The Official Jan. 6th Public Hearings Thread

68,836 Views | 885 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by bearister
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sentenced to 60 days in Prison and 12 months of supervised release.
Good luck with that medical license of yours.... Dr. "Anti-Vaxer" Gold.
It's been tarnished.

Of course, she raised more than $430,000 for her LEGAL FUND.
Even though she pleaded guilty.

Anyone see a pattern here?

Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

The talking heads before the hearing built Luttig up as saying he was incredibly renowned among lawyers.
But this guy sounds like between he and Roebrt Mueller they have 2 feet in the grave!
The hearing is doing an effective job of explaining how Trump tried to corruptly overturn the election. They've connected all of the dots.

This CNN article does a pretty good job of describing today's hearing.

Here's a summary:
  • Eastman proposed a plan for Pence to reject certification.
  • Eastman and everyone else, including Trump, knew the plan was illegal. They were advised it was illegal and it was established. There was no misunderstanding here.
  • Eastman asked for a pardon because he knew what he did.
  • Despite knowing it was illegal, Trump mounted a public pressure campaign to get Pence to break the law and to convince Trump's cult that Pence should take action.
  • Rioters had heard Trump's claims about Pence's role and it inspired them to riot to get Pence to do what Trump wanted.
  • Even during the Riot Trump criticized Pence because he "didn't have the courage to do what should have been done." (eg corruptly commit a crime to help the cult leader Trump).
  • A WH lawyer said that Eastman had been made aware that this approach could lead to violence and said 'There's been violence in the history of our country in order to protect the democracy, or to protect the republic,'

The DOJ has enough evidence to indict a number of individuals, should it choose to do the right thing to prevent future corruption and protect the history of peaceful transitions of power, which until 2021 had been uninterrupted since our founding.

The people who fail to acknowledge what happened on Jan 6 either do so out of ignorance, an allegiance to a cult, self-interest or corruption, and likely a combination of multiple of these. If what we've seen here isn't enough to prevent Trump from ever holding public office again, we should stop pretending that we have functioning checks and balances or that we live in a non-corrupt nation.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Is there any doubt that had the Proud Boys gotten a hold of VP Pence, he'd be dead?



The Proud Boys didn't bring any weapons to DC like Kavanuagh's assassin did.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Reminder: November 3, 2020 was the real insurrection.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

DiabloWags said:

Is there any doubt that had the Proud Boys gotten a hold of VP Pence, he'd be dead?



The Proud Boys didn't bring any weapons to DC like Kavanuagh's assassin did.
The assassin is from the Republican enclave of Simi Valley, known as the home of numerous law enforcement officers. The proud boys had weapons disguised as flag poles. The Idiot in Chief threw Pence to the wolves; if they had found him, they would have ripped him to shreds. To dispute this is delusional, magical thinking, or supporting the end of Democracy as we know it. Which one are you picking?
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

AunBear89 said:

Wait! According to the majority of Right Wing Loonies, January 6 was a bunch of grannies taking selfies. Not a riot.

So which is it?

Stuck in binary thinking mode again?
Pursuing the truth isn't binary thinking. Non-binary thinking doesn't mean lying through your teeth about EVERYTHING is OK.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

BearForce2 said:

DiabloWags said:

Is there any doubt that had the Proud Boys gotten a hold of VP Pence, he'd be dead?



The Proud Boys didn't bring any weapons to DC like Kavanuagh's assassin did.
The assassin is from the Republican enclave of Simi Valley, known as the home of numerous law enforcement officers. The proud boys had weapons disguised as flag poles. The Idiot in Chief threw Pence to the wolves; if they had found him, they would have ripped him to shreds. To dispute this is delusional, magical thinking, or supporting the end of Democracy as we know it. Which one are you picking?

They brought flagpoles to an insurrection so you say.....Nothing worse than death by flagpole I suppose.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

BearNIt said:

BearForce2 said:

DiabloWags said:

Is there any doubt that had the Proud Boys gotten a hold of VP Pence, he'd be dead?



