Kamala Harris for President

83,138 Views | 1470 Replies | Last: 6 days ago by Big C
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:


Look how Biden's language changed over the years. Kamala Harris was a DEI hire that he himself would have opposed years ago.
And how was Vance more accomplished than Harris? Was Vance a white privilege hire?

Trump never mentioned Vance's race and gender as the only qualification for picking his VP like Joe Biden did, my communist friend.

I am not your friend and him mentioning Kamala 's race and gender and then picking a white male speaks volume. So, no you are wrong in all counts. And honestly, if you did some research, Vance, MAGA and Trump's populist, anti-capitalism views are a lot closer to communism than you seem to think.

But you are a communist. The Democrats are in the situation they are now precisely because Biden didn't pick the best candidate as his VP. Even Obama knows Kamala won't win.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:



She is ambitious. You need to be to run for president.
Are you saying she was never in love with the Willie?
Why do you care so much about her former love life?
Apparently, it wasn't love to you but ambition.
Apparently I don't care. If your only obsession is whether a woman you don't know was in love with someone she was dating, you are a lost soul. Didn't realize you were using that criteria. Apparently Trump and all your MAGA politicians passed that test for you with flying colors?

When I think about obsession, I think about you and your ilk's strong desire to k8ll babies.
You seem to think about me a lot more than you should in ways that seems a bit odd.

The other left wingers here are at least consistent with their nutjoberry. You stuck out for your contradictions.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am really enjoying that a new group of freedom fighters has taken up opposing the crazy club, whom I have increasingly grown to ignore and not even read.

It's a basic skill, I know.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:


We work with what we are given. And given a choice between Trump and Harris, I will pick Harris. Not thrilled about it but better than picking Biden at his current age.

It's no surprise that you would vote for someone considered the most liberal [read: far left] Senator in 2019.
That should tell you how little regard I have for your group of MAGA clowns.

You would actually vote for a left-wing extremist, communist that couldn't make the cut in her own party's primary back in 2020. Amazing....not.


Yes. I would. MAGA clowns with their 60's Dixiecrat populist, racist views who do no actual governing are that bad.

I feel hope for the future!
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

He didn't have to. An old white guy picked a young white guy as his running mate, and all their white guy and white gal supporters cheered like it was the greatest choice ever made.

When, in reality, JD was picked because he won the
"Who can kiss Trump's fat white ass the bestest and longest?" Competition.

Congratulations. You, going4roses, and calbear93 are ideological brothers from a different mother.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

oski003 said:

going4roses said:

bear2034 said:

D - diversity of race but not diversity of views or ideas
E - equity, not equal opportunity but equal outcomes
I - inclusion except for people and ideas that they don't agree with


Code word breakdown :

Thug = n*gger
Inner City = n*gger
Law and order = n*gger
Welfare queen = n*gger
You people = n*gger
Personal responsibility = n*gger
Handouts = n*gger
Socialism = n*gger
Marxist = n*gger
Affirmative action = n*gger
Chicago = n*gger
Urban = n*gger
Critical Race Theory = n*gger
Woke - n*gger
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) = n*gger
Victim/Victim mentality = n*gger
Per capita = n*gger
Race baiter = n*gger
Quota = n*gger
Entitlements = n*gger
UnAmerican = n*gger
Democrat plantation = n*gger
Fatherless = n*gger
Detroit = n*gger
Low IQ = n*gger
Should've complied = n*gger

You have racist colored glasses. Hopefully, you meet some nice non-black folks who restore your distorted view of the USA (or the world).

I don't know what can be more racist than seeing EVERYTHING through the lens of race.

Finally something you and I agree on. Racism, whether from far left clowns or MAGA clowns, are bad.

What's ironic is that the Democratic pick for your president was hired solely for being a black woman when she also happens to be Asian.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Kamala Harris is a threat to democracy. Just look at what she did to San Francisco.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm playing catch up on how this works. Article from a couple days ago:

Close to 4,000 delegates will gather at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago starting Aug. 19. Biden has won more than 3,800 of those delegates, who will now all be released to vote for whomever they choose.

To win the nomination, a candidate must secure 1,986 delegates.


As of today, Harris has surpassed that number, I suppose based upon said delegates verbal announcement.

Had a challenger stepped forward immediately, I suppose said delegates could/would have withheld any such announcement.

I'm confident that the party did orchestrate it all so that there would not be challenges. It was probably discussed, pros vs cons, and decided upon.

Trump called it a Palace Coup, which is convenient for him because he's been accused of a soft coup.

Yet, I don't know what MAGAts would have thought would be acceptable to them.

I posed the question elsewhere and did not get an answer. Let's say Trump had a severe stroke or died. MAGAts shan't to insist that he resign? Okay then what if he had been shot at and simply said, "you know what? I'm sick of this, I'm going to play with babies during my remaining years. I quit in January!"

