movielover said:

---

He was gonna diss the Man, and his ratings were low.

---

And the government made a public demand that TV stations take him down and threatened that they could lose their licenses if they don't.

movielover said:

---

Kimmel did himself in.

If you are a follower and have not seen this reported today:

Too late to dig out links to the info, but tomorrow should provide much info that Kimmel getting canceled was because -- without regard to the FCC -- Disney told Kimmel he needed to apologize on Wednesday night's show,…

— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) September 19, 2025

---

What's hilarious is how all these failed comedian left-wing agitprop talk show hosts seem to view their jobs as an entitlement. Network shows get canceled all the time when people don't want to watch them and all of these guys decided to adopt a business model that guaranteed that half of the audience would never want to watch them at all. They could have followed the Carson model and made jokes about both sides, but they were rightfully viewed as propagandists and they paid the price for it.

Say what you want about the Gutfeld show (I think it's horrifically unfunny and never interesting), but that show gets way more viewers than these Democrat apologist shows.

The other piece is that antitrust goes hand-in-hand with free speech. All of these media companies keep merging into bigger and bigger conglomerates and they need federal approval for that. If you keep these guys smaller and separate, you get more viewpoint diversity. But since Israel needs control of the media to counter reality, the mergers keep happening.

ACC Bear said:

---

movielover said:

---

Kimmel did himself in.

If you are a follower and have not seen this reported today:

Too late to dig out links to the info, but tomorrow should provide much info that Kimmel getting canceled was because -- without regard to the FCC -- Disney told Kimmel he needed to apologize on Wednesday night's show,…

— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) September 19, 2025

---

What's hilarious is how all these failed comedian left-wing agitprop talk show hosts seem to view their jobs as an entitlement. Network shows get canceled all the time when people don't want to watch them and all of these guys decided to adopt a business model that guaranteed that half of the audience would never want to watch them at all. They could have followed the Carson model and made jokes about both sides, but they were rightfully viewed as propagandists and they paid the price for it.

Say what you want about the Gutfeld show (I think it's horrifically unfunny and never interesting), but that show gets way more viewers than these Democrat apologist shows.

The other piece is that antitrust goes hand-in-hand with free speech. All of these media companies keep merging into bigger and bigger conglomerates and they need federal approval for that. If you keep these guys smaller and separate, you get more viewpoint diversity. But since Israel needs control of the media to counter reality, the mergers keep happening.

---

The part you keep leaving out is that in this case the federal government made specific threats to the TV stations and said they needed to pull this show off the air.

It’s remarkable how fast the Media went from pushing Charlie Kirk was killed because of his speech to Jimmy Kimmel being fired is an attack on free speech.

— C3 (@C_3C_3) September 19, 2025

BREAKING: The House votes 310-58 to condemn Charlie Kirk’s assassination, honor his legacy, and denounce political violence.

58 Democrats voted against it. Insane. pic.twitter.com/C8nFe9c3eQ

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) September 19, 2025

ACC Bear said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

It's woke if this was about race but this about political violence.

---

Even a vote on denouncing political violence is worthless. Way to take a brave stand there.

I'm all for making Democrats expose their own stupidity, but this is why our government never gets anything important done.

And Charlie Kirk has no legacy worth celebrating. Bunch of fake debates against unprepared and overmatched indoctrinated college students. Real debates have moderators and give both sides equal time.

---

Charlie participated in moderated debates as well. The purpose of the campus format was to engage students who tend to have similar questions and make them aware of alternative views. The goal wasn't to win debates or embarrass indoctrinated kids.

Has everyone recited your daily Charlie Kirk Lamentations today? Make sure they are the appropriate volume and length so the government does not penalize you!

New bill filed in Oklahoma that says every public university in the state must have a "Charlie Kirk Memorial Plaza" with a statue of Kirk and his family. pic.twitter.com/WGWxzW9efw

— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) September 19, 2025

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

BREAKING: The House votes 310-58 to condemn Charlie Kirk’s assassination, honor his legacy, and denounce political violence.

58 Democrats voted against it. Insane. pic.twitter.com/C8nFe9c3eQ

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) September 19, 2025

---

There should be a "who cares" vote. Nobody gives a **** about Charlie Kirk or Jimmy Kimmel
. They are two half $$ed influencers and grifters- one dead the other in exile

He gave the opposing side time, priority, and respect. The Sunday TV drones typically have one fake conservative, if lucky.

This is my America. Remember Charlie Kirk. pic.twitter.com/qVDthygBPb

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) September 19, 2025

POLITICAL VIOLENCE: Remember when the Colorado Springs gay club attack was blamed on a “right-wing extremist”? The shooter, Anderson Lee Aldrich, killed five and wounded eighteen but was not a conservative activist, he was a closeted gay man who visited Club Q more than six… pic.twitter.com/MFFH6PhUqP

— @amuse (@amuse) September 19, 2025

Forty-two members of the Congressional Black Caucus voted against the resolution to honor Charlie Kirk, 4 CBC members voted present, and 4 CBC members didn't vote.

