Charlie Kirk

36,627 Views | 1192 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by movielover
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

Conspiracy theories are whack from Groyper, to Israelis to false flag to Armed Queers. The kid killed someone with grandpa's gun and left it in the woods.

And seemed to have a looney idea that shooting Kirk would protect his trans girlfriend. If anything, it puts her more at risk.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

MinotStateBeav said:

movielover said:

They'll get the truth, but will we?

Yeah I don't think there's anybody politically connected to this unless we're talking about when they go after the funding...


Or.... if they actually look into WHY his security detail was so incredibly negligent.

A totally WIDE-OPEN event with no checkpoint, no bags being checked, no one using a metal detector.
And not a single "spotter" up on a roof top.

Do you really believe that these guys were really THIS DUMB?
Or paid off?





You seem stuck on this point as you bring it up repeatedly. Have you ever been to see a speaker on a college campus before? None of the things you're saying he lacked are happening for any of those type of events. He had security, he was wearing a vest. I'm not sure why you feel the need to villainize him for having no security. At some point he has to be able to live his life and do what he was so good at doing, interacting with the masses and engaging in respectful debate.
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

movielover said:

socaltownie said:

BearGoggles said:

socaltownie said:

Yes. You have the freedom to be an *******. We have the freedim to call you one. What many oppose is that you wany us bite our tongue rather than call you out. I refuse.

It is not being an ******* or "transphobic" to have the science based opinion that there are only two sexes, to think trans women (i.e., biological males) should not participate in women's sports or invade women's spaces, and/or to think (again based on substantial science) that it is harmful to medically or surgically transition teenagers. These are mainstream (I believe majority) views where people are still vilified and, more importantly, trans people are told that they are mistreated simply because people hold these views.

Yet we've all heard the rhetoric that these reasonable beliefs are "fascist" and "killing trans people" which is just absurd rhetoric that creates a permission structure for violence. And as a result, there is a strong presence of trans people in antifa and have been recent mass shootings by trans people (or motivated by this extreme trans ideology).

That is a lot of words saying that you're not an ******* or mistreating someone for holding mainstream and quite reasonable beliefs.




OK. Lets unpack this a bit.

First, there are (mostly) two sexes but there are Many different ways that GENDER is expressed.

A way to think about this is realize that the US has a fairly wide range of accepted gender roles for those of XX sex (from bombshell hyper-feminity to tom boy rough it with the guys. Those with XX chromosomes have a fairly narrow range of what is consider acceptable male gender roles. For example, men who wanted to paint their finger nails would be considered at odds with majority gender roles - unless black and in a goth band ;-) You also would hopefully recognize that this is not historically (or culturally) fixed. Men used to wear wigs loved lace...

And yes, I am using that rather than Male and Female sexed because such terms have historical and cultural constest. Remember, it wasn''t very long ago (within our lifetimes if you are a 60 year old far like myself) where "Girls" were not considered lady like if they rode a bike with a straight cross bar rather than one that could accomodate a skirt.and where called "tom boys" if they did.


We've had gay, straight, bears (small b), bisexuals, transvestites and others for decades. A few items really pushed the 'Overton window' and received a lot of backlash.

1. Sex-change surgeries for confused children, allegedly exploded during Covid (social contagion?) and funded under Obamacare.

2. An explosion in drag queen social hours for children in schools, libraries, etc.

3. Trying to ramrod new self-identified pronouns including nonsensical they / them plural pronouns to an individual.

Detransitioner Chloe Cole is a perfect example. Mixed feelings as adolescence hit, liked being a jock, was told online she was trans, gained an immediate following and fanbase. Her parents were told if they didn't go along w her transition, she might commit suicide (a lie?). One counselor had misgivings, and was pulled off her case. Dr. Jordan Peterson says her feelings and insecurities were well within normal teenage angst. She had a double mastectomy.

She was never told the medical consequences, the affects of the powerful hormone blockers she would take, possible infertility, etc. At 15 or 16 she took a psychology class, and realized she wanted a family. She is now suing Kaiser for $75 million (?). Her online 'friends' disappeared when she de-transitioned.

