ICE

108,270 Views | 2633 Replies | Last: 15 hrs ago by brobear
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:



Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:



Apparently they're unfamiliar with the Fourth Amendment. Perhaps someone should make them aware.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tucker Carlson: "The West isn't just tolerating mass migration. Our governments are funding it.

"In our new documentary Replacing Europe: Following the World's Deadliest Migration Route, our cameras uncover what no one wants you to see, speaking directly with migrants, locals, and officials who quietly admit what the public is never told."

Watch it now only on https://tuckercarlson.com/
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:



Apparently they're unfamiliar with the Fourth Amendment. Perhaps someone should make them aware.


sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:



Apparently they're unfamiliar with the Fourth Amendment. Perhaps someone should make them aware.




An administrative warrant is not a judicial warrant. You don't want to set the precedent that the government can just enter your house whenever they want.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:



Apparently they're unfamiliar with the Fourth Amendment. Perhaps someone should make them aware.




An administrative warrant is not a judicial warrant. You don't want to set the precedent that the government can just enter your house whenever they want.


It's for illegal aliens. I'm all good with setting that precedent when we are removing people that aren't allowed to be here anyways.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:



Apparently they're unfamiliar with the Fourth Amendment. Perhaps someone should make them aware.




An administrative warrant is not a judicial warrant. You don't want to set the precedent that the government can just enter your house whenever they want.


It's for illegal aliens. I'm all good with setting that precedent when we are removing people that aren't allowed to be here anyways.

And how can you prove you know where the illegal aliens are without a judge looking at it first?

Just trust us bro?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:



Apparently they're unfamiliar with the Fourth Amendment. Perhaps someone should make them aware.




An administrative warrant is not a judicial warrant. You don't want to set the precedent that the government can just enter your house whenever they want.


It's for illegal aliens. I'm all good with setting that precedent when we are removing people that aren't allowed to be here anyways.

And how can you prove you know where the illegal aliens are without a judge looking at it first?

Just trust us bro?

While the fourth amendment typically protects citizen defendants (or illegal aliens with substantial ties to the U.S.) from being prosecuted with evidence obtained in violation of it, what would the remedy be here?
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:


This is the first sign of actual existence I've seen for the Black Panthers in at least 20 years, maybe 30 years. Whither the Weather Underground or John Birch Society? Symbionese Liberation Army?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?


He's not losing the independents on this issue
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:



Apparently they're unfamiliar with the Fourth Amendment. Perhaps someone should make them aware.




An administrative warrant is not a judicial warrant. You don't want to set the precedent that the government can just enter your house whenever they want.


It's for illegal aliens. I'm all good with setting that precedent when we are removing people that aren't allowed to be here anyways.

And how can you prove you know where the illegal aliens are without a judge looking at it first?

Just trust us bro?

LEO can enter the object of an arrest warrant's home based on the arrest warrant and do not need a separate search warrant.

An Admin warrant is effectively an arrest warrant. Admin warrants generally require a final order of removal to have been issued first, so the object of the Admin warrant has received due process (exception where the person has already been convicted of an aggravated felony, in whiich the admin order is the deportation order).

This is a change in policy for ICE. Maybe it does / does not survive legal challenge. But it is not without rational legal reasoning. It is not necessarily the abject 4th Amendment violation that some would have us believe.
harebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
harebear said:




Any proof of this besides some random dude on tiktok?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:




Well you've been duped again. This child's illegal alien father abandoned him while trying to avoid being arrested. Did you want ICE to just leave this child out in the cold?



Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:




Except most polls show overwhelmingly that Americans want illegal aliens removed. The majority might not agree with how ICE is doing it but the majority wants ICE to do it.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our Federal Government is now literally kidnapping kids on their way home from pre-school.
Clearly using the children as "bait".

This is Donald Trump's America.

This is how you MAGA!



ICE detains 4 Minnesota students, including 5-year-old, school district says
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Our Federal Government is now literally kidnapping kids on their way home from pre-school.
Clearly using the children as "bait".

This is Donald Trump's America.

This is how you MAGA!



ICE detains 4 Minnesota students, including 5-year-old, school district says


This has already been debunked. If you didn't silence voices you don't agree with, you'd have seen my posts about it
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Our Federal Government is now literally kidnapping kids on their way home from pre-school.
Clearly using the children as "bait".

This is Donald Trump's America.

This is how you MAGA!



ICE detains 4 Minnesota students, including 5-year-old, school district says


Our Federal Government is NOT literally kidnapping kids on their way home from pre-school.

They are NOT using the children as "bait".

If you look at the actual facts in the article, nothing like that happened. They arrested a father and nobody there was willing and able to take the child. Should ICE leave a 5 year old alone?

It looks like you got DUPED again. SAD.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Welcome to Nazi America.
Where DHS turns to Faux News to lie about their operations.

