calumnus said:oski003 said:calumnus said:oski003 said:
That's interesting.
Rodgers is wrongly attacked by a reporter tweeting a WSJ article wrongly attacking Rodgers.
Bahktari and Rodgers go after the reporter, instead of the author of the WSJ article and other liberal media wrongly attacking Rodgers. The reporter also wrote about misconduct from a buddy of Rodgers a little while back.
In turn, anti-vax folks threaten the reporter. Reporter wonders why she was singled out. Does that sum it up? What ended up happening to her?
Wait, you think the Wall Street Journal, before but especially since it was bought by Rupert Murdock in 2007, is "liberal media"?
Liberal tweeters . WSJ just shills for Big Pharma.
Except liberals are generally not fans of Big Pharma. That is very different than understanding science, the efficacy of vaccines, face masks and quarantines and the desirability of using them to save lives. :-)
When Biden got behind the vaccines, liberals followed. Obviously, Big Pharma is also behind the vaccines as Pfizer made $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. The enemy (Big Pharma) of your enemy (Rodgers) is your friend. So, yes, the liberals are now fans of Big Pharma. We aren't having a conversation about vaccine efficacy right now, except to say that professional athletes playing outdoors shouldn't have been forced or strongly pressured to get covid vaccines.