Anyone care to guess who said this?
Hints:
His name rhymes with Shady Lance
He enjoys pleasuring couches
He has lots of splaining to do to a certain bloc of voters.
oski003 said:okaydo said:My buddy @brianschatz and l have some thoughts about JD Vance’s really creepy idea to give less votes to people without kids.
— Chris Murphy 🟧 (@ChrisMurphyCT) July 26, 2024
Give a watch. pic.twitter.com/pHcAQzdvTA
That's not a terrible idea that he proposed in 2021. We should encourage American citizens to have families. The logic of a parent voting on behalf of their child is sound. Obviously, you can distort the proposal as these biased hosts do.
Hey, Agent 003! The Algonquin Round Table called and was asking for you.oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:GoOskie said:
Maybe oski003 can chime in on why Shady Vance likes couch cushions and mermaid p0rn.
He doesn't. That is a made up liberal fantasy.
Did Shillbilly Vance deny it? I better go check the news.
Kamala Harris is an alien from Uranus.
The current leadership of the R party thinks that they can deport a lot of people (mainly non-whites), end no fault divorce, ban abortion and birth control and force women into marriages (and staying in marriages even if they turn harmful) and having a lot of children. Another tactic could be to try and raise men / encourage men to be more understanding and cooperative so that women actually want to marry them and have children with them and stay married because it's sustainable. Imagine that!sycasey said:I think the logic of "one man, one vote" is sounder. Giving one person control over another person's vote sounds like a bad idea for a whole host of reasons.oski003 said:okaydo said:My buddy @brianschatz and l have some thoughts about JD Vance’s really creepy idea to give less votes to people without kids.
— Chris Murphy 🟧 (@ChrisMurphyCT) July 26, 2024
Give a watch. pic.twitter.com/pHcAQzdvTA
That's not a terrible idea that he proposed in 2021. We should encourage American citizens to have families. The logic of a parent voting on behalf of their child is sound. Obviously, you can distort the proposal as these biased hosts do.
Encouraging people to have children is not bad, but the way Vance talks about it makes it sound like a way to punish those who don't have kids. See: his "childless cat lady" comments from his Senate run. He doesn't seem interested in persuading those who aren't already on his side.
GoOskie said:
According to a report from the Washington Post, attorney Usha Chilukuri Vance has a reputation for being close-mouthed about her political leanings but did "express revulsion" and misgivings about Trump during the coup attempt by his followers which he encouraged after he lost to President Joe Biden.
According to one friend, "Usha found the incursion on the Capitol and Trump's role in it to be deeply disturbing," before adding, "She was generally appalled by Trump, from the moment of his first election."
The Post is also reporting that in 2016 when her husband wrote on Facebook that Trump was "cultural heroin. He makes some feel better for a bit. But he cannot fix what ails them, and one day they'll realize it," Usha Vance approvingly linked to it and commented on his "firm stand against Trump."
Some thoughts:
It's amazing that Shady Vance found someone to marry him.
She seems to be quite intelligent. But just goes to show intelligent people can be shills and terrible people.
What attracted Shillbilly to her? To me, she doesn't really remind me of a couch, but I've never met her in person.
sycasey said:I think the logic of "one man, one vote" is sounder. Giving one person control over another person's vote sounds like a bad idea for a whole host of reasons.oski003 said:okaydo said:My buddy @brianschatz and l have some thoughts about JD Vance’s really creepy idea to give less votes to people without kids.
— Chris Murphy 🟧 (@ChrisMurphyCT) July 26, 2024
Give a watch. pic.twitter.com/pHcAQzdvTA
That's not a terrible idea that he proposed in 2021. We should encourage American citizens to have families. The logic of a parent voting on behalf of their child is sound. Obviously, you can distort the proposal as these biased hosts do.
Encouraging people to have children is not bad, but the way Vance talks about it makes it sound like a way to punish those who don't have kids. See: his "childless cat lady" comments from his Senate run. He doesn't seem interested in persuading those who aren't already on his side.
dajo9 said:
But why was JD Vance searching for dolphins and women?
