Jeffrey Epstein

126,985 Views | 1539 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by BearlySane88
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Republicans served prison time for this.


Hide the grandkids. No Cackler to protect him.
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just when I was warming up to her and all. Prayers
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

SBGold said:

Me as well, she's a con artist

The 2-party system is the biggest con here, because there is a whole lot more common ground than what you are led to believe, and when there is a positive bipartisan effort like this one, it's a reason to celebrate, as opposed to ragging on those who were courageous enough to face the establishment.

MTG has been principled on this one issue (Epstein), absolutely. We'll see about the rest.

Okay maybe she actually was standing on business here.



she's standing on not getting swatted

Leave that to Slotkin now
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:


Dems take action based on morality? I needed a good laugh, thank you

Why haven't you blocked me yet? Please feel free to do so.




Because you give him life.




Barf.

It's true, Wags has the experience of getting stalked by multiple MAGAts on this forum as well.

PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Epstein and Hakeem.

UNITY OVER DIVISION

GO BEARS FOREVER.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

After Jasmine Crockett accused the wrong Jeffrey Epstein of donating to Republicans, Dr. Jeffrey Epstein will donate money to Jasmine Crockett.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:


After Jasmine Crockett accused the wrong Jeffrey Epstein of donating to Republicans, Dr. Jeffrey Epstein will donate money to Jasmine Crockett.

She can always turn it down though? So dumb these MAGAts

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Greatest bait and switch ever?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DRTFC9AjId7/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:


Dems take action based on morality? I needed a good laugh, thank you

Why haven't you blocked me yet? Please feel free to do so.




Because you give him life.


her. It's a chick
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

SBGold said:

Me as well, she's a con artist

The 2-party system is the biggest con here, because there is a whole lot more common ground than what you are led to believe, and when there is a positive bipartisan effort like this one, it's a reason to celebrate, as opposed to ragging on those who were courageous enough to face the establishment.

MTG has been principled on this one issue (Epstein), absolutely. We'll see about the rest.

Okay maybe she actually was standing on business here.




She lost her support base after going against Trump, right or wrong. She sees the writing on the walls and is gonna get into tv. My guess is she's a very vocal thorn In Trump's side for the next three years
I like this take.
Fox?
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

Just when I was warming up to her and all. Prayers

Is it more than my imagination that she's undergone some sort of makeover?

Blonder hair. Face skin smoother. Lost weight? Calmer, more pious language.

It has coincided with her break from Trump. All part of some strategy to rebrand herself.
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

cal83dls79 said:

Just when I was warming up to her and all. Prayers

Is it more than my imagination that she's undergone some sort of makeover?

Blonder hair. Face skin smoother. Lost weight? Calmer, more pious language.

It has coincided with her break from Trump. All part of some strategy to rebrand herself.
you know the old story about lipstick, pig etc?
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:


Dems take action based on morality? I needed a good laugh, thank you

Why haven't you blocked me yet? Please feel free to do so.




Because you give him life.




Barf.

It's true, Wags has the experience of getting stalked by multiple MAGAts on this forum as well.




You have that backwards lmao
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:


After Jasmine Crockett accused the wrong Jeffrey Epstein of donating to Republicans, Dr. Jeffrey Epstein will donate money to Jasmine Crockett.


Jasmine Crockett is so dumb. This is hilarious watching her try to back peddle from this
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:


After Jasmine Crockett accused the wrong Jeffrey Epstein of donating to Republicans, Dr. Jeffrey Epstein will donate money to Jasmine Crockett.

She can always turn it down though? So dumb these MAGAts

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


Why would she turn down money from a legit democratic donor? So dumb these dems
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

SBGold said:

Me as well, she's a con artist

The 2-party system is the biggest con here, because there is a whole lot more common ground than what you are led to believe, and when there is a positive bipartisan effort like this one, it's a reason to celebrate, as opposed to ragging on those who were courageous enough to face the establishment.

MTG has been principled on this one issue (Epstein), absolutely. We'll see about the rest.

Okay maybe she actually was standing on business here.




She lost her support base after going against Trump, right or wrong. She sees the writing on the walls and is gonna get into tv. My guess is she's a very vocal thorn In Trump's side for the next three years
I like this take.
Fox?


Maybe but I envision her being the "right wing" voice on lefty news like ms now and cnn
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She'll get paid more.

If CNN were to fire Scott Jennings and replace him with her, at least I wouldn't have to see his ugly face again.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

She'll get paid more.

If CNN were to fire Scott Jennings and replace him with her, at least I wouldn't have to see his ugly face again.


Nah CNN would be dumb to fire Jennings. He brings in their best ratings and is their most "clippable" for social media soundbites
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

SBGold said:

Me as well, she's a con artist

The 2-party system is the biggest con here, because there is a whole lot more common ground than what you are led to believe, and when there is a positive bipartisan effort like this one, it's a reason to celebrate, as opposed to ragging on those who were courageous enough to face the establishment.

MTG has been principled on this one issue (Epstein), absolutely. We'll see about the rest.

Okay maybe she actually was standing on business here.




She lost her support base after going against Trump, right or wrong. She sees the writing on the walls and is gonna get into tv. My guess is she's a very vocal thorn In Trump's side for the next three years
I like this take.
Fox?



The View
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
" Now you can understand why Trump wakes up in the middle of the night sweating when he hears you and I are friends."

Yet oddly, what has been universally left out of media coverage of that quote is what it was in reference to: Epstein appeared to be taking credit for former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak's reentry into Israeli politics in 2019, which aimed to topple current prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the second of what would be three Israeli elections in a year.