The Proud Boys didn't bring any weapons to DC like Kavanuagh's assassin did.
The assassin is from the Republican enclave of Simi Valley, known as the home of numerous law enforcement officers. The proud boys had weapons disguised as flag poles. The Idiot in Chief threw Pence to the wolves; if they had found him, they would have ripped him to shreds. To dispute this is delusional, magical thinking, or supporting the end of Democracy as we know it. Which one are you picking?

They brought flagpoles to an insurrection so you say.....Nothing worse than death by flagpole I suppose.
Delusional and magical thinking it is.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

BearForce2 said:

BearNIt said:

BearForce2 said:

DiabloWags said:

Is there any doubt that had the Proud Boys gotten a hold of VP Pence, he'd be dead?



The Proud Boys didn't bring any weapons to DC like Kavanuagh's assassin did.
The assassin is from the Republican enclave of Simi Valley, known as the home of numerous law enforcement officers. The proud boys had weapons disguised as flag poles. The Idiot in Chief threw Pence to the wolves; if they had found him, they would have ripped him to shreds. To dispute this is delusional, magical thinking, or supporting the end of Democracy as we know it. Which one are you picking?

They brought flagpoles to an insurrection so you say.....Nothing worse than death by flagpole I suppose.
Delusional and magical thinking it is.
Breaking: Democrats introduce bill on House floor to ban automatic flag poles.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

BearForce2 said:

DiabloWags said:

Is there any doubt that had the Proud Boys gotten a hold of VP Pence, he'd be dead?



The Proud Boys didn't bring any weapons to DC like Kavanuagh's assassin did.



So, that's just another idiotic take!
Dude should just retire. So shamed.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

BearForce2 said:

BearNIt said:

BearForce2 said:

DiabloWags said:

Is there any doubt that had the Proud Boys gotten a hold of VP Pence, he'd be dead?



The Proud Boys didn't bring any weapons to DC like Kavanuagh's assassin did.
The assassin is from the Republican enclave of Simi Valley, known as the home of numerous law enforcement officers. The proud boys had weapons disguised as flag poles. The Idiot in Chief threw Pence to the wolves; if they had found him, they would have ripped him to shreds. To dispute this is delusional, magical thinking, or supporting the end of Democracy as we know it. Which one are you picking?

They brought flagpoles to an insurrection so you say.....Nothing worse than death by flagpole I suppose.
Delusional and magical thinking it is.


He should try it out and let us know how it felt.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

concordtom said:


We also don't run opponent's buses off the road in a threatening convoy.
We don't punch protestors at rally's.
We don't storm capitol buildings with guns, crutches, sharp tipped flag poles.
We don't call racists nazi's "Fine People" and tell them that we "Love" them.


This is exactly what Democrats do.

Link(s)?
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"These are all important parts of the puzzle. But the immediate danger to American democracy stems from the fact that the Republican party is justifying all this, remains united behind the man responsible, and, worst of all, actually wants to put him back in power. This is about Trump, but not just about Trump. This is what the Republican party is: the very few voices siding against Trumpism are being shunned and ostracized, and most Republicans are united in their quest to install authoritarian rule by a reactionary minority.

And even if conservatives aren't necessarily on board with all the specifics of Trump's conspiracy claims, the right in general is united behind the idea that progressives are out to destroy "real" America and must be stopped by whatever means. White conservatives consider themselves the sole proponents of "real America" and therefore entitled to rule, as is the party that focuses almost solely on their interests and sensibilities.

This is the basis on which 147 congressional Republicans voted to overturn the election results even after the assault on the Capitol. This is why the Republican party officially defended the violent attack of January 6 as "legitimate political discourse" and lashed out against the few Republicans who publicly dared to object. This is why Republicans are either explicitly running on the big lie or, at the very least, are lending legitimacy to the idea that there was something wrong with the 2020 election.….

And how are the people the hearings present as Team Normal, as standing up to Trump's coup attempt, dealing with all this? Take Bill Barr: he's on record saying he would vote for Trump in 2024. In his testimony for the committee as well as in his book, Barr has left no doubt that he believes Trump is either willfully pushing treasonous conspiracy theories or is completely detached from reality yet Barr is still willing to help put him back in the White House."

