Some musings about the Democratic Party's deep challenge

53,282 Views | 684 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Aunburdened
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Their embrace of the drug culture is part of the downfall of our cities, which includes Socialism and open borders (drug cartels).

PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Hakeem the Dream also solicited donations from Epstein after he was convicted.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CA Democrats won't protect trafficked children.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DX5L1awBdNP/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seems to be another misleading gram posting. Not good to mislead

Choose Kindness
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is he lying?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:




Wow, I thought Nazi talk was verboten on this board when used to tag a group of people (Americans in this case)

Choose Kindness
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:




Wow, I thought Nazi talk was verboten on this board when used to tag a group of people (Americans in this case)

Choose Kindness


No, repeatedly calling people that post on this board a Nazi is though. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I find this hard to believe
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

I find this hard to believe


Okay? Personal attacks against posters aren't allowed. Personal attacks against other people outside the board seem to be allowed, as we see regularly.

Hope that helps
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Ted sounds serious. I like James Carville's "energy" better.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

How is it that these grifters are being exposed at the same time? Wait a sec....


movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SPLC funded the Charlottesville mess, and for a $275,000 investment, they raised $65 million!

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DX7QdvUTWP3/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:



Oh , wow, guess what, what you posted was AGAIN MISLEADING! TO THE AI:

The claim you've seen is misleading and missing critical context. Here's what actually happened:
What really occurred:
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) introduced a resolution directing the House Ethics Committee to publicly release all reports related to sexual misconduct and harassment investigations involving members of Congress. The House voted to refer the resolution to committee a move that effectively killed it by a vote of 357 to 65. NBC News
It was overwhelmingly bipartisan opposition not just female Democrats:
Nearly all Republicans (175) and nearly all Democrats (182) voted to refer the resolution to committee, essentially killing it. Only 38 Republicans and 27 Democrats voted against referring the resolution meaning they supported releasing the records. The MountaineerThe Hill
Why the claim about "78 female Democrats" is misleading:
While it may be technically accurate that 78 female Democrats voted against the resolution, singling them out distorts the picture entirely. The vote to block release was dominated by male members of both parties, and the majority of "no" votes came from Republicans. Framing it as "78 female Democrats blocked it" obscures that:
  • 175 Republicans also voted to kill it
  • The opposition was overwhelmingly bipartisan
  • The House Ethics Committee itself led by both a Republican chair and Democratic ranking member argued the resolution "could have a negative impact on the Committee's ability to investigate and eliminate sexual misconduct in the House," warning it could "chill victim cooperation and witness participation." NOTUS
Mace herself acknowledged the bipartisan nature of the opposition, saying: "Both parties colluded today to protect predators. They voted to keep sexual harassment records buried, and they did it together." Newsweek
Bottom line: The claim cherry-picks one demographic subset from a lopsided bipartisan vote to create a misleading partisan narrative. The vote to block release was a 357-65 bipartisan action, with Republicans supplying the majority of blocking votes."

ALWAYS VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:



Oh , wow, guess what, what you posted was AGAIN MISLEADING! TO THE AI:

The claim you've seen is misleading and missing critical context. Here's what actually happened:
What really occurred:
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) introduced a resolution directing the House Ethics Committee to publicly release all reports related to sexual misconduct and harassment investigations involving members of Congress. The House voted to refer the resolution to committee a move that effectively killed it by a vote of 357 to 65. NBC News
It was overwhelmingly bipartisan opposition not just female Democrats:
Nearly all Republicans (175) and nearly all Democrats (182) voted to refer the resolution to committee, essentially killing it. Only 38 Republicans and 27 Democrats voted against referring the resolution meaning they supported releasing the records. The MountaineerThe Hill
Why the claim about "78 female Democrats" is misleading:
While it may be technically accurate that 78 female Democrats voted against the resolution, singling them out distorts the picture entirely. The vote to block release was dominated by male members of both parties, and the majority of "no" votes came from Republicans. Framing it as "78 female Democrats blocked it" obscures that:
  • 175 Republicans also voted to kill it
  • The opposition was overwhelmingly bipartisan
  • The House Ethics Committee itself led by both a Republican chair and Democratic ranking member argued the resolution "could have a negative impact on the Committee's ability to investigate and eliminate sexual misconduct in the House," warning it could "chill victim cooperation and witness participation." NOTUS
Mace herself acknowledged the bipartisan nature of the opposition, saying: "Both parties colluded today to protect predators. They voted to keep sexual harassment records buried, and they did it together." Newsweek
Bottom line: The claim cherry-picks one demographic subset from a lopsided bipartisan vote to create a misleading partisan narrative. The vote to block release was a 357-65 bipartisan action, with Republicans supplying the majority of blocking votes."

ALWAYS VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN


It is notable that 78 female Democrats voted to shelve the bill that would release congressional sexual misconduct reports.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrat DEI.

Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.