Holy shlit
— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) November 7, 2024
Kamala Harris ended $20 million in debt
This was a campaign that raised over $1 billion
It wasn't a campaign, it was a massive pyramid scheme
I guess this wasn't a winning strategy pic.twitter.com/edir68Mnvk
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) November 6, 2024
Happy Roevember said:82gradDLSdad said:I'm sure Nancy will try to get her likeness on Mt. Rushmore right alongside Biden's.dajo9 said:Vice President Harris has shown she has zero interest in doing things the old way. She is carving a new path for Presidential campaigns and with how great a job she is doing, future campaigns will emulate her path. Kamala Harris is the next generation of leadership that is way past due.82gradDLSdad said:Never knew about this dinner. I give Schumer a lot of credit for sitting there and not showing too much displeasure with Trump. Again, not knowing anything about this dinner it seems like Kamala should have gone. She could have had some fun at Trump's expense. Seems like good PR at the very least.bear2034 said:TRUMP: "But if you really wanted Vice President Harris to accept your invitation, I guess you should have told her the funds were going to bail out the looters and rioters in Minneapolis and she would've been here guaranteed." pic.twitter.com/9aeeWEqmlT
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) October 18, 2024
Why did Kamala skip out on the Al Smith dinner?Joe Biden is a primary target of much of the rage and contempt of Democrats for losing the election.
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) November 11, 2024
Just a few short months ago, Nancy Pelosi said he's not just one of the greatest presidents of all time, but belongs on Mt. Rushmore:pic.twitter.com/lYyw4ZFjG8
“You saw that over the weekend, Kamala Harris' former communications director, Jamal Simmons, said Biden should step down to let her be the first woman president,” says @MarkHalperin. “Idiotic idea, won't happen. But behind that idiotic idea is a really smart point that ... they… pic.twitter.com/mLwjcnA9gT
— 2WAY (@2waytvapp) November 12, 2024
bear2034 said:Happy Roevember said:82gradDLSdad said:I'm sure Nancy will try to get her likeness on Mt. Rushmore right alongside Biden's.dajo9 said:Vice President Harris has shown she has zero interest in doing things the old way. She is carving a new path for Presidential campaigns and with how great a job she is doing, future campaigns will emulate her path. Kamala Harris is the next generation of leadership that is way past due.82gradDLSdad said:Never knew about this dinner. I give Schumer a lot of credit for sitting there and not showing too much displeasure with Trump. Again, not knowing anything about this dinner it seems like Kamala should have gone. She could have had some fun at Trump's expense. Seems like good PR at the very least.bear2034 said:TRUMP: "But if you really wanted Vice President Harris to accept your invitation, I guess you should have told her the funds were going to bail out the looters and rioters in Minneapolis and she would've been here guaranteed." pic.twitter.com/9aeeWEqmlT
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) October 18, 2024
Why did Kamala skip out on the Al Smith dinner?Joe Biden is a primary target of much of the rage and contempt of Democrats for losing the election.
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) November 11, 2024
Just a few short months ago, Nancy Pelosi said he's not just one of the greatest presidents of all time, but belongs on Mt. Rushmore:pic.twitter.com/lYyw4ZFjG8“You saw that over the weekend, Kamala Harris' former communications director, Jamal Simmons, said Biden should step down to let her be the first woman president,” says @MarkHalperin. “Idiotic idea, won't happen. But behind that idiotic idea is a really smart point that ... they… pic.twitter.com/mLwjcnA9gT
— 2WAY (@2waytvapp) November 12, 2024
This thing has some legs. Some Democrats are considering asking Joe Biden to resign to allow Kamala Harris become the first woman president between now and Trump's inauguration.
It just shows that some on the left just don't get it. They are so beholden to identity politics and out of touch with the country they are willing to push a sitting President out of office so a token minority could have a couple of weeks in the big chair. Who cares about the country or even respecting minority women enough to expect them to earn the privilege? Disgusting.bear2034 said:“You saw that over the weekend, Kamala Harris' former communications director, Jamal Simmons, said Biden should step down to let her be the first woman president,” says @MarkHalperin. “Idiotic idea, won't happen. But behind that idiotic idea is a really smart point that ... they… pic.twitter.com/mLwjcnA9gT
— 2WAY (@2waytvapp) November 12, 2024
This thing has some legs. Some Democrats are considering asking Joe Biden to resign to allow Kamala Harris become the first woman president between now and Trump's inauguration.
tequila4kapp said:It just shows that some on the left just don't get it. They are so beholden to identity politics and out of touch with the country they are willing to push a sitting President out of office so a token minority could have a couple of weeks in the big chair. Who cares about the country or even respecting minority women enough to expect them to earn the privilege? Disgusting.bear2034 said:“You saw that over the weekend, Kamala Harris' former communications director, Jamal Simmons, said Biden should step down to let her be the first woman president,” says @MarkHalperin. “Idiotic idea, won't happen. But behind that idiotic idea is a really smart point that ... they… pic.twitter.com/mLwjcnA9gT
— 2WAY (@2waytvapp) November 12, 2024
This thing has some legs. Some Democrats are considering asking Joe Biden to resign to allow Kamala Harris become the first woman president between now and Trump's inauguration.