The January 6 hearings aren't acknowledging the elephant in the room


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jun/17/the-january-6-hearings-arent-acknowledging-the-elephant-in-the-room?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"These are all important parts of the puzzle. But the immediate danger to American democracy stems from the fact that the Republican party is justifying all this, remains united behind the man responsible, and, worst of all, actually wants to put him back in power. This is about Trump, but not just about Trump. This is what the Republican party is: the very few voices siding against Trumpism are being shunned and ostracized, and most Republicans are united in their quest to install authoritarian rule by a reactionary minority.

And even if conservatives aren't necessarily on board with all the specifics of Trump's conspiracy claims, the right in general is united behind the idea that progressives are out to destroy "real" America and must be stopped by whatever means. White conservatives consider themselves the sole proponents of "real America" and therefore entitled to rule, as is the party that focuses almost solely on their interests and sensibilities.

This is the basis on which 147 congressional Republicans voted to overturn the election results even after the assault on the Capitol. This is why the Republican party officially defended the violent attack of January 6 as "legitimate political discourse" and lashed out against the few Republicans who publicly dared to object. This is why Republicans are either explicitly running on the big lie or, at the very least, are lending legitimacy to the idea that there was something wrong with the 2020 election.….

And how are the people the hearings present as Team Normal, as standing up to Trump's coup attempt, dealing with all this? Take Bill Barr: he's on record saying he would vote for Trump in 2024. In his testimony for the committee as well as in his book, Barr has left no doubt that he believes Trump is either willfully pushing treasonous conspiracy theories or is completely detached from reality yet Barr is still willing to help put him back in the White House."

The January 6 hearings aren't acknowledging the elephant in the room


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jun/17/the-january-6-hearings-arent-acknowledging-the-elephant-in-the-room?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other


Well duhhhhhhhh !!!!!

This was clear to me pre trump (actually since I was a child) and thus it's why refuse to be quiet.

Christian white supremacy(racist using racism) is the at the center of the problem. And even with this piece the author is still not getting it.

Racists have been rewarded by American society in every possible way

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTdKys9nx/?k=1
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTdKyXTQP/?k=1
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If those on the capital hill were treated like black people fighting for
Human rights
End to police terrorism
Payment for stolen generational wealth /Restitution/Redress

Then the masses would on the right track …
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No surprise that this list is full of sources of tweets that are regularly posted by disingenuous conspiracy theorists and bots on this forum. It's a shame that there is no interest in removing people who post here primarily to spread misinformation.

BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

No surprise that this list is full of sources of tweets that are regularly posted by disingenuous conspiracy theorists and bots on this forum. It's a shame that there is no interest in removing people who post here primarily to spread misinformation.



It's no surprise that the cheaters also happen to be rioters.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL, game recognizes game. Ann Coultergeist on 2000 Dead Horses.

Quote:

As much as I'm enjoying the January 6th committee's careful assembly of evidence proving former President Trump is a ******bag, I wasn't seeing much in the way of a criminal offense until this week's underreported story about how Trump used his "STOP THE STEAL" fundraising appeals to grift his supporters out of $250 million, none of which was, in fact, used to fight election fraud.

It didn't even go to the poor saps who got themselves arrested at the Capitol on Jan. 6. Instead, the $250 million seems to have been funneled exclusively to Trump businesses, family and friends.

Which brings me to Dinesh D'Souza's movie "2,000 Mules." The movie tells Trump diehards (a dwindling crowd) that their man probably DID win the 2020 election!

Using cellphone tracking data obtained by "True the Vote" (which sounds like a group named by Melania Trump -- "BE BEST!") D'Souza claims to have proof that 2,000 people delivered multiple ballots to election drop boxes in the five crucial battleground states that Trump lost.

There are two problems with this.

First, the movie doesn't show what it says it shows.

...

The second problem -- my problem with the movie -- is the idea that Trump's 2020 loss cries out for an explanation. We know for a fact that Trump was wildly popular, sailing to a landslide election on the love of a grateful nation. Only something nefarious could explain his defeat!