My point is, does it matter why he's exiting the stage in order to find a new D party Candidate at this late date?

I don't think so. The Party still has to come up with a candidate, and it's up to party rules. The constitution does not address political parties, and I don't know what laws do.

Neither do the detractors
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:


Look how Biden's language changed over the years. Kamala Harris was a DEI hire that he himself would have opposed years ago.
And how was Vance more accomplished than Harris? Was Vance a white privilege hire?

Trump never mentioned Vance's race and gender as the only qualification for picking his VP like Joe Biden did, my communist friend.

I am not your friend and him mentioning Kamala 's race and gender and then picking a white male speaks volume. So, no you are wrong in all counts. And honestly, if you did some research, Vance, MAGA and Trump's populist, anti-capitalism views are a lot closer to communism than you seem to think.

But you are a communist. The Democrats are in the situation they are now precisely because Biden didn't pick the best candidate as his VP. Even Obama knows Kamala won't win.
I'm finding it hysterical that bear2034 has decided that Calbear93 must be a communist because they disagree. I may disagree with Calbear93 on many things, but it's obvious that he's not a communist.

As for Obama, the headlines I seeing today say he has been advising Harris and will endorse her soon. Obama apparently held off to let Biden withdraw without being overshadowed by his statement.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:


Look how Biden's language changed over the years. Kamala Harris was a DEI hire that he himself would have opposed years ago.
And how was Vance more accomplished than Harris? Was Vance a white privilege hire?

Trump never mentioned Vance's race and gender as the only qualification for picking his VP like Joe Biden did, my communist friend.

I am not your friend and him mentioning Kamala 's race and gender and then picking a white male speaks volume. So, no you are wrong in all counts. And honestly, if you did some research, Vance, MAGA and Trump's populist, anti-capitalism views are a lot closer to communism than you seem to think.

But you are a communist. The Democrats are in the situation they are now precisely because Biden didn't pick the best candidate as his VP. Even Obama knows Kamala won't win.
I'm finding it hysterical that bear2034 has decided that Calbear93 must be a communist because they disagree. I may disagree with Calbear93 on many things, but it's obvious that he's not a communist.

As for Obama, the headlines I seeing today say he has been advising Harris and will endorse her soon. Obama apparently held off to let Biden withdraw without being overshadowed by his statement.

When asked if he would vote for a communist, he responded that he would. Communists in western democracies don't admit to being communists, they all consider themselves moderates.
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


Kamala Harris is a threat to democracy. Just look at what she did to San Francisco.
I imagine it would be pretty hard for you to get to SF from Moscow on the little rubles you get paid with.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoOskie said:

bear2034 said:

Kamala Harris is a threat to democracy. Just look at what she did to San Francisco.
I imagine it would be pretty hard for you to get to SF from Moscow on the little rubles you get paid with.
The Democrats and the media have already transitioned from playing the Russia card to the race card. I suggest you should transition too.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:


We work with what we are given. And given a choice between Trump and Harris, I will pick Harris. Not thrilled about it but better than picking Biden at his current age.

It's no surprise that you would vote for someone considered the most liberal [read: far left] Senator in 2019.
That should tell you how little regard I have for your group of MAGA clowns.

You would actually vote for a left-wing extremist, communist that couldn't make the cut in her own party's primary back in 2020. Amazing....not.

Yes. I would. MAGA clowns with their 60's Dixiecrat populist, racist views who do no actual governing are that bad.

How does it feel to come out of the closet today?
Was never in a closet so sorry I cannot bond with you on some shared experience.

You always paraded yourself here as some sort of centrist or moderate Republican but now we see that it was all a charade.
Unlike you, I do not call any party or position my master that owns my allegiance.

I just share my views, irrespective of the alignment with any specific party.

You know - having my own opinions.

Now, you may think you knew me, but I don't know you and you don't know me.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:



She is ambitious. You need to be to run for president.
Are you saying she was never in love with the Willie?
Why do you care so much about her former love life?
Apparently, it wasn't love to you but ambition.
Apparently I don't care. If your only obsession is whether a woman you don't know was in love with someone she was dating, you are a lost soul. Didn't realize you were using that criteria. Apparently Trump and all your MAGA politicians passed that test for you with flying colors?

When I think about obsession, I think about you and your ilk's strong desire to k8ll babies.
You seem to think about me a lot more than you should in ways that seems a bit odd.

The other left wingers here are at least consistent with their nutjoberry. You stuck out for your contradictions.
Seems like you like things in black and white. Whatever works for you. Others who have the capacity to understand nuances don't have to think along the lines of MAGA or nutjob communist, but I also understand that we are all different with different levels of ability to process shades of concepts.

