dajo9 said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

SBGold said:

---

You aren't interested in a Kirk statue being paraded in Times Square? That's totally for this board.

Sock puppets seeking to diminish posts and censor is bad and should be against the new rules.

---

The trolling isn't the link, it's the way you present the info in a way to clearly try to offend people. 75% of your posts have some trolling comment or slant to it. You troll the mods repeatedly by posting "free wags". Almost every post of yours since the new rules has broken one of the new rules. What's the point of having rules if they won't even be enforced?

---

I disagree. Also, I dont think we should create a society in which we are on eggshells so as not to risk offending the most easily offended people.

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

SBGold said:

---

You aren't interested in a Kirk statue being paraded in Times Square? That's totally for this board.

Sock puppets seeking to diminish posts and censor is bad and should be against the new rules.

---

The trolling isn't the link, it's the way you present the info in a way to clearly try to offend people. 75% of your posts have some trolling comment or slant to it. You troll the mods repeatedly by posting "free wags". Almost every post of yours since the new rules has broken one of the new rules. What's the point of having rules if they won't even be enforced?

---

I disagree. Also, I dont think we should create a society in which we are on eggshells so as not to risk offending the most easily offended people.

---

I know you do because the trolling isn't directed at you or your views. This isn't society, it's a message board with new rules that were just put in place. There isn't free speech here, defined by those new rules. Equating this website to the world at large is flawed from the start. Someone being offended by something you say and intentionally trying to offend people aren't the same. SBG falls in the second group.

---

dajo9 said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

SBGold said:

---

You aren't interested in a Kirk statue being paraded in Times Square? That's totally for this board.

Sock puppets seeking to diminish posts and censor is bad and should be against the new rules.

---

The trolling isn't the link, it's the way you present the info in a way to clearly try to offend people. 75% of your posts have some trolling comment or slant to it. You troll the mods repeatedly by posting "free wags". Almost every post of yours since the new rules has broken one of the new rules. What's the point of having rules if they won't even be enforced?

---

I disagree. Also, I dont think we should create a society in which we are on eggshells so as not to risk offending the most easily offended people.

---

I know you do because the trolling isn't directed at you or your views. This isn't society, it's a message board with new rules that were just put in place. There isn't free speech here, defined by those new rules. Equating this website to the world at large is flawed from the start. Someone being offended by something you say and intentionally trying to offend people aren't the same. SBG falls in the second group.

---

I receive plenty of trolling

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

I disagree. Also, I dont think we should create a society in which we are on eggshells so as not to risk offending the most easily offended people.

---

I know you do because the trolling isn't directed at you or your views. This isn't society, it's a message board with new rules that were just put in place. There isn't free speech here, defined by those new rules. Equating this website to the world at large is flawed from the start. Someone being offended by something you say and intentionally trying to offend people aren't the same. SBG falls in the second group.

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

SBGold said:

---

https://nypost.com/2026/07/15/us-news/charlie-kirk-freedom-statue-to-be-unveiled-in-center-of-the-universe-in-nyc-on-anniversary-of-his-death/?utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=nypost&sr_share=facebook&utm_medium=social&fbclid=IwdGRjcATFVQ5wZG9mA2ZkaWQWUKo1LCmCOxwjZnLxkg5oiI10tfG2Y2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR634NNdDKUGw434qKgQWT6HicXfhpAJHglYe-edEwajqlbFTL0Ah6PayA30wA_aem_QIVKYcv2Vo4ny7UemLzzgQ

Can't wait for this statue, it looks great

Lol

Vote BLue!

---

This is the type of trolling that violates the new rules.

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

I have put you on ignore. When you can respond as Diablo we can talk.

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

I have put you on ignore. When you can respond as Diablo we can talk.

---

This offends me as well. Trolling the unproven accusation that ProBonoBear is Diablo Wags.

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

I have put you on ignore. When you can respond as Diablo we can talk.

---

This offends me as well. Trolling the unproven accusation that ProBonoBear is Diablo Wags.

