Kamala Harris for President

50,509 Views | 979 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by bearister
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

GoOskie said:

Chapman_is_Gone said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:



She is ambitious. You need to be to run for president.
Are you saying she was never in love with the Willie?
Why do you care so much about her former love life?


I care if someone is a wh ore. Is that so hard for you to understand? It speaks to her character.
Yes, much worse than the guy who was besties with an underage sex trafficker (Jeff Epstein), pumped and paid off p0rn stars, married an eastern European escort (probable russian spy), and talks about doing his own daughter. Soooo much better to support that guy.


I don't support Trump.

I despise all of you morons who enjoy political entertainment. You are ****ing losers.


So you post here. Makes sense.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 Days Since Dem Coup said:

In other news, Democrat mega-donor Reid Hoffman hates Lina Khan and wants Kamala to fire her. That'll create an interesting conundrum for dajo9.



Also, a retrospective of some of Kamala's greatest hits








JD Vance loves Lina Khan. No lie. He honestly believes that corporations harm the working class and they need to be made smaller and weaker. He wants heavy tariffs to make it more expensive to buy foreign made products. He wants more social programs. The MAGA crowd has no idea what the populist platform is.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

GoOskie said:

Chapman_is_Gone said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:



She is ambitious. You need to be to run for president.
Are you saying she was never in love with the Willie?
Why do you care so much about her former love life?


I care if someone is a wh ore. Is that so hard for you to understand? It speaks to her character.
Yes, much worse than the guy who was besties with an underage sex trafficker (Jeff Epstein), pumped and paid off p0rn stars, married an eastern European escort (probable russian spy), and talks about doing his own daughter. Soooo much better to support that guy.


I don't support Trump.

I despise all of you morons who enjoy political entertainment. You are ****ing losers.


Thank you for not supporting Trump.
We Americans have LOTS of problems to address, and I won't attempt to list them here. But the solution is NOT to turn them over to a narcissistic liar who stirs up conflict amongst all of us in order to ascend to a position that satisfies his ego, solving only HIS one need while worsening all of ours.

It's a crazy world that we live in where this voting dichotomy even exists.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The MAGA crowd think a platform is the thing you sit on near a salt lick, waiting to kill a deer. Or it's the thing the winners of the Smash 'Em Up Derby stand on when they get their giant novelty check and a kiss from the queen of the county fair.


Political platform? "Is that what Our Lord and Savior, the Donald, stands on when he's telling us how great he is and how much America sucks?"
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html

Too many of these averages include polling from before Biden dropped out.

It's too early to draw conclusions, but so far the polls taken after Harris became the de facto nominee have shown an average of 1 to 3 points shift towards the Dem. We'll see if this continues, though it is worth noting that we are also in a period of time where you'd expect the Republican to be in a polling "bounce" (post GOP convention and before the Dem convention). Plus you'd expect Trump personally to see a bounce from the assassination attempt. A lot of confounding factors right now.


I watched something else last night ("is America ready for a female minority as President?") that made me go to bed with sad thoughts about the common bias toward me and toward white race, and the real possibility of a President Trump, again.

I had been in a Walmart tire shop in 2016, killing time, and struck up a conversation with the others waiting. This included two white ladies and one man of color. Of note, one of the ladies told me she would never vote for a woman to be president. I was shocked. She said women were nuts, and that men were better suited to the role. The other woman was also for Trump over Hillary, and the man was indifferent in his response.

Upon recalling this, I just felt there are too many people who won't think further beyond their long ago programmed bias.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html


This is why choosing Harris over Biden was stupid.

She doesn't bring anything to the table.

I suspect that in an open primary she would not have won the nomination.



I suspect this is accurate.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

Chapman_is_Gone said:

GoOskie said:

Chapman_is_Gone said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:



She is ambitious. You need to be to run for president.
Are you saying she was never in love with the Willie?
Why do you care so much about her former love life?


