Discussion on Musk's DoGE ideas, the federal deficit, and GDP

52,109 Views | 973 Replies | Last: 5 days ago by movielover
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's important to note that Elon wasn't the one who floated that.

It's also important to note that anybody who is splitting hairs like that is a giant, and useful, idiot.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

You have repeated this over and over again because you are woefully ignorant and misinformed.

This is arguably the second best display of Dunning Kruger cognitive bias I have seen on this board.
Have you considered getting a clue? SAD.

With Elon Musk leaving DOGE, what does that mean for dividend checks?


On Feb. 19, President Donald Trump said he would consider the plan to pay out $5,000 stimulus checks to taxpayers in the form of a 'DOGE dividend' during a summit in Miami. He explained it as using part of the 20% of the savings identified by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and giving it back to taxpayers.


Wait, the president considering $5,000 rebate checks that somebody, not Musk, pondered is the same as Musk promising $5,000? Seriously?

This may now arguably be the best display of Dunning Kruger cognitive bias I have seen on this board. SAD.

DUH.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You're just not very bright.
You're also extremely lazy.

And of course, you didn't even bother to read the article because your reading comprehension is so poor.
Typical Oski.

The $5,000 was based on what Musk initially thought could be achieved if there were $2 Trillion in spending cuts.
DUH.

Once again, you are a terrific example of Dunning-Kruger in full effect.
You prove that every day here.

Congrats again!

oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

You're just not very bright.
You're also extremely lazy.

And of course, you didn't even bother to read the article because your reading comprehension is so poor.
Typical Oski.

The $5,000 was based on what Musk initially thought could be achieved if there were $2 Trillion in spending cuts.
DUH.

Once again, you are a terrific example of Dunning-Kruger in full effect.
You prove that every day here.

Congrats again!




Musk did not promise a $5,000 rebate check.

You're just not very bright.
You're also extremely arrogant and lazy.

Once again, you are a terrific example of Dunning-Kruger in full effect.
You prove that every day here.
Congrats again!
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's only June and Elon Musk has joined the Resistance

https://bsky.app/profile/dennycarter.bsky.social/post/3lqqgr65ajc2u
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

It's only June and Elon Musk has joined the Resistance

https://bsky.app/profile/dennycarter.bsky.social/post/3lqqgr65ajc2u


Does this mean your homies are going to stop setting teslas and Tesla distribution centers on fire?
Muckieeye
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am sure we can count on your homies and the rest of the cult to pick up the slack.
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives...
I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative.
-John Stewart Mill
Muckieeye
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haloski said:

It's important to note that Elon wasn't the one who floated that.

It's also important to note that anybody who is splitting hairs like that is a giant, and useful, idiot.
This kind of hair splitting is oski003's signature move. He thinks it makes him look smart, or something…
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives...
I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative.
-John Stewart Mill
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muckieeye said:

Haloski said:

It's important to note that Elon wasn't the one who floated that.

It's also important to note that anybody who is splitting hairs like that is a giant, and useful, idiot.
This kind of hair splitting is oski003's signature move. He thinks it makes him look smart, or something…


It makes me look correct. I base my judgements on issues and facts, not hatred and bias.
Muckieeye
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's a very inflated image you present of yourself. I see a majority of your posts in this vein to be either quibbles over semantics or you demanding linguistic precision.

If you feel that being a pedant on a message board is a flex of some kind, I guess that is a you thing.
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives...
I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative.
-John Stewart Mill
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Muckieeye said:

Haloski said:

It's important to note that Elon wasn't the one who floated that.

It's also important to note that anybody who is splitting hairs like that is a giant, and useful, idiot.
This kind of hair splitting is oski003's signature move. He thinks it makes him look smart, or something…


It makes me look correct. I base my judgements on issues and facts, not hatred and bias.


Their POLICIES fail over and over, so they have to rely on emotion and deception.

Big spending led to record inflation.

Open borders led to chaos and record housing inflation.

Green energy led to more inflation.

DEI led to lower results, incompetence and deaths.

Insulting 50-65% of Americans as nazi's and deplorables has led to ballot box failures.

Latinos aren't throwing down for trans surgeries, communism and atheism. They're fundamentally Conservative.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muckieeye said:

Haloski said:

It's important to note that Elon wasn't the one who floated that.

It's also important to note that anybody who is splitting hairs like that is a giant, and useful, idiot.
This kind of hair splitting is oski003's signature move. He thinks it makes him look smart, or something…

He was one of those kids that sat waaaaaaaaaaaaay in the back.



bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Washington Post reported Friday: "Across the government, the Trump administration is scrambling to rehire many federal employees dismissed under DOGE's staff-slashing initiatives after wiping out entire offices, in some cases imperiling key services such as weather forecasting and the drug approval process."
-Maureen Dowd
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

The Washington Post reported Friday: "Across the government, the Trump administration is scrambling to rehire many federal employees dismissed under DOGE's staff-slashing initiatives after wiping out entire offices, in some cases imperiling key services such as weather forecasting and the drug approval process."
-Maureen Dowd


**** Maureen Dowd. Her writing in 2000 did extreme long lasting damage to this country.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not promoting her. I simply provided a quote attribution.

Her personal hard on against HRC always amused me. There must have been a slight at a cocktail party along the way.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Federal government is bloated, then Biden added another 300,000 bodies?

Adjust where needed.

US Institute of Peace (USIP) - CIA? - had pallets of cash, guns on hand, and a director deleted terabytes of information - which DOGE recovered

USAID = CIA?

State Department = 20%, 30%, 40% CIA?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


Yeah it was disgusting how they patted themselves on the back for cutting a measly 9 billion.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
House Speaker Mike Johnson is a fraud.
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

House Speaker Mike Johnson is a fraud.

No argument from me, he's always been a fraud and never should have been voted leader but unfortunately the MAGA wing conservatives don't have the votes in the house or senate so we're stuck with these uniparty shills who's priority is defense contractor spending.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

bear2034 said:


Yeah it was disgusting how they patted themselves on the back for cutting a measly 9 billion.


It's allegedly a test run for more, there are 2-3 paths they can take to trim the hopeful first phase - $200 Billion in waste.
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

MinotStateBeav said:

bear2034 said:


Yeah it was disgusting how they patted themselves on the back for cutting a measly 9 billion.


It's allegedly a test run for more, there are 2-3 paths they can take to trim the hopeful first phase - $200 Billion in waste.
We'll see. The amount of vacation time this congress has taken is a joke, I'm not hopeful they are going to accomplish much. If they do, maybe I'll change my mind, but they have started off like cutting spending is an annoyance to them right now.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

. . . but they have started off like cutting spending is an annoyance to them right now.


True.

And at the end of the day, the Bond Market will hold them accountable. Rising yields due to endless supply of debt is not how you grow the econony.

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.