It appears that CC had unqualified and rushed therapeutic care. Why the rush? Dr. Peterson claims conditions like bulimia can cluster w teenagers, and the same might happen with the new 'trans movement'. The apparent explosion of trans children in Hollywood would appear to confirm external factors having a huge influence.

Transgendered academic Dr. Camille Paglia has said that our social upheaval about sexuality, gender roles, etc., denote a civilization in decline, like ancient Rome. She grappled with gender dysphoria since her youth.

"Paglia doesn't mince words when it comes to this point. "Sex change is literally impossible," she says. "[E]very cell of our bodies, except for the blood, remains coded with our birth gender for life." She suggests that those who pursue gender reassignment are acting out in rebellion, instead of living out how they were born, as many insist is the case."

Her views are controversial to some, and some on the intolerant Left label her transphobic.

https://intellectualtakeout.org/2019/09/paglia-criticizing-transgenderism-is-not-transphobic/

Drag Queen hour has a boatload of problems, not the least being that 50% or more of our students are below-grade level with basic math and reading comprehension.




1. I raised this in another post: How much surgical gender-affirming care for minors is really going on? My sense is that it is a lot rarer than you seem to think it is. As it should be.

2. Regarding Drag Queen Story Hour, this is yet another topic where valued poster movielover and I agree. It seems like drag queens were barely even a thing anymore,, until that library story hour event was publicized. Now, it seems like the "PC" left is going out of their way to love drag queens, seemingly to flaunt how "progressive" they are. (SF Chron entertainment section would be a good example of this). I just don't see that as being appropriate for kids and, as far as reporting on them for adults, I really doubt if many people at all give a crap. Any political party that wants to lose elections, just keep talking about how wonderful drag queens are! To any drag queens out there, have a wonderful life, I have no problem with you, but I'm just not interested in your drag queen life or performances.

Look I have never been to a drag queen show. Have no interest in a drag queen show and really could care less.

But I do want to know why is a person with XX chromosomes wanting to wear a dress or make up so threatening? These story hours are absolutely NOT sexual. There is no flirting going on. Frankly Moms in Yoga pants is a hell of a lot more sexualized.

Rather, queer story hour questions gender norms. And I am not sure that is some bad. We know that we are in a crisis right now in a whole bunch of ways in the current state of gender norms. People have rightly written that the American male is in crisis in figuring out how to be a man in this post-industrial age where women out earn and are out educating them. Women are trapped with gender norms and contradictions that I could never articulate better than was done 2 years ago. Is there really anything so bad, so threatening so worrisome as a XX chromoson person who feels proud and comfortable enough in THEIR skin as to wear a smashing day dress perfectly matching their shoes and lip gloss. You go girl!




BTW - before these strange times (and since I am an old fart) I remember that Milton Berle dressed as a woman and so did Corporal Klinger. Some like it hot was a movie with a PG rating and RuPaul is easily found on Youtube.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

White on white crime ?


Are we really going there?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Show me proof or it didn't happen… only right wingers roll like this


You'll never open your eyes will you?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why do you want old Drag Queens pimping in front of CHILDREN???!!! Grooming?

In college a friend loved to go to Finnochio's in North Beach... I never went, but he enjoyed it.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Young Black man compares MLK vs Charlie Kirk.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOqSuE5jbXj/?igsh=MXRvOXJyODdmOHllNg==
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Why do you want old Drag Queens pimping in front of CHILDREN???!!! Grooming?

In college a friend loved to go to Finnochio's in North Beach... I never went, but he enjoyed it.


I'm far more offended by Charlie Kirk grooming underage girls than I am by parents bringing children to events where there are cross dressers and transgender people.

The latter is none of the governments business while the former is none of Charlie Kirk's business.
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Why do you want old Drag Queens pimping in front of CHILDREN???!!! Grooming?




But that isn't what they are doing. Essentially you are equating being gay with being a pedophile. Not true and long a slur/stereotype. It is, at its most basic, a XX chromosome person wearing a damm well put together ensemble. If you want to get cultural - it is a proud and defiant statement that they are queer and proud and won't be ashamed of it.. If you want to get political - it is ironically questioning gender norms and constraints.

