DiabloWags said:oski003 said:DiabloWags said:
Not a 50% copper tariff
-IF IT WERE LOWER, YOU'D COMPLAIN THE TARIFF IS TOO LOW TO MOVE THE NEEDLE. YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT NEARLY EVERYTHING THIS ADMINISTRATION DOES.
See responses above in caps.
Wrong.
I'm afraid you're conflating again.
The 15% tariff on the EU for automobiles is indeed too low to move the needle.
Every single U.S. Auto CEO is on the record stating that.
I've maintained the same here in my posts.
The 50% tariff on Copper has nothing to do with increasing copper production.
It won't move the needle since it takes 29 years for a copper mine to come online.
A better permitting process would move the needle.
For example, it takes a copper refiner 5 years to come online.
PS. This Administration is full of "jack-asses" like Peter Navarro who don't have a clue.
I guess you and the other Trump supporters here still haven't figured that out yet.
Or can you tell me why we have a 39% tariff on Switzerland when they have no industrial tariffs on the U.S.
Zero. Nadda.
That PPI number today was just the beginning.
Who will Trump blame this on next?
Biden still?
So, you'd prefer a 50% on automobiles and a 15% on aluminum then?