I care if someone is a wh ore. Is that so hard for you to understand? It speaks to her character.
Yes, much worse than the guy who was besties with an underage sex trafficker (Jeff Epstein), pumped and paid off p0rn stars, married an eastern European escort (probable russian spy), and talks about doing his own daughter. Soooo much better to support that guy.


I don't support Trump.

I despise all of you morons who enjoy political entertainment. You are ****ing losers.


So you post here. Makes sense.


He's just venting, not being entertained.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

dimitrig said:

concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html


This is why choosing Harris over Biden was stupid.

She doesn't bring anything to the table.

I suspect that in an open primary she would not have won the nomination.



I suspect this is accurate.


When you say "open primary" I think it's clear you mean "cabal of wealthy donors wining and dining delegates behind closed doors". You guys want Republican-lite and are sour that Democrats have no interest in the failed policies of the old Republican party.

It's clear that Kamala is the people's choice. The grassroots response has been overwhelming. It has surpassed anything I expected.
"The rules were that you were not going to fact check"
MAGA
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

GoOskie said:

dimitrig said:

concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html


This is why choosing Harris over Biden was stupid.

She doesn't bring anything to the table.

I suspect that in an open primary she would not have won the nomination.

It's only July. Give it a little time, things will change.

True. Someone might try to kill Trump again.

Anything can happen!

Tune in next week!


Or he could fall down stairs.
Or get a fatal case of some exotic venereal disease.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:


We work with what we are given. And given a choice between Trump and Harris, I will pick Harris. Not thrilled about it but better than picking Biden at his current age.

It's no surprise that you would vote for someone considered the most liberal [read: far left] Senator in 2019.


Why am I sitting here wasting my evening listening to this entirely unremarkable person try to spit out some concept she memorized that her handlers though would sound good? Which is offensive in content… to suggest that outcomes should be equal. Good God. **** her.


While we can certainly quibble with aspects of what she's saying, the fact that you are so vehemently opposed to discussing it tells me you have received considerably more than the median in life.
Congratulations!

Humility and gratitude are lovely attributes.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That fat f@&k hasn't used stairs regularly in decades. He wanted to install an escalator to facilitate boarding Air Force One.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

concordtom said:

dimitrig said:

concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html


This is why choosing Harris over Biden was stupid.

She doesn't bring anything to the table.

I suspect that in an open primary she would not have won the nomination.



I suspect this is accurate.


When you say "open primary" I think it's clear you mean "cabal of wealthy donors wining and dining delegates behind closed doors". You guys want Republican-lite and are sour that Democrats have no interest in the failed policies of the old Republican party.

It's clear that Kamala is the people's choice. The grassroots response has been overwhelming. It has surpassed anything I expected.


First, I'm not the one who wrote "open primary", so I'm not sure you intended to write to me as "you guys" like you're on some rant.

Second, is it clear that I meant "cabal of wealthy donors wining and dining delegates behind closed doors"???
I'm not sure what gave you that impression.

Good morning, Dajo.
Yes, I certainly hope Kamala defeats Trump!
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

That fat f@&k hasn't used stairs regularly in decades. He wanted to install an escalator to facilitate boarding Air Force One.

Which is exactly why it'll be a beautiful thing when he is filmed falling down the full flight of metal stairs, cracking his head open on the bottom one in full view of 30 cameras, to show that nobody pushed him, and there was no secret tripping wire - no conspiracy assassination. He did it all on his own, like the dumb ass he is!
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Chapman_is_Gone said:

GoOskie said:

Chapman_is_Gone said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:



She is ambitious. You need to be to run for president.
Are you saying she was never in love with the Willie?
Why do you care so much about her former love life?


I care if someone is a wh ore. Is that so hard for you to understand? It speaks to her character.
Yes, much worse than the guy who was besties with an underage sex trafficker (Jeff Epstein), pumped and paid off p0rn stars, married an eastern European escort (probable russian spy), and talks about doing his own daughter. Soooo much better to support that guy.


I don't support Trump.

I despise all of you morons who enjoy political entertainment. You are ****ing losers.
Yet 26 of your last 29 BI posts have been to OT. Welcome to the club, loser!
lol

This is why we come to BI first thing in the morning!!