Look, if you told me or showed me videos of someone reading stories to children and lewdly talking in a less than rated G way I would be there with you. Not appropriate. But I am sure I could find you the divorcee who is wearing a too low cut top in yoga pants. Why is that "OK" and the other subject to a fox news story?

And again - you essentially are arguing that Klinger was grooming - that a whole punch of kids "went gay" because the office clerk on the most popular show in america tried to find matching pumps.





going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Notice the conversation isn't about ___ it's about everything else as usual
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

movielover said:

Why do you want old Drag Queens pimping in front of CHILDREN???!!! Grooming?

In college a friend loved to go to Finnochio's in North Beach... I never went, but he enjoyed it.


I'm far more offended by Charlie Kirk grooming underage girls than I am by parents bringing children to events where there are cross dressers and transgender people.

The latter is none of the governments business while the former is none of Charlie Kirk's business.


When did Charlie groom underage girls??
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Notice the conversation isn't about ___ it's about everything else as usual


Says you… that's comical
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

movielover said:

Why do you want old Drag Queens pimping in front of CHILDREN???!!! Grooming?

In college a friend loved to go to Finnochio's in North Beach... I never went, but he enjoyed it.


I'm far more offended by Charlie Kirk grooming underage girls than I am by parents bringing children to events where there are cross dressers and transgender people.

The latter is none of the governments business while the former is none of Charlie Kirk's business.


When did Charlie groom underage girls??


When he has told minor women how they should live their lives
https://www.aol.com/charlie-kirk-tells-14-old-152343673.html
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

movielover said:

Why do you want old Drag Queens pimping in front of CHILDREN???!!! Grooming?

In college a friend loved to go to Finnochio's in North Beach... I never went, but he enjoyed it.


I'm far more offended by Charlie Kirk grooming underage girls than I am by parents bringing children to events where there are cross dressers and transgender people.

The latter is none of the governments business while the former is none of Charlie Kirk's business.


When did Charlie groom underage girls??

Didn't find anything but I did find this
https://www.threads.com/@dream.foramerica/post/C5Rm1rHSv27/media


BTW - he is an IDIOT!! I can tell you from blissful and really happy experience that dating women in their 30s is FAR superior than in their 20s. I will not go into graphic details but lets just say one group is often in their starfish phase and the others have the right amount of experience and joy to be oh so much fun. Plus they have stuff to talk about.

Yeah - sometimes I channel my inner Shockey ;-)
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

movielover said:

Why do you want old Drag Queens pimping in front of CHILDREN???!!! Grooming?

In college a friend loved to go to Finnochio's in North Beach... I never went, but he enjoyed it.


I'm far more offended by Charlie Kirk grooming underage girls than I am by parents bringing children to events where there are cross dressers and transgender people.

The latter is none of the governments business while the former is none of Charlie Kirk's business.


When did Charlie groom underage girls??


When he has told minor women how they should live their lives
https://www.aol.com/charlie-kirk-tells-14-old-152343673.html


This is quite the stretch, even for you buddy
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

movielover said:

Why do you want old Drag Queens pimping in front of CHILDREN???!!! Grooming?

In college a friend loved to go to Finnochio's in North Beach... I never went, but he enjoyed it.


I'm far more offended by Charlie Kirk grooming underage girls than I am by parents bringing children to events where there are cross dressers and transgender people.

The latter is none of the governments business while the former is none of Charlie Kirk's business.


When did Charlie groom underage girls??


When he has told minor women how they should live their lives
https://www.aol.com/charlie-kirk-tells-14-old-152343673.html


This is quite the stretch, even for you buddy


It's less of a stretch than parents bringing their children into the presence of cross dressers is grooming.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

movielover said:

Why do you want old Drag Queens pimping in front of CHILDREN???!!! Grooming?

In college a friend loved to go to Finnochio's in North Beach... I never went, but he enjoyed it.


I'm far more offended by Charlie Kirk grooming underage girls than I am by parents bringing children to events where there are cross dressers and transgender people.

