Official Cal at Woke S. Campbell Stadium Game Thread

97,128 Views | 1292 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Cal88
bencgilmore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23 said:

dimitrig said:

LunchTime said:

You don't get a ton of opportunities to catch good teams when they suck.

Cal beat Texas, Auburn, Oklahoma when they were terrible. Cal lost to a terrible FSU. Even holmoe thrashed USC when they were shart.

We also blew a chance against Notre Dame.




This did not feel at all like Notre dame. I've been following cal football for 40+ years. This has to be on my top 5 list of most devastating losses


Come on...
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bencgilmore said:

ducky23 said:

dimitrig said:

LunchTime said:

You don't get a ton of opportunities to catch good teams when they suck.

Cal beat Texas, Auburn, Oklahoma when they were terrible. Cal lost to a terrible FSU. Even holmoe thrashed USC when they were shart.

We also blew a chance against Notre Dame.




This did not feel at all like Notre dame. I've been following cal football for 40+ years. This has to be on my top 5 list of most devastating losses


Come on...


Really?

In the last 40 years, when has the very existence of cal football been on the line?
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23 said:

bencgilmore said:

ducky23 said:

dimitrig said:

LunchTime said:

You don't get a ton of opportunities to catch good teams when they suck.

Cal beat Texas, Auburn, Oklahoma when they were terrible. Cal lost to a terrible FSU. Even holmoe thrashed USC when they were shart.
We also blew a chance against Notre Dame.
This did not feel at all like Notre dame. I've been following cal football for 40+ years. This has to be on my top 5 list of most devastating losses
Come on...
Really?

In the last 40 years, when has the very existence of cal football been on the line?
Christ and Knowlton have been on record saying they were completely committed to the PAC-12 and had no contingency for its collapse, we do have new leadership at the top but no apparent urgency that we are fighting for survival game-to-game for the next 5 seasons
bencgilmore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23 said:

bencgilmore said:

ducky23 said:

dimitrig said:

LunchTime said:

You don't get a ton of opportunities to catch good teams when they suck.

Cal beat Texas, Auburn, Oklahoma when they were terrible. Cal lost to a terrible FSU. Even holmoe thrashed USC when they were shart.

We also blew a chance against Notre Dame.




This did not feel at all like Notre dame. I've been following cal football for 40+ years. This has to be on my top 5 list of most devastating losses


Come on...


Really?

In the last 40 years, when has the very existence of cal football been on the line?


Cal footballs future was not at stake (no one game is going to decide it) . And there have been many worse losses. Lay off the Macallan for a minute
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bencgilmore said:

ducky23 said:

bencgilmore said:

ducky23 said:

dimitrig said:

LunchTime said:

You don't get a ton of opportunities to catch good teams when they suck.

Cal beat Texas, Auburn, Oklahoma when they were terrible. Cal lost to a terrible FSU. Even holmoe thrashed USC when they were shart.

We also blew a chance against Notre Dame.




This did not feel at all like Notre dame. I've been following cal football for 40+ years. This has to be on my top 5 list of most devastating losses


Come on...


Really?

In the last 40 years, when has the very existence of cal football been on the line?


Cal footballs future was not at stake (no one game is going to decide it) . And there have been many worse losses. Lay off the Macallan for a minute


Sigh…our future wasn't at stake, but the win sure would've helped.

With a win, we get two more weeks of the national media focusing on the calgorithm, we then roll into gameday at Berkeley. If we somehow beat Miami, we are now the IT team in all of college football. That's not hyperbole. That's exactly what would've happened. You really don't think that would've helped?

It's not necessarily the wins and losses. It's the exposure. It's changing our reputation in the college football landscape. If we can't do that, we're going to be left out. How is this difficult to understand?
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bencgilmore said:

ducky23 said:

bencgilmore said:

ducky23 said:

dimitrig said:

LunchTime said:

You don't get a ton of opportunities to catch good teams when they suck.

Cal beat Texas, Auburn, Oklahoma when they were terrible. Cal lost to a terrible FSU. Even holmoe thrashed USC when they were shart.
We also blew a chance against Notre Dame.
This did not feel at all like Notre dame. I've been following cal football for 40+ years. This has to be on my top 5 list of most devastating losses
Come on...
Really?