If that was really true the 25th Amendment would have been invoked. It seems more probable certain power brokers realized he couldn't beat Trump.bearister said:
" …they are willing to push a sitting President out of office.."
tRump and the debate did that by convincing everyone Biden was senile…..and tRump finally got one right. My Mom could walk on the beach normally in her early 90's. Biden looked like he was on a rollercoaster.
You're missing a key point. Invoking the 25th amendment would have discredited the entire democrat party which had been covering him for 4 years. That is why they didn't pull the 25th amendment trigger. That and that fact that the Obama team running the country didn't want to lose power and/or piss off Jill.tequila4kapp said:If that was really true the 25th Amendment would have been invoked. It seems more probable certain power brokers realized he couldn't beat Trump.bearister said:
" …they are willing to push a sitting President out of office.."
tRump and the debate did that by convincing everyone Biden was senile…..and tRump finally got one right. My Mom could walk on the beach normally in her early 90's. Biden looked like he was on a rollercoaster.
BearGoggles said:You're missing a key point. Invoking the 25th amendment would have discredited the entire democrat party which had been covering him for 4 years. That is why they didn't pull the 25th amendment trigger. That and that fact that the Obama team running the country didn't want to lose power and/or piss off Jill.tequila4kapp said:If that was really true the 25th Amendment would have been invoked. It seems more probable certain power brokers realized he couldn't beat Trump.bearister said:
" …they are willing to push a sitting President out of office.."
tRump and the debate did that by convincing everyone Biden was senile…..and tRump finally got one right. My Mom could walk on the beach normally in her early 90's. Biden looked like he was on a rollercoaster.
It was both the fact that he was senile and couldn't beat Trump (partly because he was too old to campaign).
I'm wondering how long it will be until we start hearing stories of how the country was run the past 4 years and who was making decisions/influencing Biden. In any other context, this would be elder abuse. The dems do a much better job of closing ranks and not leaking. But at some point it will come out.
sycasey said:Ann Selzer's poll in Iowa is one that a lot of people look to as a bellwether of how things are going in the midwest, because a shift in Iowa usually correlates to one across MI, WI, PA, MN, OH, etc. (It pointed to Trump beating expectations in 2016 and 2020, for example.) If this accuracy trend continues, then a blue shift like this would mean Trump is done. He can't win without picking off at least one of the midwestern blue states, and Iowa is redder than Wisconsin or Pennsylvania.bearister said:bear2034 said:
Please don't tell me Harrison Ford partied with Diddy too.
In the Google Image library search term "202 Diddy Trump Photos"
Oh, and BTW:Iowa Poll: Kamala Harris leapfrogs Donald Trump to take lead near Election Day. Here's how https://t.co/4767zdTjyL via @DMRegister
— J. Ann Selzer (@jaselzer) November 2, 2024
“There was a backlash with some of our progressive staff that didn’t want her to be on it.”
— Tim Miller (@Timodc) November 13, 2024
All you can do is laugh…(and not hire people like this for presidential campaigns anymore) https://t.co/8fExp4cgU2
Big C said:
^ If she had gone on Rogan, no guarantee she would've helped herself. Maybe the opposite. 20/20 hindsight, though: mistake.
Dozens of different, mostly-minor reasons she lost... and they all added up.
She is the person who showed up to the most popular Muslim based pod cast and tried to make a joke about bacon being a seasoning. It was so bad the pod caster shelved the episode.Big C said:
^ If she had gone on Rogan, no guarantee she would've helped herself. Maybe the opposite. 20/20 hindsight, though: mistake.
Dozens of different, mostly-minor reasons she lost... and they all added up.
sycasey said:Big C said:
^ If she had gone on Rogan, no guarantee she would've helped herself. Maybe the opposite. 20/20 hindsight, though: mistake.
Dozens of different, mostly-minor reasons she lost... and they all added up.
It's also less about Kamala herself and more that people broadly on the left shouldn't avoid a popular podcast space like this. It means you aren't reaching an important slice of the electorate
I remember when Bernie went on and got flack for it. That was stupid.
This is what gets me about the talk of misogyny. She didn't do anything to appeal to men. Abortion (women) + Trump is Hitler (base) was it.Anarchistbear said:
She was advised not to go on Rogan because it would hurt her and to appear with Liz Cheney because it would help her.
Both the advisors and candidate are dumber than bricks
dimitrig said:
Not going on Rogan isn't why she lost.
She lost because she was an unelected, unlikeable black female candidate who was associated with the currently unpopular (deserved or not) President.
I generally agree. Slight adjustment would be that if you have a tough, close election it can be decided by the totality of several small-ish decisions. The decision to give up free access to @15M men was not a good one and definitely contributed to her Ldimitrig said:
Not going on Rogan isn't why she lost.
She lost because she was an unelected, unlikeable black female candidate who was associated with the currently unpopular (deserved or not) President.
I said this back in July:
" About the only contender worse than Biden is Kamala Harris."