In June 2019, after spending years attacking Netanyahu's increasingly extreme and corruption-embroiled rule, Barak, a former defense minister and military chief of staff, officially came out of retirement and formed a new party to challenge him. In a chat with former Trump advisor Steve Bannon that month, Epstein implied the move was his doing, as he shared a report from Israeli outlet Ynet Global about Barak's announcement.

"I've been busy," Epstein wrote in a follow-up message. "Wow!!!" Bannon replied. (Jacobin has cleaned up Epstein's bizarre punctuation for clarity.)

"I'm dealing with Ehud in Israel. Making me crazy," Epstein elaborated twelve minutes later.

"Ehud massive can we announce I'm his strategic advisor?" Bannon asked.

"This will be a long campaign. Elections in sept (17). Lots to talk about," Epstein wrote back.

"This is brilliant move," wrote Bannon.

"Thx. Only the first step," Epstein replied, before writing the quote that has been so widely spread in the past week free of its context. "Now you can understand why Trump wakes up in the middle of the night sweating when he hears you and I are friends."

https://jacobin.com/202
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:


Dems take action based on morality? I needed a good laugh, thank you

Why haven't you blocked me yet? Please feel free to do so.




Because you give him life.




Barf.

It's true, Wags has the experience of getting stalked by multiple MAGAts on this forum as well.




And the pathetically ironic truth is that after all of that stalking, our Mascot only made $10 in shares of Exact Sciences (EXAS) which was just bought out by Abbott Labs last week for $105 a share.

At least he made some money for a couple of Denny's Value Slams.

Lmfao.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:



The View


Lol
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

She'll get paid more.

If CNN were to fire Scott Jennings and replace him with her, at least I wouldn't have to see his ugly face again.


Nah CNN would be dumb to fire Jennings. He brings in their best ratings and is their most "clippable" for social media soundbites


I think "punchable" is the word used for Jennings.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:


After Jasmine Crockett accused the wrong Jeffrey Epstein of donating to Republicans, Dr. Jeffrey Epstein will donate money to Jasmine Crockett.

PAC-10-Bear: Channeler for the dead.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All the way from India, Nigeria, or Niger.
Or, Russia Russia Russia.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

She'll get paid more.

If CNN were to fire Scott Jennings and replace him with her, at least I wouldn't have to see his ugly face again.


Nah CNN would be dumb to fire Jennings. He brings in their best ratings and is their most "clippable" for social media soundbites


I think "punchable" is the word used for Jennings.


Of course you'd resort to violence. Typical left
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

She'll get paid more.

If CNN were to fire Scott Jennings and replace him with her, at least I wouldn't have to see his ugly face again.


Nah CNN would be dumb to fire Jennings. He brings in their best ratings and is their most "clippable" for social media soundbites


I think "punchable" is the word used for Jennings.


Of course you'd resort to violence. Typical left

I'll be first in line to deliver a haymaker

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

She'll get paid more.

If CNN were to fire Scott Jennings and replace him with her, at least I wouldn't have to see his ugly face again.


Nah CNN would be dumb to fire Jennings. He brings in their best ratings and is their most "clippable" for social media soundbites


I think "punchable" is the word used for Jennings.


Of course you'd resort to violence. Typical left

I'll be first in line to deliver a haymaker

Jennings should be worried. My sources tell me you were 12-0 in your brief MMA career.

SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

She'll get paid more.

If CNN were to fire Scott Jennings and replace him with her, at least I wouldn't have to see his ugly face again.


Nah CNN would be dumb to fire Jennings. He brings in their best ratings and is their most "clippable" for social media soundbites


I think "punchable" is the word used for Jennings.


Of course you'd resort to violence. Typical left

I'll be first in line to deliver a haymaker

Jennings should be worried. My sources tell me you were 12-0 in your brief MMA career.



Hooyah!


Best not to have a biter dog around me

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?

SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:




On this, I agree. A clear oversight.

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

Aunburdened said:




On this, I agree. A clear oversight.

It's not an oversight. The New York Times is a pro-genocide news organization.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

She'll get paid more.

If CNN were to fire Scott Jennings and replace him with her, at least I wouldn't have to see his ugly face again.


Nah CNN would be dumb to fire Jennings. He brings in their best ratings and is their most "clippable" for social media soundbites


I think "punchable" is the word used for Jennings.


Of course you'd resort to violence. Typical left

I'll be first in line to deliver a haymaker

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


I'm not sure any of your punches would be classified as a haymaker but you go out there and hit your hardest tough guy
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

She'll get paid more.

If CNN were to fire Scott Jennings and replace him with her, at least I wouldn't have to see his ugly face again.


Nah CNN would be dumb to fire Jennings. He brings in their best ratings and is their most "clippable" for social media soundbites


I think "punchable" is the word used for Jennings.


Of course you'd resort to violence. Typical left

I'll be first in line to deliver a haymaker

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


I'm not sure any of your punches would be classified as a haymaker but you go out there and hit your hardest tough guy

I give you life
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:

SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

She'll get paid more.

If CNN were to fire Scott Jennings and replace him with her, at least I wouldn't have to see his ugly face again.


Nah CNN would be dumb to fire Jennings. He brings in their best ratings and is their most "clippable" for social media soundbites


I think "punchable" is the word used for Jennings.


Of course you'd resort to violence. Typical left

I'll be first in line to deliver a haymaker

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


I'm not sure any of your punches would be classified as a haymaker but you go out there and hit your hardest tough guy

I give you life


You wish lmao, you're just easy to rag on
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.