In the last 40 years, when has the very existence of cal football been on the line?
Cal footballs future was not at stake (no one game is going to decide it) . And there have been many worse losses. Lay off the Macallan for a minute
It's one game but several more of these over the next 5 seasons and we're outside the Power 4 thanks to myopia as seen here
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23 said:

bencgilmore said:

ducky23 said:

bencgilmore said:

ducky23 said:

dimitrig said:

LunchTime said:

You don't get a ton of opportunities to catch good teams when they suck.

Cal beat Texas, Auburn, Oklahoma when they were terrible. Cal lost to a terrible FSU. Even holmoe thrashed USC when they were shart.

We also blew a chance against Notre Dame.




This did not feel at all like Notre dame. I've been following cal football for 40+ years. This has to be on my top 5 list of most devastating losses


Come on...


Really?

In the last 40 years, when has the very existence of cal football been on the line?


Cal footballs future was not at stake (no one game is going to decide it) . And there have been many worse losses. Lay off the Macallan for a minute


Sigh…our future wasn't at stake, but the win sure would've helped.

With a win, we get two more weeks of the national media focusing on the calgorithm, we then roll into gameday at Berkeley. If we somehow beat Miami, we are now the IT team in all of college football. That's not hyperbole. That's exactly what would've happened. You really don't think that would've helped?

It's not necessarily the wins and losses. It's the exposure. It's changing our reputation in the college football landscape. If we can't do that, we're going to be left out. How is this difficult to understand?


It was a huge missed opportunity. Maybe we upset Miami at home in two weeks and make up for it, but then we could have been 5-0 and leading the ACC, so it is a huge missed opportunity in any case.

But no, it is not a big deal if the goal is 7-5 and another loss in a minor bowl.

People forget that just last year Christ/Knowlton were contemplating joining the MWC or shutting down the program. The ACC is a lifeline, but we cannot continue being mediocre or worse with bad coaching.

bencgilmore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Won't augue there. No doubt it was frustrating. But let's be real... We need good seasons, not games. And it's still looking like a good season
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think the good news is that in the ACC we don't necessarily have to rely on one game to get decent national exposure. If we have a decent record we will get regular appearances on ESPN, and the good TV ratings should follow. So the focus needs to be on putting together good seasons: 8 wins or more. That's still in reach.
golden sloth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

I think the good news is that in the ACC we don't necessarily have to rely on one game to get decent national exposure. If we have a decent record we will get regular appearances on ESPN, and the good TV ratings should follow. So the focus needs to be on putting together good seasons: 8 wins or more. That's still in reach.


I agree, but with the national audience, it would be nice to capitalize and perform well. I fear between FSU, Miami, and Pitt we will receive three national broadcasts, but we will likely lose all three.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
golden sloth said:

sycasey said:

I think the good news is that in the ACC we don't necessarily have to rely on one game to get decent national exposure. If we have a decent record we will get regular appearances on ESPN, and the good TV ratings should follow. So the focus needs to be on putting together good seasons: 8 wins or more. That's still in reach.


I agree, but with the national audience, it would be nice to capitalize and perform well. I fear between FSU, Miami, and Pitt we will receive three national broadcasts, but we will likely lose all three.


Cal is in 15th place in the ACC. Stanford is tied with Clemson for 4th.
TedfordTheGreat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bencgilmore said:

ducky23 said:

bencgilmore said:

ducky23 said:

dimitrig said:

LunchTime said:

You don't get a ton of opportunities to catch good teams when they suck.

Cal beat Texas, Auburn, Oklahoma when they were terrible. Cal lost to a terrible FSU. Even holmoe thrashed USC when they were shart.

We also blew a chance against Notre Dame.




This did not feel at all like Notre dame. I've been following cal football for 40+ years. This has to be on my top 5 list of most devastating losses


Come on...


Really?

In the last 40 years, when has the very existence of cal football been on the line?


