Kamala Harris for President

83,107 Views | 1470 Replies | Last: 6 days ago by Big C
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

To defeat Trump, Harris must talk more about the economy


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/29/harris-economy-election-trump-polls?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other



"An astounding 62% say the government is mostly working to benefit itself and elites rather than the common good."

Under the tRump tax cuts America's 748 billionaires got $2.2 trillion richer. tRump is talking about eliminating the Federal income tax. tRump has never paid his fair share. Musk, the richest man in the world who is always fending off unfair employment cases filed by his employees, is All In for tRump. Are these guys elites? Are these guys going to work for the common good or their own?
Agreed, this needs to be nailed byHarris-Walz. I don't know if thy can do it in a week
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jeff Gerth got famous for writing hack articles about Whitewater
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's the Andrew Weismann Report, Mueller was about as lucid as Joe Biden.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

bearister said:

To defeat Trump, Harris must talk more about the economy


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/29/harris-economy-election-trump-polls?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other



"An astounding 62% say the government is mostly working to benefit itself and elites rather than the common good."

Under the tRump tax cuts America's 748 billionaires got $2.2 trillion richer. tRump is talking about eliminating the Federal income tax. tRump has never paid his fair share. Musk, the richest man in the world who is always fending off unfair employment cases filed by his employees, is All In for tRump. Are these guys elites? Are these guys going to work for the common good or their own?
Agreed, this needs to be nailed byHarris-Walz. I don't know if thy can do it in a week


Why is your candidate waiting until the last minute? Is this why she didn't pass the bar on try #1?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Everyone is running ads with an economic message. The trouble in the current media environment is making sure people see and/or hear it. To do that you need something attention-grabbing and that's the difficult part.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

SBGold said:

bearister said:

To defeat Trump, Harris must talk more about the economy


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/29/harris-economy-election-trump-polls?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other



"An astounding 62% say the government is mostly working to benefit itself and elites rather than the common good."

Under the tRump tax cuts America's 748 billionaires got $2.2 trillion richer. tRump is talking about eliminating the Federal income tax. tRump has never paid his fair share. Musk, the richest man in the world who is always fending off unfair employment cases filed by his employees, is All In for tRump. Are these guys elites? Are these guys going to work for the common good or their own?
Agreed, this needs to be nailed byHarris-Walz. I don't know if thy can do it in a week


Why is your candidate waiting until the last minute? Is this why she didn't pass the bar on try #1?
Isn't she your candidate? I thought you were not voting for Trump

VOTE BLUE
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New Data Shows Kamala Harris Falling Behind With Critical Demographic

October 29, 2024By Chris Powell

"In a new CNN poll, Vice President Kamala Harris is facing a significant decline in support among Hispanic voters in key battleground states. The poll, which surveyed voters in Nevada and Arizona, shows that the vice president's advantage over former President Donald Trump has dramatically shrunk compared to Joe Biden's 2020 performance with the same demographic. This signals potential trouble for Democrats in the upcoming 2024 election."

https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/watch-new-data-shows-kamala-harris-falling-behind-with-critical-demographic-mace/
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

bearister said:

To defeat Trump, Harris must talk more about the economy


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/29/harris-economy-election-trump-polls?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other



"An astounding 62% say the government is mostly working to benefit itself and elites rather than the common good."

Under the tRump tax cuts America's 748 billionaires got $2.2 trillion richer. tRump is talking about eliminating the Federal income tax. tRump has never paid his fair share. Musk, the richest man in the world who is always fending off unfair employment cases filed by his employees, is All In for tRump. Are these guys elites? Are these guys going to work for the common good or their own?
Agreed, this needs to be nailed byHarris-Walz. I don't know if thy can do it in a week


Why is your candidate waiting until the last minute? Is this why she didn't pass the bar on try #1?
Isn't she your candidate? I thought you were not voting for Trump

VOTE BLUE


I am considering either writing in my dog or voting for Jill Stein. I actually have never voted for Trump in my life. There have been better candidates.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Vice President Harris pulling in the largest crowd of this election tonight in Washington DC at the site of Trump's treason.