The latter is none of the governments business while the former is none of Charlie Kirk's business.


When did Charlie groom underage girls??

Didn't find anything but I did find this
https://www.threads.com/@dream.foramerica/post/C5Rm1rHSv27/media


BTW - he is an IDIOT!! I can tell you from blissful and really happy experience that dating women in their 30s is FAR superior than in their 20s. I will not go into graphic details but lets just say one group is often in their starfish phase and the others have the right amount of experience and joy to be oh so much fun. Plus they have stuff to talk about.

Yeah - sometimes I channel my inner

Shockey ;-)


I would argue that's entirely based on one's experiences. Not to knock 30+ women they are great too
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

movielover said:

Why do you want old Drag Queens pimping in front of CHILDREN???!!! Grooming?

In college a friend loved to go to Finnochio's in North Beach... I never went, but he enjoyed it.


I'm far more offended by Charlie Kirk grooming underage girls than I am by parents bringing children to events where there are cross dressers and transgender people.

The latter is none of the governments business while the former is none of Charlie Kirk's business.


When did Charlie groom underage girls??


When he has told minor women how they should live their lives
https://www.aol.com/charlie-kirk-tells-14-old-152343673.html


This is quite the stretch, even for you buddy


It's less of a stretch than parents bringing their children into the presence of cross dressers is grooming.


Uh no it's not at all lol but I never made that claim so not sure what one has to do with the other.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie said:

Big C said:

movielover said:

socaltownie said:

BearGoggles said:

socaltownie said:

Yes. You have the freedom to be an *******. We have the freedim to call you one. What many oppose is that you wany us bite our tongue rather than call you out. I refuse.

It is not being an ******* or "transphobic" to have the science based opinion that there are only two sexes, to think trans women (i.e., biological males) should not participate in women's sports or invade women's spaces, and/or to think (again based on substantial science) that it is harmful to medically or surgically transition teenagers. These are mainstream (I believe majority) views where people are still vilified and, more importantly, trans people are told that they are mistreated simply because people hold these views.

Yet we've all heard the rhetoric that these reasonable beliefs are "fascist" and "killing trans people" which is just absurd rhetoric that creates a permission structure for violence. And as a result, there is a strong presence of trans people in antifa and have been recent mass shootings by trans people (or motivated by this extreme trans ideology).

That is a lot of words saying that you're not an ******* or mistreating someone for holding mainstream and quite reasonable beliefs.




OK. Lets unpack this a bit.

First, there are (mostly) two sexes but there are Many different ways that GENDER is expressed.

A way to think about this is realize that the US has a fairly wide range of accepted gender roles for those of XX sex (from bombshell hyper-feminity to tom boy rough it with the guys. Those with XX chromosomes have a fairly narrow range of what is consider acceptable male gender roles. For example, men who wanted to paint their finger nails would be considered at odds with majority gender roles - unless black and in a goth band ;-) You also would hopefully recognize that this is not historically (or culturally) fixed. Men used to wear wigs loved lace...

And yes, I am using that rather than Male and Female sexed because such terms have historical and cultural constest. Remember, it wasn''t very long ago (within our lifetimes if you are a 60 year old far like myself) where "Girls" were not considered lady like if they rode a bike with a straight cross bar rather than one that could accomodate a skirt.and where called "tom boys" if they did.


We've had gay, straight, bears (small b), bisexuals, transvestites and others for decades. A few items really pushed the 'Overton window' and received a lot of backlash.

1. Sex-change surgeries for confused children, allegedly exploded during Covid (social contagion?) and funded under Obamacare.

2. An explosion in drag queen social hours for children in schools, libraries, etc.

3. Trying to ramrod new self-identified pronouns including nonsensical they / them plural pronouns to an individual.

Detransitioner Chloe Cole is a perfect example. Mixed feelings as adolescence hit, liked being a jock, was told online she was trans, gained an immediate following and fanbase. Her parents were told if they didn't go along w her transition, she might commit suicide (a lie?). One counselor had misgivings, and was pulled off her case. Dr. Jordan Peterson says her feelings and insecurities were well within normal teenage angst. She had a double mastectomy.