The very definition of a horrible person is one that flips from a decent person to the exact opposite because of "money and fame".concordtom said:GoOskie said:
According to a report from the Washington Post, attorney Usha Chilukuri Vance has a reputation for being close-mouthed about her political leanings but did "express revulsion" and misgivings about Trump during the coup attempt by his followers which he encouraged after he lost to President Joe Biden.
According to one friend, "Usha found the incursion on the Capitol and Trump's role in it to be deeply disturbing," before adding, "She was generally appalled by Trump, from the moment of his first election."
The Post is also reporting that in 2016 when her husband wrote on Facebook that Trump was "cultural heroin. He makes some feel better for a bit. But he cannot fix what ails them, and one day they'll realize it," Usha Vance approvingly linked to it and commented on his "firm stand against Trump."
Some thoughts:
It's amazing that Shady Vance found someone to marry him.
She seems to be quite intelligent. But just goes to show intelligent people can be shills and terrible people.
What attracted Shillbilly to her? To me, she doesn't really remind me of a couch, but I've never met her in person.
I wouldn't go so far as to call her "a horrible person". Money and fame have been known to flip people since forever. It's called bribery and coercion.
Voters need to be able to spot people of character. For me, the Vances fail the test. As ordinary citizens, they are probably fine neighbors. But they fail the character test for national leadership.
harebear said:The current leadership of the R party thinks that they can deport a lot of people (mainly non-whites), end no fault divorce, ban abortion and birth control and force women into marriages (and staying in marriages even if they turn harmful) and having a lot of children. Another tactic could be to try and raise men / encourage men to be more understanding and cooperative so that women actually want to marry them and have children with them and stay married because it's sustainable. Imagine that!sycasey said:I think the logic of "one man, one vote" is sounder. Giving one person control over another person's vote sounds like a bad idea for a whole host of reasons.oski003 said:okaydo said:My buddy @brianschatz and l have some thoughts about JD Vance’s really creepy idea to give less votes to people without kids.
— Chris Murphy 🟧 (@ChrisMurphyCT) July 26, 2024
Give a watch. pic.twitter.com/pHcAQzdvTA
That's not a terrible idea that he proposed in 2021. We should encourage American citizens to have families. The logic of a parent voting on behalf of their child is sound. Obviously, you can distort the proposal as these biased hosts do.
Encouraging people to have children is not bad, but the way Vance talks about it makes it sound like a way to punish those who don't have kids. See: his "childless cat lady" comments from his Senate run. He doesn't seem interested in persuading those who aren't already on his side.
GoOskie said:The very definition of a horrible person is one that flips from a decent person to the exact opposite because of "money and fame".concordtom said:GoOskie said:
According to a report from the Washington Post, attorney Usha Chilukuri Vance has a reputation for being close-mouthed about her political leanings but did "express revulsion" and misgivings about Trump during the coup attempt by his followers which he encouraged after he lost to President Joe Biden.
According to one friend, "Usha found the incursion on the Capitol and Trump's role in it to be deeply disturbing," before adding, "She was generally appalled by Trump, from the moment of his first election."
The Post is also reporting that in 2016 when her husband wrote on Facebook that Trump was "cultural heroin. He makes some feel better for a bit. But he cannot fix what ails them, and one day they'll realize it," Usha Vance approvingly linked to it and commented on his "firm stand against Trump."
Some thoughts:
It's amazing that Shady Vance found someone to marry him.
She seems to be quite intelligent. But just goes to show intelligent people can be shills and terrible people.
What attracted Shillbilly to her? To me, she doesn't really remind me of a couch, but I've never met her in person.
I wouldn't go so far as to call her "a horrible person". Money and fame have been known to flip people since forever. It's called bribery and coercion.
Voters need to be able to spot people of character. For me, the Vances fail the test. As ordinary citizens, they are probably fine neighbors. But they fail the character test for national leadership.
concordtom said:dajo9 said:
But why was JD Vance searching for dolphins and women?
If dolphins are mammals, wouldn't they also have *****es? JD is an inquiring mind and wanted to know.
…OMG??????? pic.twitter.com/2IGEKyG5R4
— Charlotte Clymer 🇺🇦 (@cmclymer) July 27, 2024
okaydo said:…OMG??????? pic.twitter.com/2IGEKyG5R4
— Charlotte Clymer 🇺🇦 (@cmclymer) July 27, 2024
concordtom said:
It's okay. We acknowledge that you don't get it.
