes, the numbers are up because testing is up. Your "Don't say.." comment is deliberately obtuse.
1. No one ever took issue with Trump's premise that when you test more you find more cases. They took major issue with the fact that his conclusion from that was that you should test less so your numbers don't look as bad. That doesn't help our ability to respond. It hurts it. If the point is trying to make Trump look better, testing less may do that. If the point is trying to save lives, it most certainly won't.
2. The increase in testing has been used by some to completely explain the entire increase in cases. It does not do that. It does explain a good chunk of it. It does not explain all of it, and the death rates that followed demonstrated that.
Deaths is the key indicator. It lags, but it is going up significantly in Europe and is starting to rise again here. Of course since ours never went down to nearly the levels in Europe, we are still "winning".
Europe has been a lot more lax as their months with low numbers went on. They are now trying to bring back measures to halt the spread.
Wearing masks is an effing easy thing to do and it is an extremely obvious, successful method to slow transmission of the virus. It doesn't eliminate transmission.
Making this a political issue is just wrong.
Case numbers rising in spite of masks IS NOT PROOF that mask wearing is ineffective. No one said that masks could 100% prevent disease spread. To prove your thesis you would have to show that COVID spreads the same way in places where the only variable is masks vs. no masks.LMK5 said:Mask wearing is widespread. For instance, here in California there isn't a facility you can walk in to without wearing a mask, yet, our cases are rising. In the US, the vast majority in our largest population centers are wearing masks, yet those cases are also up. My niece lives in the UK where restrictions are tight, yet, cases are up. How are cases going up in the US and Europe simultaneously? It used to be that a wave hit in one place then made its way to the other.OaktownBear said:I love it when people ask a question, give the answer, and then say you can't use that answer.LMK5 said:
Cases up in America and Europe--simultaneously. Figure that one out. Cases up in ... wait for it ... Iceland! Masks don't seem to be as effective as some thought. If they were, why would we have more daily cases than way back in the pre-mask-wearing days? Don't say it's due to more testing because when Trump says that it gets shot down by the experts.
The virus will continue to do what it wants: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/30/coronavirus-strain-from-spain-accounts-for-most-uk-cases-study
C'mon man. I've seen your posting. You are a lot smarter than this.
The science behind mask wearing has been clear since April.
Cases have always been a problematic number because of the difference in detecting those cases. We know we had a lot more cases in March, April and May than we were finding because back then you pretty much only got a test if you were in the hospital.
Yes, the numbers are up because testing is up. Your "Don't say.." comment is deliberately obtuse.
1. No one ever took issue with Trump's premise that when you test more you find more cases. They took major issue with the fact that his conclusion from that was that you should test less so your numbers don't look as bad. That doesn't help our ability to respond. It hurts it. If the point is trying to make Trump look better, testing less may do that. If the point is trying to save lives, it most certainly won't.
2. The increase in testing has been used by some to completely explain the entire increase in cases. It does not do that. It does explain a good chunk of it. It does not explain all of it, and the death rates that followed demonstrated that.
Deaths is the key indicator. It lags, but it is going up significantly in Europe and is starting to rise again here. Of course since ours never went down to nearly the levels in Europe, we are still "winning".
Europe has been a lot more lax as their months with low numbers went on. They are now trying to bring back measures to halt the spread.
Wearing masks is an effing easy thing to do and it is an extremely obvious, successful method to slow transmission of the virus. It doesn't eliminate transmission.
Making this a political issue is just wrong.
Mask wearing and social distancing don't seem to be as effective as we'd hoped. These are the same methods used in 1918. I haven't heard any good reason why we'd have the kind of new case numbers we are having along with Europe except for the following article. The virus mutates, then spreads anew: https://metro.co.uk/2020/10/30/covid-strain-from-spanish-farm-workers-now-accounts-for-most-uk-cases-13505716/
sycasey said:
Case numbers rising in spite of masks IS NOT PROOF that mask wearing is ineffective. No one said that masks could 100% prevent disease spread. To prove your thesis you would have to show that COVID spreads the same way in places where the only variable is masks vs. no masks.
w/special exception for ageless Dr Whobearister said:
My Mom told me to never buy anything that a man in a bow tie is selling.