Hello? Trump lost only one demographic in 2020 compared to 2016. What was that demographic? ...
Answer: WHITE MEN!

How did liberal activists pull off that?

In the five states where D'Souza deploys his hocus-pocus cellphone data -- Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin -- Trump lost 8% of white voters compared to 2016. He lost 12% of white men.

That's according to Trump's own pollster, the highly respected Tony Fabrizio, as well as everyone else who's looked at the 2020 election data. It was also predicted by anyone who supported Trump in 2016 -- and then watched him piss away his presidency for four years by betraying his base.
Ann Coulter is a deplorable through and through and was a massive Trump supporter. She can grift with the best of them but even she isn't dumb enough to pretend that the election was stolen. Trump didn't need any help losing the election because he's a losing loser who lost on his own. And down ballot Republicans did much better than him.


dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"These are all important parts of the puzzle. But the immediate danger to American democracy stems from the fact that the Republican party is justifying all this, remains united behind the man responsible, and, worst of all, actually wants to put him back in power. This is about Trump, but not just about Trump. This is what the Republican party is: the very few voices siding against Trumpism are being shunned and ostracized, and most Republicans are united in their quest to install authoritarian rule by a reactionary minority.

And even if conservatives aren't necessarily on board with all the specifics of Trump's conspiracy claims, the right in general is united behind the idea that progressives are out to destroy "real" America and must be stopped by whatever means. White conservatives consider themselves the sole proponents of "real America" and therefore entitled to rule, as is the party that focuses almost solely on their interests and sensibilities.

This is the basis on which 147 congressional Republicans voted to overturn the election results even after the assault on the Capitol. This is why the Republican party officially defended the violent attack of January 6 as "legitimate political discourse" and lashed out against the few Republicans who publicly dared to object. This is why Republicans are either explicitly running on the big lie or, at the very least, are lending legitimacy to the idea that there was something wrong with the 2020 election.….

And how are the people the hearings present as Team Normal, as standing up to Trump's coup attempt, dealing with all this? Take Bill Barr: he's on record saying he would vote for Trump in 2024. In his testimony for the committee as well as in his book, Barr has left no doubt that he believes Trump is either willfully pushing treasonous conspiracy theories or is completely detached from reality yet Barr is still willing to help put him back in the White House."

The January 6 hearings aren't acknowledging the elephant in the room


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jun/17/the-january-6-hearings-arent-acknowledging-the-elephant-in-the-room?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other


This is why the DOJ needs to be strong in support of the rule of law. If Garland is afraid to upset the insurrectionist Republicans then we will lose our democracy. The Republicans are not going to willingly back down from trying to implement minority rule.

In fact, minority rule is a staple of the American South which is the core of the modern Republican Party. They violently implemented minority rule from the beginning of the Constitution until the 1920's mass migration of blacks out of the South (though they still had the mechanisms in place into the 1960s).

People act like what is going on is new and unprecedented. It's not.
American Vermin
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

bearister said:

"These are all important parts of the puzzle. But the immediate danger to American democracy stems from the fact that the Republican party is justifying all this, remains united behind the man responsible, and, worst of all, actually wants to put him back in power. This is about Trump, but not just about Trump. This is what the Republican party is: the very few voices siding against Trumpism are being shunned and ostracized, and most Republicans are united in their quest to install authoritarian rule by a reactionary minority.

And even if conservatives aren't necessarily on board with all the specifics of Trump's conspiracy claims, the right in general is united behind the idea that progressives are out to destroy "real" America and must be stopped by whatever means. White conservatives consider themselves the sole proponents of "real America" and therefore entitled to rule, as is the party that focuses almost solely on their interests and sensibilities.

This is the basis on which 147 congressional Republicans voted to overturn the election results even after the assault on the Capitol. This is why the Republican party officially defended the violent attack of January 6 as "legitimate political discourse" and lashed out against the few Republicans who publicly dared to object. This is why Republicans are either explicitly running on the big lie or, at the very least, are lending legitimacy to the idea that there was something wrong with the 2020 election.….