A cop that wanted to defund police.sycasey said:But I thought she was bad because she was a cop?movielover said:
Kamala's track record is Left of radical Bernie Sanders.
oski003 said:okaydo said:…OMG??????? pic.twitter.com/2IGEKyG5R4
— Charlotte Clymer 🇺🇦 (@cmclymer) July 27, 2024
Is there something wrong with what he said?
okaydo said:Vance is awesome. He should continue being himself and he shouldn't succumb to the woke mob.oski003 said:Is there something wrong with what he said?okaydo said:…OMG??????? pic.twitter.com/2IGEKyG5R4
— Charlotte Clymer 🇺🇦 (@cmclymer) July 27, 2024
harebear said:The current leadership of the R party thinks that they can deport a lot of people (mainly non-whites), end no fault divorce, ban abortion and birth control and force women into marriages (and staying in marriages even if they turn harmful) and having a lot of children. Another tactic could be to try and raise men / encourage men to be more understanding and cooperative so that women actually want to marry them and have children with them and stay married because it's sustainable. Imagine that!sycasey said:I think the logic of "one man, one vote" is sounder. Giving one person control over another person's vote sounds like a bad idea for a whole host of reasons.oski003 said:okaydo said:My buddy @brianschatz and l have some thoughts about JD Vance’s really creepy idea to give less votes to people without kids.
— Chris Murphy 🟧 (@ChrisMurphyCT) July 26, 2024
Give a watch. pic.twitter.com/pHcAQzdvTA
That's not a terrible idea that he proposed in 2021. We should encourage American citizens to have families. The logic of a parent voting on behalf of their child is sound. Obviously, you can distort the proposal as these biased hosts do.
Encouraging people to have children is not bad, but the way Vance talks about it makes it sound like a way to punish those who don't have kids. See: his "childless cat lady" comments from his Senate run. He doesn't seem interested in persuading those who aren't already on his side.
Men voting for Harris pic.twitter.com/myp4ZAlZIb
— Luc J. Gagnon 🇺🇸 (@LakePoliticsYT) July 27, 2024
oski003 said:concordtom said:
It's okay. We acknowledge that you don't get it.
Do I need LSD to understand your make believe micro aggressions?
Quote:
If Vance can rile the left up like Trump, then he truly is awesome.
WATCH: @TeamsterSOB on JD Vance as Trump's VP
— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) July 15, 2024
"He's been great on Teamster issues...He's been right there on all our issues. We've publicly stated it, and look in this day and age there's nothing better than having a US Marine represented as the Vice President candidate." pic.twitter.com/jbYhZTJcoM
Cal88 said:oski003 said:concordtom said:
It's okay. We acknowledge that you don't get it.
Do I need LSD to understand your make believe micro aggressions?
TDS was the 3-letter acronym you were looking for here.
IMO Vance has some definite flaws in his background, like his close ties to AI/big data oligarch Peter Thiel, but he is a much, much better choice than the establishment GOP picks like Rubio or neocons like Haley, Cotton or Pompeo. The stuff about couches and dolphins is similar to the fake stories about Trump pee tapes, it speaks more about the depravity of the critics than about the real flaws of the target politicians.Quote:
If Vance can rile the left up like Trump, then he truly is awesome.
Had Trump picked someone like Haley or Pompeo, who are completely aligned with the establishment/Endless Wars agenda, the chances of more assassination attempts would definitely increase.
okaydo said:
Oski003 thought this was a good idea I'm 1992:
So do men have a different water supply and a different supply of air (to name just two things)? I hope there's a lot of room in Vance's backer's big gay (not there this is anything wrong with that) bunker, and that's it's well supplied.bear2034 said:harebear said:The current leadership of the R party thinks that they can deport a lot of people (mainly non-whites), end no fault divorce, ban abortion and birth control and force women into marriages (and staying in marriages even if they turn harmful) and having a lot of children. Another tactic could be to try and raise men / encourage men to be more understanding and cooperative so that women actually want to marry them and have children with them and stay married because it's sustainable. Imagine that!sycasey said:I think the logic of "one man, one vote" is sounder. Giving one person control over another person's vote sounds like a bad idea for a whole host of reasons.oski003 said:okaydo said:My buddy @brianschatz and l have some thoughts about JD Vance’s really creepy idea to give less votes to people without kids.
