The censorship thread

47,696 Views | 594 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by PAC-10-BEAR
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:






When the rest is filled with the lies and libel, qualifiers don't really work for anything. She still blamed Charlie for his own death, which is abhorrent regardless of the rest of her post

She did not blame Charlie for his own death.


Try rereading the highlighted part…

The highlighted part where right after she wrote "It does not excuse his death?"


But she still blamed him for regardless. That's all I said

Totally weak and not worth firing someone over.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:






When the rest is filled with the lies and libel, qualifiers don't really work for anything. She still blamed Charlie for his own death, which is abhorrent regardless of the rest of her post

She did not blame Charlie for his own death.


Try rereading the highlighted part…

The highlighted part where right after she wrote "It does not excuse his death?"


But she still blamed him for regardless. That's all I said

Totally weak and not worth firing someone over.


Obviously her employers felt differently. To me it's very clear she blamed Charlie for it, regardless of her disclaimers before and after
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Only the best lawyers work for Trump:
" Bloomberg) -- A federal judge in Florida has tossed out President Donald Trump's $15 billion defamation lawsuit against the New York Times days after it was filed, finding the president's lawyers failed to follow court rules requiring "short, plain, direct" claims."

*They get to amend the complaint.

*……and the prosecutors in his DOJ are no better.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

sycasey said:



Completely disagree with the Trump admin on the Israel speech policing. Kimmel flat out lying on a national broadcast was pathetic and he deserved to be fired for what he did. TikTok was simple, they don't want US citizens data in the hands of the CCP and don't want their influence. In terms of who bought it out, I don't know anything about that whole deal.

" Kimmel flat out lying on a national broadcast was pathetic and he deserved to be fired for what he did."

exploding sheep do not actually make the sound "Sisss...booom...bah" as the temporal sequences is off. Carson should have been fired the next morning for lying as I used Karnak for all my good wisdom.

In all seriousness, one could make the argument that it isn't FUNNY and that, as such, it might be time for Jimmy to take a time out because, perhaps, things are a bit raw for it to be part of a late night show. But the idea that Jimmy Kimmel should be held to journalistic standards is sorta a new one.

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ACC Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:



if the CIA and FBI do the same, it'll pretty much kill the whole business model for the New York Time and Washington Post. What will they write about if not to be the stenographers of the permanent war class?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OsoDorado
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:



Crazy if true. Unbelievable!
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:







A lot of people have been saying that Trump is going to endorse that check over to E. Jean Carroll to pay down the $83,000,000 simoleons he owes her.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
These lawsuits, both against and for him, are bunk, and a symptom of a legal system that is out of control.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

These lawsuits, both against and for him, are bunk, and a symptom of a legal system that is out of control.

The lawsuits against Trump were all politically motivated based on the timing of them. The problem for Trump is that he is too easy of a Lawfare target because he actually committed the crimes/civil wrongs.

The cases filed by Trump are all meritless but his targets are paying off because of the leverage the government has to block a merger, unleash the FCC Dogs of War, etc. Trump is doing little more than extorting "protection money" payments.

Trump's revenge criminal prosecution cases are all bullsh@it and even if they had merit the DOJ can't field a competent prosecutor.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Cal88 said:

These lawsuits, both against and for him, are bunk, and a symptom of a legal system that is out of control.

The lawsuits against Trump were all politically motivated based on the timing of them. The problem for Trump is that he is too easy of a Lawfare target because he actually committed the crimes/civil wrongs.

The cases filed by Trump are all meritless but his targets are paying off because of the leverage the government has to block a merger, unleash the FCC Dogs of War, etc. Trump is doing little more than extorting "protection money" payments.

Trump's revenge criminal prosecution cases are all bullsh@it and even if they had merit the DOJ can't field a competent prosecutor.

Trump is the most investigated person on the planet. Obama, Comey, and company spied on him and couldn't find any satisfying dirt so they had to make up stuff and make it believable to convince law school graduates like you year after year.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HawaiiBear33
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Why don't you liberals care about this?
HawaiiBear33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HawaiiBear33 said:



Why don't you liberals care about this?

I don't live in the UK?

Meanwhile, back home:

oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

HawaiiBear33 said:



Why don't you liberals care about this?

I don't live in the UK?