And how are the people the hearings present as Team Normal, as standing up to Trump's coup attempt, dealing with all this? Take Bill Barr: he's on record saying he would vote for Trump in 2024. In his testimony for the committee as well as in his book, Barr has left no doubt that he believes Trump is either willfully pushing treasonous conspiracy theories or is completely detached from reality yet Barr is still willing to help put him back in the White House."

The January 6 hearings aren't acknowledging the elephant in the room


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jun/17/the-january-6-hearings-arent-acknowledging-the-elephant-in-the-room?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other


This is why the DOJ needs to be strong in support of the rule of law. If Garland is afraid to upset the insurrectionist Republicans then we will lose our democracy. The Republicans are not going to willingly back down from trying to implement minority rule.

In fact, minority rule is a staple of the American South which is the core of the modern Republican Party. They violently implemented minority rule from the beginning of the Constitution until the 1920's mass migration of blacks out of the South (though they still had the mechanisms in place into the 1960s).

People act like what is going on is new and unprecedented. It's not.


Yes, you are correct. This is the last paragraph from the Guardian article I linked:

"In 2020, the historian Heather Cox Richardson published a book on How the South Won the Civil War. It should be required reading for this particular moment in American politics. Richardson argues that while the Confederacy obviously lost the military confrontation, the broader ideology it was built on, the idea that the world works best when it is dominated by wealthy white men, and that only those wealthy white men are therefore entitled to rule, continued to shape the American project, and is still the leading threat to true democracy in this country today. I worry, to build on the title of Richardson's book, that future historians might have to write about How the Insurrectionists Won the Presidency."

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?


This part
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

dajo9 said:

bearister said:

"These are all important parts of the puzzle. But the immediate danger to American democracy stems from the fact that the Republican party is justifying all this, remains united behind the man responsible, and, worst of all, actually wants to put him back in power. This is about Trump, but not just about Trump. This is what the Republican party is: the very few voices siding against Trumpism are being shunned and ostracized, and most Republicans are united in their quest to install authoritarian rule by a reactionary minority.

And even if conservatives aren't necessarily on board with all the specifics of Trump's conspiracy claims, the right in general is united behind the idea that progressives are out to destroy "real" America and must be stopped by whatever means. White conservatives consider themselves the sole proponents of "real America" and therefore entitled to rule, as is the party that focuses almost solely on their interests and sensibilities.

This is the basis on which 147 congressional Republicans voted to overturn the election results even after the assault on the Capitol. This is why the Republican party officially defended the violent attack of January 6 as "legitimate political discourse" and lashed out against the few Republicans who publicly dared to object. This is why Republicans are either explicitly running on the big lie or, at the very least, are lending legitimacy to the idea that there was something wrong with the 2020 election.….

And how are the people the hearings present as Team Normal, as standing up to Trump's coup attempt, dealing with all this? Take Bill Barr: he's on record saying he would vote for Trump in 2024. In his testimony for the committee as well as in his book, Barr has left no doubt that he believes Trump is either willfully pushing treasonous conspiracy theories or is completely detached from reality yet Barr is still willing to help put him back in the White House."

The January 6 hearings aren't acknowledging the elephant in the room


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jun/17/the-january-6-hearings-arent-acknowledging-the-elephant-in-the-room?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other


This is why the DOJ needs to be strong in support of the rule of law. If Garland is afraid to upset the insurrectionist Republicans then we will lose our democracy. The Republicans are not going to willingly back down from trying to implement minority rule.

In fact, minority rule is a staple of the American South which is the core of the modern Republican Party. They violently implemented minority rule from the beginning of the Constitution until the 1920's mass migration of blacks out of the South (though they still had the mechanisms in place into the 1960s).

People act like what is going on is new and unprecedented. It's not.


Yes, you are correct. This is the last paragraph from the Guardian article I linked:

"In 2020, the historian Heather Cox Richardson published a book on How the South Won the Civil War. It should be required reading for this particular moment in American politics. Richardson argues that while the Confederacy obviously lost the military confrontation, the broader ideology it was built on, the idea that the world works best when it is dominated by wealthy white men, and that only those wealthy white men are therefore entitled to rule, continued to shape the American project, and is still the leading threat to true democracy in this country today. I worry, to build on the title of Richardson's book, that future historians might have to write about How the Insurrectionists Won the Presidency."




Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Friend," it began. "The Democrats are trying to STEAL the Election. I've activated the Official Election Defense Fund and I need EVERY PATRIOT, including YOU, to step up and make sure we have enough resources to PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF OUR ELECTION."

If EVERY Patriot chips in $5, President Trump will have what it takes to DEFEND the Election and WIN!" said the email that was transmitted on 10 November three days after Biden's victory had been sealed….

There was only one problem with this epic flurry of emails: the Official Election Defense Fund did not exist. As the House committee investigating the January 6 insurrection at the US Capitol revealed in a public hearing this week, Trump and his allies raised $250m from the emails by persuading loyal followers to donate to a chimera….

Now Trump is facing his own accusations of defrauding his people. The allegation that he cheated his supporters out of millions of dollars by dangling in front of them a fictitious election defense fund could expose the former president to legal peril."

The 'big rip-off': how Trump exploited his fans with 'election defense' fund


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/18/donald-trump-election-defense-fundraising-defrauded-fans?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"Friend," it began. "The Democrats are trying to STEAL the Election. I've activated the Official Election Defense Fund and I need EVERY PATRIOT, including YOU, to step up and make sure we have enough resources to PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF OUR ELECTION."

If EVERY Patriot chips in $5, President Trump will have what it takes to DEFEND the Election and WIN!" said the email that was transmitted on 10 November three days after Biden's victory had been sealed….

There was only one problem with this epic flurry of emails: the Official Election Defense Fund did not exist. As the House committee investigating the January 6 insurrection at the US Capitol revealed in a public hearing this week, Trump and his allies raised $250m from the emails by persuading loyal followers to donate to a chimera….

Now Trump is facing his own accusations of defrauding his people. The allegation that he cheated his supporters out of millions of dollars by dangling in front of them a fictitious election defense fund could expose the former president to legal peril."

The 'big rip-off': how Trump exploited his fans with 'election defense' fund


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/18/donald-trump-election-defense-fundraising-defrauded-fans?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other


He will never be found guilty of anything.
I have little hope for this country.
I'm going to buy guns - it's every man for himself!
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

bearister said:

"These are all important parts of the puzzle. But the immediate danger to American democracy stems from the fact that the Republican party is justifying all this, remains united behind the man responsible, and, worst of all, actually wants to put him back in power. This is about Trump, but not just about Trump. This is what the Republican party is: the very few voices siding against Trumpism are being shunned and ostracized, and most Republicans are united in their quest to install authoritarian rule by a reactionary minority.

And even if conservatives aren't necessarily on board with all the specifics of Trump's conspiracy claims, the right in general is united behind the idea that progressives are out to destroy "real" America and must be stopped by whatever means. White conservatives consider themselves the sole proponents of "real America" and therefore entitled to rule, as is the party that focuses almost solely on their interests and sensibilities.

This is the basis on which 147 congressional Republicans voted to overturn the election results even after the assault on the Capitol. This is why the Republican party officially defended the violent attack of January 6 as "legitimate political discourse" and lashed out against the few Republicans who publicly dared to object. This is why Republicans are either explicitly running on the big lie or, at the very least, are lending legitimacy to the idea that there was something wrong with the 2020 election.….

And how are the people the hearings present as Team Normal, as standing up to Trump's coup attempt, dealing with all this? Take Bill Barr: he's on record saying he would vote for Trump in 2024. In his testimony for the committee as well as in his book, Barr has left no doubt that he believes Trump is either willfully pushing treasonous conspiracy theories or is completely detached from reality yet Barr is still willing to help put him back in the White House."

The January 6 hearings aren't acknowledging the elephant in the room


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jun/17/the-january-6-hearings-arent-acknowledging-the-elephant-in-the-room?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other


This is why the DOJ needs to be strong in support of the rule of law. If Garland is afraid to upset the insurrectionist Republicans then we will lose our democracy. The Republicans are not going to willingly back down from trying to implement minority rule.