The hearty belly laughs get the lungs and blood flowing. Great way to start the day!

Hahaha!!!!
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

Chapman_is_Gone said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:



She is ambitious. You need to be to run for president.
Are you saying she was never in love with the Willie?
Why do you care so much about her former love life?


I care if someone is a wh ore. Is that so hard for you to understand? It speaks to her character.


Character? Between Trump and Harris, you will go with character to use against Harris? That seems genuine.


Lol!
Dude tries to slap the wh*re label on her while she's in a contest with sexual Vietnam trump?
OMG, queue the tape immediately!!



Edit: a convicted sexual predator, no less.
Wow!!!
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoOskie said:

Chapman_is_Gone said:

GoOskie said:

Chapman_is_Gone said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:



She is ambitious. You need to be to run for president.
Are you saying she was never in love with the Willie?
Why do you care so much about her former love life?


I care if someone is a wh ore. Is that so hard for you to understand? It speaks to her character.
Yes, much worse than the guy who was besties with an underage sex trafficker (Jeff Epstein), pumped and paid off p0rn stars, married an eastern European escort (probable russian spy), and talks about doing his own daughter. Soooo much better to support that guy.


I don't support Trump.

I despise all of you morons who enjoy political entertainment. You are ****ing losers.
"I don't support Trump."

Most people who will vote for him anyways usually say this. I don't know why you cowards just don't fess up. You'll vote for the Manchurian candidate who was besties with an underage sex trafficker. Admit it!

And why just call her a wh o re? Be a man and not a coward. Call her what you REALLY want to call her.


Face it, you've been called out, Chapman! So, who are you voting for?
graguna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harris is dominating the news cycle and has yet to pick a VP and the DNC is coming up mid Aug. I wasn't excited about her until I saw what she's done in her first 5 days. Master class!! Couldn't have gone better.
My guess is she's already decided on Kelly but why announce and get bumped to the top of the news cycle when you're already there.
Wait for a lull or for trumps next childish attention getting stunt and then announce.
Kelly is perfect - white, astronaut, wife was really shot, etc
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
graguna said:

Harris is dominating the news cycle and has yet to pick a VP and the DNC is coming up mid Aug. I wasn't excited about her until I saw what she's done in her first 5 days. Master class!! Couldn't have gone better.
My guess is she's already decided on Kelly but why announce and get bumped to the top of the news cycle when you're already there.
Wait for a lull or for trumps next childish attention getting stunt and then announce.
Kelly is perfect - white, astronaut, wife was really shot, etc



Pennsylvania has more electoral votes, and is eastern, but Kelly does have The Right Stuff!!
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kelly, Shapiro, Beshear, Waltz. The Democrats have an abundance of good options.
"The rules were that you were not going to fact check"
MAGA
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Kelly, Shapiro, Beshear, Waltz. The Democrats have an abundance of good options.

They can't pick Shapiro because he will help win PA but also help lose MI. My guess is Kelly but pulling him out of the Senate in a state they will likely lose a Senate seat. Beshear to me is the likely choice because he's a Gov of a red state so he can't really get anything done since the state legislature blocks him. Here's the problem though, you'll have a VP who did nothing while in office together with a Gov who did nothing while in office lol.
graguna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

dajo9 said:

Kelly, Shapiro, Beshear, Waltz. The Democrats have an abundance of good options.

They can't pick Shapiro because he will help win PA but also help lose MI. My guess is Kelly but pulling him out of the Senate in a state they will likely lose a Senate seat. Beshear to me is the likely choice because he's a Gov of a red state so he can't really get anything done since the state legislature blocks him. Here's the problem though, you'll have a VP who did nothing while in office together with a Gov who did nothing while in office lol.

" you'll have a VP who did nothing while in office"
To me this means she is tied with trump 5 days in and lots of people dont know her yet. Huge upside here. this is great!


"with a Gov who did nothing while in office lol."
luckily for the country millions of people don't agree with this
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html


It will come down to this.

