PAC-10-BEAR said:BearlySane88 said:OsoDorado said:Grigsby said:BearlySane88 said:bearister said:movielover said:
One expert I listened to, said, if you do public events w 2-3,000 people in a free society, it's almost impossible to stop a determined person with a hunting rifle and scope.
A Beverly Hills security consultant warned Kirk months ago that he would be murdered on a college campus if he didn't have metal detectors at a 700 ft radius from stage and bullet proof plexiglass on the stage. Those security steps would have prevented injury/death at both Kirk's event and Trump's rally, especially in light of the fact both shooters were amateurs.
Charlie knew he could be killed one day, him being behind glass would have entirely changed the power of his interactions. Charlie was for the people and with the people, he didn't hide. Maybe people just shouldn't shoot people they disagree with, how about that?
He was a genocide denier, a stochastic terrorist, and a seditionist. He got exactly what he deserved just as all Nazis do.
Agree with everything but the last sentence. Just can't endorse saying Charlie Kirk "got exactly what he deserved." This is worth pointing out. Care to rephrase?
And the left isn't the problem, correct? This is your side but appreciate you calling him out for it. It's language like this that will lead us to a civil war. Charlie wasn't a nazi, that claim is just absurd.
At least Grisby didn't hold back like others who are pretending.
No Grisgby went full re-tard, you never go full re-tard. I'm sure there are others here who have said in private or in their heads.