In fact, minority rule is a staple of the American South which is the core of the modern Republican Party. They violently implemented minority rule from the beginning of the Constitution until the 1920's mass migration of blacks out of the South (though they still had the mechanisms in place into the 1960s).

People act like what is going on is new and unprecedented. It's not.


It's too late! We elected a man who said "you can grab them by the p*, you can do anything you want!"

And it looks like garland is the biggest p* of 'em all!
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:


It's too late! We elected a man who said "you can grab them by the p*, you can do anything you want!"

And it looks like garland is the biggest p* of 'em all!


When was the last time you've been to a family friendly drag show?
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Ex-justice department lawyers say new revelations at the hearings increase the likelihood that Trump will be charged with crimes involving conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding or defrauding the United States, as he took desperate and seemingly illegal steps to undermine Biden's election.

Trump could also potentially face fraud charges over his role in an apparently extraordinary fundraising scam described by House panel members as the "big rip-off" that netted some $250m for an "election defense fund" that did not exist but funneled huge sums to Trump's Save America political action committee and Trump properties….


The crux of any prosecution of Trump would hinge heavily on convincing a jury that Trump knew he lost the election and acted with criminal intent to overturn the valid election results. The hearings have focused heavily on testimony that Trump fully knew he had lost and went full steam ahead to concoct schemes to stay in power.…

The Detached from Reality Defense:

In a novel legal twist that could emerge if Trump is charged, Bromwich said: "Bizarrely, Trump's best defense to the mountain of evidence that proves these crimes seems to be that he was incapable of forming the criminal intent necessary to convict. That he was detached from reality, in Barr's words. But there is strong evidence that he is not crazy but instead is crazy like a fox."*



Searing testimony increases odds of charges against Trump, experts say


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/19/trump-charges-january-6-hearings-capitol-attack?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

*This defense would seem to be a tough sell to a D.C. jury. I suppose he would have to craft it so that his position is he only became delusional after he lost the election and was not detached from reality during his entire presidency (we all know that in fact he has never been delusional, merely stupid and corrupt, genetic traits also on display in his spawn).
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
6 in 10 Americans say Trump should be charged for Jan. 6 riot: POLL - ABC News


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/10-americans-trump-charged-jan-riot-poll/story?id=85482369

"The poll divides along party lines, with 91% of Democrats thinking Trump should be charged with a crime compared to 19% of Republicans. On whether Trump bears a "great deal" or a "good amount" of responsibility for the attack, 91% of Democrats and 21% of Republicans say he does.

Among self-described independents, 62% think Trump should be charged and 61% think he bears a "great deal" or a "good amount" of responsibility."
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:


The crux of any prosecution of Trump would hinge heavily on convincing a jury that Trump knew he lost the election and acted with criminal intent to overturn the valid election results. The hearings have focused heavily on testimony that Trump fully knew he had lost and went full steam ahead to concoct schemes to stay in power.…



Doubtful. Very doubtful.

There was nothing so obviously wrong than slavery, and that required a civil war and hundreds of years.

The OJ trial was also obvious, but he was acquitted - not even a hung jury.

The Trump "tweenkie" defense need never even happen.
Jury selection would find that one solitary MAGA or Republican partisan who would hold out for a hung jury, meanwhile the rest of the nation will vote in a R president and anything AG Garland might do will not be carried over to a new trial.

The only justice for Trump will come if he has a sudden heart attack. And if I were a nurse or doctor or ambulance driver, I would suddenly find myself overcome with an uncontrollable case of vomiting or diarrhea or … whatever it takes to refuse service.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

6 in 10 Americans say Trump should be charged for Jan. 6 riot: POLL - ABC News


6 out of 10 = hung jury. Redemption for the criminal, who will keep his money.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

bearister said:

6 in 10 Americans say Trump should be charged for Jan. 6 riot: POLL - ABC News


6 out of 10 = hung jury. Redemption for the criminal, who will keep his money.


In D.C. it is within the realm of possibility that tRump gets convicted (it only takes 1 juror for hung jury). After all, Paulie Walnuts Manafort and Roger "Tricky Dick Back Tat" both went down in federal court in D.C.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Jan 6 Commission Fail
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.