bearister said:

---

In science if there is such a thing as the sweet spot of a Happy Place, she hits it, Dead Center:

Sarah Cooper on Twitter: "How to second term https://t.co/WTuH277sUA" / Twitter

---

bearister said:

---

Donald Trump's re-election playbook: 25 ways he'll lie, cheat and abuse his power
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jun/28/donald-trump-re-election-playbook-25-lies-cheats-and-steals?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

---

smh said:

---

bearister said:

---

Donald Trump's re-election playbook: 25 ways he'll lie, cheat and abuse his power
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jun/28/donald-trump-re-election-playbook-25-lies-cheats-and-steals?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

---

author! author!!
> Robert Reich, a former US secretary of labor, is professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley and the author of Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few and The Common Good. His new book, The System: Who Rigged It, How We Fix It, is out now. He is a columnist for Guardian US

---

dajo9 said:

---

What's the point in engaging with Yogi? You guys are playing chess with a pigeon and there is crap all over these threads.

---

Big C said:

---

bearister said:

---

" In hundreds of highly classified phone calls with foreign heads of state, President Donald Trump was so consistently unprepared for discussion of serious issues, so often outplayed in his conversations with powerful leaders like Russian President Vladimir Putin and Turkish President Recep Erdogan, and so abusive to leaders of America's principal allies, that the calls helped convince some senior US officials -- including his former secretaries of state and defense, two national security advisers and his longest-serving chief of staff -- that the President himself posed a danger to the national security of the United States, according to White House and intelligence officials intimately familiar with the contents of the conversations."

From pandering to Putin to abusing allies and ignoring his own advisers, Trump's phone calls alarm US officials - CNNPolitics


https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/29/politics/trump-phone-calls-national-security-concerns/index.html

---

I'm telling you... he might not make it to January 20th. I just hope he doesn't take too much of the country down with him, as he self-destructs.

---

Roxie Richter said:

---

Big C said:

---

bearister said:

---

" In hundreds of highly classified phone calls with foreign heads of state, President Donald Trump was so consistently unprepared for discussion of serious issues, so often outplayed in his conversations with powerful leaders like Russian President Vladimir Putin and Turkish President Recep Erdogan, and so abusive to leaders of America's principal allies, that the calls helped convince some senior US officials -- including his former secretaries of state and defense, two national security advisers and his longest-serving chief of staff -- that the President himself posed a danger to the national security of the United States, according to White House and intelligence officials intimately familiar with the contents of the conversations."

From pandering to Putin to abusing allies and ignoring his own advisers, Trump's phone calls alarm US officials - CNNPolitics


https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/29/politics/trump-phone-calls-national-security-concerns/index.html

---

I'm telling you... he might not make it to January 20th. I just hope he doesn't take too much of the country down with him, as he self-destructs.

---

The frightening part will be what he does between Nov 4 and January 19th

---

smh said:

---

> If Biden is elected, there's a good chance you will be dead within the year.

gosh, so guess comic guy isn't a bernie bro neither?

---

Roxie Richter said:

---

Big C said:

---

bearister said:

---

" In hundreds of highly classified phone calls with foreign heads of state, President Donald Trump was so consistently unprepared for discussion of serious issues, so often outplayed in his conversations with powerful leaders like Russian President Vladimir Putin and Turkish President Recep Erdogan, and so abusive to leaders of America's principal allies, that the calls helped convince some senior US officials -- including his former secretaries of state and defense, two national security advisers and his longest-serving chief of staff -- that the President himself posed a danger to the national security of the United States, according to White House and intelligence officials intimately familiar with the contents of the conversations."

From pandering to Putin to abusing allies and ignoring his own advisers, Trump's phone calls alarm US officials - CNNPolitics


https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/29/politics/trump-phone-calls-national-security-concerns/index.html

---

I'm telling you... he might not make it to January 20th. I just hope he doesn't take too much of the country down with him, as he self-destructs.

---

The frightening part will be what he does between Nov 4 and January 19th

---

Quote:

---

"Voters of faith know that that project to shift the court in a more conservative direction is on the 5-yard line and it's a strategic imperative to get President Trump reelected," Reed said. "The Louisiana decision has brought the life issue into fuller relief and reminded us why we have to give the president the chance to nominate more justices."

---

bearister said:

---

" Meh, that's much ado about nothing IMO. It's not like the Taliban wasn't already highly motivated to want to kill our soliders already."

Good argument. Completely neutralizes any argument that tRump did anything wrong. Bravo!

"Afghan officials said prizes of as much as $100,000 per killed soldier were offered for American and coalition targets." Axios

Apparently Putin wasn't convinced that the "high motivation" of which you speak was delivering the goods.

---

bearister said:

---

Garou said:

---

bearister said:

---

" Meh, that's much ado about nothing IMO. It's not like the Taliban wasn't already highly motivated to want to kill our soliders already."

Good argument. Completely neutralizes any argument that tRump did anything wrong. Bravo!

"Afghan officials said prizes of as much as $100,000 per killed soldier were offered for American and coalition targets." Axios

Apparently Putin wasn't convinced that the "high motivation" of which you speak was delivering the goods.

---

Learn to tell the difference between propaganda and reality

---

Your remark is either a non sequitur or you have facts supporting the position that it is untrue the Russians paid bounties.

---

bearister said:

---

Garou said:

---

bearister said:

---

Garou said:

---

bearister said:

---

" Meh, that's much ado about nothing IMO. It's not like the Taliban wasn't already highly motivated to want to kill our soliders already."

Good argument. Completely neutralizes any argument that tRump did anything wrong. Bravo!

"Afghan officials said prizes of as much as $100,000 per killed soldier were offered for American and coalition targets." Axios

Apparently Putin wasn't convinced that the "high motivation" of which you speak was delivering the goods.

---

Learn to tell the difference between propaganda and reality

---

Your remark is either a non sequitur or you have facts supporting the position that it is untrue the Russians paid bounties.

---

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/nsa-differed-from-cia-others-on-russia-bounty-intelligence/ar-BB16a7hg

When are people gonna get tired of asking for evidence and then having it produced again and again

---

The headline of your linked story states:
" NSA Differed From CIA, Others on Russia Bounty Intelligence"

So let me see if I can frame your argument: The conclusion of the NSA on Russian bounties constitutes "evidence" proving your position in the matter but the conclusions of the CIA and other agencies that differ from those of the NSA do not constitute "evidence" proving my position.....and if I don't accept the conclusions of the NSA on the matter then I don't know the difference between reality and propaganda.

Oh, and I will never tire of having you repeat over and over the "evidence" which supports the statements you post.

---