heartofthebear said:

---

movielover said:

---

These are stone-cold Progressive Democrat policies.

---

Name one progressive that has stated that any of these are their policy ideas.
BTW, the Paris Accord does not cause inflation.
Inflation is caused by banks printing money and/or companies raising prices beyond the COL rate.

---

Reducing energy Supply affects everything, especially food.

A 'temporary' historic inflation hit, and over 100 Million people now "food insecure" because of whacky unproven Marxist idealogies?

Natural Gas is cleaner, abundant, yet Progressive Democrats ban it. Impossible to run the world's largest economy off of solar panels and wind turbines.

We see no push for insulating homes or nuclear power. See, it's a religion, not logic.

The same zealots cause hundreds of millions of trees to burn, polluting our air, with zero benifit! No wood products, jobs, tax revenue. Just incinerated forests and critters.

movielover said:

---

A 'temporary' historic inflation hit, and over 100 Million people now "food insecure" because of whacky unproven Marxist idealogies?

Natural Gas is cleaner, abundant, yet Progressive Democrats ban it. Impossible to run the world's largest economy off of solar panels and wind turbines.

We see no push for insulating homes or nuclear power. See, it's a religion, not logic.

The same zealots cause hundreds of millions of trees to burn, polluting our air, with zero benifit! No wood products, jobs, tax revenue. Just incinerated forests and critters.

---

Got it, thanks for your opinion and grievances. I take it all of these problems are because of the progressives. I suggest you start debating Ralph Nadar and see how far your arguments go. I just don't respect them as stated. Natural gas may be clean to burn but logistically harmful to the environment.

Actually you are the one with the religious beliefs because you believe these issues are caused by progressives yet you still have not mentioned a single progressive that believes these things. It must be a religion of yours. And even if you mention one, you have not established that it is the norm for progressives. You probably believe these things because your source BOX NEWS is telling you that.

heartofthebear said:

---

movielover said:

---

A 'temporary' historic inflation hit, and over 100 Million people now "food insecure" because of whacky unproven Marxist idealogies?

Natural Gas is cleaner, abundant, yet Progressive Democrats ban it. Impossible to run the world's largest economy off of solar panels and wind turbines.

We see no push for insulating homes or nuclear power. See, it's a religion, not logic.

The same zealots cause hundreds of millions of trees to burn, polluting our air, with zero benifit! No wood products, jobs, tax revenue. Just incinerated forests and critters.

---

Got it, thanks for your opinion and grievances. I take it all of these problems are because of the progressives. I suggest you start debating Ralph Nadar and see how far your arguments go. I just don't respect them as stated. Natural gas may be clean to burn but logistically harmful to the environment.

Actually you are the one with the religious beliefs because you believe these issues are caused by progressives yet you still have not mentioned a single progressive that believes these things. It must be a religion of yours. And even if you mention one, you have not established that it is the norm for progressives. You probably believe these things because your source BOX NEWS is telling you that.

---

I'd hate to be in a large chain reaction accident where a bunch of cars have ruptured tanks of natural gas.

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

heartofthebear said:

---

movielover said:

---

A 'temporary' historic inflation hit, and over 100 Million people now "food insecure" because of whacky unproven Marxist idealogies?

Natural Gas is cleaner, abundant, yet Progressive Democrats ban it. Impossible to run the world's largest economy off of solar panels and wind turbines.

We see no push for insulating homes or nuclear power. See, it's a religion, not logic.

The same zealots cause hundreds of millions of trees to burn, polluting our air, with zero benifit! No wood products, jobs, tax revenue. Just incinerated forests and critters.

---

Got it, thanks for your opinion and grievances. I take it all of these problems are because of the progressives. I suggest you start debating Ralph Nadar and see how far your arguments go. I just don't respect them as stated. Natural gas may be clean to burn but logistically harmful to the environment.

Actually you are the one with the religious beliefs because you believe these issues are caused by progressives yet you still have not mentioned a single progressive that believes these things. It must be a religion of yours. And even if you mention one, you have not established that it is the norm for progressives. You probably believe these things because your source BOX NEWS is telling you that.

---

I'd hate to be in a large chain reaction accident where a bunch of cars have ruptured tanks of natural gas.

---

I'd hate to be in a large chain reaction accident where a bunch of electric cars have battery fires.

pic.twitter.com/ZnYHOUsZNT

— Maria Baja (@TriaRyder) May 30, 2023

"It seems like every family member of President Biden got money, except for President Biden's 4-year-old granddaughter (Hunter's love child with prostitute) who he doesn't claim"

And reporters had a cow when Ronald Reagan got $1 million in a speech in Japan (?) after he left the White House.

Joe Biden stole classified documents.

BearHunter said:

---

Joe Biden stole classified documents.

---

So did Donald Trump. Only one of the two have returned everything and cooperated with the investigation.

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearHunter said:

---

Joe Biden stole classified documents.

---

So did Donald Trump. Only one of the two have returned everything and cooperated with the investigation.

---

Presidents have unilateral authority to declassify. Vice Presidents don't. Cooperating with the investigation doesn't exonerate you from stealing classified documents.

BearHunter said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearHunter said:

---

Joe Biden stole classified documents.

---

So did Donald Trump. Only one of the two have returned everything and cooperated with the investigation.

---

Presidents have unilateral authority to declassify. Vice Presidents don't. Cooperating with the investigation doesn't exonerate you from stealing classified documents.