MAGAts still in denial
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

bearister said:

To defeat Trump, Harris must talk more about the economy


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/29/harris-economy-election-trump-polls?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other



"An astounding 62% say the government is mostly working to benefit itself and elites rather than the common good."

Under the tRump tax cuts America's 748 billionaires got $2.2 trillion richer. tRump is talking about eliminating the Federal income tax. tRump has never paid his fair share. Musk, the richest man in the world who is always fending off unfair employment cases filed by his employees, is All In for tRump. Are these guys elites? Are these guys going to work for the common good or their own?
Agreed, this needs to be nailed byHarris-Walz. I don't know if thy can do it in a week


Why is your candidate waiting until the last minute? Is this why she didn't pass the bar on try #1?
Isn't she your candidate? I thought you were not voting for Trump

VOTE BLUE


I am considering either writing in my dog or voting for Jill Stein. I actually have never voted for Trump in my life. There have been better candidates.

Hey, do your country a solid: Move to Pennsylvania and don't vote for Trump there.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

^ kidding ^
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:


^ kidding ^
No no, not kidding

VOTE BLUE
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

> Putin owns Trump. Everybody knows that.
agree, esp dos in da nile
muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

bearister said:

To defeat Trump, Harris must talk more about the economy


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/29/harris-economy-election-trump-polls?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other



"An astounding 62% say the government is mostly working to benefit itself and elites rather than the common good."

Under the tRump tax cuts America's 748 billionaires got $2.2 trillion richer. tRump is talking about eliminating the Federal income tax. tRump has never paid his fair share. Musk, the richest man in the world who is always fending off unfair employment cases filed by his employees, is All In for tRump. Are these guys elites? Are these guys going to work for the common good or their own?
Agreed, this needs to be nailed byHarris-Walz. I don't know if thy can do it in a week


Why is your candidate waiting until the last minute? Is this why she didn't pass the bar on try #1?
Isn't she your candidate? I thought you were not voting for Trump

VOTE BLUE


I am considering either writing in my dog or voting for Jill Stein. I actually have never voted for Trump in my life. There have been better candidates.


Nobody is perfect. Prefer war or peace? An open or closed border? High or low inflation? I could argue you shouldn't throw away your vote, but I voted for Ross Perot twice... but Perot had a considerable following and helped get us the Tea Party, which helped later get us MAGA policies.

Bernie probably should have been the Democratic nominee in 2016 except for the DNC / HRC chicanery.
Chapman_is_Gone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

bearister said:

" Notice your default response is fundamentally to go to "What Trump has done?"

In a two person race isn't it always relevant to compare and contrast what the competitors are doing?

MAGAs are forced to perpetually raise the shield of "Whataboutism" because their candidate is a moral bankrupt, a traitor, a convicted felon x 34, an adjudicated tax fraud and sexual abuser, and a seditionist (this is still a partial list). He ain't going to fare well compared to 99% of mankind….and that percentage is still probably understated.

*For instance, it is actually laughable that the tRumpers got all fired up and indignant that Harris gave non responsive answers and evaded during the Fox interview (which is true) in light of the fact tRump's default is to respond with a demonstrable lie with a fall back of evading and redirecting to his talking points (which is why he can't ever take a witness stand, be sworn and subject to cross examination).


It doesn't have to dissolve into "what about the other person". I hope I live long enough to see the day when really smart people with great ideas run for office and tell you what they plan to do. And like mature adults ignore the bull**** and just stick to the facts. That's one of the reasons I keep saying that this and many elections, among other things, are a continuing embarrassment to our country. And this is coming from a guy that if you met me you'd think I joke about everything. At least that's what my wife says.

