The Economy

50,163 Views | 936 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by dajo9
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

So the Autopen added $8.5 Trillion in new debt, and no new jobs in 4 years, but we did add a proxy war w Russia, blew up NS2 pipelines, and set modern record inflation. Great.


Inflation is still here due to Trump and his tariffs.
Core PCE at 2.9%

But you always conveniently ignore that due to your Pom Poms hitting you in the head.

Trump's BBB is gonna add $3.5 TRILLION to the debt over the next 10 years.
It wil also increase by 10 million the number of people without health insurance.

But you ignore that too.

You're just not a credible poster.


DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Govt will most likely run out of funding at 11:59 pm Tuesday.

Govt will shut down.
That means no Sept. NFP number for Friday.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

The Govt will most likely run out of funding at 11:59 pm Tuesday.

Govt will shut down.
That means no Sept. NFP number for Friday.

in english, if you please?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Non-farm payrolls.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How many Federal workers does President Trump RIF?

Will Hegseth retire some officers this week at his Quantico Generals meeting? Just a pep talk, really? Physical tests? Russia?
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

How many Federal workers does President Trump RIF?

Will Hegseth retire some officers this week at his Quantico Generals meeting? Just a pep talk, really? Physical tests? Russia?

There's never been a need for RIFs in previous shutdowns. It's not like we were so strapped for cash that we couldn't pay hundreds of thousands of people who took the DOGE buyout while they look for other jobs. If Trump RIFs people during the shutdown, it's an excuse, not a necessity. Half of them will likely have to be hired back, just like what has been happening lately.

I believe the DOGE buyouts end next Saturday (end of the current pay period). I wonder if the shutdown will interfere with their final paycheck. Possibly they could proceed the checks in the next couple of days, but I can't recall ever seeing paychecks arriving that early.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

movielover said:

How many Federal workers does President Trump RIF?

Will Hegseth retire some officers this week at his Quantico Generals meeting? Just a pep talk, really? Physical tests? Russia?

There's never been a need for RIFs in previous shutdowns. It's not like we were so strapped for cash that we couldn't pay hundreds of thousands of people who took the DOGE buyout while they look for other jobs. If Trump RIFs people during the shutdown, it's an excuse, not a necessity. Half of them will likely have to be hired back, just like what has been happening lately.

The other thing is that it's not only left-wing people in blue states who have government jobs. Large-scale layoffs would be a major own-goal for the Trump team (which doesn't mean they won't do it).
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ummmm no.

When Mr. Trump isn't trying to shame American retailers and producers into eating tariff costs, he claims that these costs will be absorbed by foreign exporters. But the import price index has remained virtually unchanged since the implementation of the tariffs, providing evidence that foreign producers aren't absorbing the costs of the tariffs by cutting prices. Goldman Sachs found that through June American businesses appear to have absorbed 64% of the cost of tariffs so far.

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/the-economic-cost-of-trumps-tariff-revival-f9237364?st=Pd81Jf&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Ummmm no.

When Mr. Trump isn't trying to shame American retailers and producers into eating tariff costs, he claims that these costs will be absorbed by foreign exporters. But the import price index has remained virtually unchanged since the implementation of the tariffs, providing evidence that foreign producers aren't absorbing the costs of the tariffs by cutting prices. Goldman Sachs found that through June American businesses appear to have absorbed 64% of the cost of tariffs so far.

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/the-economic-cost-of-trumps-tariff-revival-f9237364?st=Pd81Jf&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink


The problem here is that too much reporting is coming out of the Federal government. If we can cut off the flow of real data then we can just rely on what Trump says for our truths.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:




Since Trump can't govern, I guess this is the main jobs report now
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

sycasey said:




Since Trump can't govern, I guess this is the main jobs report now


And it's Biden's fault.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interestingly enough, we can rely on a lot of PRIVATE SECTOR DATA.
But as you guessed it, much of their data depends on official statistics.

From Bloomberg's Tracy Alloway and Joe Weisenthal in their ODD LOTS column:

So there are definitely alternatives out there. The issue is that private data is not necessarily a perfect substitute for official numbers in part because private data often depends on official statistics.

For instance, when it comes to the labor market, today we got ADP data for September showing US companies cut 32,000 jobs. That was very different to economists' collective expectations for a 51,000 increase!

Part of this discrepancy is down to ADP's benchmark revisions, where they changed the weighting of jobs across various industries. These revisions are based on you guessed it official QCEW data published by the BLS that provides a much more comprehensive (but lagged) picture of the US jobs market. (We've talked in this space about QCEW before).

ADP data also shows a narrower slice of the jobs market than payrolls, since only companies that actually use ADP's payrolls services get reflected in the figure. ADP might be the largest provider of payroll services in the US, but it still only accounts for about 10% of the total market. This is one reason why you analysts sometimes dismiss the report as noisy and the gap between ADP and official BLS payrolls figures has become a pretty big talking point in recent years.