— Chris Murphy 🟧 (@ChrisMurphyCT) July 26, 2024
Give a watch. pic.twitter.com/pHcAQzdvTA
That's not a terrible idea that he proposed in 2021. We should encourage American citizens to have families. The logic of a parent voting on behalf of their child is sound. Obviously, you can distort the proposal as these biased hosts do.
Encouraging people to have children is not bad, but the way Vance talks about it makes it sound like a way to punish those who don't have kids. See: his "childless cat lady" comments from his Senate run. He doesn't seem interested in persuading those who aren't already on his side.Men voting for Harris pic.twitter.com/myp4ZAlZIb
— Luc J. Gagnon 🇺🇸 (@LakePoliticsYT) July 27, 2024
FYI, taking on a fictional sitcom character didn't end well for Quayle's reputation once the Murphy Brown response episode aired.oski003 said:okaydo said:
Oski003 thought this was a good idea I'm 1992:
???
My brother: “I think if JD Vance is elected vice president turkey would leave nato. Because of what he did to the ottomans”
— KHive Worker Bee (@selina_dedalus) July 28, 2024
oski003 said:concordtom said:
It's okay. We acknowledge that you don't get it.
Do I need LSD to understand your make believe micro aggressions?
At the risk of being seen as a wife guy (lol like I care), I have to say this is insane: "I love my wife. Obviously she’s not a white person, and we’ve been attacked by some white supremacists over that, but I love Usha, she’s such a good mom.”
— Andrew Kinsey (@KinseyAndrew) July 28, 2024
Let me list a few reasons why. /1
Yes.
— Dr. Drew Dellinger (@drewdellinger) July 28, 2024
If one ever feels the need to mention white supremacists who have attacked one’s marriage, the *only* appropriate follow up is some sentiment such as, “but of course those fools can fuck off into the Sun.”
dajo9 said:
Lots of fragile masculinity on the right. They are a weird group.
The “Trump is weird” messaging is weirdly excellent and plays way better than “Trump is a danger to democracy” with low information voters.
— Holly Figueroa O'Reilly (@AynRandPaulRyan) July 27, 2024
So…Trump is weird. And dangerous in ways we can talk about in depth if you want. But definitely weird.#trumpisweird pic.twitter.com/VGWxiQgaZ5
movielover said:
Nellie Ohr (CIA contractor?) allegedly fed open-source dirt / information to Bruce Ohr, top DOJ official ... and her husband.
Ohr and others then allegedly fed Christopher Steele, ex MI5 Russian 'expert', said fabricated information.
Russian 'sources' also allegedly fed Steele information.
Except Steele wasn't really an expert, and hadn't been to Russia in decades.
His Russian 'sources' allegedly included drunk Russian American putz Igor Danchenko, former employee of ... the liberal Brookings Institute.
Danchenko's 'sources' allegedly included people he spoke to in bars.
This Mish mash of bar talk shoveled to a young drunk was then combined with Nellie Ohr's fecal dump.
Allegedly hangers on from the Clinton machine may have also added more fecal material.
Steele then copy pasted and returned this brown blob into the DC machine... allegedly the State Dept, John McCain, and others had the stained, unproven 'material'.
The allegedly pee tape has never been proven.
But we did have multiple illegal FISA spying applications.
Candidate and then President Trump was spied on. 85% of NSA database queries by outside contractors were illegal. FBI / DOJ employees Strzok and Pauge had damning texts revealed, and 26 Federal DOJ attorneys illegally erased Federal phones in the Mueller (Weismann) witch hunt.
George Papadopoulos was illegally set up abroad, and when he came back to the US 4 or 5 FB-I agents were caught w their peckers in their hands bc Papadopoulos smartly didn't bring the $10,000 in cash he was given as part of the setup. So they nailed him on some minor count to save face.
Carter Page, a former intell source, was now supposedly also working w Russia.