Everybody who regularly invests hours each week participating on this off-topic board (and the 10-15 of them know who they are), and everyone who enjoys political entertainment, is a ****ing loser.
Chapman_is_Gone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Bernie was beating Kamala by a wide margin in 2020, he must be wondering how Kamala got to where she is now. Oh wait, he knows.
You mean, the fact that she slu tted her way to her current status?
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

bear2034 said:

Bernie was beating Kamala by a wide margin in 2020, he must be wondering how Kamala got to where she is now. Oh wait, he knows.
You mean, the fact that she slu tted her way to her current status?
Chapman World:

Men with dozens of sexual hookups: What a great guy! A man's man!

Women that have a few affairs: Total sl ut! Sleeping her way to the top!
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

It's the Andrew Weismann Report, Mueller was about as lucid as Joe Biden.

If the had given the gig to Alan Grayson, a pit bull, albeit a woman beater, tRump would have been executed at Leavenworth by now.

Unknown to me at the time of his appointment, Mueller was basically a Federalist Society lap dog and well past shelf code.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah, they cheated in Georgia 2020. Anything to stop Hitler.

Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kamala's Brownshirts



Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Plan A: Win (sorry, not gonna happen)
Plan B: Cheat (but will it be enough?)
Plan C: Suspend democracy (because Hitler)

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think the tRumpists know the polls are bullsh@it and they think that tRump is going to get landslided.
The focus on cheating is a dead giveaway.

Don't panic. 50M will actually vote for tRump and he'll "get" 87M+.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

82gradDLSdad said:

bearister said:

" Notice your default response is fundamentally to go to "What Trump has done?"

In a two person race isn't it always relevant to compare and contrast what the competitors are doing?

MAGAs are forced to perpetually raise the shield of "Whataboutism" because their candidate is a moral bankrupt, a traitor, a convicted felon x 34, an adjudicated tax fraud and sexual abuser, and a seditionist (this is still a partial list). He ain't going to fare well compared to 99% of mankind….and that percentage is still probably understated.

*For instance, it is actually laughable that the tRumpers got all fired up and indignant that Harris gave non responsive answers and evaded during the Fox interview (which is true) in light of the fact tRump's default is to respond with a demonstrable lie with a fall back of evading and redirecting to his talking points (which is why he can't ever take a witness stand, be sworn and subject to cross examination).


It doesn't have to dissolve into "what about the other person". I hope I live long enough to see the day when really smart people with great ideas run for office and tell you what they plan to do. And like mature adults ignore the bull**** and just stick to the facts. That's one of the reasons I keep saying that this and many elections, among other things, are a continuing embarrassment to our country. And this is coming from a guy that if you met me you'd think I joke about everything. At least that's what my wife says.

Everybody who regularly invests hours each week participating on this off-topic board (and the 10-15 of them know who they are), and everyone who enjoys political entertainment, is a ****ing loser.

I appreciate you wanting to help us; I really do. However, for your own well-being, I feel I need to warn you: Every time you come here, you depart with some loser juice dripping off you, it's unavoidable... and some of it probably sinks in.

As we are probably 10-15 hopeless cases, maybe better for you if you let us wallow in our own loserness.

Signed,
Useful Idiot / Effing Loser
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

LA Times, WaPo, and now USA Today.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?


John Stewart, who also has TDS, said the libs overreacted.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

movielover said:

It's the Andrew Weismann Report, Mueller was about as lucid as Joe Biden.

If the had given the gig to Alan Grayson, a pit bull, albeit a woman beater, tRump would have been executed at Leavenworth by now.

Unknown to me at the time of his appointment, Mueller was basically a Federalist Society lap dog and well past shelf code.


I recall when all this was hot a few tears ago the sordid, dirty history of Mueller in Boston. One of his alleged transgressions: he allegedly helped keep four innocent men in jail for decades to protect dirty G-men.