Cal footballs future was not at stake (no one game is going to decide it) . And there have been many worse losses. Lay off the Macallan for a minute
You are right in there this game didn't decide our future for sure, but to get that national attention again? We'd have to beat Miami and then probably Pitt, a tall order we created for ourselves. If we rolled into the Miami game with momentum, even if we lose against a top ten team we stay ranked and stay in the convo for a rematch with Miami maybe down the road at the conference championship.

We need a perfect storm now to have a great season, more than likely we will end with a 8-4 or 7-5 type season. Good enough maybe in your book, but in my mind that is pushing us one step closer to relegation in 6 years. There are only so many years you can write off, losing these easy games are a difference between a 8-4 season or a 10-2 season
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?

This team, like most of Wilcox's teams, has no offense whatsoever.

Time to make a change.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You're leaving out a critireturning.

A sputtering offense with a dynamite running back returning. Having a proven playmaker - 6th best all-purpose yards in the NCAA - is golden.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
golden sloth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fred Bear said:

Quote:

We need a perfect storm now to have a great season, more than likely we will end with a 8-4 or 7-5 type season. Good enough maybe in your book, but in my mind that is pushing us one step closer to relegation in 6 years. There are only so many years you can write off, losing these easy games are a difference between a 8-4 season or a 10-2 season
We need a perfect storm to have an 8-4 season. If people really thought 10-2 was possible, I don't even know what to say to that. You clearly have a glass 3/4-full view of the world and I envy you.

People are making way, way too much about beating a 2-2 Auburn program on the road because of the name, just like they would have made too much out of beating Florida State if we'd somehow squeaked that one out despite all the mistakes. This is not a good football team. Teams that are poorly coached like this program is will find ways to blow games they shouldn't. Far better Jeff Tedford coached teams with far more talent blew games against the kind of competition Cal will be facing down the line. You can take it to the bank that as past Justin Wilcox teams have found ways to lose games they shouldn't in past seasons, they will find ways to do it this year too, even if the sum total of the talent is somewhat better than it has been recently. Just the kicking game alone is enough to guarantee that. If we somehow manage to finish 8-4, be extremely thankful for it.


I dont think you've looked around our new conference. Miami looks great, everyone else looks beatable. I'm not saying they will win every game, but the opportunity is there to win.
TedfordTheGreat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fred Bear said:

Quote:

We need a perfect storm now to have a great season, more than likely we will end with a 8-4 or 7-5 type season. Good enough maybe in your book, but in my mind that is pushing us one step closer to relegation in 6 years. There are only so many years you can write off, losing these easy games are a difference between a 8-4 season or a 10-2 season
We need a perfect storm to have an 8-4 season. If people really thought 10-2 was possible, I don't even know what to say to that. You clearly have a glass 3/4-full view of the world and I envy you.

People are making way, way too much about beating a 2-2 Auburn program on the road because of the name, just like they would have made too much out of beating Florida State if we'd somehow squeaked that one out despite all the mistakes. This is not a good football team. Teams that are poorly coached like this program is will find ways to blow games they shouldn't. Far better Jeff Tedford coached teams with far more talent blew games against the kind of competition Cal will be facing down the line. You can take it to the bank that as past Justin Wilcox teams have found ways to lose games they shouldn't in past seasons, they will find ways to do it this year too, even if the sum total of the talent is somewhat better than it has been recently. Just the kicking game alone is enough to guarantee that. If we somehow manage to finish 8-4, be extremely thankful for it.


Great I think we're on the same page then. Wilcox is not the guy and will never be the guy if thats his ceiling. so all that's left is for you to leave us alone and let us lament what could've been. I think some of us were secretly hoping that a change of scenery would give Wilcox a chance since we're stuck with him. that has obviously proven to be not true yet again

congratulations for knowing all along. some of us naturally have a little bit more hope every season, but that Hope for sure is fading away

82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
golden sloth said:

Fred Bear said:

Quote:

We need a perfect storm now to have a great season, more than likely we will end with a 8-4 or 7-5 type season. Good enough maybe in your book, but in my mind that is pushing us one step closer to relegation in 6 years. There are only so many years you can write off, losing these easy games are a difference between a 8-4 season or a 10-2 season
We need a perfect storm to have an 8-4 season. If people really thought 10-2 was possible, I don't even know what to say to that. You clearly have a glass 3/4-full view of the world and I envy you.