She can fail miserably by playing identity politics. open border, high taxes and wealthy are not paying enough, racial catering. She can walk down the path of Hillary who chose the progressive wing over moderates in the rust and sun belt and allowed this MAGA populist, white nationalist nonsense to take hold.

Or she can recognize that most Americans want economic progress, US to be a world leader, sane immigration, open competition and unity as opposed to division by race, gender or sexual orientation. If she appeals to the moderates and carries through in the next four years, MAGA and woke progressives can be moved to the fringe where they belong and American can truly be great again not just on a cap but in reality.

She needs to choose the path. Her dismissing the antisemitic protesters was a good sign.
Chapman_is_Gone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

Chapman_is_Gone said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:


We work with what we are given. And given a choice between Trump and Harris, I will pick Harris. Not thrilled about it but better than picking Biden at his current age.

It's no surprise that you would vote for someone considered the most liberal [read: far left] Senator in 2019.


Why am I sitting here wasting my evening listening to this entirely unremarkable person try to spit out some concept she memorized that her handlers though would sound good? Which is offensive in content… to suggest that outcomes should be equal. Good God. **** her.


While we can certainly quibble with aspects of what she's saying, the fact that you are so vehemently opposed to discussing it tells me you have received considerably more than the median in life.
Congratulations!

Humility and gratitude are lovely attributes.


Tom, to be serious for a moment, I've studied and worked far harder in my life than has the average person. I remember clearly all the jerk offs back in high school who wouldn't study and would **** around all day. Many of them are now working at Big O Tire for $35,000 a year. Would Kamala, if she had a chance, redistribute a large part of my income to Mr. Big O Tire in the name of equal outcomes? You better believe she would.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

dajo9 said:

Kelly, Shapiro, Beshear, Waltz. The Democrats have an abundance of good options.

They can't pick Shapiro because he will help win PA but also help lose MI. My guess is Kelly but pulling him out of the Senate in a state they will likely lose a Senate seat. Beshear to me is the likely choice because he's a Gov of a red state so he can't really get anything done since the state legislature blocks him. Here's the problem though, you'll have a VP who did nothing while in office together with a Gov who did nothing while in office lol.



Hmmmm. Kentucky Governor Beshear…

Looks like a meat and potatoes guy who could make Harris look more moderate to lots of voters simply by standing next to her.
Sadly, that's where the American voters are at - a bunch of dingalings.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html


It will come down to this.

She can fail miserably by playing identity politics. open border, high taxes and wealthy are not paying enough, racial catering. She can walk down the path of Hillary who chose the progressive wing over moderates in the rust and sun belt and allowed this MAGA populist, white nationalist nonsense to take hold.

Or she can recognize that most Americans want economic progress, US to be a world leader, sane immigration, open competition and unity as opposed to division by race, gender or sexual orientation. If she appeals to the moderates and carries through in the next four years, MAGA and woke progressives can be moved to the fringe where they belong and American can truly be great again not just on a cap but in reality.

She needs to choose the path. Her dismissing the antisemitic protesters was a good sign.


I'll agree that she definitely needs to drop the progressive talk and shift moderate if she wants to get elected.

She's got two strikes against her already:
Female
Nonwhite
Fortunately, Trump has two strikes against him:
Ass hole
Dumb ass

It's going to be both interesting and consequential.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

calbear93 said:

concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html


It will come down to this.

She can fail miserably by playing identity politics. open border, high taxes and wealthy are not paying enough, racial catering. She can walk down the path of Hillary who chose the progressive wing over moderates in the rust and sun belt and allowed this MAGA populist, white nationalist nonsense to take hold.

Or she can recognize that most Americans want economic progress, US to be a world leader, sane immigration, open competition and unity as opposed to division by race, gender or sexual orientation. If she appeals to the moderates and carries through in the next four years, MAGA and woke progressives can be moved to the fringe where they belong and American can truly be great again not just on a cap but in reality.

She needs to choose the path. Her dismissing the antisemitic protesters was a good sign.


I'll agree that she definitely needs to drop the progressive talk and shift moderate if she wants to get elected.

