Soccer Topics: No goalies in the USA

126,553 Views | 2549 Replies | Last: 51 min ago by Cal88
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I'm sitting on a bench near the Campanile . The game is 5 PM my time, right?
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:


I'm sitting on a bench near the Campanile . The game is 5 PM my time, right?


It was yesterday
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

Big C said:


I'm sitting on a bench near the Campanile . The game is 5 PM my time, right?


It was yesterday

Funny, So funny I FORGOT TO LAUGH.

(hadn't used that line yet this century... a classic!)
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

If England wins they will be walking into a buzzsaw in Azteca.

Totally agreed. I see Mexico winning that matchup!
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

sluggo said:

I just realized the US game is one hour later than I thought and I need to be in a taxi 75 minutes after the game starts. Please kill me now.


The U.S game is at 3am where I am


Same. Maybe we are on the same block.
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

sluggo said:

I just realized the US game is one hour later than I thought and I need to be in a taxi 75 minutes after the game starts. Please kill me now.

Ohhhhhh,….
Brother…..
I'm so sorry.

Solutions: sign up for YouTube TV, watch on your phone with headphones as you are in transit?
I watch games on my phone all the time.

Better yet, Go to Costco and buy the iPad with cellular. This way you'll get a bigger screen. Then you cancel YouTubeTV and return the iPad. Free.

I'm guessing money is not the issue for you, though.


Why a taxi? How long is the cab ride and what happens when you arrive at your destination?


I have sling. I have not tried to use it on my phone overseas. I have used my computer + vpn. Maybe I can do something like that.

I seem fancy this summer but I really am not.
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

concordtom said:

sluggo said:

I just realized the US game is one hour later than I thought and I need to be in a taxi 75 minutes after the game starts. Please kill me now.

Ohhhhhh,….
Brother…..
I'm so sorry.

Solutions: sign up for YouTube TV, watch on your phone with headphones as you are in transit?
I watch games on my phone all the time.

Better yet, Go to Costco and buy the iPad with cellular. This way you'll get a bigger screen. Then you cancel YouTubeTV and return the iPad. Free.

I'm guessing money is not the issue for you, though.


Why a taxi? How long is the cab ride and what happens when you arrive at your destination?


I have sling. I have not tried to use it on my phone overseas. I have used my computer + vpn. Maybe I can do something like that.

I seem fancy this summer but I really am not.



Game should end by airport. If at airport I will be fine. Headed home.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

sycasey said:

If England wins they will be walking into a buzzsaw in Azteca.

Totally agreed. I see Mexico winning that matchup!


The Leopards have entered the chat!
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

I just realized the US game is one hour later than I thought and I need to be in a taxi 75 minutes after the game starts. Please kill me now.

tough break, but pick a lane and stick to it.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2-2 with England scoring at least one goal on a set play, then choking on the PKs.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mpasi has been phenomenal for DR Congo
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Hard to see how anyone beats France.

Morocco will be a competitive opponent.

Deeper into the bracket, both Spain and Portugal match up well with France, but if it's Brazil or England then it won't be that close.


Not arguing but how are you making these distinctions? I think more in terms of overall quality. Brazil is not very good but England is. I think Portugal has a Christian Ronaldo problem, best for them if he gets hurt.


England is overrated, mostly due to the EPL overexposure. Poor goalkeeping for starts, you switch keepers in this game and England is up 2-0.

The best England teams were from the Keegan-Robson era when the only "foreigners" in English clubs were from Scotland and Ireland. The last great team they have fielded was the 98 team with Scholes, Owen, Shearer, Campbell, Beckham.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Best English keeper in the modern era, Liverpool's Ray Clemence (Banks was before my time), alongside with the best English striker ever, Kevin Keegan and LFC teammate Phil Thompson, circa late 70s.

concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

concordtom said:

sycasey said:

If England wins they will be walking into a buzzsaw in Azteca.

Totally agreed. I see Mexico winning that matchup!


The Leopards have entered the chat!


I had to look it up, and I think you'll enjoy the conclusion. I did, you PSG fan, you!


who was leopard in terms of english history?