People are making way, way too much about beating a 2-2 Auburn program on the road because of the name, just like they would have made too much out of beating Florida State if we'd somehow squeaked that one out despite all the mistakes. This is not a good football team. Teams that are poorly coached like this program is will find ways to blow games they shouldn't. Far better Jeff Tedford coached teams with far more talent blew games against the kind of competition Cal will be facing down the line. You can take it to the bank that as past Justin Wilcox teams have found ways to lose games they shouldn't in past seasons, they will find ways to do it this year too, even if the sum total of the talent is somewhat better than it has been recently. Just the kicking game alone is enough to guarantee that. If we somehow manage to finish 8-4, be extremely thankful for it.


I dont think you've looked around our new conference. Miami looks great, everyone else looks beatable. I'm not saying they will win every game, but the opportunity is there to win.


I'm sure FSU is representative of the league so we could win a lot. I'll be shocked if we do though. They're a lot of holes in this team and coaching staff. They have been very evident for years and continue into this year.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kevin Daft played QB, was on the Bear coaching staff for 6 or 7 years, and has been the OC at Dartmouth 7 years with a lot of success. They had a five-year run which broke all Dartmouth records for wins. He also recruits SoCal and Texas.

He should fit the Cal budget.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
golden sloth said:

Fred Bear said:

Quote:

We need a perfect storm now to have a great season, more than likely we will end with a 8-4 or 7-5 type season. Good enough maybe in your book, but in my mind that is pushing us one step closer to relegation in 6 years. There are only so many years you can write off, losing these easy games are a difference between a 8-4 season or a 10-2 season
We need a perfect storm to have an 8-4 season. If people really thought 10-2 was possible, I don't even know what to say to that. You clearly have a glass 3/4-full view of the world and I envy you.

People are making way, way too much about beating a 2-2 Auburn program on the road because of the name, just like they would have made too much out of beating Florida State if we'd somehow squeaked that one out despite all the mistakes. This is not a good football team. Teams that are poorly coached like this program is will find ways to blow games they shouldn't. Far better Jeff Tedford coached teams with far more talent blew games against the kind of competition Cal will be facing down the line. You can take it to the bank that as past Justin Wilcox teams have found ways to lose games they shouldn't in past seasons, they will find ways to do it this year too, even if the sum total of the talent is somewhat better than it has been recently. Just the kicking game alone is enough to guarantee that. If we somehow manage to finish 8-4, be extremely thankful for it.


I dont think you've looked around our new conference. Miami looks great, everyone else looks beatable. I'm not saying they will win every game, but the opportunity is there to win.


It is a huge opportunity but it really looks like we are squandering it with Wilcox and his latest OC Bloesch. Maybe he changes from what we have seen in his first 4 games, but we all know the chances of that are slim. We will probably win enough games to again get to a minor bowl and the Wilcox fans will celebrate and deride anyone who thinks that is underperforming against this schedule and squandering the huge opportunity that has been given to us.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Kevin Daft played QB, was on the Bear coaching staff for 6 or 7 years, and has been the OC at Princeton for 7 years with a lot of success. They had a five-year run which broke all Priceton records for wins. He also recruits SoCal and Texas.

He should fit the Cal budget.


Brenan Marion (The "Go Go Offense") is a young, super smart and creative guy a lot of us wanted last time and he is putting up a lot of points at UNLV (top 20 offense).
https://unlvrebels.com/sports/football/roster/coaches/brennan-marion/3613

82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

movielover said:

Kevin Daft played QB, was on the Bear coaching staff for 6 or 7 years, and has been the OC at Princeton for 7 years with a lot of success. They had a five-year run which broke all Priceton records for wins. He also recruits SoCal and Texas.

He should fit the Cal budget.


Brenan Marion (The "Go Go Offense") is a young, super smart and creative guy a lot of us wanted last time and he is putting up a lot of points at UNLV (top 20 offense).
https://unlvrebels.com/sports/football/roster/coaches/brennan-marion/3613




Wilcox would have the go-gos if he ever hired this guy and turned him loose.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

calumnus said:

movielover said:

Kevin Daft played QB, was on the Bear coaching staff for 6 or 7 years, and has been the OC at Princeton for 7 years with a lot of success. They had a five-year run which broke all Priceton records for wins. He also recruits SoCal and Texas.