She's got two strikes against her already:
Female
Nonwhite
Fortunately, Trump has two strikes against him:
Ass hole
Dumb ass

It's going to be both interesting and consequential.


Nonwhite isn't a strike against her. 41% of America is nonwhite. Also, 51% of America is female.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

concordtom said:

Chapman_is_Gone said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:


We work with what we are given. And given a choice between Trump and Harris, I will pick Harris. Not thrilled about it but better than picking Biden at his current age.

It's no surprise that you would vote for someone considered the most liberal [read: far left] Senator in 2019.


Why am I sitting here wasting my evening listening to this entirely unremarkable person try to spit out some concept she memorized that her handlers though would sound good? Which is offensive in content… to suggest that outcomes should be equal. Good God. **** her.


While we can certainly quibble with aspects of what she's saying, the fact that you are so vehemently opposed to discussing it tells me you have received considerably more than the median in life.
Congratulations!

Humility and gratitude are lovely attributes.


Tom, to be serious for a moment, I've studied and worked far harder in my life than has the average person. I remember clearly all the jerk offs back in high school who wouldn't study and would **** around all day. Many of them are now working at Big O Tire for $35,000 a year. Would Kamala, if she had a chance, redistribute a large part of my income to Mr. Big O Tire in the name of equal outcomes? You better believe she would.


I respect your intelligence and your hard work. I'd be interested in your thoughts on the growing wealth and income disparities that exist in this country.

Do you think this growing divide is a positive for our national harmony?

What do you think are causes and ramifications of widening socioeconomic disparities?

I'll engage in that discussion all day long, because this is, essentially, the national prosperity, is it not?

For the record, just so you know, I am a privileged white person who is the son of two sets of families who say they are "self made", but the more I look at it, they were in the right place in the right time, born with the best IQ's, with families that pushed them through the right doors, and they had the right skin color. Now, certainly, some of that is going to lead to a certain amount of inequality. But I've seen plenty of ditch diggers who work much harder and will never sniff what comes so easily.

My point is… a certain amount of it is systemic. Do you disagree? Or do you think it all comes down to your hard work.

It's okay to be honest (with yourself) and vulnerable here. You are entirely anonymous. That's the beauty of BI!
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

concordtom said:

calbear93 said:

concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html


It will come down to this.

She can fail miserably by playing identity politics. open border, high taxes and wealthy are not paying enough, racial catering. She can walk down the path of Hillary who chose the progressive wing over moderates in the rust and sun belt and allowed this MAGA populist, white nationalist nonsense to take hold.

Or she can recognize that most Americans want economic progress, US to be a world leader, sane immigration, open competition and unity as opposed to division by race, gender or sexual orientation. If she appeals to the moderates and carries through in the next four years, MAGA and woke progressives can be moved to the fringe where they belong and American can truly be great again not just on a cap but in reality.

She needs to choose the path. Her dismissing the antisemitic protesters was a good sign.


I'll agree that she definitely needs to drop the progressive talk and shift moderate if she wants to get elected.

She's got two strikes against her already:
Female
Nonwhite
Fortunately, Trump has two strikes against him:
Ass hole
Dumb ass

It's going to be both interesting and consequential.


Nonwhite isn't a strike against her. 41% of America is nonwhite. Also, 51% of America is female.


What are the racial demographic percentages in the key swing states? More white than your 41%, I'll guess.

And

Read my prior story of the lady who told me she didn't think a woman was suited for being president, simply because men are better suited for it.

Subconscious bias runs deep, even against "self" interest sometimes.

Thus, I think both points are invalidated.