DHS says child in Minnesota was 'abandoned' by father, not targeted by ICE | Fox News


Columbia Heights Public Schools Superintendent Zena Stenvik said the boy had been taken by federal agents from a running car while it had been in the family's driveway Tuesday afternoon.

Stenvik had said the family has an active asylum case and has not been ordered to leave the country.

The school official alleged officers told the child to knock on the door to his home to see if other people were inside.

"Why detain a 5-year-old?" Stenvik was quoted as saying, according to the AP. "You cannot tell me that this child is going to be classified as a violent criminal."

School board chair Mary Granlund, who witnessed Liam and his dad being detained, told reporters on Thursday that she heard an adult inside the home begging agents to leave the child but they refused.
Granlund was driving to pick up her own children from school Tuesday when she heard and then saw commotion near the family's house.

"I heard one person say: 'What are you doing? Don't take the child,'" she said.

As Granlund got out of her car and walked toward the house, she heard another person yell that someone from the school district had just arrived, referring to Granlund, and could assume responsibility for Liam, she said.

"There was ample opportunity to be able to safely hand that child off to adults," Granlund said.

She said she saw Liam's mom through the window and could hear his father yell at her not to open the door, fearing ICE agents would push their way into the house. It was not immediately clear whether the mother was detained.



"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Welcome to Nazi America.
Where DHS turns to Faux News to lie about their operations.

DHS says child in Minnesota was 'abandoned' by father, not targeted by ICE | Fox News


Columbia Heights Public Schools Superintendent Zena Stenvik said the boy had been taken by federal agents from a running car while it had been in the family's driveway Tuesday afternoon.

Stenvik had said the family has an active asylum case and has not been ordered to leave the country.

The school official alleged officers told the child to knock on the door to his home to see if other people were inside.

"Why detain a 5-year-old?" Stenvik was quoted as saying, according to the AP. "You cannot tell me that this child is going to be classified as a violent criminal."

School board chair Mary Granlund, who witnessed Liam and his dad being detained, told reporters on Thursday that she heard an adult inside the home begging agents to leave the child but they refused.
Granlund was driving to pick up her own children from school Tuesday when she heard and then saw commotion near the family's house.

"I heard one person say: 'What are you doing? Don't take the child,'" she said.

As Granlund got out of her car and walked toward the house, she heard another person yell that someone from the school district had just arrived, referring to Granlund, and could assume responsibility for Liam, she said.

"There was ample opportunity to be able to safely hand that child off to adults," Granlund said.

She said she saw Liam's mom through the window and could hear his father yell at her not to open the door, fearing ICE agents would push their way into the house. It was not immediately clear whether the mother was detained.






So again, mom won't claim her kid and dad got arrested. What would have them do with the child? Leave him outside? Your narrative is entirely flawed bro
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Welcome to Nazi America.
Where DHS turns to Faux News to lie about their operations.

DHS says child in Minnesota was 'abandoned' by father, not targeted by ICE | Fox News


Columbia Heights Public Schools Superintendent Zena Stenvik said the boy had been taken by federal agents from a running car while it had been in the family's driveway Tuesday afternoon.

Stenvik had said the family has an active asylum case and has not been ordered to leave the country.

The school official alleged officers told the child to knock on the door to his home to see if other people were inside.

"Why detain a 5-year-old?" Stenvik was quoted as saying, according to the AP. "You cannot tell me that this child is going to be classified as a violent criminal."

School board chair Mary Granlund, who witnessed Liam and his dad being detained, told reporters on Thursday that she heard an adult inside the home begging agents to leave the child but they refused.
Granlund was driving to pick up her own children from school Tuesday when she heard and then saw commotion near the family's house.

"I heard one person say: 'What are you doing? Don't take the child,'" she said.

As Granlund got out of her car and walked toward the house, she heard another person yell that someone from the school district had just arrived, referring to Granlund, and could assume responsibility for Liam, she said.

"There was ample opportunity to be able to safely hand that child off to adults," Granlund said.

She said she saw Liam's mom through the window and could hear his father yell at her not to open the door, fearing ICE agents would push their way into the house. It was not immediately clear whether the mother was detained.






Their is zero information in the above article indicating that our Federal Government is literally kidnapping kids on their way home from pre-school.

They are NOT using the children as "bait".

If you look at the actual facts that you just posted, nothing like that happened. They arrested a father and no legal family member there was willing and able to take the child. Should ICE leave a 5 year old alone? Should ICE leave them with someone who lives in the neighborhood just because they work at the child's school?

It looks like you got DUPED again. SAD.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You can't be a good person and support what the Federal government is doing right now
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

You can't be a good person and support what the Federal government is doing right now


Agreed.

