Trump picks JD Vance (39) for VP

34,074 Views | 558 Replies | Last: 23 days ago by bear2034
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So what logic led you to blind faith in a POTUS w dementia, a Cackler Obama won't let out without a Minder, and the neocon Liberal oligarchs running our country - who have gotten us into 2 wars, weakened NATO, and created sky-high inflation and unliveable cities?

All of these concerns and many more are unquestionably reasonable and yet you pretend otherwise while lashing out with insults and invective. If this is not blind faith or unquestioning obedience, then it is a tacit affirmation that they are welcome developments. Perhaps if you would concede the obvious on occasion--for example, that having a demented president for another four months is not ideal--you wouldn't come across as an NPC.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld said:

movielover said:

So what logic led you to blind faith in a POTUS w dementia, a Cackler Obama won't let out without a Minder, and the neocon Liberal oligarchs running our country - who have gotten us into 2 wars, weakened NATO, and created sky-high inflation and unliveable cities?
I know you just spew nonsense, but if you hadn't lost the plot your posts would offend even you. Are you capable of actually expressing yourself without meme-driven MAGA crackpot talk and easily disproven talking points?

Let's just start with the first few words of your crazy. (Yes, what you write is bordering on insane). How exactly did I have "blind faith" in Biden? Define blind faith and then show how I exercised that definition?

By that judgment I am guessing you think a non-critical look at a politician is a bad thing. So, using your own critique, how do you rationalize the things you excuse and do not judge (demonstrate blind faith) in your support of Trump?

I would love an actual coherent response but know I will not get it.

You would definitely get the coherent response that you would love...

except...

one of his many, many woman friends is marrying a sheep this Saturday... and he's busy shopping for the perfect wedding gift. (Suggestion: anything but a wool coat!)

dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This couch****er thinks misogyny is how you lift people up
https://www.threads.net/@kamalahq/post/C_S6xYPSe1K/?xmt=AQGzqCtr16lI55Eqg_fo0Bb_fsM1mXMNhXTyaYeNpInUSQ
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

This couch****er thinks misogyny is how you lift people up
https://www.threads.net/@kamalahq/post/C_S6xYPSe1K/?xmt=AQGzqCtr16lI55Eqg_fo0Bb_fsM1mXMNhXTyaYeNpInUSQ


That's not what Vance said. Are you stupid? Are you projecting on this whole couch f'ing thing? Is this something you actually do? You are gross.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

This couch****er thinks misogyny is how you lift people up
https://www.threads.net/@kamalahq/post/C_S6xYPSe1K/?xmt=AQGzqCtr16lI55Eqg_fo0Bb_fsM1mXMNhXTyaYeNpInUSQ


That's not what Vance said. Are you stupid? Are you projecting on this whole couch f'ing thing? Is this something you actually do? You are gross.


It's exactly what that couch****er said. A candidate who isn't "stodgy" and likes to tell some "jokes". They think misogyny is a big joke. **** them.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

This couch****er thinks misogyny is how you lift people up
https://www.threads.net/@kamalahq/post/C_S6xYPSe1K/?xmt=AQGzqCtr16lI55Eqg_fo0Bb_fsM1mXMNhXTyaYeNpInUSQ


That's not what Vance said. Are you stupid? Are you projecting on this whole couch f'ing thing? Is this something you actually do? You are gross.


It's exactly what that couch****er said. A candidate who isn't "stodgy" and likes to tell some "jokes". They think misogyny is a big joke. **** them.


Thank you for at least providing a short clip, so it is very easy to see that isn't what he said. Dajo9 died from screwing couches and posting stupid stuff.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

This couch****er thinks misogyny is how you lift people up
https://www.threads.net/@kamalahq/post/C_S6xYPSe1K/?xmt=AQGzqCtr16lI55Eqg_fo0Bb_fsM1mXMNhXTyaYeNpInUSQ


That's not what Vance said. Are you stupid? Are you projecting on this whole couch f'ing thing? Is this something you actually do? You are gross.


It's exactly what that couch****er said. A candidate who isn't "stodgy" and likes to tell some "jokes". They think misogyny is a big joke. **** them.


