Discussion on Musk's DoGE ideas, the federal deficit, and GDP

43,691 Views | 876 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by oski003
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Obama put Biden in charge of his version of DOGE but he failed. Trump and Elon are implementing what Obama and Biden couldn't or didn't want to do.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

There is absolutely no way this guy would ever do a Nazi salute.
There is absolutely no way the Democrats would fund the Azov neo-Nazis in Ukraine.

And yet your boy Musk tweeted that Adolf Hitler didn't kill millions of people.
Is this why you admire Elon so much?




bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

There is absolutely no way this guy would ever do a Nazi salute.
There is absolutely no way the Democrats would fund the Azov neo-Nazis in Ukraine.

And yet your boy Musk tweeted that Adolf Hitler didn't kill millions of people.
Is this why you admire Elon so much?

Oh, no! you're devastated.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:



Oh, no! you're devastated.

The only devastation that I see is Consumer Sentiment given how stupid Trump and his supporters are.
Consumer Confidence hit a 2-YEAR LOW.
Reported today.

MAGA !!!

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Obama created DOGE 1.0.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Apparently, Hitler didn't murder millions of people.
It was the Public Works guys.

Do you believe that too?

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another reason they call it the bleeding edge.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Apparently, Hitler didn't murder millions of people.
It was the Public Works guys.

Do you believe that too?

No one cares about what Forbes has to say about Elon Musk.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Apparently, Hitler didn't murder millions of people.
It was the Public Works guys.

Do you believe that too?
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We'll cut a charity program so that Trump is able to golf this weekend."

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DOGE sackings at NOAA spark new warning over tornado response as 34 killed in twisters - Irish Star


https://www.irishstar.com/news/us-news/doge-sackings-noaa-spark-new-34868198

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DOGE has been very popular except for the people who spray swastikas on other people's property.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

DOGE has been very popular except for the people who spray swastikas on other people's property.
I've never spray painted anyone else's property let alone paint swastikas on them. I suspect there are at least 75-100 million in my category.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Correct. We mainly have to worry about the 10-20 million radical Democrats, some who turn violent.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How did they all become radicalized?

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

How did they all become radicalized?



Great question!

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats kneeling to BLM, wearing Kente cloth.

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/on-and-off-the-avenue/the-embarrassment-of-democrats-wearing-kente-cloth-stoles

The New Yorker: The Embarrassment of Democrats Wearing Kente-Cloth Stoles

"The announcement did not warrant such a visual stunt, but the Democratic Party, the party of optics and gesture, apparently could not resist. On Monday, members of Congress introduced the Justice in Policing Act of 2020, news that was bulldozed by the pageant antics accompanying it. Swathed in identical kente stoles, the lawmakers, intent on conveying solidarity with their constituents, only made themselves models of obtuseness."
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We held primaries and Trump defeated Nikki Haley, Ron DeSantis, and Chris Christie. The other side voted for Biden and got Kamala.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"I was at the State of the Union and I was up in the balcony. I was looking down at the Democrats holding up these silly little signs and the sign that I saw the most was one that said 'Musk steals'."

"I really thought about that, which is, you know, how is Elon stealing? He's returning money to the Treasury."

"And then it hit me, they actually have come to believe that this taxpayer money is theirs and by returning it to the Treasury, Elon is stealing from them."

"That's my best explanation of why they're in such hysterical state about this."

- David Sacks
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"Musk steals!" - Democrat sign paddles
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:



"That's my best explanation of why they're in such hysterical state about this."



What is your best explanation for posting 44x on a Sunday?
Do you get paid for your posts?

Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

bear2034 said:



"That's my best explanation of why they're in such hysterical state about this."



What is your best explanation for posting 44x on a Sunday?
Do you get paid for your posts?



I wish I got paid for his posts!

2034 'n' I would go from "buddies" to "best buddies"!
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

bear2034 said:



"That's my best explanation of why they're in such hysterical state about this."


What is your best explanation for posting 44x on a Sunday?
Do you get paid for your posts?

It wasn't me. It was my auto-pen.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

bear2034 said:



"That's my best explanation of why they're in such hysterical state about this."



What is your best explanation for posting 44x on a Sunday?
Do you get paid for your posts?




Why do you care?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

DiabloWags said:

bear2034 said:



"That's my best explanation of why they're in such hysterical state about this."



What is your best explanation for posting 44x on a Sunday?
Do you get paid for your posts?




Why do you care?

The vast majority of posters here are genuinely interested in engaging in a thoughtful discussion.