DiabloWags said:

---

movielover said:

---

Forty-two members of the Congressional Black Caucus voted against the resolution to honor Charlie Kirk, 4 CBC members voted present, and 4 CBC members didn't vote.

---

---

George Floyd was a criminal high on drugs resisting arrest who died because of poor policing. Charlie Kirk was a political figure who was assassinated by a rifleman on a rooftop while giving a speech. You just gave a terrible analogy. SAD

movielover said:

---

Forty-two members of the Congressional Black Caucus voted against the resolution to honor Charlie Kirk, 4 CBC members voted present, and 4 CBC members didn't vote.

---

Ilhan Omar voted against the resolution but she also married her brother.

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

movielover said:

---

Forty-two members of the Congressional Black Caucus voted against the resolution to honor Charlie Kirk, 4 CBC members voted present, and 4 CBC members didn't vote.

---

---

George Floyd was a criminal high on drugs resisting arrest who died because of poor policing. Charlie Kirk was a political figure who was assassinated by a rifleman on a rooftop while giving a speech. You just gave a terrible analogy. SAD

---

Also, even in the most unfavorable interpretation of his remarks, Jimmy Kimmel did not mock Charlie Kirk after his death.

sycasey said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

movielover said:

---

Forty-two members of the Congressional Black Caucus voted against the resolution to honor Charlie Kirk, 4 CBC members voted present, and 4 CBC members didn't vote.

---

---

George Floyd was a criminal high on drugs resisting arrest who died because of poor policing. Charlie Kirk was a political figure who was assassinated by a rifleman on a rooftop while giving a speech. You just gave a terrible analogy. SAD

---

Also, even in the most unfavorable interpretation of his remarks, Jimmy Kimmel did not mock Charlie Kirk after his death.

---

He didn't. He just used Kirk's death to carry out a misleading political liberal hit job on Republicans which completely backfired because he was wrong. That still shouldn't cancel him.

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

movielover said:

---

Forty-two members of the Congressional Black Caucus voted against the resolution to honor Charlie Kirk, 4 CBC members voted present, and 4 CBC members didn't vote.

---

---

George Floyd was a criminal high on drugs resisting arrest who died because of poor policing. Charlie Kirk was a political figure who was assassinated by a rifleman on a rooftop while giving a speech. You just gave a terrible analogy. SAD

---

I appreciate this clarification because I have always confused those two guys!

I see this one posted. I took a Look at the CSIS methodology, which is published.

Let’s look at what is excluded from that graph.

1. Economic sabotage and terrorism (tesla and burning police stations and businesses as an example).

2. Violence at demonstrations (exception was… pic.twitter.com/lCJMb7lBWI

— Attorney With Twins (@EsqAndTwins) September 18, 2025

Good breakdown of how leftists lie with statistics.

Islam violence and BLM classified as right wing are my favorites

In the opening interview, Tom Homan rode Maher hard and put him back in the stable wet. Maher never asked Homan one challenging question, simply pitched him softballs that allowed Holman to launch into his rapid fire filibustering bullsh@it, all the while sounding like he had a mouthful of marbles. I could only understand half of what he said. A nun slapping the back of his head with a ring on when he was in grammar school would have cleared that up right proper. Did Trump broker the deal at that lunch with Maher to have this guy on?

Maher said how brave Homan was to come on the show. Why is that? Homan knew he would schlong Maher and that Bill would take it.

*During the panel discussion Bill lamented that Schwarzenegger has refused his invite to come on the show for 30 years. I guaranty Arnold will go on show now to lobby against redistricting. Joe Machin was overwhelming unimpressive…..but I thought Maher was rude to him a couple of times about his tie and a lame joke.

bearister said:

---

In the opening interview, Tom Homan rode Maher hard and put him back in the stable wet. Maher never asked Homan one challenging question, simply pitched him softballs that allowed Holman to launch into his rapid fire filibustering bullsh@it, all the while sounding like he had a mouthful of marbles. I could only understand half of what he said. A nun slapping the back of his head with a ring on when he was in grammar school would have cleared that up right proper. Did Trump broker the deal at that lunch with Maher to have this guy on?

Maher said how brave Homan was to come on the show. Why is that? Homan knew he would schlong Maher and that Bill would take it.

---

Haven't seen the show yet, but this is exactly what I would expect from Bill Maher.

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

George Floyd was a criminal high on drugs resisting arrest who died because of poor policing. Charlie Kirk was a political figure who was assassinated by a rifleman on a rooftop while giving a speech. You just gave a terrible analogy. SAD

---

How crappy was Charlie Kirk's security team?
How come there was no one up on a roof as a spotter or sniper?
How come there was no entry checkpoint at a wide-open ticketed event with no security on the perimeter?

SAD

---

Holy hell bro, get a new talking point. You're not edgy, just annoying atp