Add:

Here are the racial percentage demographics for the swing states:

**Michigan:**
- White: 73.8%
- Black or African American: 14.1%
- Hispanic or Latino: 5.3%
- Asian: 3.5%
- Other races/multiracial: 3.3%

**Wisconsin:**
- White: 81.7%
- Black or African American: 6.8%
- Hispanic or Latino: 7.7%
- Asian: 3.3%
- Other races/multiracial: 1.9%

**Pennsylvania:**
- White: 74.3%
- Black or African American: 11.8%
- Hispanic or Latino: 8.3%
- Asian: 4.1%
- Other races/multiracial: 1.5%

**Georgia:**
- White: 50.1%
- Black or African American: 33.0%
- Hispanic or Latino: 10.2%
- Asian: 4.7%
- Other races/multiracial: 2.0%

**Arizona:**
- White: 54.0%
- Hispanic or Latino: 32.3%
- Black or African American: 4.8%
- Asian: 4.1%
- Other races/multiracial: 4.8%

**Nevada:**
- White: 55.8%
- Hispanic or Latino: 29.9%
- Black or African American: 9.4%
- Asian: 8.5%
- Other races/multiracial: 12.7%

dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

concordtom said:

dimitrig said:

concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html


This is why choosing Harris over Biden was stupid.

She doesn't bring anything to the table.

I suspect that in an open primary she would not have won the nomination.



I suspect this is accurate.


When you say "open primary" I think it's clear you mean "cabal of wealthy donors wining and dining delegates behind closed doors". You guys want Republican-lite and are sour that Democrats have no interest in the failed policies of the old Republican party.

It's clear that Kamala is the people's choice. The grassroots response has been overwhelming. It has surpassed anything I expected.

I think "cabal of wealthy donors wining and dining delegates behind closed doors" is what the DNC is doing right now.

When the people had a choice she didn't win a single delegate.

She would probably do better this time, but she wouldn't win it.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

oski003 said:

concordtom said:

calbear93 said:

concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html


It will come down to this.

She can fail miserably by playing identity politics. open border, high taxes and wealthy are not paying enough, racial catering. She can walk down the path of Hillary who chose the progressive wing over moderates in the rust and sun belt and allowed this MAGA populist, white nationalist nonsense to take hold.

Or she can recognize that most Americans want economic progress, US to be a world leader, sane immigration, open competition and unity as opposed to division by race, gender or sexual orientation. If she appeals to the moderates and carries through in the next four years, MAGA and woke progressives can be moved to the fringe where they belong and American can truly be great again not just on a cap but in reality.

She needs to choose the path. Her dismissing the antisemitic protesters was a good sign.


I'll agree that she definitely needs to drop the progressive talk and shift moderate if she wants to get elected.

She's got two strikes against her already:
Female
Nonwhite
Fortunately, Trump has two strikes against him:
Ass hole
Dumb ass

It's going to be both interesting and consequential.


Nonwhite isn't a strike against her. 41% of America is nonwhite. Also, 51% of America is female.


What are the racial demographic percentages in the key swing states? More white than your 41%, I'll guess.

And

Read my prior story of the lady who told me she didn't think a woman was suited for being president, simply because men are better suited for it.

Subconscious bias runs deep, even against "self" interest sometimes.

Thus, I think both points are invalidated.




Add:

Here are the racial percentage demographics for the swing states:

**Michigan:**
- White: 73.8%
- Black or African American: 14.1%
- Hispanic or Latino: 5.3%
- Asian: 3.5%
- Other races/multiracial: 3.3%

**Wisconsin:**
- White: 81.7%
- Black or African American: 6.8%
- Hispanic or Latino: 7.7%
- Asian: 3.3%
- Other races/multiracial: 1.9%

**Pennsylvania:**
- White: 74.3%
- Black or African American: 11.8%
- Hispanic or Latino: 8.3%
- Asian: 4.1%
- Other races/multiracial: 1.5%

**Georgia:**
- White: 50.1%
- Black or African American: 33.0%
- Hispanic or Latino: 10.2%
- Asian: 4.7%
- Other races/multiracial: 2.0%

**Arizona:**
- White: 54.0%
- Hispanic or Latino: 32.3%
- Black or African American: 4.8%
- Asian: 4.1%
- Other races/multiracial: 4.8%

**Nevada:**
- White: 55.8%
- Hispanic or Latino: 29.9%
- Black or African American: 9.4%
- Asian: 8.5%
- Other races/multiracial: 12.7%