Obviously the deep state is involved. Why else would the virus be flourishing in states with lower mask compliance?sycasey said:Case numbers rising in spite of masks IS NOT PROOF that mask wearing is ineffective. No one said that masks could 100% prevent disease spread. To prove your thesis you would have to show that COVID spreads the same way in places where the only variable is masks vs. no masks.LMK5 said:Mask wearing is widespread. For instance, here in California there isn't a facility you can walk in to without wearing a mask, yet, our cases are rising. In the US, the vast majority in our largest population centers are wearing masks, yet those cases are also up. My niece lives in the UK where restrictions are tight, yet, cases are up. How are cases going up in the US and Europe simultaneously? It used to be that a wave hit in one place then made its way to the other.OaktownBear said:I love it when people ask a question, give the answer, and then say you can't use that answer.LMK5 said:
Cases up in America and Europe--simultaneously. Figure that one out. Cases up in ... wait for it ... Iceland! Masks don't seem to be as effective as some thought. If they were, why would we have more daily cases than way back in the pre-mask-wearing days? Don't say it's due to more testing because when Trump says that it gets shot down by the experts.
The virus will continue to do what it wants: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/30/coronavirus-strain-from-spain-accounts-for-most-uk-cases-study
C'mon man. I've seen your posting. You are a lot smarter than this.
The science behind mask wearing has been clear since April.
Cases have always been a problematic number because of the difference in detecting those cases. We know we had a lot more cases in March, April and May than we were finding because back then you pretty much only got a test if you were in the hospital.
Yes, the numbers are up because testing is up. Your "Don't say.." comment is deliberately obtuse.
1. No one ever took issue with Trump's premise that when you test more you find more cases. They took major issue with the fact that his conclusion from that was that you should test less so your numbers don't look as bad. That doesn't help our ability to respond. It hurts it. If the point is trying to make Trump look better, testing less may do that. If the point is trying to save lives, it most certainly won't.
2. The increase in testing has been used by some to completely explain the entire increase in cases. It does not do that. It does explain a good chunk of it. It does not explain all of it, and the death rates that followed demonstrated that.
Deaths is the key indicator. It lags, but it is going up significantly in Europe and is starting to rise again here. Of course since ours never went down to nearly the levels in Europe, we are still "winning".
Europe has been a lot more lax as their months with low numbers went on. They are now trying to bring back measures to halt the spread.
Wearing masks is an effing easy thing to do and it is an extremely obvious, successful method to slow transmission of the virus. It doesn't eliminate transmission.
Making this a political issue is just wrong.
Mask wearing and social distancing don't seem to be as effective as we'd hoped. These are the same methods used in 1918. I haven't heard any good reason why we'd have the kind of new case numbers we are having along with Europe except for the following article. The virus mutates, then spreads anew: https://metro.co.uk/2020/10/30/covid-strain-from-spanish-farm-workers-now-accounts-for-most-uk-cases-13505716/
Yeah, but the Doctor can pull off a fez also, so he can do anything.smh said:w/special exception for ageless Dr Whobearister said:
My Mom told me to never buy anything that a man in a bow tie is selling.
^ skeptical Companion is sweet Amelia Pond
The stupidity of being in a crowded indoor environment pretty much counteracts the effectiveness of wearing a mask in any case.Anarchistbear said:
Europe opened earlier. In a way that was smarter because a lot of riskier activities were outdoors- drinking, eating, etc plus people spent more time outdoors. People also became complacent. Then it became colder and more bars, etc moved indoors as did people where things were riskier. If you are in a bar or club indoors after midnight chances are masks are not what is on your mind. You are likely yelling, laughing, spitting and trying to $uck someone.