---

dajo9 says don't be offended. Being blind doesn't negate that something is happening.

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

I have put you on ignore. When you can respond as Diablo we can talk.

---

This offends me as well. Trolling the unproven accusation that ProBonoBear is Diablo Wags.

---

dajo9 says don't be offended. Being blind doesn't negate that something is happening.

---

Calling me blind is a personal attack.

---

dajo9 said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

SBGold said:

---

You aren't interested in a Kirk statue being paraded in Times Square? That's totally for this board.

Sock puppets seeking to diminish posts and censor is bad and should be against the new rules.

---

The trolling isn't the link, it's the way you present the info in a way to clearly try to offend people. 75% of your posts have some trolling comment or slant to it. You troll the mods repeatedly by posting "free wags". Almost every post of yours since the new rules has broken one of the new rules. What's the point of having rules if they won't even be enforced?

---

I disagree. Also, I dont think we should create a society in which we are on eggshells so as not to risk offending the most easily offended people.

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

SBGold said:

---

You aren't interested in a Kirk statue being paraded in Times Square? That's totally for this board.

Sock puppets seeking to diminish posts and censor is bad and should be against the new rules.

---

The trolling isn't the link, it's the way you present the info in a way to clearly try to offend people. 75% of your posts have some trolling comment or slant to it. You troll the mods repeatedly by posting "free wags". Almost every post of yours since the new rules has broken one of the new rules. What's the point of having rules if they won't even be enforced?

---

I disagree. Also, I dont think we should create a society in which we are on eggshells so as not to risk offending the most easily offended people.

---

I know you do because the trolling isn't directed at you or your views. This isn't society, it's a message board with new rules that were just put in place. There isn't free speech here, defined by those new rules. Equating this website to the world at large is flawed from the start. Someone being offended by something you say and intentionally trying to offend people aren't the same. SBG falls in the second group.

---

SBGold said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

SBGold said:

---

You aren't interested in a Kirk statue being paraded in Times Square? That's totally for this board.

Sock puppets seeking to diminish posts and censor is bad and should be against the new rules.

---

The trolling isn't the link, it's the way you present the info in a way to clearly try to offend people. 75% of your posts have some trolling comment or slant to it. You troll the mods repeatedly by posting "free wags". Almost every post of yours since the new rules has broken one of the new rules. What's the point of having rules if they won't even be enforced?

---

I disagree. Also, I dont think we should create a society in which we are on eggshells so as not to risk offending the most easily offended people.

---

I know you do because the trolling isn't directed at you or your views. This isn't society, it's a message board with new rules that were just put in place. There isn't free speech here, defined by those new rules. Equating this website to the world at large is flawed from the start. Someone being offended by something you say and intentionally trying to offend people aren't the same. SBG falls in the second group.

---

I posted nothing offensive or trolling. The end.

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

SBGold said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

SBGold said:

---

You aren't interested in a Kirk statue being paraded in Times Square? That's totally for this board.

Sock puppets seeking to diminish posts and censor is bad and should be against the new rules.

---

The trolling isn't the link, it's the way you present the info in a way to clearly try to offend people. 75% of your posts have some trolling comment or slant to it. You troll the mods repeatedly by posting "free wags". Almost every post of yours since the new rules has broken one of the new rules. What's the point of having rules if they won't even be enforced?

---

I disagree. Also, I dont think we should create a society in which we are on eggshells so as not to risk offending the most easily offended people.

---

I know you do because the trolling isn't directed at you or your views. This isn't society, it's a message board with new rules that were just put in place. There isn't free speech here, defined by those new rules. Equating this website to the world at large is flawed from the start. Someone being offended by something you say and intentionally trying to offend people aren't the same. SBG falls in the second group.

---

I posted nothing offensive or trolling. The end.

---

Nearly all of your posts are trolling. The end.

---

SBGold said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

SBGold said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

SBGold said:

---

You aren't interested in a Kirk statue being paraded in Times Square? That's totally for this board.

Sock puppets seeking to diminish posts and censor is bad and should be against the new rules.