Meanwhile, back home:




Publishing information that is knowingly used by criminals to commit crimes can lead to criminal charges and lawsuits.

Is there anything else you need clarification on?
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

HawaiiBear33 said:



Why don't you liberals care about this?

I don't live in the UK?

Meanwhile, back home:




Publishing information that is knowingly used by criminals to commit crimes can lead to criminal charges and lawsuits.

Is there anything else you need clarification on?
Until they actually file charges against the app developers themselves, I have to see the pressure against Apple has having ulterior purposes.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HawaiiBear33 said:



Why don't you liberals care about this?
If true, I do care and denounce it. However, I've seen so many instances of overblown claims by your sources in the past that I don't consider them reliable and accurate. I will admit I'm that I don't have time to do deep dives into stuff like this. I do think that if it is as you describe, the people of the UK will have to be the ones who demand and make changes, not American onlookers.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

HawaiiBear33 said:



Why don't you liberals care about this?
If true, I do care and denounce it. However, I've seen so many instances of overblown claims by your sources in the past that I don't consider them reliable and accurate. I will admit I'm that I don't have time to do deep dives into stuff like this. I do think that if it is as you describe, the people of the UK will have to be the ones who demand and make changes, not American onlookers.

The UK and other Western democracies do not have free speech protections as strong as those in the US. Personally, I think they should but it is not up to me.

Also, if I'm making a list of "countries that will most punish you for political speech" then I don't think the UK will be very high on that list.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

HawaiiBear33 said:



Why don't you liberals care about this?

I don't live in the UK?

Meanwhile, back home:




Publishing information that is knowingly used by criminals to commit crimes can lead to criminal charges and lawsuits.

Is there anything else you need clarification on?
Until they actually file charges against the app developers themselves, I have to see the pressure against Apple has having ulterior purposes.


Of course you have to.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

HawaiiBear33 said:



Why don't you liberals care about this?

I don't live in the UK?

Meanwhile, back home:




Publishing information that is knowingly used by criminals to commit crimes can lead to criminal charges and lawsuits.

Is there anything else you need clarification on?

No doxxing apps, no kiddie porn. Why is it so hard for them to understand?
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:


Publishing information that is knowingly used by criminals to commit crimes can lead to criminal charges and lawsuits.



This is a reasonable point and Trump has never wavered in regard to its core tenet.

Also:

https://www.justice.gov/pardon/media/1386096/dl?inline
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

HawaiiBear33 said:



Why don't you liberals care about this?

I don't live in the UK?

Meanwhile, back home:




Publishing information that is knowingly used by criminals to commit crimes can lead to criminal charges and lawsuits.

Is there anything else you need clarification on?

No doxxing apps, no kiddie porn. Why is it so hard for them to understand?
So you're equating doxxing apps with kiddie porn? A bit of a false equivalence there.

Are you also against doxxing apps that target people that weren't sufficiently mournful of Charlie Kirk's death?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

HawaiiBear33 said:



Why don't you liberals care about this?

I don't live in the UK?

Meanwhile, back home:




Publishing information that is knowingly used by criminals to commit crimes can lead to criminal charges and lawsuits.

Is there anything else you need clarification on?

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hit Man: A Technical Manual for Independent Contractors - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hit_Man:_A_Technical_Manual_for_Independent_Contractors

The Florida housewife that wrote this fiction book (now a 77 year old great grandmother) is the subject of an article in the October issue of Vanity Fair. The article is worth the price of the magazine.

Mike Wallace did a 60 Minutes segment in 1997 on a contracted triple murder linked to the book:


*Paladin Press owner, Peder Lund, a Green Beret that served in Vietnam, was nuts.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

HawaiiBear33 said:



Why don't you liberals care about this?

I don't live in the UK?

Meanwhile, back home:




Publishing information that is knowingly used by criminals to commit crimes can lead to criminal charges and lawsuits.

Is there anything else you need clarification on?

No doxxing apps, no kiddie porn. Why is it so hard for them to understand?

So you're equating doxxing apps with kiddie porn? A bit of a false equivalence there.

Are you also against doxxing apps that target people that weren't sufficiently mournful of Charlie Kirk's death?

No doxxing apps, no kiddie porn. Why is it so hard for them to understand?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:



As a government employee, I welcome her to my world.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.