Cases are rising slower in California than in most other states and frankly, Northern California is still way below the rest of the country despite having the first known death.LMK5 said:I'm not talking about politics. I'm wearing a mask as we speak. Mask wearing is widespread. For instance, here in California there isn't a facility you can walk in to without wearing a mask, yet, our cases are rising. In the US, the vast majority in our largest population centers are wearing masks, yet those cases are also up. My niece lives in the UK where restrictions are tight, yet, cases are up. How are cases going up in the US and Europe simultaneously? It used to be that a wave hit in one place then made its way to the other.OaktownBear said:I love it when people ask a question, give the answer, and then say you can't use that answer.LMK5 said:
Cases up in America and Europe--simultaneously. Figure that one out. Cases up in ... wait for it ... Iceland! Masks don't seem to be as effective as some thought. If they were, why would we have more daily cases than way back in the pre-mask-wearing days? Don't say it's due to more testing because when Trump says that it gets shot down by the experts.
The virus will continue to do what it wants: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/30/coronavirus-strain-from-spain-accounts-for-most-uk-cases-study
C'mon man. I've seen your posting. You are a lot smarter than this.
The science behind mask wearing has been clear since April.
Cases have always been a problematic number because of the difference in detecting those cases. We know we had a lot more cases in March, April and May than we were finding because back then you pretty much only got a test if you were in the hospital.
Yes, the numbers are up because testing is up. Your "Don't say.." comment is deliberately obtuse.
1. No one ever took issue with Trump's premise that when you test more you find more cases. They took major issue with the fact that his conclusion from that was that you should test less so your numbers don't look as bad. That doesn't help our ability to respond. It hurts it. If the point is trying to make Trump look better, testing less may do that. If the point is trying to save lives, it most certainly won't.
2. The increase in testing has been used by some to completely explain the entire increase in cases. It does not do that. It does explain a good chunk of it. It does not explain all of it, and the death rates that followed demonstrated that.
Deaths is the key indicator. It lags, but it is going up significantly in Europe and is starting to rise again here. Of course since ours never went down to nearly the levels in Europe, we are still "winning".
Europe has been a lot more lax as their months with low numbers went on. They are now trying to bring back measures to halt the spread.
Wearing masks is an effing easy thing to do and it is an extremely obvious, successful method to slow transmission of the virus. It doesn't eliminate transmission.
Making this a political issue is just wrong.
Mask wearing and social distancing don't seem to be as effective as we'd hoped. These are the same methods used in 1918. I haven't heard any good reason why we'd have the kind of new case numbers we are having along with Europe except for the following article. The virus mutates, then spreads anew: https://metro.co.uk/2020/10/30/covid-strain-from-spanish-farm-workers-now-accounts-for-most-uk-cases-13505716/
woah, good points, surprising legal scholar. as reward here's a peak at KG's nude scene in "Not Another Happy Ending (2013)" nominated Worst British Actress at Palm d'Or..OaktownBear said:
Yeah, but the Doctor can pull off a fez also, so he can do anything.
And actually, remember, Rule #1 is "The Doctor lies", so...
Karen Gillan gets the award for best parlay of obscure adoration by sci-fi geeks into a massive career involving high paying parts that require little acting.
Of course Matt Smith was able to use the notoriety in America from Doctor Who to negotiate a higher salary than the titular queen in The Crown.
We are pretty close to 100k new cases today (worldometers has us at 95k currently and the day's not over). Maybe when Trump said we were rounding the corner he was thinking case counts were like an old school odometer that resets to 0 after you surpass 100,000 miles.Unit2Sucks said:
1/3 of a million infected and 4k dead since Tuesday. Sure we're rounding the corner and it will be gone on Tuesday. I get that there are a bunch of Trump dead enders, but are people really that obtuse to what is happening out there?