Sadly, there will always be people that have their TV sets tuned to FAUX NEWS 24/7 to swallow the latest Trump Administration propaganda from the likes of Stephen Miller, Kristi Noem, and others.

If one is actually an educated student of history, you would have found Stephen Miller's speech that he delivered at the memorial for Charlie Kirk, eerily similar to the "Storm is Coming" speech by Nazi Joseph Goebbels in 1932.

The rhetorical similarities are stunning.

Imagery of "storms" . . . a call to "action" . . . and themes of "martyrdom and revenge".

That's TRUMP'S AMERICA in a nutshell.

"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Our Federal Government is now literally kidnapping kids on their way home from pre-school.
Clearly using the children as "bait".

This is Donald Trump's America.

This is how you MAGA!



ICE detains 4 Minnesota students, including 5-year-old, school district says


Our Federal Government is NOT literally kidnapping kids on their way home from pre-school.

They are NOT using the children as "bait".

If you look at the actual facts in the article, nothing like that happened. They arrested a father and nobody there was willing and able to take the child. Should ICE leave a 5 year old alone?

It looks like you got DUPED again. SAD.

The family's lawyer claims they were here legally as asylum petitioners.



Let's see what shakes out in court before we make any definitive statements here. Nothing the government says on these matters should be taken at face value, it's pretty clear.

Personally, I think our government could be using more humane methods than taking a pre-schooler out of his classroom and then trying to arrest his parents in front of him while they try to recover their child.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Our Federal Government is now literally kidnapping kids on their way home from pre-school.
Clearly using the children as "bait".

This is Donald Trump's America.

This is how you MAGA!



ICE detains 4 Minnesota students, including 5-year-old, school district says


Our Federal Government is NOT literally kidnapping kids on their way home from pre-school.

They are NOT using the children as "bait".

If you look at the actual facts in the article, nothing like that happened. They arrested a father and nobody there was willing and able to take the child. Should ICE leave a 5 year old alone?

It looks like you got DUPED again. SAD.

The family's lawyer claims they were here legally as asylum petitioners.



Let's see what shakes out in court before we make any definitive statements here. Nothing the government says on these matters should be taken at face value, it's pretty clear.

Personally, I think our government could be using more humane methods than taking a pre-schooler out of his classroom and then trying to arrest his parents in front of him while they try to recover their child.


I appreciate that, unlike Diablowags, you posted something factual, which is that the family CLAIMS they are here legally. However, you then write that they took the preschooler out of school, which appears to have zero evidence supporting it. Please stop being DUPED by outrageous media sources.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

The family's lawyer claims they were here legally as asylum petitioners.



Let's see what shakes out in court before we make any definitive statements here. Nothing the government says on these matters should be taken at face value, it's pretty clear.

Personally, I think our government could be using more humane methods than taking a pre-schooler out of his classroom and then trying to arrest his parents in front of him while they try to recover their child.


I POSTED THIS FACT in my second post this morning in this thread when I quoted the public school superintendent Zena Stenvik. The family had an active asylum case and had not been ordered to leave the country according to Stenvik.

But I would not be surprised if people that I have on ignore (but who continue to reply to my posts) continue to suffer from poor reading comprehension and do nothing more than accept what Faux News has reported given their undying love for Donald Trump and his policies.

As you point out, the propaganda out of the current Administration is pretty thick.
Again, it's noteworthy that they went directly to Fox News Digital with their version of what happened here.

As a Cal alum having attended a University with a strong reputation when it comes to questioning Govt "activities" . . . I wholeheartedly agree that nothing the government says about these matters should be taken at face value.

But I guess that there will always be people that blame the protestors in the streets who are fighting for their Civil Rights.



"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

sycasey said:

The family's lawyer claims they were here legally as asylum petitioners.



Let's see what shakes out in court before we make any definitive statements here. Nothing the government says on these matters should be taken at face value, it's pretty clear.

Personally, I think our government could be using more humane methods than taking a pre-schooler out of his classroom and then trying to arrest his parents in front of him while they try to recover their child.


I POSTED THIS FACT in my second post this morning in this thread when I quoted the public school superintendent Zena Stenvik. The family had an active asylum case and had not been ordered to leave the country according to Stenvik.

But I would not be surprised if people that I have on ignore (but who continue to reply to my posts) continue to suffer from poor reading comprehension and do nothing more than accept what Faux News has reported given their undying love for Donald Trump and his policies.




Dear person who PRETENDS to ignore people and brags about ignoring them, if there were any facts you posted, they were buried in all the lies you wrote after you were DUPED by your lame sources. Clearly you are the one who SUFFERS from POOR reading comprehension. As a Cal alum having attended a University with a strong reputation, I will poke holes in incorrect arguments. If you don't want someone to criticize what you wrote, please post something that isn't FALSE.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.