I cannot blame you for your limitations.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

oski003 said:

going4roses said:

bear2034 said:

D - diversity of race but not diversity of views or ideas
E - equity, not equal opportunity but equal outcomes
I - inclusion except for people and ideas that they don't agree with


Code word breakdown :

Thug = n*gger
Inner City = n*gger
Law and order = n*gger
Welfare queen = n*gger
You people = n*gger
Personal responsibility = n*gger
Handouts = n*gger
Socialism = n*gger
Marxist = n*gger
Affirmative action = n*gger
Chicago = n*gger
Urban = n*gger
Critical Race Theory = n*gger
Woke - n*gger
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) = n*gger
Victim/Victim mentality = n*gger
Per capita = n*gger
Race baiter = n*gger
Quota = n*gger
Entitlements = n*gger
UnAmerican = n*gger
Democrat plantation = n*gger
Fatherless = n*gger
Detroit = n*gger
Low IQ = n*gger
Should've complied = n*gger

You have racist colored glasses. Hopefully, you meet some nice non-black folks who restore your distorted view of the USA (or the world).

I don't know what can be more racist than seeing EVERYTHING through the lens of race.

Finally something you and I agree on. Racism, whether from far left clowns or MAGA clowns, are bad.

What's ironic is that the Democratic pick for your president was hired solely for being a black woman when she also happens to be Asian.
And you seem to be really connected and deeply knowledgeable about what happened. Thank you for your brilliant insight.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

AunBear89 said:

He didn't have to. An old white guy picked a young white guy as his running mate, and all their white guy and white gal supporters cheered like it was the greatest choice ever made.

When, in reality, JD was picked because he won the
"Who can kiss Trump's fat white ass the bestest and longest?" Competition.

Congratulations. You, going4roses, and calbear93 are ideological brothers from a different mother.
OK, strangely that was not the dumbest thing you have written today. For most, it would be patent as to why that was dumb, and it would constitute the dumbest thing written in their lifetime.

You play at a much higher level of idiocy. So, hard to really compare this post to your other posts other than it figures.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:


Look how Biden's language changed over the years. Kamala Harris was a DEI hire that he himself would have opposed years ago.
And how was Vance more accomplished than Harris? Was Vance a white privilege hire?

Trump never mentioned Vance's race and gender as the only qualification for picking his VP like Joe Biden did, my communist friend.

I am not your friend and him mentioning Kamala 's race and gender and then picking a white male speaks volume. So, no you are wrong in all counts. And honestly, if you did some research, Vance, MAGA and Trump's populist, anti-capitalism views are a lot closer to communism than you seem to think.

But you are a communist. The Democrats are in the situation they are now precisely because Biden didn't pick the best candidate as his VP. Even Obama knows Kamala won't win.
I'm finding it hysterical that bear2034 has decided that Calbear93 must be a communist because they disagree. I may disagree with Calbear93 on many things, but it's obvious that he's not a communist.

As for Obama, the headlines I seeing today say he has been advising Harris and will endorse her soon. Obama apparently held off to let Biden withdraw without being overshadowed by his statement.

When asked if he would vote for a communist, he responded that he would. Communists in western democracies don't admit to being communists, they all consider themselves moderates.
The fact that you throw out communism without really even understanding what that means or who Engels or Marx is or that the person you think is such a great hire is anti-corporation and big business and would rather suppress competition to protect common workers (I've actually met JD Vance and his wife - you don't seem to really understand his populist views).

You just saw some 80s movies and think communism means something it doesn't.

And yet your level of misunderstanding of communism tracks with your typical levels of misunderstanding.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Record zoom call tonight (~150,000 people) for Vice President Harris has raised over $1M

Edit - raised over $2M
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 Days Since Dem Coup said:

In other news, Democrat mega-donor Reid Hoffman hates Lina Khan and wants Kamala to fire her. That'll create an interesting conundrum for dajo9.



Also, a retrospective of some of Kamala's greatest hits






Biden is a plagiarist so she fit right in.

concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html


This is why choosing Harris over Biden was stupid.

She doesn't bring anything to the table.

I suspect that in an open primary she would not have won the nomination.

GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 Days Since Dem Coup said:

MiZery said:

So again


When did Biden claim she was a border czar? When did he say she was responsible for the border? Is Axios your source? Seriously?

Feel free to STFU on this and pretty much any other topic ever, you disingenuous dip****


I don't see border czar written anywhere in what you posted. Biden doesn't say it in his video. Where's your proof?
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html


This is why choosing Harris over Biden was stupid.

She doesn't bring anything to the table.

I suspect that in an open primary she would not have won the nomination.


It's only July. Give it a little time, things will change.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html


This is almost all from before Vice President Harris became the nominee and the ongoing groundswell of support began
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoOskie said:

dimitrig said:

concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html


This is why choosing Harris over Biden was stupid.

She doesn't bring anything to the table.