---

The trolling isn't the link, it's the way you present the info in a way to clearly try to offend people. 75% of your posts have some trolling comment or slant to it. You troll the mods repeatedly by posting "free wags". Almost every post of yours since the new rules has broken one of the new rules. What's the point of having rules if they won't even be enforced?

---

I disagree. Also, I dont think we should create a society in which we are on eggshells so as not to risk offending the most easily offended people.

---

I know you do because the trolling isn't directed at you or your views. This isn't society, it's a message board with new rules that were just put in place. There isn't free speech here, defined by those new rules. Equating this website to the world at large is flawed from the start. Someone being offended by something you say and intentionally trying to offend people aren't the same. SBG falls in the second group.

---

I posted nothing offensive or trolling. The end.

---

Nearly all of your posts are trolling. The end.

---

You are free to have your opinion. I would note that just because you don't like me personally that does not mean everything I am posting is trolling. When I am posting, Draper states clearly what my thoughts are here re: sock puppets:



VOTE BLUE AND FREE WAGS

---

The fact that the left isn't outraged and calling for immediate investigations into China & Iran interfering in our election to HURT Trump is proof that the Russia hoax was never actually about "election integrity"

If they didn't have double standards they would have none at all

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) August 7, 2020

SBGold said:

---

Just like HelltoPay does.

---

SBGold said:

---

You should tell John Solomon that, he disagrees.

---

To @CNN, you have a short memory. In 2024 you credibly covered that China hacked Great Britain’s voter files. Those files are public like the US. Why was it news then but now disinformation when Trump reveals it happened to Americans? https://t.co/7DBIjgn6fN

— John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) July 17, 2026

SBGold said:

---

What's you definition of trolling?

The site honestly does not have one, the User Agreement states:

" Trolling (posting to purposefully antagonize other posters)"

I have not posted anything here in my life for that purpose. A post to counter misinformation? To provide a point of view? To share a point or news with like-minded people? All yes. Frankly, I don't post or seek the other side of my views to respond to me at all. If they do, that's fine. If they feel antagonized? I don't know, that feels like I painted my house a certain color and the neighbor disapproves.

VOTE BLUE and FREE WAGS

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

SBGold said:

---

You should tell John Solomon that, he disagrees.

---

To @CNN, you have a short memory. In 2024 you credibly covered that China hacked Great Britain’s voter files. Those files are public like the US. Why was it news then but now disinformation when Trump reveals it happened to Americans? https://t.co/7DBIjgn6fN

— John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) July 17, 2026

---

SBGold said:

---

Georgetown to honor Kirk on the Kirkaversary.

https://nypost.com/2026/09/07/us-news/georgetown-students-plan-charlie-kirk-lookalike-contest-on-assassination-anniversary/

I'd like to see the contestants for the Charlie and Erika contest. Should be some good video.

Vote Blue and Vote Gavin

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

Georgetown to honor Kirk on the Kirkaversary.

https://nypost.com/2026/09/07/us-news/georgetown-students-plan-charlie-kirk-lookalike-contest-on-assassination-anniversary/

I'd like to see the contestants for the Charlie and Erika contest. Should be some good video.

Vote Blue and Vote Gavin

---

This is grotesque and not surprising that you would support something like this or troll with a post like this. Political violence and celebrating it are never called for.

---

TRANS TERROR: The Department of Health & Human Services released a report that seemed obvious to most of us - those who embrace gender ideology ALSO embrace political violence. It isn't just the trans folks pumped with hormones who are violent; it is also the folks who support… pic.twitter.com/lG36XNyBY9

— @amuse (@amuse) September 7, 2026

DiabloWags said:

---

Why would anyone with reasonable intelligence believe RFK Jr?

I wouldn't be so gullible.
Another bogus "study".

Out of 1,208 respondents surveyed, only 13 identified as transgender or gender-nonconforming. The report did not measure whether anyone actually committed or intended to commit violence, nor did it establish that affirming transgender individuals causes violent attitudes.

Thanks.

---