BearlySane88 said:
concordtom said:
BearlySane88 said:
dajo9 said:
BREAKING NEWS
3 years ago Tyler Robinson had breakfast at a diner and 2 tables over a transgender person was having a cup of coffee. Kash Patel promises to relentlessly follow this lead.
So you're minimizing the fact that he lived and likely was in a relationship with his trans roommate? This isn't some far flung connection like you make it seem.
That being said, no clue why he shot Charlie but it's starting to line up like the right thought it would and the opposite of what all of you on here claimed it to would be. Shooter wasn't far right, or even close to it.
How about if NONE OF US try to condemn entire groups of people, specifically one half of the US or the other half (as there's only two halves in a Left-Right model) , simply because of the singular act of a singular person.
Can we agree that what Tyler did was specific to Tyler, and that it was horrible?
Yes absolutely abhorrent but I don't think it's ever just about one person. Yes he made the action, he wasn't driven to that action on his own though. And that goes for all of these "ideology killers."
Im intrigued why you continue to use the shooters name. When there are mass shootings, I regularly hear people, predominantly the left, saying don't glorify the shooter.
Why use his name?
Hmmm. Interesting question.
What, if I refuse to use his name then I don't give him glory?
if I refuse to use his name then we can make him a monster?
Hmmm. I suppose I ve been using his name because he's a foolish 22 year old
I see him as a normal kid from a normal family who is a product of the idiocy happening in this country.
Gun policy? Check.
Online bickering and dehumanization of the uses and thems - rather than shaking hands and bowling together? Check.
Religious messaging causing guilt? Probably.
Sexual confusion? Possibly, based on posts here.
Maybe saying Tyler reminds people.
George Floyd was a human, too. Say his name.
Tyler is a victim (of something), too.
How does that response sound?