Boston Herald: Howie Carr: Mueller's hands dirty in old FBI frame-up

"But I don't think he or most people understand how bad Mueller's actions were "chilling," is how a Clinton federal judge in 2006 described the former FBI director's attempts to cover up a massive frame-up by Boston G-men decades earlier."

https://www.bostonherald.com/2019/01/30/howie-carr-muellers-hands-dirty-in-old-fbi-frame-up/

"In the 1980s, the acting US Attorney for the Massachusetts District launched an aggressive campaign to pressure the Massachusetts Parole Board to keep the framed men imprisoned. That federal prosecutor was Robert Mueller, who would become the FBI Director two decades later. Mueller was the Justice Department's chief prosecutor in Massachusetts when [Whitey] Bulger was at the height of his criminal spree, including murder, and was being shielded by federal authorities...."

"...The wrongly-convicted men were paid a settlement of nearly $102 million, although only two received the money directly, since Tameleo and Greco died in prison."

https://markhyman.substack.com/p/the-fbi-whitey-bulger-and-robert
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

bear2034 said:

Bernie was beating Kamala by a wide margin in 2020, he must be wondering how Kamala got to where she is now. Oh wait, he knows.
You mean, the fact that she slu tted her way to her current status?
She loved the mayor like it was her father.
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

82gradDLSdad said:

bearister said:

" Notice your default response is fundamentally to go to "What Trump has done?"

In a two person race isn't it always relevant to compare and contrast what the competitors are doing?

MAGAs are forced to perpetually raise the shield of "Whataboutism" because their candidate is a moral bankrupt, a traitor, a convicted felon x 34, an adjudicated tax fraud and sexual abuser, and a seditionist (this is still a partial list). He ain't going to fare well compared to 99% of mankind….and that percentage is still probably understated.

*For instance, it is actually laughable that the tRumpers got all fired up and indignant that Harris gave non responsive answers and evaded during the Fox interview (which is true) in light of the fact tRump's default is to respond with a demonstrable lie with a fall back of evading and redirecting to his talking points (which is why he can't ever take a witness stand, be sworn and subject to cross examination).


It doesn't have to dissolve into "what about the other person". I hope I live long enough to see the day when really smart people with great ideas run for office and tell you what they plan to do. And like mature adults ignore the bull**** and just stick to the facts. That's one of the reasons I keep saying that this and many elections, among other things, are a continuing embarrassment to our country. And this is coming from a guy that if you met me you'd think I joke about everything. At least that's what my wife says.

Everybody who regularly invests hours each week participating on this off-topic board (and the 10-15 of them know who they are), and everyone who enjoys political entertainment, is a ****ing loser.
What are your (none ****ing idiot) forms of entertainment?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dementia Donold's post shows he now realizes he is going to lose Pennsylvania
https://www.threads.net/@barbaraj.sobel/post/DBwCkPIpZLD?xmt=AQGzy1s09t9Aje-oQJg-HRk5-MqmuCndJUD_bEJljwnu4Q
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Dementia Donold's post shows he now realizes he is going to lose Pennsylvania..
aim higher..
muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Dementia Donold's post shows he now realizes he is going to lose Pennsylvania
https://www.threads.net/@barbaraj.sobel/post/DBwCkPIpZLD?xmt=AQGzy1s09t9Aje-oQJg-HRk5-MqmuCndJUD_bEJljwnu4Q
LOL

VOTE BLUE, we can do this MI, WI, NC

Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


LA Times, WaPo, and now USA Today.

Regarding the WaPo, LAT and USAT choosing at the last minute to not endorse, I had three thoughts:

1. the respective publishers are either acting in their own personal financial interests... or chicken****
2. hey wait, what would I do, if faced with the possibility of a US Army tank coming to my business or residence?
3. hey wait again: in that case (#2), maybe they shouldn't have gotten into the business they're in


Of course, maybe the publishers are life-long leftists, but have now, finally, seen the light! Yeah, that's it!
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shocking but totally predictable. Trump is going to take away women's rights. See, he said it. But he didn't. Anything to stop Hitler.



 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.