When someone clearly is posting TROLL type posts with no real interest in genuinely engaging . . . then a forum like this winds up losing any kind of opportunity to add value.

Sadly, the moderators of this Forum don't have an issue with this.
Just as they don't have any problem with those posting here who never attended or graduated from CAL.

In fact, I have found you yourself have repeatedly posted "memes" and other "facts" and "talking" points that you have no understanding of, especially as it relates to the economy. Rarely do you ever post your own original thoughts in a genuine manner to engage in a fruitful discussion.

For some reason, this consideration escapes you.

<From the OT Moderators: we understand trolling to involve deliberately offensive or provocative messages, not the perceived quality or sophistication of the message. Posts that potentially violate rules need 2 flags to be brought to our attention.>
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why do you hurl adolescent insults at so many people with contrary views?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

movielover said:

DiabloWags said:

bear2034 said:



"That's my best explanation of why they're in such hysterical state about this."



What is your best explanation for posting 44x on a Sunday?
Do you get paid for your posts?




Why do you care?

The vast majority of posters here are genuinely interested in engaging in a thoughtful discussion.

When someone clearly is posting TROLL type posts with no real interest in genuinely engaging . . . then a forum like this winds up losing any kind of opportunity to add value.

Sadly, the moderators of this Forum don't have an issue with this.
Just as they don't have any problem with those posting here who never attended or graduated from CAL.

In fact, I have found you yourself have repeatedly posted "memes" and other "facts" and "talking" points that you have no understanding of, especially as it relates to the economy. Rarely do you ever post your own original thoughts in a genuine manner to engage in a fruitful discussion.

For some reason, this consideration escapes you.

<From the OT Moderators: we understand trolling to involve deliberately offensive or provocative messages, not the perceived quality or sophistication of the message. Posts that potentially violate rules need 2 flags to be brought to our attention.>

Mods are already busy keeping a lid on the more aggro posters here, no need to saddle them with your pet peeves.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:




Mods are already busy keeping a lid on the more aggro posters here, no need to saddle them with your pet peeves.

If you think that I'm the only one with this position, you are sadly mistaken.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:


<From the OT Moderators: we understand trolling to involve deliberately offensive or provocative messages, not the perceived quality or sophistication of the message. Posts that potentially violate rules need 2 flags to be brought to our attention.>

Thanks for the definition.
Can you share with the community why AunBear89 was recently given a permanent ban?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

DiabloWags said:


<From the OT Moderators: we understand trolling to involve deliberately offensive or provocative messages, not the perceived quality or sophistication of the message. Posts that potentially violate rules need 2 flags to be brought to our attention.>

Thanks for the definition.
Can you share with the community why AunBear89 was recently given a permanent ban?



It's pretty clear that he has an impulsively pugilistic disposition and posting pattern. The great majority of his posts had little or no content and were more like verbal schoolyard tussles. He used to have long, repetitive tussles with the late Blueblood way back when, but while Blueblood matured a bit with age, AunBear did not. He kept at it despite having received several temporary bans.

You have a tendency to blow off your lid from time to time, but most of your posts have content, often interesting and informative material derived from your practical experience as a trader. AunBear on the other hand made virtually no effort to engage in real conversations, he is here primarily for the cyber bar brawls with the "other camp", a behavioral pattern which I would imagine can get taxing for the mods.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm sure he has 'fun' w his buddy "Globalist Gary", aka "Carbon Tax Cohn".
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

I'm sure he has 'fun' w his buddy "Globalist Gary", aka "Carbon Tax Cohn".


You clearly dont believe in FREE TRADE.

Go ahead and tell us in your own words, why TARIFFS are bullish and why the stockmarket is wrong.

I'll wait.




Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

movielover said:

I'm sure he has 'fun' w his buddy "Globalist Gary", aka "Carbon Tax Cohn".

You clearly dont believe in FREE TRADE.

Go ahead and tell us in your own words, why TARIFFS are bullish and why the stockmarket is wrong.

I'll wait.


Free trade can be dangerous, and tariffs can be counterproductive, trade should be managed on a case by case basis.

For example, if we had free trade with China in the auto sector, the entire automotive sector in the US would be wiped out in a decade or two, max. See the TV and consumer electronics market. You have to weigh advantages from importing cheaper products with negative externalities (loss of high paying jobs in an industry with very high multiplier effects).

I would let in some Chinese manufacturers setting up shop and supliers in the US or going into JVs with domestic partners, best of both worlds, same as what is done with Japanese companies.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.