He should fit the Cal budget.


Brenan Marion (The "Go Go Offense") is a young, super smart and creative guy a lot of us wanted last time and he is putting up a lot of points at UNLV (top 20 offense).
https://unlvrebels.com/sports/football/roster/coaches/brennan-marion/3613




Wilcox would have the go-gos if he ever hired this guy and turned him loose.


And that is the problem now going into year 8. Cal's success in the 70s, 90s and 00s has always been lead by then-cutting edge offenses. Obviously they had to have good defense too, but Cal will never be able to get the overwhelming talent advantage needed to win with conservative, play it safe coaching. We need smart coaches who can win with scheme, think outside the box, who can put the talented players we do have in the best position to succeed and play away from our weaknesses.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

golden sloth said:

Fred Bear said:

Quote:

We need a perfect storm now to have a great season, more than likely we will end with a 8-4 or 7-5 type season. Good enough maybe in your book, but in my mind that is pushing us one step closer to relegation in 6 years. There are only so many years you can write off, losing these easy games are a difference between a 8-4 season or a 10-2 season
We need a perfect storm to have an 8-4 season. If people really thought 10-2 was possible, I don't even know what to say to that. You clearly have a glass 3/4-full view of the world and I envy you.

People are making way, way too much about beating a 2-2 Auburn program on the road because of the name, just like they would have made too much out of beating Florida State if we'd somehow squeaked that one out despite all the mistakes. This is not a good football team. Teams that are poorly coached like this program is will find ways to blow games they shouldn't. Far better Jeff Tedford coached teams with far more talent blew games against the kind of competition Cal will be facing down the line. You can take it to the bank that as past Justin Wilcox teams have found ways to lose games they shouldn't in past seasons, they will find ways to do it this year too, even if the sum total of the talent is somewhat better than it has been recently. Just the kicking game alone is enough to guarantee that. If we somehow manage to finish 8-4, be extremely thankful for it.


I dont think you've looked around our new conference. Miami looks great, everyone else looks beatable. I'm not saying they will win every game, but the opportunity is there to win.


I'm sure FSU is representative of the league so we could win a lot. I'll be shocked if we do though. They're a lot of holes in this team and coaching staff. They have been very evident for years and continue into this year.


The only team FSU beat is us. If FSU is representative of the league we will go winless the rest of the way.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

golden sloth said:

Fred Bear said:

Quote:

We need a perfect storm now to have a great season, more than likely we will end with a 8-4 or 7-5 type season. Good enough maybe in your book, but in my mind that is pushing us one step closer to relegation in 6 years. There are only so many years you can write off, losing these easy games are a difference between a 8-4 season or a 10-2 season
We need a perfect storm to have an 8-4 season. If people really thought 10-2 was possible, I don't even know what to say to that. You clearly have a glass 3/4-full view of the world and I envy you.

People are making way, way too much about beating a 2-2 Auburn program on the road because of the name, just like they would have made too much out of beating Florida State if we'd somehow squeaked that one out despite all the mistakes. This is not a good football team. Teams that are poorly coached like this program is will find ways to blow games they shouldn't. Far better Jeff Tedford coached teams with far more talent blew games against the kind of competition Cal will be facing down the line. You can take it to the bank that as past Justin Wilcox teams have found ways to lose games they shouldn't in past seasons, they will find ways to do it this year too, even if the sum total of the talent is somewhat better than it has been recently. Just the kicking game alone is enough to guarantee that. If we somehow manage to finish 8-4, be extremely thankful for it.


I dont think you've looked around our new conference. Miami looks great, everyone else looks beatable. I'm not saying they will win every game, but the opportunity is there to win.


I'm sure FSU is representative of the league so we could win a lot. I'll be shocked if we do though. They're a lot of holes in this team and coaching staff. They have been very evident for years and continue into this year.


The only team FSU beat is us. If FSU is representative of the league we will go winless the rest of the way.



