Eastern Oregon Bear said:
movielover said:
Except:
- StarLink provides an actual service
- outperforms competitors, at often a better cost
- not a sham, unused building
Criminal investigations should follow.
Satellite internet always had a lag problem compared to terrestrial Internet systems. Do we really want the FAA to have laggy Internet?
I suspect Verizon also offers a service. I'm not sure what your building comment is supposed to mean.
Once again, the FAA has a valid contract with Verizon. There will likely be penalties for cancelling it. Do we really need to waste money to make Elon even richer?
Unrelated to the back and forth and just to internet access...
Here in (very) rural Wyoming, I've had a DSL line since I moved here (we still don't have fiber optics). It's amazing when there's not competition for the lines how fast that 25+ year old technology actually works. With that DSL line and download speeds of about 10mbs. I'm able to flawlessly stream video, doing pretty complex computing stuff... the real drawback is the upload speed is awful, and it can be choppy on video calls - not awful, but not smooth, which is a problem if you're having an important video call or recording something.
Starlink has been amazing. Super easy to set-up and download speeds of 200mbs and more importantly upload speeds of 30mbs.
I keep them both for fail over and because my DSL service is part of my residential phone service which comes with an honest to goodness landline, which is fun to use and has such better fidelity than either cell or internet calls. When people visit part of the experience is using the corded phone!