Thank you for at least providing a short clip, so it is very easy to see that isn't what he said. Dajo9 died from screwing couches and posting stupid stuff.


Yes watch the clip. This couch****er is asked about misogynistic tweets and the response is Donold likes to joke around.
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Memes are bad. Humor is bad. Just not uplifting. But falsely attributing support for racists is good. Lying about statements made about veterans is good. Cartoon News Network.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

This couch****er thinks misogyny is how you lift people up
https://www.threads.net/@kamalahq/post/C_S6xYPSe1K/?xmt=AQGzqCtr16lI55Eqg_fo0Bb_fsM1mXMNhXTyaYeNpInUSQ


That's not what Vance said. Are you stupid? Are you projecting on this whole couch f'ing thing? Is this something you actually do? You are gross.


It's exactly what that couch****er said. A candidate who isn't "stodgy" and likes to tell some "jokes". They think misogyny is a big joke. **** them.


Thank you for at least providing a short clip, so it is very easy to see that isn't what he said. Dajo9 died from screwing couches and posting stupid stuff.


Yes watch the clip. This couch****er is asked about misogynistic tweets and the response is Donold likes to joke around.


Your filtering of what was actually said is messed up, likely caused by having sex with animals. Please get help.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/109450/replies/2365765
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/109450/replies/2365765


You were wrong there, animal fornicator.
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

So what logic led you to blind faith in a POTUS w dementia, a Cackler Obama won't let out without a Minder, and the neocon Liberal oligarchs running our country - who have gotten us into 2 wars, weakened NATO, and created sky-high inflation and unliveable cities?

All of these concerns and many more are unquestionably reasonable and yet you pretend otherwise while lashing out with insults and invective. If this is not blind faith or unquestioning obedience, then it is a tacit affirmation that they are welcome developments. Perhaps if you would concede the obvious on occasion--for example, that having a demented president for another four months is not ideal--you wouldn't come across as an NPC.
I assume "you" here is me? Please list the insults and invective in the post you are responding to.

And also explain why you and other right wing posters (all sock puppets?) respond to questions directly asked to a different poster? I asked movielover to give a definition of "blind faith" and then show how I had exhibited that definition of blind faith to Biden. He can't and won't but here comes Zippergate to the rescue with more false accusations that he too will not clarify. Just sloppy language and falsehoods and unreasoned discussion and "just asking questions" and whataboutism...and never responsibility for what you write. You use a term and make an accusation and when asked to clarify it's...runaway!!!! Runaway!!! Go post elsewhere with more accusation and outrage. You're like an unbroken dog who just craps everywhere in the house.

But here's your big chance to prove me wrong even in this small small way. List the insult in the post you are responding too, define blind faith, and then show how my post is a demonstration of blind faith. Simple assignment a third grader could complete it if what they were saying were factual. Of course if it's just words with no actual connection to reality then do what you do best, runaway!
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I know you just spew nonsense, but if you hadn't lost the plot your posts would offend even you. Are you capable of actually expressing yourself without meme-driven MAGA crackpot talk and easily disproven talking points?


Let's just start with the first few words of your crazy. (Yes, what you write is bordering on insane).

Care to point out where the argument is in here? I'd be happy to engage with you on any of the points Movielover listed or anything else for that matter. But to do so, you're going to have to make an actual argument for why you think it's okay to have a non-functioning president, how the current wars are being well managed, why the open border has been a good policy, etc.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

I know you just spew nonsense, but if you hadn't lost the plot your posts would offend even you. Are you capable of actually expressing yourself without meme-driven MAGA crackpot talk and easily disproven talking points?


Let's just start with the first few words of your crazy. (Yes, what you write is bordering on insane).

Care to point out where the argument is in here? I'd be happy to engage with you on any of the points Movielover listed or anything else for that matter. But to do so, you're going to have to make an actual argument for why you think it's okay to have a non-functioning president, how the current wars are being well managed, why the open border has been a good policy, etc.


I think it was just his erudite way of calling you a couch****er
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Zippergate said:

I know you just spew nonsense, but if you hadn't lost the plot your posts would offend even you. Are you capable of actually expressing yourself without meme-driven MAGA crackpot talk and easily disproven talking points?