In English history, "Leopard" has two distinct historical meanings: a title applied to the young Prince Edward (later King Edward I) in the 13th century, and an old term used in medieval heraldry to describe the three lions on the English Royal Arms. As explained:

1. The "Leopard Prince" (King Edward I)

During the baronial rebellions of the 1250s and 1260s, the young heir to the throne, Lord Edward (later Edward I), was famously dubbed "the Leopard".

The Context: He was fiercely energetic, bold, and sometimes dangerously unpredictable. During political turmoil, he shifted allegiances and built his own aggressive network of followers.

The Symbolism: In a letter sent by the papal legate in 1263, the leopard was used as a metaphor to describe Edward's dual nature. The symbolism was derived from medieval bestiaries (books of beasts): a leopard could not be tamed, was a master of the hunt, and was considered an equal rival to the lion.

2. The Heraldic Leopard (The Three Lions of England)


The most common reference to a "leopard" in English history comes from medieval heraldry. If you look at the official coat of arms of England (or the England national football team's crest), you will see three gold cats:

The Three Lions: King Richard I ("the Lionheart") first standardized these three cats on the royal seal in the late 12th century.

The "Leopard" Mistake: In Anglo-Norman French (the language used by the English royal court in the Middle Ages), a lion walking forward with its head turned to face the viewer is technically blazoned as a lion passant guardant. Medieval heraldry experts confusingly termed this specific walking pose a "leopard".

The Legacy: While these animals were officially called "lions" from the late 1300s onward, French heralds and historical documents continued to refer to them as leopards, and the French often insulted the English during the Hundred Years' War as "the leopards".
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harry Kane makes it happen for England. Matchup with Mexico incoming!
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Harry Kane makes it happen for England. Matchup with Mexico incoming!


That should be a fun watch.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

Cal88 said:

concordtom said:

sycasey said:

If England wins they will be walking into a buzzsaw in Azteca.

Totally agreed. I see Mexico winning that matchup!


The Leopards have entered the chat!


I had to look it up, and I think you'll enjoy the conclusion. I did, you PSG fan, you!


who was leopard in terms of english history?


In English history, "Leopard" has two distinct historical meanings: a title applied to the young Prince Edward (later King Edward I) in the 13th century, and an old term used in medieval heraldry to describe the three lions on the English Royal Arms. As explained:

1. The "Leopard Prince" (King Edward I)

During the baronial rebellions of the 1250s and 1260s, the young heir to the throne, Lord Edward (later Edward I), was famously dubbed "the Leopard".

The Context: He was fiercely energetic, bold, and sometimes dangerously unpredictable. During political turmoil, he shifted allegiances and built his own aggressive network of followers.

The Symbolism: In a letter sent by the papal legate in 1263, the leopard was used as a metaphor to describe Edward's dual nature. The symbolism was derived from medieval bestiaries (books of beasts): a leopard could not be tamed, was a master of the hunt, and was considered an equal rival to the lion.

2. The Heraldic Leopard (The Three Lions of England)


The most common reference to a "leopard" in English history comes from medieval heraldry. If you look at the official coat of arms of England (or the England national football team's crest), you will see three gold cats:

The Three Lions: King Richard I ("the Lionheart") first standardized these three cats on the royal seal in the late 12th century.

The "Leopard" Mistake: In Anglo-Norman French (the language used by the English royal court in the Middle Ages), a lion walking forward with its head turned to face the viewer is technically blazoned as a lion passant guardant. Medieval heraldry experts confusingly termed this specific walking pose a "leopard".

The Legacy: While these animals were officially called "lions" from the late 1300s onward, French heralds and historical documents continued to refer to them as leopards, and the French often insulted the English during the Hundred Years' War as "the leopards".


Only one set of Leopards in this world cup.



sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sluggo said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Hard to see how anyone beats France.

Morocco will be a competitive opponent.

Deeper into the bracket, both Spain and Portugal match up well with France, but if it's Brazil or England then it won't be that close.


Not arguing but how are you making these distinctions? I think more in terms of overall quality. Brazil is not very good but England is. I think Portugal has a Christian Ronaldo problem, best for them if he gets hurt.


England is overrated, mostly due to the EPL overexposure. Poor goalkeeping for starts, you switch keepers in this game and England is up 2-0.

The best England teams were from the Keegan-Robson era when the only "foreigners" in English clubs were from Scotland and Ireland. The last great team they have fielded was the 98 team with Scholes, Owen, Shearer, Campbell, Beckham.