All in all, private sector data is not a perfect substitute for the official stuff, as we're about to learn in real-time. UBS Chief Economist Paul Donovan puts it as follows:
Quote:

"Private data is like viewing the economy through a keyhole clear, but with a narrow field of vision. Official data is like opening the door. Private data relies on official data to model the bits of the economy outside its field of vision, and that modelling becomes less accurate in the absence of official data."

That door is now slammed shut.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zero job growth in four years with previously two million Fake new jobs reported.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Zero job growth in four years with previously two million Fake new jobs reported.


I've found you to have zero credibility when it comes to discussing economic topics.
You're wasting your time replying.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When you see a Trump supporter with no knowledge of basic economics repeatedly boast about how the U.S. Treasury is bringing in Billions of dollars in tariff money - - - you know that this person makes two very naive assumptions:

1.) The tariffs are not paid by the consumer

2.) The Govt knows how to use the tariff money better than the taxpayer does.

Clearly, all of the above are FALSE.


Good Riddance SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

DiabloWags said:

Ummmm no.

When Mr. Trump isn't trying to shame American retailers and producers into eating tariff costs, he claims that these costs will be absorbed by foreign exporters. But the import price index has remained virtually unchanged since the implementation of the tariffs, providing evidence that foreign producers aren't absorbing the costs of the tariffs by cutting prices. Goldman Sachs found that through June American businesses appear to have absorbed 64% of the cost of tariffs so far.

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/the-economic-cost-of-trumps-tariff-revival-f9237364?st=Pd81Jf&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink


The problem here is that too much reporting is coming out of the Federal government. If we can cut off the flow of real data then we can just rely on what Trump says for our truths.

Turns out all the "jobs" Biden created were either for illegal immigrants or illegal child labor.

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A record $12.2 TRILLION in ETF Assets at end of August.

$917 Billion has come in during 2025 came in as of Sept. 29th.

2024 saw $1.1 Trillion come in.



movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Netflix drops $15 Billion in value this week, partly bc of their pro trans childhood propoganda.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Q4 is here and liquidity is coming along with lower interest rates.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OPEC+ will raise oil output from November by 137,000 bpd

Group has upped output targets by over 2.7 million bpd this year

Shift in policy designed to regain market share from rivals such as U.S. shale producers

Saudis oil cost is less than $10 a barrel.
But they need $92 a barrel to balance their budget.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Commerce Department's report that U.S. companies signed nearly $170B in contracts abroad during President Donald Trump's first nine months and a surge expected to support 600,000 American jobs.

cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Americans spending picked up in the last 3 months of 2024 to a 4.2% annual rate of increase, the strongest pace in almost two years and an acceleration from the preceding quarter's already robust 3.7%

And make no mistake, spending has been growing faster than incomes owing to consumer's surging wealth.

In other words, the economy is a reflection of the stock market,vand not the other way around.

An important concept as we move through 2025.


What you're seeing, I believe, is that the USD has lost much of its purchasing power over the last year. Consumers are spending more USD, but those USD are worth substantially less, and the value that they receive for that increased spending is actually the same, or less.

Throughout much of our history, you can see that the purchasing power of 1 oz of gold remains fairly constant. For the last 200+ years, an ounce of gold will purchase a nice, custom-tailored 3-piece suit.

That said, the price of gold, in USD, has doubled over the last two years. So, relative to gold, the USD has lost half of its purchasing power.

I don't think that the USD has lost half of its purchasing power at the grocery store, but if you look at the price increases in food, and what you get at the store for $100, you don't get nearly as much.

With the rampant USD-printing that's happening now, and will be happening in the coming months, I think it's misguided to measure prosperity in USD. Far better to measure prosperity in terms of purchasing power, and quality of life.
cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

OPEC+ will raise oil output from November by 137,000 bpd

Group has upped output targets by over 2.7 million bpd this year

Shift in policy designed to regain market share from rivals such as U.S. shale producers

Saudis oil cost is less than $10 a barrel.
But they need $92 a barrel to balance their budget.


Yep. They're putting their competitors in Texassistan out of business, and killing the TX economy. The layoffs in the oil industry are just starting.

The Texas oil folks need $80/bbl oil to stay in business. But with the world-wide economic slowdown, that ain't happening.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

OPEC+ will raise oil output from November by 137,000 bpd

Group has upped output targets by over 2.7 million bpd this year

Shift in policy designed to regain market share from rivals such as U.S. shale producers

Saudis oil cost is less than $10 a barrel.
But they need $92 a barrel to balance their budget.


The agreement authoritarian has with his authoritarian allies in Saudia Arabia is that they increase global oil supply for him and contract it if Dems are in charge. So Trump is having his friends flood the market with oil, causing turmoil for the U.S. oil industry. This is what the U.S. oil industry voted for.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.