Let's just start with the first few words of your crazy. (Yes, what you write is bordering on insane).

Care to point out where the argument is in here? I'd be happy to engage with you on any of the points Movielover listed or anything else for that matter. But to do so, you're going to have to make an actual argument for why you think it's okay to have a non-functioning president, how the current wars are being well managed, why the open border has been a good policy, etc.


I think it was just his erudite way of calling you a couch****er


I doubt he fornicates with couches, but at least he doesn't fornicate with animals like you libs.
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whenever I come across an article about $ex with animals, children or any inanimate objects, I can usually safely assume the perp is a conservative, MAGA or a what a bouter like yourself.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoOskie said:

Whenever I come across an article about $ex with animals, children or any inanimate objects, I can usually safely assume the perp is a conservative, MAGA or a what a bouter like yourself.


That's weird. Whenever I come across an article about sex with couches, I can usually safely assume the perp is a liberal who hates law and order and wants tampons in boys bathrooms and drag queens in stripper outfits reading to little kids in libraries.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did they run out of opportunities at gay nightclubs? They can easily get laid at gay nightclubs ... opps.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Did they run out of opportunities at gay nightclubs? They can easily get laid at gay nightclubs ... opps.
I'll defer to your superior and more intimate knowledge of gay nightclubs.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

GoOskie said:

Whenever I come across an article about $ex with animals, children or any inanimate objects, I can usually safely assume the perp is a conservative, MAGA or a what a bouter like yourself.


That's weird. Whenever I come across an article about sex with couches, I can usually safely assume the perp is a liberal who hates law and order and wants tampons in boys bathrooms and drag queens in stripper outfits reading to little kids in libraries.

The couch references are totally played out... and have been for some time. That said, have you noticed that it's almost always you that's in the middle of these things, when the conversation degenerates? Why do you suppose that is?


I bring this up as someone who has come to have some respect for you, as a poster (in general).
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

oski003 said:

GoOskie said:

Whenever I come across an article about $ex with animals, children or any inanimate objects, I can usually safely assume the perp is a conservative, MAGA or a what a bouter like yourself.


That's weird. Whenever I come across an article about sex with couches, I can usually safely assume the perp is a liberal who hates law and order and wants tampons in boys bathrooms and drag queens in stripper outfits reading to little kids in libraries.

The couch references are totally played out... and have been for some time. That said, have you noticed that it's almost always you that's in the middle of these things, when the conversation degenerates? Why do you suppose that is?


I bring this up as someone who has come to have some respect for you, as a poster (in general).


Sometimes I indeed wonder if I should ignore all the pompous dishonest crap that is thrown at Trump and Vance because Trump isn't a good person and there is a possibility he attempts something crazy as president. However, he didn't do so the first term. How much of this was other government folks rightfully or wrongfully restraining his ability to be a president? As I have already voiced, I don't like how Democrats handle crime, the border and covid, and two of those three have a direct effect on me. Because the liberals here have gone gloves off in light of the election coming up, I don't mind getting in the midst of it when they are spewing bs everywhere. Note that there are topics and comments made here that are anti Trump that I don't respond to. That means I agree with it or generally don't care. For example, the history of folks who have worked for Trump that don't endorse him is alarming.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Big C said:

oski003 said:

GoOskie said:

Whenever I come across an article about $ex with animals, children or any inanimate objects, I can usually safely assume the perp is a conservative, MAGA or a what a bouter like yourself.


That's weird. Whenever I come across an article about sex with couches, I can usually safely assume the perp is a liberal who hates law and order and wants tampons in boys bathrooms and drag queens in stripper outfits reading to little kids in libraries.

The couch references are totally played out... and have been for some time. That said, have you noticed that it's almost always you that's in the middle of these things, when the conversation degenerates? Why do you suppose that is?


I bring this up as someone who has come to have some respect for you, as a poster (in general).


Trump isn't a good person and there is a possibility he attempts something crazy as president. However, he didn't do so the first term.


He literally tried to overthrow the peaceful transition of power in his first term
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, they wanted election irregularities vetted, which most AGs fought. That's why the well-planned J6 setup and recently exposed tapes apparently showing our corrupt FBI planting bombs / fake bombs near the VP as an insurance policy.