I guess you are a traditionalist, or maybe just when it comes to England's teams. I don't remember that 98 team getting anywhere. Was that the team where Beckham got the red against Argentina and their over the hill keeper got chipped? I thought Shearer had "retired" from the national team by then. If I remember correctly (no research for this thread), they did get to the finals of two Euros (the last one and the covid delayed one), and they could have won either. And I believe the go to the semis of the 2018 WC going out to Croatia.

I think the overexposure makes them difficult to root for. And they are missing a maestro in the midfield, say an Odegaard. But I think they are as talented as any team but Spain and France and maybe the deepest. And if the game is slow Harry Kane is as good as anyone.

Pickford is funny. He is the most overconfident player I can remember, and he is not a great club keeper. But he has won a lot for the national team, and he is at his best when the stakes are highest. I don't think he is a weakness like Mike Maignan.

I missed most of the game today. The parts I saw they were dominating but scoring is not easy.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

dajo9 said:

sluggo said:

I just realized the US game is one hour later than I thought and I need to be in a taxi 75 minutes after the game starts. Please kill me now.


The U.S game is at 3am where I am


I'm in Greece. You?

Same. Maybe we are on the same block.
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

sluggo said:

dajo9 said:

sluggo said:

I just realized the US game is one hour later than I thought and I need to be in a taxi 75 minutes after the game starts. Please kill me now.


The U.S game is at 3am where I am


I'm in Greece. You?

Same. Maybe we are on the same block.



Greece.
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I got my brand new McKennie t-shirt pseudo-jersey on and am ready to go 4.5 hours before the game! LFG!
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

Harry Kane makes it happen for England. Matchup with Mexico incoming!


That should be a fun watch.

I think it will be one-way traffic, England 4-1. Gimenez is the only Mexican player that would conceivably make the English squad, and he would come off the bench for the last few minutes during desperation.
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

sluggo said:

I just realized the US game is one hour later than I thought and I need to be in a taxi 75 minutes after the game starts. Please kill me now.


The U.S game is at 3am where I am
nothing good happens after 3am was my rule
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

dajo9 said:

sluggo said:

I just realized the US game is one hour later than I thought and I need to be in a taxi 75 minutes after the game starts. Please kill me now.


The U.S game is at 3am where I am

nothing good happens after 3am was my rule

A good general rule but does not apply to soccer. I was on the east coast when the US beat Mexico in the round of 16 in 2002 and remember setting an alarm to watch live starting sometime between 2 and 4am.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

Harry Kane makes it happen for England. Matchup with Mexico incoming!


That should be a fun watch.

I think it will be one-way traffic, England 4-1. Gimenez is the only Mexican player that would conceivably make the English squad, and he would come off the bench for the last few minutes during desperation.


Interesting take. I trust your judgement but really was speaking more to the atmosphere. It'll be electric
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1-1, Mexico advances on PKs. Home field advantage a huge factor.

Meanwhile in DC:

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Belgium in big trouble, down 0-2 to Senegal in the 65th minute.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another subpar Belgium coach faceplanting.

Review of Kane's dive shows ref made the right non-call, both Henry and Zlatan were claiming it was a clear-cut penalty.

Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

1-1, Mexico advances on PKs. Home field advantage a huge factor.

Meanwhile in DC:





Our neighbors are more neighborly
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Belgium ties it! Holy smokes!
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Belgium ties it! Holy smokes!


Two goals in the last 4 minutes of regulation. Unreal!
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

Belgium ties it! Holy smokes!


Two goals in the last 4 minutes of regulation. Unreal!

Did look to me like Senegal's defense got sloppy late, which is the common rap on African teams.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

Belgium ties it! Holy smokes!


Two goals in the last 4 minutes of regulation. Unreal!

Did look to me like Senegal's defense got sloppy late, which is the common rap on African teams.


Not sure who I'd rather the US play should we win tonight.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

I got my brand new McKennie t-shirt pseudo-jersey on and am ready to go 4.5 hours before the game! LFG!

With that much time, that's what you should say to whomever you're in Greece with (assuming that's an appropriate thing).
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:



Meanwhile in DC:




He has an interesting name, no?
What should we call him? Is it Mark? Wayne? Markwayne?
None of the above.
It's Dick to you and me!
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.