I much higher percentage of minorities vote for minorities versus the percentage of white people voting for white people. I am not sure her race is a disadvantage. On the other hand, imagine if she were Latino or identified as Asian. She'd have no chance!
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
graguna said:

Harris is dominating the news cycle and has yet to pick a VP and the DNC is coming up mid Aug. I wasn't excited about her until I saw what she's done in her first 5 days. Master class!! Couldn't have gone better.
My guess is she's already decided on Kelly but why announce and get bumped to the top of the news cycle when you're already there.
Wait for a lull or for trumps next childish attention getting stunt and then announce.
Kelly is perfect - white, astronaut, wife was really shot, etc.

The media has elevated Kamala to godlike status after the coup.
This is what cults and communists do.
Joe who?
graguna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

graguna said:

Harris is dominating the news cycle and has yet to pick a VP and the DNC is coming up mid Aug. I wasn't excited about her until I saw what she's done in her first 5 days. Master class!! Couldn't have gone better.
My guess is she's already decided on Kelly but why announce and get bumped to the top of the news cycle when you're already there.
Wait for a lull or for trumps next childish attention getting stunt and then announce.
Kelly is perfect - white, astronaut, wife was really shot, etc.

The media has elevated Kamala to godlike status after the coup.
This is what cults and communists do.
Joe who?
isn't it awesome?
For years it was trump who got 75% of the media's attention. Now he's being ignored. No one even cares about the scatch on his ear anymore. And come on now, losers are tattooing trump on their body and dressing like MAGA clowns. Which party is the cult?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Exclusive poll: Harris opens up early edge with young voters

In a Biden-Trump race, the split among 18- to 34-year-olds was 53% for Biden and 47% for Trump, giving Biden a 6-point lead.

But in a Harris-Trump contest, the same respondents split 60% for Harris and 40% for Trump a 20-point lead for Harris."
Assuming this poll is accurate, is it because young voters are stupid like Kamala said?

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
graguna said:

bear2034 said:

graguna said:

Harris is dominating the news cycle and has yet to pick a VP and the DNC is coming up mid Aug. I wasn't excited about her until I saw what she's done in her first 5 days. Master class!! Couldn't have gone better.
My guess is she's already decided on Kelly but why announce and get bumped to the top of the news cycle when you're already there.
Wait for a lull or for trumps next childish attention getting stunt and then announce.
Kelly is perfect - white, astronaut, wife was really shot, etc.

The media has elevated Kamala to godlike status after the coup.
This is what cults and communists do.
Joe who?
isn't it awesome?
For years it was trump who got 75% of the media's attention. Now he's being ignored. No one even cares about the scatch on his ear anymore. And come on now, losers are tattooing trump on their body and dressing like MAGA clowns. Which party is the cult?

Quite the opposite. The liberal media is circulating stories that something other than a bullet might have hit Trump. Remember, Trump makes the libs moist.
graguna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

graguna said:

bear2034 said:

graguna said:

Harris is dominating the news cycle and has yet to pick a VP and the DNC is coming up mid Aug. I wasn't excited about her until I saw what she's done in her first 5 days. Master class!! Couldn't have gone better.
My guess is she's already decided on Kelly but why announce and get bumped to the top of the news cycle when you're already there.
Wait for a lull or for trumps next childish attention getting stunt and then announce.
Kelly is perfect - white, astronaut, wife was really shot, etc.

The media has elevated Kamala to godlike status after the coup.
This is what cults and communists do.
Joe who?
isn't it awesome?
For years it was trump who got 75% of the media's attention. Now he's being ignored. No one even cares about the scatch on his ear anymore. And come on now, losers are tattooing trump on their body and dressing like MAGA clowns. Which party is the cult?

Quite the opposite. The liberal media is circulating stories that something other than a bullet might have hit Trump. Remember, Trump makes the libs moist.
some claim that sleeping with young girls rejuvenates old men. ( the Cocoon effect ) Does it also give them the ability to regrow an ear?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.