But it was almost a coin flip. Essentially equal on a neutral field. That said, right now FSU is in the bottom half of the conference. Unless we see improvement my guess is we go 4-4 or 3-5 in conference and finish with 7 or 8 wins due to what could turn out to be the easiest schedule in Cal history.

I'm hoping for improvement but not holding my breath.
southseasbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Kevin Daft played QB, was on the Bear coaching staff for 6 or 7 years, and has been the OC at Dartmouth 7 years with a lot of success. They had a five-year run which broke all Dartmouth records for wins. He also recruits SoCal and Texas.

He should fit the Cal budget.
Intriguing thought. On the other hand, Buddy Teevens had success at Dartmouth (in two different stints) but washed out at Stanford.
Pittstop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
southseasbear said:

movielover said:

Kevin Daft played QB, was on the Bear coaching staff for 6 or 7 years, and has been the OC at Dartmouth 7 years with a lot of success. They had a five-year run which broke all Dartmouth records for wins. He also recruits SoCal and Texas.

He should fit the Cal budget.
Intriguing thought. On the other hand, Buddy Teevens had success at Dartmouth (in two different stints) but washed out at Stanford.


As a 'HC'. Coordinator is different. A 'singular' focus & specialty.
southseasbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pittstop said:

southseasbear said:

movielover said:

Kevin Daft played QB, was on the Bear coaching staff for 6 or 7 years, and has been the OC at Dartmouth 7 years with a lot of success. They had a five-year run which broke all Dartmouth records for wins. He also recruits SoCal and Texas.

He should fit the Cal budget.
Intriguing thought. On the other hand, Buddy Teevens had success at Dartmouth (in two different stints) but washed out at Stanford.


As a 'HC'. Coordinator is different. A 'singular' focus & specialty.
Good point!
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

movielover said:

Kevin Daft played QB, was on the Bear coaching staff for 6 or 7 years, and has been the OC at Princeton for 7 years with a lot of success. They had a five-year run which broke all Priceton records for wins. He also recruits SoCal and Texas.

He should fit the Cal budget.


Brenan Marion (The "Go Go Offense") is a young, super smart and creative guy a lot of us wanted last time and he is putting up a lot of points at UNLV (top 20 offense).
https://unlvrebels.com/sports/football/roster/coaches/brennan-marion/3613




He just lost his QB. Unlv boosters are apparently not coming through on the promised NIL money, so the starting 3-0 QB said he is sitting the rest of the season.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

calumnus said:

movielover said:

Kevin Daft played QB, was on the Bear coaching staff for 6 or 7 years, and has been the OC at Princeton for 7 years with a lot of success. They had a five-year run which broke all Priceton records for wins. He also recruits SoCal and Texas.

He should fit the Cal budget.


Brenan Marion (The "Go Go Offense") is a young, super smart and creative guy a lot of us wanted last time and he is putting up a lot of points at UNLV (top 20 offense).
https://unlvrebels.com/sports/football/roster/coaches/brennan-marion/3613




He just lost his QB. Unlv boosters are apparently not coming through on the promised NIL money, so the starting 3-0 QB said he is sitting the rest of the season.


College sports is very broken

Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

oski003 said:

calumnus said:

movielover said:

Kevin Daft played QB, was on the Bear coaching staff for 6 or 7 years, and has been the OC at Princeton for 7 years with a lot of success. They had a five-year run which broke all Priceton records for wins. He also recruits SoCal and Texas.

He should fit the Cal budget.


Brenan Marion (The "Go Go Offense") is a young, super smart and creative guy a lot of us wanted last time and he is putting up a lot of points at UNLV (top 20 offense).
https://unlvrebels.com/sports/football/roster/coaches/brennan-marion/3613




He just lost his QB. Unlv boosters are apparently not coming through on the promised NIL money, so the starting 3-0 QB said he is sitting the rest of the season.

College sports is very broken

We went from programs like ours being penalized for a player having called home from a payphone using a pone card, to this. The pendulum has swung too far to the other extreme.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In prior decades I've heard coaches wanted to (or fed) hungry players, and were worried about potential NCAA violations. (Not elaborate or recruiting meals.)
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, and also you had student-athletes going hungry during the school breaks.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.