wifeisafurd said:

oski003 said:

Cal88 said:





Also, wasn't the city deficit reduced by a state bailout?



The rest of the deficit was covered by delaying pension funding programs so they will go unfunded for five years. Nice F-U to City workers.


That is inaccurate. Post Great Recession legislation required additional funding in anticipation of lower stock market returns. Given high actual stock market returns the additional funding has overfunded the pensions. Based on the old legislation the overfunding would be returned from 2033-2038. Mamdani's change is simply smoothing the funding curve. The pensions are not unfunded.

My mother in law receives a NYC pension. Our family has real skin in the game here beyond trying to score political points.

https://fiscalpolicy.org/explainer-the-proposed-restructuring-of-new-york-city-pension-payments