The Economy

232,755 Views | 2709 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by SBGold
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And to once again reinforce the fact that the stock market is NOT the economy, S&P 500 earnings expectations have hit yet another record high with a whopping $344.30 last week.




The analysts' consensus estimates from which we derive forward EPS are $326.78 for 2026 and $380.37 for 2027.
Both continue to be revised higher.

Also remarkable is that industry analysts continues to raise their consensus S&P 500 EPS growth rates for all 4 quarters this year as seen in the chart below. All double-digit gains.



BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Muckieeye said:

BearlySane88 said:

SBGold said:

3 clearly doesn't have enough info to opine about the anti-trust decision made under the Biden administration, but he's unwilling to admit it. Must be a male, I bet he doesn't take advice on driving directions either.

Wags doing good work.

Choose Kindness


You're a male lol

Only 2 stars for this post? Did your burner accounts get deleted? Are you on the outs with the rest of the BI Conservative He-man Women Haters' Club and they aren't upvoting you like before?


6 stars for this post.
6 > 2



It's funny, the only people posting about star counts are those on the left. Why they are so important to you, I'll never know.


Meanwhile, on this thread about the ECONOMY there are those that count "edits".
Your lack of self-awareness is truly stunning.






You talking about someone else's self awareness is the funniest post that'll happen all week.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:


You talking about someone else's self awareness is the funniest post that'll happen all week.


While you're pedantically counting the number of times I edit a post, I'm actually discussing the TOPIC of the thread which happens to be the ECONOMY.

But you do you.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is the recent upturn in forecasted forward earnings growth suggesting surprisingly stronger GDP?
Stay tuned.

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


You talking about someone else's self awareness is the funniest post that'll happen all week.


While you're pedantically counting the number of times I edit a post, I'm actually discussing the TOPIC of the thread which happens to be the ECONOMY.

But you do you.



I don't have to count, it's clearly shown. You've now posted several times this morning, calling people out for random things that have nothing to do with the topic. Again, your self awareness is severely lacking
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MSN: The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta lowered its GDPNow estimate for Q4 2025 growth to +3.7% from +4.2% early last week, it said on Tuesday.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


You talking about someone else's self awareness is the funniest post that'll happen all week.


While you're pedantically counting the number of times I edit a post, I'm actually discussing the TOPIC of the thread which happens to be the ECONOMY.

But you do you.



I don't have to count, it's clearly shown. You've now posted several times this morning, calling people out for random things that have nothing to do with the topic. Again, your self awareness is severely lacking


Your lack of self-discipline is showing again.
This is not an elementary school "playground".

Your last 10 consecutive posts on this thread have had NOTHING to do with the ECONOMY.

Please try and stay on topic.
Thanks.

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

MSN: The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta lowered its GDPNow estimate for Q4 2025 growth to +3.7% from +4.2% early last week, it said on Tuesday.


It's currently at 1.2% for Q1.




GDPNow - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


You talking about someone else's self awareness is the funniest post that'll happen all week.


While you're pedantically counting the number of times I edit a post, I'm actually discussing the TOPIC of the thread which happens to be the ECONOMY.

But you do you.



I don't have to count, it's clearly shown. You've now posted several times this morning, calling people out for random things that have nothing to do with the topic. Again, your self awareness is severely lacking


Your lack of self-discipline is showing again.
This is not an elementary school "playground".

Your last 10 consecutive posts on this thread have had NOTHING to do with the ECONOMY.

Please try and stay on topic.
Thanks.




You like calling people out but don't like being called out in return and as soon as someone does you cry about the rules. He who lives in glass houses….
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've noticed that you've never posted any data or charts here about the ECONOMY.
You've never posted anything from Bloomberg, Reuters, or the WSJ.

I've noticed that you've never posted anything "organically" about the ECONOMY.
Nor have you ever started a thread about anything related to the ECONOMY.

Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


You talking about someone else's self awareness is the funniest post that'll happen all week.


While you're pedantically counting the number of times I edit a post, I'm actually discussing the TOPIC of the thread which happens to be the ECONOMY.

But you do you.



I don't have to count, it's clearly shown. You've now posted several times this morning, calling people out for random things that have nothing to do with the topic. Again, your self awareness is severely lacking


Your lack of self-discipline is showing again.
This is not an elementary school "playground".