She was never told the medical consequences, the affects of the powerful hormone blockers she would take, possible infertility, etc. At 15 or 16 she took a psychology class, and realized she wanted a family. She is now suing Kaiser for $75 million (?). Her online 'friends' disappeared when she de-transitioned.

It appears that CC had unqualified and rushed therapeutic care. Why the rush? Dr. Peterson claims conditions like bulimia can cluster w teenagers, and the same might happen with the new 'trans movement'. The apparent explosion of trans children in Hollywood would appear to confirm external factors having a huge influence.

Transgendered academic Dr. Camille Paglia has said that our social upheaval about sexuality, gender roles, etc., denote a civilization in decline, like ancient Rome. She grappled with gender dysphoria since her youth.

"Paglia doesn't mince words when it comes to this point. "Sex change is literally impossible," she says. "[E]very cell of our bodies, except for the blood, remains coded with our birth gender for life." She suggests that those who pursue gender reassignment are acting out in rebellion, instead of living out how they were born, as many insist is the case."

Her views are controversial to some, and some on the intolerant Left label her transphobic.

https://intellectualtakeout.org/2019/09/paglia-criticizing-transgenderism-is-not-transphobic/

Drag Queen hour has a boatload of problems, not the least being that 50% or more of our students are below-grade level with basic math and reading comprehension.




1. I raised this in another post: How much surgical gender-affirming care for minors is really going on? My sense is that it is a lot rarer than you seem to think it is. As it should be.

2. Regarding Drag Queen Story Hour, this is yet another topic where valued poster movielover and I agree. It seems like drag queens were barely even a thing anymore,, until that library story hour event was publicized. Now, it seems like the "PC" left is going out of their way to love drag queens, seemingly to flaunt how "progressive" they are. (SF Chron entertainment section would be a good example of this). I just don't see that as being appropriate for kids and, as far as reporting on them for adults, I really doubt if many people at all give a crap. Any political party that wants to lose elections, just keep talking about how wonderful drag queens are! To any drag queens out there, have a wonderful life, I have no problem with you, but I'm just not interested in your drag queen life or performances.

Look I have never been to a drag queen show. Have no interest in a drag queen show and really could care less.

But I do want to know why is a person with XX chromosomes wanting to wear a dress or make up so threatening? These story hours are absolutely NOT sexual. There is no flirting going on. Frankly Moms in Yoga pants is a hell of a lot more sexualized.

Rather, queer story hour questions gender norms. And I am not sure that is some bad. We know that we are in a crisis right now in a whole bunch of ways in the current state of gender norms. People have rightly written that the American male is in crisis in figuring out how to be a man in this post-industrial age where women out earn and are out educating them. Women are trapped with gender norms and contradictions that I could never articulate better than was done 2 years ago. Is there really anything so bad, so threatening so worrisome as a XX chromoson person who feels proud and comfortable enough in THEIR skin as to wear a smashing day dress perfectly matching their shoes and lip gloss. You go girl!

BTW - before these strange times (and since I am an old fart) I remember that Milton Berle dressed as a woman and so did Corporal Klinger. Some like it hot was a movie with a PG rating and RuPaul is easily found on Youtube.

I remember referring to RuPaul as a cross-dresser. The term, transvestite, was used for awhile for others. Back then, people mostly stayed in their lanes, there were roles in Hollywood for RuPaul and those with similar lifestyles. But somewhere between then and now, the drag queens started reading books to children and transgenders became disproportionately violent....
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

movielover said:

Why do you want old Drag Queens pimping in front of CHILDREN???!!! Grooming?

In college a friend loved to go to Finnochio's in North Beach... I never went, but he enjoyed it.


I'm far more offended by Charlie Kirk grooming underage girls than I am by parents bringing children to events where there are cross dressers and transgender people.

The latter is none of the governments business while the former is none of Charlie Kirk's business.


When did Charlie groom underage girls??


When he has told minor women how they should live their lives
https://www.aol.com/charlie-kirk-tells-14-old-152343673.html


This is quite the stretch, even for you buddy


It's less of a stretch than parents bringing their children into the presence of cross dressers is grooming.