To me these kinds of arguments are more of a stand-in for a larger issue:Cal88 said:dimitrig said:
Not going on Rogan isn't why she lost.
She lost because she was an unelected, unlikeable black female candidate who was associated with the currently unpopular (deserved or not) President.
There was the same polemic about Hillary not having gone to Wisconsin in 2016, but it wouldn't have made any difference either.
Ehh, I don't think so. I'm pretty sure Biden would have lost by more.dimitrig said:
" About the only contender worse than Biden is Kamala Harris."
sycasey said:
Assuming this is true . . . oy. Dems need to stop listening to these kinds of staffers.“There was a backlash with some of our progressive staff that didn’t want her to be on it.”
— Tim Miller (@Timodc) November 13, 2024
All you can do is laugh…(and not hire people like this for presidential campaigns anymore) https://t.co/8fExp4cgU2
Big C said:
^ If she had gone on Rogan, no guarantee she would've helped herself. Maybe the opposite. 20/20 hindsight, though: mistake.
Dozens of different, mostly-minor reasons she lost... and they all added up.
tequila4kapp said:I generally agree. Slight adjustment would be that if you have a tough, close election it can be decided by the totality of several small-ish decisions. The decision to give up free access to @15M men was not a good one and definitely contributed to her Ldimitrig said:
Not going on Rogan isn't why she lost.
She lost because she was an unelected, unlikeable black female candidate who was associated with the currently unpopular (deserved or not) President.
I said this back in July:
" About the only contender worse than Biden is Kamala Harris."
Rogan's audience is reportedly just short of 15M and overwhelmingly male. So as political demographics go, yes.movielover said:Free access to 15M men. Huh?tequila4kapp said:I generally agree. Slight adjustment would be that if you have a tough, close election it can be decided by the totality of several small-ish decisions. The decision to give up free access to @15M men was not a good one and definitely contributed to her Ldimitrig said:
Not going on Rogan isn't why she lost.
She lost because she was an unelected, unlikeable black female candidate who was associated with the currently unpopular (deserved or not) President.
I said this back in July:
" About the only contender worse than Biden is Kamala Harris."
movielover said:Big C said:
^ If she had gone on Rogan, no guarantee she would've helped herself. Maybe the opposite. 20/20 hindsight, though: mistake.
Dozens of different, mostly-minor reasons she lost... and they all added up.
ROTFLMAO
Minor reasons:
1. Historic inflation
2. Wide open border, 8 - 15 million illegals ushered in for WEF Globalists
3. Cities overwhelmed w #2
4. Two wars
5. Over one million dead
6. American cities a dystopian nightmare
7. Our Black brothers saw the bank vault opened for illegal immigrants
8. Catholics, Amish*, and Latinis
9. Pressler, Musk, Rogan, Gabbard, RFK Jr and even Barron
10. Overzealous milk Nazi's*
11. Soft-on-crime policies, coddling criminals
12. Widespread censorship
13. Letting the cartel run the border
14. Progressive policies are kooky (see above)
It is a real concern probably because month over month or annual inflation (rate of growth) does not account for the cumulative effect. For example, per CNN the average household spends $1,150 more per month today than during Trump's 1st term; food prices are @23% more, energy @43% and vehicles @20% more.Big C said:
b. the inflation -- though a real concern for a lot of people -- had mostly come back down
tequila4kapp said:It is a real concern probably because month over month or annual inflation (rate of growth) does not account for the cumulative effect. For example, per CNN the average household spends $1,150 more per month today than during Trump's 1st term; food prices are @23% more, energy @43% and vehicles @20% more.Big C said:
b. the inflation -- though a real concern for a lot of people -- had mostly come back down
Big C said:movielover said:Big C said:
^ If she had gone on Rogan, no guarantee she would've helped herself. Maybe the opposite. 20/20 hindsight, though: mistake.
Dozens of different, mostly-minor reasons she lost... and they all added up.
ROTFLMAO
Minor reasons:
1. Historic inflation
2. Wide open border, 8 - 15 million illegals ushered in for WEF Globalists
3. Cities overwhelmed w #2
4. Two wars
5. Over one million dead
6. American cities a dystopian nightmare
7. Our Black brothers saw the bank vault opened for illegal immigrants
8. Catholics, Amish*, and Latinis
9. Pressler, Musk, Rogan, Gabbard, RFK Jr and even Barron
10. Overzealous milk Nazi's*
11. Soft-on-crime policies, coddling criminals
12. Widespread censorship
13. Letting the cartel run the border
14. Progressive policies are kooky (see above)
I'll just dissect #1 (for now).
a. the inflation in the mid-late '70s, early '80s was the "historic" one. Ancient history for young bucks like you
b. the inflation -- though a real concern for a lot of people -- had mostly come back down
c. sometimes the remedies for inflation can be worse than the inflation itself
d. how was the Vice President responsible for the inflation?
e. how was the President even responsible for the inflation? In the '70s, we saw two Presidents (one GOP, one Dem) have their reelections thwarted by inflation... they couldn't stop it, given "c" (above).