Your last 10 consecutive posts on this thread have had NOTHING to do with the ECONOMY.

Please try and stay on topic.
Thanks.




You like calling people out but don't like being called out in return and as soon as someone does you cry about the rules. He who lives in glass houses….


Please post on topic and stop spamming threads like these.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

I've noticed that you've never posted any data or charts here about the ECONOMY.
You've never posted anything from Bloomberg, Reuters, or the WSJ.





You must have missed it then
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


You talking about someone else's self awareness is the funniest post that'll happen all week.


While you're pedantically counting the number of times I edit a post, I'm actually discussing the TOPIC of the thread which happens to be the ECONOMY.

But you do you.



I don't have to count, it's clearly shown. You've now posted several times this morning, calling people out for random things that have nothing to do with the topic. Again, your self awareness is severely lacking


Your lack of self-discipline is showing again.
This is not an elementary school "playground".

Your last 10 consecutive posts on this thread have had NOTHING to do with the ECONOMY.

Please try and stay on topic.
Thanks.




You like calling people out but don't like being called out in return and as soon as someone does you cry about the rules. He who lives in glass houses….


Please post on topic and stop spamming threads like these.


When you say the same to Wags, then we can talk
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


You talking about someone else's self awareness is the funniest post that'll happen all week.


While you're pedantically counting the number of times I edit a post, I'm actually discussing the TOPIC of the thread which happens to be the ECONOMY.

But you do you.



I don't have to count, it's clearly shown. You've now posted several times this morning, calling people out for random things that have nothing to do with the topic. Again, your self awareness is severely lacking


Your lack of self-discipline is showing again.
This is not an elementary school "playground".

Your last 10 consecutive posts on this thread have had NOTHING to do with the ECONOMY.

Please try and stay on topic.
Thanks.




You like calling people out but don't like being called out in return and as soon as someone does you cry about the rules. He who lives in glass houses….


Please post on topic and stop spamming threads like these.
Bingo. BS, you've made your point over and over and over and over again. Let it go. You don't have to get in the last word in every discussion.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


You talking about someone else's self awareness is the funniest post that'll happen all week.


While you're pedantically counting the number of times I edit a post, I'm actually discussing the TOPIC of the thread which happens to be the ECONOMY.

But you do you.



I don't have to count, it's clearly shown. You've now posted several times this morning, calling people out for random things that have nothing to do with the topic. Again, your self awareness is severely lacking


Your lack of self-discipline is showing again.
This is not an elementary school "playground".

Your last 10 consecutive posts on this thread have had NOTHING to do with the ECONOMY.

Please try and stay on topic.
Thanks.




You like calling people out but don't like being called out in return and as soon as someone does you cry about the rules. He who lives in glass houses….


Please post on topic and stop spamming threads like these.
Bingo. BS, you've made your point over and over and over and over again. Let it go. You don't have to get in the last word in every discussion.


When you say the same to Wags, we can talk
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I searched and Wags is right, there is nothing posted and analyzed
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

I searched and Wags is right, there is nothing posted and analyzed


Search again then lol. The fact that you're putting your time into this, shows the pedantic nature of your posts
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I can get pedantic all day.

It should be readily available for you to direct us to your posting. Thanks for your attention to this matter!
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WSJ: "America Is in the Middle of a Stealth Manufacturing Boom

[Liberal Editor] Factory jobs are down, but factory output has risen briskly. Credit goes not to tariffs, but to the most basic economic force of all: demand."

By Greg Ip, April 18, 2026

"You won't hear this from either critics or fans of President Trump's tariffs, but there's a manufacturing revival going on."
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

I can get pedantic all day.



Oh, we are well aware.

Choose pedantic
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

WSJ: "America Is in the Middle of a Stealth Manufacturing Boom

[Liberal Editor] Factory jobs are down, but factory output has risen briskly. Credit goes not to tariffs, but to the most basic economic force of all: demand."

By Greg Ip, April 18, 2026

"You won't hear this from either critics or fans of President Trump's tariffs, but there's a manufacturing revival going on."

you do know the article gives no credit to tarrifs for this phenomenon right?

To also quote "It doesn't mean the indiscriminate application of brute tariff force".

Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

SBGold said:

I can get pedantic all day.



Oh, we are well aware.

Choose pedantic

Still no citing, come on teach.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:

SBGold said:

I can get pedantic all day.



Oh, we are well aware.

Choose pedantic

Still no citing, come on teach.


Still being pedantic, come on student
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


You talking about someone else's self awareness is the funniest post that'll happen all week.


While you're pedantically counting the number of times I edit a post, I'm actually discussing the TOPIC of the thread which happens to be the ECONOMY.

But you do you.



I don't have to count, it's clearly shown. You've now posted several times this morning, calling people out for random things that have nothing to do with the topic. Again, your self awareness is severely lacking


Bingo.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


You talking about someone else's self awareness is the funniest post that'll happen all week.


While you're pedantically counting the number of times I edit a post, I'm actually discussing the TOPIC of the thread which happens to be the ECONOMY.

But you do you.



I don't have to count, it's clearly shown. You've now posted several times this morning, calling people out for random things that have nothing to do with the topic. Again, your self awareness is severely lacking


Your lack of self-discipline is showing again.
This is not an elementary school "playground".

Your last 10 consecutive posts on this thread have had NOTHING to do with the ECONOMY.

Please try and stay on topic.
Thanks.




You like calling people out but don't like being called out in return and as soon as someone does you cry about the rules. He who lives in glass houses….


Bingo.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


You talking about someone else's self awareness is the funniest post that'll happen all week.


While you're pedantically counting the number of times I edit a post, I'm actually discussing the TOPIC of the thread which happens to be the ECONOMY.

But you do you.



I don't have to count, it's clearly shown. You've now posted several times this morning, calling people out for random things that have nothing to do with the topic. Again, your self awareness is severely lacking


Your lack of self-discipline is showing again.
This is not an elementary school "playground".

Your last 10 consecutive posts on this thread have had NOTHING to do with the ECONOMY.

Please try and stay on topic.
Thanks.




You like calling people out but don't like being called out in return and as soon as someone does you cry about the rules. He who lives in glass houses….


Please post on topic and stop spamming threads like these.


When you say the same to Wags, then we can talk


Wags has made several informative and relevant posts on this page alone, your posts are mostly immature quibbles that bring down the quality of the discussion, that's why I flagged your post above.

I have no intention of replying to your nth immature comeback here, waste of time.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


You talking about someone else's self awareness is the funniest post that'll happen all week.


While you're pedantically counting the number of times I edit a post, I'm actually discussing the TOPIC of the thread which happens to be the ECONOMY.

But you do you.



I don't have to count, it's clearly shown. You've now posted several times this morning, calling people out for random things that have nothing to do with the topic. Again, your self awareness is severely lacking


Your lack of self-discipline is showing again.
This is not an elementary school "playground".

Your last 10 consecutive posts on this thread have had NOTHING to do with the ECONOMY.

Please try and stay on topic.
Thanks.




You like calling people out but don't like being called out in return and as soon as someone does you cry about the rules. He who lives in glass houses….


Please post on topic and stop spamming threads like these.


When you say the same to Wags, then we can talk


Wags has made several informative and relevant posts on this page alone, your posts are mostly immature quibbles that bring down the quality of the discussion, that's why I flagged your post above.

I have no intention of replying to your nth immature comeback here, waste of time.


When you call out Wags and SB, then we can talk. Otherwise, you're just being a hypocrite like normal
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

I've noticed that you've never posted any data or charts here about the ECONOMY.
You've never posted anything from Bloomberg, Reuters, or the WSJ.





You must have missed it then


Nope, I didn't miss a thing.
You've never posted anything from Bloomberg, Reuters, or the WSJ.
That's a FACT.

Meanwhile, your last 17 consecutive posts on this thread have nothing to do with the ECONOMY.
I could have gone back farther . . . but didn't want to waste anymore of my time.

This is why people like Cal88 and others are flagging your childish posts.

PS. I started this thread back on February 8th, 2025
Since then, it has over 231,000 views and nearly 2,700 replies.

Have a nice day.




BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

I've noticed that you've never posted any data or charts here about the ECONOMY.
You've never posted anything from Bloomberg, Reuters, or the WSJ.