Uh no it's not at all lol but I never made that claim so not sure what one has to do with the other.


It is. One has parental consent and the other does not. I let the right define words like groomer and then I go with their definitions.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

The assassination is the turning point.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Snowflake said:


Ok you're going on the block list


Lmfao.


BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

movielover said:

Why do you want old Drag Queens pimping in front of CHILDREN???!!! Grooming?

In college a friend loved to go to Finnochio's in North Beach... I never went, but he enjoyed it.


I'm far more offended by Charlie Kirk grooming underage girls than I am by parents bringing children to events where there are cross dressers and transgender people.

The latter is none of the governments business while the former is none of Charlie Kirk's business.


When did Charlie groom underage girls??


When he has told minor women how they should live their lives
https://www.aol.com/charlie-kirk-tells-14-old-152343673.html


This is quite the stretch, even for you buddy


It's less of a stretch than parents bringing their children into the presence of cross dressers is grooming.


Uh no it's not at all lol but I never made that claim so not sure what one has to do with the other.


It is. One has parental consent and the other does not. I let the right define words like groomer and then I go with their definitions.



Parental consent for what, getting married in college? Or you're saying parental consent for Charlie to say that to a teenager?

What does the right define it as?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

White on white crime ?


https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezacjrp/asp/Offense_Race.asp

Unfortunately, "black crime" is much more prevalent than "white crime," despite blacks still being a minority in the USA. Unlike you, I don't think of the race of every offender and victim when a crime is committed, and I certainly don't feel the need to post such on a thread where a political figure was assassinated because I can't get over what race I am.


Race stats:
In the United States, the Black or African American population is approximately 13% to 14% of the total population, while the White population, including non-Hispanic and Hispanic individuals, makes up a larger share, roughly 58% to 62%. The most recent data from sources like the U.S. Census Bureau and USAFacts shows the non-Hispanic White population decreasing in proportion, while other groups, particularly the Hispanic and multiracial populations, are growing.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

White on white crime ?

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A cross-dresser reading a children's book to kids is not "grooming" in any sense of the word. This is moral panic bull***t.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

A cross-dresser reading a children's book to kids is not "grooming" in any sense of the word. This is moral panic bull***t.

Agree that it's not "grooming", but I still wouldn't take my kids to it. Kids need things simple. As they get older, they can learn about and navigate through the "gray areas". (obviously depends on age of "kid"... or does it?)

I don't totally disagree with what socaltownie wrote above, replying to my post: maybe not so bad if kids learn about some gender-bending stuff (paraphrase). Yeah, true maybe, but I'm still not bringing my kids to it. I'm just not.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

sycasey said:

A cross-dresser reading a children's book to kids is not "grooming" in any sense of the word. This is moral panic bull***t.


Agree that it's not "grooming", but I still wouldn't take my kids to it. Kids need things simple. As they get older, they can learn about and navigate through the "gray areas".

I don't totally disagree with what socaltownie wrote above, replying to my post: maybe not so bad if kids learn about some gender-bending stuff (paraphrase). Yeah, true maybe, but I'm still not bringing my kids to it. I'm just not.

Don't have a problem with that either. It's just that words mean things and calling this "grooming" kind of downgrades actual grooming. Just say you think it's weird or something.

EDIT: The same goes for dajo's claims about Charlie Kirk's "grooming." Though I suspect he might be trolling with that.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

sycasey said:

MinotStateBeav said:

socaltownie said:

MinotStateBeav said:

Sorry that was a puff piece cover by Klippenstein..."OH see these things on these bullets, they actually mean this other thing" while completely ignoring Bella Ciao and the 3 arrows down. We're not stupid. Most killers have other issues.

He also goes onto say "Nobody was celebrating"...total absolute bollucks. They were excitedly warning people the day before that something was going to happen.

Where is your proof the day before? I haven't seen ANY Of that reporting and it isn't in the indicment.

And the down arrows are pretty clearly shown to be a Helldivers 2 thing. I don't play it but it makes total sense and is the best explination that fits.



