movielover said:
It goes farther than that.It’s almost surreal how the media and Democrats are whitewashing the allegations against the SPLC, casting them as the good guys who just happened to pay informants. Here’s a quick sample of what’s actually in the indictment:
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) April 22, 2026
• “active promotion of racist groups”
• “made… pic.twitter.com/0I3bI8sm5iI remember Scott Adams on his coffee show soon after Charlottesville. He mocked crowd size, saying if that’s was the best the neo-Nazis could muster, then there wasn’t a real threat.
— Election Wizard (@ElectionWiz) April 22, 2026
Scott saw it for what it was: phony and weak.
He was completely vindicated today.
"active promotion of racist groups"
"made racist postings under the supervision of the SPLC"
"coordinate transportation to the event for several attendees"
"directly paying leaders" (because nothing says "informant" like paying the guy in charge)
"high-level SPLC employee who had knowledge the documents had been stolen"
"donated funds would be used in the commission of state and federal crimes"
"SPLC opened bank accounts connected to a series of fictitious entities"
Yeah this doesn't look good for them