The censorship thread

45,519 Views | 566 Replies | Last: 5 days ago by ACC Bear
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:




You think the government lefties weren't all about cancel culture? How quick we are to forget
ACC Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:



These people should be fired not for what they're saying but for being stupid enough to say this stuff under their real name on the Internet.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Didn't think I would be saying this, but uh . . . credit to Tucker Carlson.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DOJ Deletes Study Showing Domestic Terrorists Are Most Often Right Wing https://www.404media.co/doj-deletes-study-showing-domestic-terrorists-are-most-often-right-wing/



*Since in the Culture War which pits Good vs Evil, the end justifies the means, any discussion of the means is irrelevant. That being the case, why can't MAGA just proudly own all their sh@it and quit trying to dodge, evade and deny?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?


sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MAGA is absolutely speed-running the part of wokeness where average people get sick of their B.S. and create a backlash.



This take on Kimmel's remarks is correct:

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

MAGA is absolutely speed-running the part of wokeness where average people get sick of their B.S. and create a backlash.



This take on Kimmel's remarks is correct:




Neither of those two people are "average" people. They are both clearly anti Trump if you take just a 60 second look at their posts and reposts. Obviously lefties won't be happy
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Observing oski003 continue with his mental gymnastics defending Trump becomes more remarkable by the day. Remember, this guy prides himself on being an objective independent.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

MAGA is absolutely speed-running the part of wokeness where average people get sick of their B.S. and create a backlash.

Who cancelled Jimmy? Catturd and some right wingers?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

MAGA is absolutely speed-running the part of wokeness where average people get sick of their B.S. and create a backlash.



This take on Kimmel's remarks is correct:




Like the ignorant liberals on BI, Kimmel held poor assumptions about Kirk's murderer. However, he shouldn't be taken off the air. That's wrong. Ignorant liberals shouldn't be silenced for stuff like this.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Liberals silencing liberals.

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

MAGA is absolutely speed-running the part of wokeness where average people get sick of their B.S. and create a backlash.



This take on Kimmel's remarks is correct:




Neither of those two people are "average" people. They are both clearly anti Trump if you take just a 60 second look at their posts and reposts. Obviously lefties won't be happy

I think you don't know who Isaac Saul is.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Bill Maher better break out his knee pads again.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

MAGA is absolutely speed-running the part of wokeness where average people get sick of their B.S. and create a backlash.



This take on Kimmel's remarks is correct:




Neither of those two people are "average" people. They are both clearly anti Trump if you take just a 60 second look at their posts and reposts. Obviously lefties won't be happy

I think you don't know who Isaac Saul is.


Nope never heard of him but after 60 seconds of looking at his profile, he's not impartial
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:




Re: Malice/cons, remind him/them that if they did/do think cancel culture exists and recognize that in the eyes of many that this is proof of it, he'll need to speak out against it to maintain consistency. If he doesn't, then his values were never true and he's adopted the very mindset that he once was critical of.

Also, there is much more direct government involvement here. The precedent is really not good.

This street goes both ways and there are a lot of hypocrites driving both ways.
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

MAGA is absolutely speed-running the part of wokeness where average people get sick of their B.S. and create a backlash.



This take on Kimmel's remarks is correct:




Like the ignorant liberals on BI, Kimmel held poor assumptions about Kirk's murderer. However, he shouldn't be taken off the air. That's wrong. Ignorant liberals shouldn't be silenced for stuff like this.


100% right, sir!

Whatever one's politics, this is the fundamental issue here. The fact that this came in the light of government pressure on a media consolidating merger approval is very, very troubling.

NOBODY should be cool with this.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why does Brian Kilmeade still have a job?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?


MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:



Completely disagree with the Trump admin on the Israel speech policing. Kimmel flat out lying on a national broadcast was pathetic and he deserved to be fired for what he did. TikTok was simple, they don't want US citizens data in the hands of the CCP and don't want their influence. In terms of who bought it out, I don't know anything about that whole deal.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:






When the rest is filled with the lies and libel, qualifiers don't really work for anything. She still blamed Charlie for his own death, which is abhorrent regardless of the rest of her post
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:






When the rest is filled with the lies and libel, qualifiers don't really work for anything. She still blamed Charlie for his own death, which is abhorrent regardless of the rest of her post

She did not blame Charlie for his own death.
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:






When the rest is filled with the lies and libel, qualifiers don't really work for anything. She still blamed Charlie for his own death, which is abhorrent regardless of the rest of her post

She did not blame Charlie for his own death.

She typed his death is a reflection of his own actions..stop it.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:






When the rest is filled with the lies and libel, qualifiers don't really work for anything. She still blamed Charlie for his own death, which is abhorrent regardless of the rest of her post

She did not blame Charlie for his own death.

Yes, she did.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:






When the rest is filled with the lies and libel, qualifiers don't really work for anything. She still blamed Charlie for his own death, which is abhorrent regardless of the rest of her post

She did not blame Charlie for his own death.


Try rereading the highlighted part…
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:






When the rest is filled with the lies and libel, qualifiers don't really work for anything. She still blamed Charlie for his own death, which is abhorrent regardless of the rest of her post

She did not blame Charlie for his own death.


Try rereading the highlighted part…

The highlighted part where right after she wrote "It does not excuse his death?"
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:






When the rest is filled with the lies and libel, qualifiers don't really work for anything. She still blamed Charlie for his own death, which is abhorrent regardless of the rest of her post

She did not blame Charlie for his own death.


Try rereading the highlighted part…

The highlighted part where right after she wrote "It does not excuse his death?"


But she still blamed him for regardless. That's all I said
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.