Does this person have any association with Tyler Robinson? People on the internet can just say stuff. It doesn't mean they were involved.

That would be true if there wasn't other accounts doing it too.

Again, people on the internet can just say stuff. You need to prove that they were linked to claim an organized effort.
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

MinotStateBeav said:

sycasey said:

MinotStateBeav said:

socaltownie said:

MinotStateBeav said:

Sorry that was a puff piece cover by Klippenstein..."OH see these things on these bullets, they actually mean this other thing" while completely ignoring Bella Ciao and the 3 arrows down. We're not stupid. Most killers have other issues.

He also goes onto say "Nobody was celebrating"...total absolute bollucks. They were excitedly warning people the day before that something was going to happen.

Where is your proof the day before? I haven't seen ANY Of that reporting and it isn't in the indicment.

And the down arrows are pretty clearly shown to be a Helldivers 2 thing. I don't play it but it makes total sense and is the best explination that fits.



Does this person have any association with Tyler Robinson? People on the internet can just say stuff. It doesn't mean they were involved.

That would be true if there wasn't other accounts doing it too.

Again, people on the internet can just say stuff. You need to prove that they were linked to claim an organized effort.

Sorry but I don't work for the FBI
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

movielover said:

Why do you want old Drag Queens pimping in front of CHILDREN???!!! Grooming?

In college a friend loved to go to Finnochio's in North Beach... I never went, but he enjoyed it.


I'm far more offended by Charlie Kirk grooming underage girls than I am by parents bringing children to events where there are cross dressers and transgender people.

The latter is none of the governments business while the former is none of Charlie Kirk's business.


Except many of these look-at-me events are at schools and libraries, and parents aren't present.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

sycasey said:

MinotStateBeav said:

sycasey said:

MinotStateBeav said:

socaltownie said:

MinotStateBeav said:

Sorry that was a puff piece cover by Klippenstein..."OH see these things on these bullets, they actually mean this other thing" while completely ignoring Bella Ciao and the 3 arrows down. We're not stupid. Most killers have other issues.

He also goes onto say "Nobody was celebrating"...total absolute bollucks. They were excitedly warning people the day before that something was going to happen.

Where is your proof the day before? I haven't seen ANY Of that reporting and it isn't in the indicment.

And the down arrows are pretty clearly shown to be a Helldivers 2 thing. I don't play it but it makes total sense and is the best explination that fits.



Does this person have any association with Tyler Robinson? People on the internet can just say stuff. It doesn't mean they were involved.

That would be true if there wasn't other accounts doing it too.

Again, people on the internet can just say stuff. You need to prove that they were linked to claim an organized effort.

Sorry but I don't work for the FBI

Right, which means you don't know s***.
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

MinotStateBeav said:

sycasey said:

MinotStateBeav said:

sycasey said:

MinotStateBeav said:

socaltownie said:

MinotStateBeav said:

Sorry that was a puff piece cover by Klippenstein..."OH see these things on these bullets, they actually mean this other thing" while completely ignoring Bella Ciao and the 3 arrows down. We're not stupid. Most killers have other issues.

He also goes onto say "Nobody was celebrating"...total absolute bollucks. They were excitedly warning people the day before that something was going to happen.

Where is your proof the day before? I haven't seen ANY Of that reporting and it isn't in the indicment.

And the down arrows are pretty clearly shown to be a Helldivers 2 thing. I don't play it but it makes total sense and is the best explination that fits.



Does this person have any association with Tyler Robinson? People on the internet can just say stuff. It doesn't mean they were involved.

That would be true if there wasn't other accounts doing it too.

Again, people on the internet can just say stuff. You need to prove that they were linked to claim an organized effort.

Sorry but I don't work for the FBI

Right, which means you don't know s***.

Ok, sperg out buddy
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HOW COME KIRK'S SECURITY TEAM HAD NO ONE UP ON THE ROOF?

ARE YOU ****ING KIDDING ME?

PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DIDDYWAGGLES CAPS LOCK STUCK ALL DAY.

TIME TO CLEAN KEYBOARD.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.