- this is why they refused President Trump's request for the National Guard
- security PURPOSEFULLY OPENED NUMEROUS GATES AND DOORS and ESCORTED citizens inside
- ex military leader was one of two apparent plants urging citizens to go INTO THE CAPITOL for 2 days; he was originally a Top 10 FBI Most Wanted; then scrubbed; then eventually given a slap on the wrist. Explain that?? Meanwhile, citizens rot in a DC jail for months or years.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

No, they wanted election irregularities vetted, which most AGs fought. That's why the well-planned J6 setup and recently exposed tapes apparently showing our corrupt FBI planting bombs / fake bombs near the VP as an insurance policy.

- this is why they refused President Trump's request for the National Guard
- security PURPOSEFULLY OPENED NUMEROUS GATES AND DOORS and ESCORTED citizens inside
- ex military leader was one of two apparent plants urging citizens to go INTO THE CAPITOL for 2 days; he was originally a Top 10 FBI Most Wanted; then scrubbed; then eventually given a slap on the wrist. Explain that?? Meanwhile, citizens rot in a DC jail for months or years.


That's your team sealion003
harebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
harebear said:



It is also closeas Vance ever got to combat.

"Vance was a public affairs Marine, someone who photographed and wrote about the military's deployment in Iraq and whose work was published on military sites under his name at the time, James D. Hamel. Vance has said on multiple occasions that he saw no combat but that he did leave the base as part of his job.

Public affairs troops have a long history of deploying alongside front-line infantrymen, seeing combat and even being wounded or engaging with the enemy. This was not the case for Vance. In his book, Hillbilly Elegy, he wrote that the most memorable thing that happened to him when he was off the base was giving an Iraqi child a pencil eraser."
Politico
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

harebear said:



It is also closeas Vance ever got to combat.

"Vance was a public affairs Marine, someone who photographed and wrote about the military's deployment in Iraq and whose work was published on military sites under his name at the time, James D. Hamel. Vance has said on multiple occasions that he saw no combat but that he did leave the base as part of his job.

Public affairs troops have a long history of deploying alongside front-line infantrymen, seeing combat and even being wounded or engaging with the enemy. This was not the case for Vance. In his book, Hillbilly Elegy, he wrote that the most memorable thing that happened to him when he was off the base was giving an Iraqi child a pencil eraser."
Politico


He is refreshingly honest unlike lying Walz.
harebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

Zippergate said:

I know you just spew nonsense, but if you hadn't lost the plot your posts would offend even you. Are you capable of actually expressing yourself without meme-driven MAGA crackpot talk and easily disproven talking points?


Let's just start with the first few words of your crazy. (Yes, what you write is bordering on insane).

Care to point out where the argument is in here? I'd be happy to engage with you on any of the points Movielover listed or anything else for that matter. But to do so, you're going to have to make an actual argument for why you think it's okay to have a non-functioning president, how the current wars are being well managed, why the open border has been a good policy, etc.


I think it was just his erudite way of calling you a couch****er


I doubt he fornicates with couches, but at least he doesn't fornicate with animals like you libs.
wow, getting under your skin. You need a vacation, get off the couch
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

JD Vance rips CNN's Jake Tapper. I don't think journalists will want to interview him anymore.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here is video of that couch****er Vance responding positively to a NAZI salute

https://www.threads.net/@radical_left_thug/post/DBmwpyTukJa?xmt=AQGz-Q_ZLlVjGw09Z1DA6JGTDC17xBnGq22PeUlwB7AaaQ
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.D.Vance regurgitating Talking Points and tRump victim outrage to Tapper:



*Tapper should have said, "Fat Boy, if you point your finger at me one more time I'm gonna throat punch you."
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:


Vance has accomplished enough that he adds credibility to the ticket. Met him and his extremely educated wife once and thought they were very intelligent, down to earth, and thoughtful. Would be very comfortable if he eventually became president. He was surprisingly populist on need to provide more support for working class and underprivileged considering his background in venture capital, but I think he will come across very well in the midwest and other states up for grabs..
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Joe Rogan Experience #2221 - JD Vance
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.