You must have missed it then


Nope, I didn't miss a thing.
You've never posted anything from Bloomberg, Reuters, or the WSJ

In fact, your last 17 consecutive posts on this thread have nothing to do with the ECONOMY.
I could have gone back farther . . . but didn't want to waste anymore of my time.







You must have missed it then but good to see you're back to counting posts.

Is that supposed to be a brag? Lmao nobody cares
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


You talking about someone else's self awareness is the funniest post that'll happen all week.


While you're pedantically counting the number of times I edit a post, I'm actually discussing the TOPIC of the thread which happens to be the ECONOMY.

But you do you.



I don't have to count, it's clearly shown. You've now posted several times this morning, calling people out for random things that have nothing to do with the topic. Again, your self awareness is severely lacking


Your lack of self-discipline is showing again.
This is not an elementary school "playground".

Your last 10 consecutive posts on this thread have had NOTHING to do with the ECONOMY.

Please try and stay on topic.
Thanks.




You like calling people out but don't like being called out in return and as soon as someone does you cry about the rules. He who lives in glass houses….


Please post on topic and stop spamming threads like these.


When you say the same to Wags, then we can talk


Wags has made several informative and relevant posts on this page alone, your posts are mostly immature quibbles that bring down the quality of the discussion, that's why I flagged your post above.

I have no intention of replying to your nth immature comeback here, waste of time.


When you call out Wags and SB, then we can talk. Otherwise, you're just being a hypocrite like normal

You don't know what posts Cal88 has flagged and if they were by other posters as well as you. You also don't know which posts other people have flagged.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


You talking about someone else's self awareness is the funniest post that'll happen all week.


While you're pedantically counting the number of times I edit a post, I'm actually discussing the TOPIC of the thread which happens to be the ECONOMY.

But you do you.



I don't have to count, it's clearly shown. You've now posted several times this morning, calling people out for random things that have nothing to do with the topic. Again, your self awareness is severely lacking


Your lack of self-discipline is showing again.
This is not an elementary school "playground".

Your last 10 consecutive posts on this thread have had NOTHING to do with the ECONOMY.

Please try and stay on topic.
Thanks.




You like calling people out but don't like being called out in return and as soon as someone does you cry about the rules. He who lives in glass houses….


Please post on topic and stop spamming threads like these.


When you say the same to Wags, then we can talk


Wags has made several informative and relevant posts on this page alone, your posts are mostly immature quibbles that bring down the quality of the discussion, that's why I flagged your post above.

I have no intention of replying to your nth immature comeback here, waste of time.


When you call out Wags and SB, then we can talk. Otherwise, you're just being a hypocrite like normal

You don't know what posts Cal88 has flagged and if they were by other posters as well as you. You also don't know which posts other people have flagged.


I'm talking about publicly calling people out on this board. When you only do that to one side, you're a hypocrite by definition
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not following how that makes him a hypocrite by definition.

Definition of a hypocrite (the research shows):

A hypocrite is a person who pretends to have virtues, moral beliefs, or principles that they do not actually possess, often acting in direct contradiction to their stated beliefs. It involves feigning a persona to deceive others, commonly by criticizing behavior in others while engaging in it themselves


I feel like 88 has not shown anything of this in his responses to you

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

I'm not following how that makes him a hypocrite by definition.

Definition of a hypocrite (the research shows):

A hypocrite is a person who pretends to have virtues, moral beliefs, or principles that they do not actually possess, often acting in direct contradiction to their stated beliefs. It involves feigning a persona to deceive others, commonly by criticizing behavior in others while engaging in it themselves


I feel like 88 has not shown anything of this in his responses to you

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN


If you don't call out the same actions on both sides, yes that's by definition being a hypocrite.

Thank you for your attention to this lesson
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

SBGold said:

I'm not following how that makes him a hypocrite by definition.

Definition of a hypocrite (the research shows):

A hypocrite is a person who pretends to have virtues, moral beliefs, or principles that they do not actually possess, often acting in direct contradiction to their stated beliefs. It involves feigning a persona to deceive others, commonly by criticizing behavior in others while engaging in it themselves


I feel like 88 has not shown anything of this in his responses to you

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN


If you don't call out the same actions on both sides, yes that's by definition being a hypocrite.

Thank you for your attention to this lesson

Maybe both sides aren't misbehaving to the same degree.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.