I suspect that in an open primary she would not have won the nomination.

It's only July. Give it a little time, things will change.

True. Someone might try to kill Trump again.

Anything can happen!

Tune in next week!



Chapman_is_Gone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:


We work with what we are given. And given a choice between Trump and Harris, I will pick Harris. Not thrilled about it but better than picking Biden at his current age.

It's no surprise that you would vote for someone considered the most liberal [read: far left] Senator in 2019.


Why am I sitting here wasting my evening listening to this entirely unremarkable person try to spit out some concept she memorized that her handlers though would sound good? Which is offensive in content… to suggest that outcomes should be equal. Good God. **** her.
Chapman_is_Gone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:



She is ambitious. You need to be to run for president.
Are you saying she was never in love with the Willie?
Why do you care so much about her former love life?


I care if someone is a wh ore. Is that so hard for you to understand? It speaks to her character.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:



She is ambitious. You need to be to run for president.
Are you saying she was never in love with the Willie?
Why do you care so much about her former love life?


I care if someone is a wh ore. Is that so hard for you to understand? It speaks to her character.


Character? Hmm …
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:



She is ambitious. You need to be to run for president.
Are you saying she was never in love with the Willie?
Why do you care so much about her former love life?


I care if someone is a wh ore. Is that so hard for you to understand? It speaks to her character.
Yes, much worse than the guy who was besties with an underage sex trafficker (Jeff Epstein), pumped and paid off p0rn stars, married an eastern European escort (probable russian spy), and talks about doing his own daughter. Soooo much better to support that guy.
Chapman_is_Gone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoOskie said:

Chapman_is_Gone said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:



She is ambitious. You need to be to run for president.
Are you saying she was never in love with the Willie?
Why do you care so much about her former love life?


I care if someone is a wh ore. Is that so hard for you to understand? It speaks to her character.
Yes, much worse than the guy who was besties with an underage sex trafficker (Jeff Epstein), pumped and paid off p0rn stars, married an eastern European escort (probable russian spy), and talks about doing his own daughter. Soooo much better to support that guy.


I don't support Trump.

I despise all of you morons who enjoy political entertainment. You are ****ing losers.
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

GoOskie said:

Chapman_is_Gone said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:



She is ambitious. You need to be to run for president.
Are you saying she was never in love with the Willie?
Why do you care so much about her former love life?


I care if someone is a wh ore. Is that so hard for you to understand? It speaks to her character.
Yes, much worse than the guy who was besties with an underage sex trafficker (Jeff Epstein), pumped and paid off p0rn stars, married an eastern European escort (probable russian spy), and talks about doing his own daughter. Soooo much better to support that guy.


I don't support Trump.

I despise all of you morons who enjoy political entertainment. You are ****ing losers.
"I don't support Trump."

Most people who will vote for him anyways usually say this. I don't know why you cowards just don't fess up. You'll vote for the Manchurian candidate who was besties with an underage sex trafficker. Admit it!

And why just call her a wh o re? Be a man and not a coward. Call her what you REALLY want to call her.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

This article states where polls are at in the ~7(?) swing states that will determine the outcome.
Trump is ahead of Harris in all of them.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/where-harris-stands-against-trump-100000705.html

Too many of these averages include polling from before Biden dropped out.

It's too early to draw conclusions, but so far the polls taken after Harris became the de facto nominee have shown an average of 1 to 3 points shift towards the Dem. We'll see if this continues, though it is worth noting that we are also in a period of time where you'd expect the Republican to be in a polling "bounce" (post GOP convention and before the Dem convention). Plus you'd expect Trump personally to see a bounce from the assassination attempt. A lot of confounding factors right now.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

GoOskie said:

Chapman_is_Gone said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:



She is ambitious. You need to be to run for president.
Are you saying she was never in love with the Willie?
Why do you care so much about her former love life?


I care if someone is a wh ore. Is that so hard for you to understand? It speaks to her character.
Yes, much worse than the guy who was besties with an underage sex trafficker (Jeff Epstein), pumped and paid off p0rn stars, married an eastern European escort (probable russian spy), and talks about doing his own daughter. Soooo much better to support that guy.


I don't support Trump.

I despise all of you morons who enjoy political entertainment. You are ****ing losers.
Yet 26 of your last 29 BI posts have been to OT. Welcome to the club, loser!
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

calbear93 said:

bear2034 said:

calbear93 said:



She is ambitious. You need to be to run for president.
Are you saying she was never in love with the Willie?
Why do you care so much about her former love life?


I care if someone is a wh ore. Is that so hard for you to understand? It speaks to her character.


Character? Between Trump and Harris, you will go with character to use against Harris? That seems genuine.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's the biggest loser, the likes of which we've never seen. YUGE loser. Really. People are saying:"Sir, that Chapman ass is a big loser!"
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.