---

In addition, President Trump had his declassified documents:
- at secure MAL (security)
- extra layer of protection (Secret Service)
- further layer - Feds asked for extra locks to be added
- security cameras

Vice President Biden:
- docs at multiple locations, including a garage
- no security
- no Secret Service
- drug-addict son had access

movielover said:

---

BearHunter said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearHunter said:

---

Joe Biden stole classified documents.

---

So did Donald Trump. Only one of the two have returned everything and cooperated with the investigation.

---

Presidents have unilateral authority to declassify. Vice Presidents don't. Cooperating with the investigation doesn't exonerate you from stealing classified documents.

---

In addition, President Trump had his declassified documents:
- at secure MAL (security)
- extra layer of protection (Secret Service)
- further layer - Feds asked for extra locks to be added
- security cameras

Vice President Biden:had his classified documents:
- docs at multiple locations, including a garage
- no security
- no Secret Service
- drug-addict son had access

---

Correct!

"Ten percent for the Big Guy."

Presidential records are documents created or received by the President or his White House staff.

Under the Presidential Records Act, the President is allowed to keep his presidential records when he leaves office.

It doesn't matter whether they are classified.

Obviously, many presidential records are classified.

That's why Congress funds the Office of the Former President, with secure office space, staff with security clearances, and Secret Service protection.

President Trump used Mar-A-Lago as his office while president.

So it's obviously very secure.

Separately, the President can declassify any record he wants.

He doesn't need to get permission to do it.

And he can even do it through his actions, like simply taking his presidential records when he leaves office.

That's what an Obama judge in DC held after Clinton got caught with 8 years of highly classified audio recordings in his sock drawer.

- From Mike Davis Twitter feed

Proof the Head of CIA+FBI already knew back in Sept 2016 that Clinton planned to take down top presidential candidate Trump with a fabricated Russian collusion hoax in order to distract from her own use of private email servers. This is election interference at the very least… https://t.co/HW4kkxtaGu

— dontbh8n (@dontbh8n1) June 3, 2023

movielover said:

---

Proof the Head of CIA+FBI already knew back in Sept 2016 that Clinton planned to take down top presidential candidate Trump with a fabricated Russian collusion hoax in order to distract from her own use of private email servers. This is election interference at the very least… https://t.co/HW4kkxtaGu

— dontbh8n (@dontbh8n1) June 3, 2023

---

The best part of all of that is that there is zero proof that the DNC email servers were even hacked at all, let alone by the Russians.

.@mrddmia: Jack Smith will indict President Trump on obstruction to deflect Joe Biden’s bribery scheme. It’s the same playbook they used in 2016. Hillary got caught with emails and destroyed her server. So the FBI came up with a crossfire hurricane to deflect everything on… pic.twitter.com/n88Ub0LS4v

— The Dirty Truth (Josh) (@AKA_RealDirty) June 5, 2023

Is history going to repeat itself? Expect Trump to be indicted for obstruction to distract from the Biden crime family bribery scandal and FBI coverup.

Aunbear, we need your crazy conspiracy image here

BearHunter said:

---

Presidential records are documents created or received by the President or his White House staff.

Under the Presidential Records Act, the President is allowed to keep his presidential records when he leaves office.

It doesn't matter whether they are classified.

Obviously, many presidential records are classified.

That's why Congress funds the Office of the Former President, with secure office space, staff with security clearances, and Secret Service protection.

President Trump used Mar-A-Lago as his office while president.

So it's obviously very secure.

Separately, the President can declassify any record he wants.

He doesn't need to get permission to do it.

And he can even do it through his actions, like simply taking his presidential records when he leaves office.

That's what an Obama judge in DC held after Clinton got caught with 8 years of highly classified audio recordings in his sock drawer.

- From Mike Davis Twitter feed

---

The shills in the media don't like these facts.

I think it was FusionGPS (Glenn Simpson, former WSJ writer)) who allegedly inspected the server; the FBI and their techies never even touched it. Ridiculous.

Few things matter more than equal justice under the law, civilian control over law enforcement, and the separation of powers. We should thus be appalled by the FBI Director's refusal to turn over alleged evidence of Biden corruption.https://t.co/mQoVTIukwI

— Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger) June 5, 2023

Shellenberger is an old-fashioned Democrat.

Biden flew to Ukraine on his last days as vice president. It appears that he had some very important business which required him to be there in person. Coincidentally or not, the criminal proceedings against Burisma were shut down during Biden's visit.https://t.co/59QNS0BmGf https://t.co/lnnh7HUZYT pic.twitter.com/QLWD6pDRaI

— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) June 7, 2023

* Now 5 months. https://t.co/aNCmrXuX1y

— 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 (@mrddmia) June 7, 2023

Dates and locations where stolen classified documents were found:

Nov 2 Penn Biden Center, DC
Dec 20 Wilmington, DE
Jan 11 Wilmington, DE
Jan 12 Wilmington, DE
Jan 20 Wilmington, DE (DOJ)

Why did Garland allow Biden's attorneys to perform prior searchesand taint crime scenes?

Why didn't Garland send FBI, like with Trump?

You know the answers. Quit pretending you are even more stupid than we already know you are.

I guess this is your way of telling us you know the answers too. Great, we both want justice. When do we want it?

You don't want justice, you want revenge. Not the same thing, no matter how hard you silly MAGAts wish it was.

We're now talking about personal morals? Let the punishment fit the crime.