ICE

1,575 Views | 68 Replies | Last: 10 min ago by movielover
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 7:10p, 10/8/25
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 7:11p, 10/8/25
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.
Reply Quote
2
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 7:52p, 10/8/25
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point
Reply Quote
3
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 8:01p, 10/8/25
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point

Reply Quote
2
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 8:50p, 10/8/25
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point



Okay so he's standing in a parking spot, my mistake. He's still on their property and subject to what he received.
Reply Quote
3
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 8:54p, 10/8/25
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point



Okay so he's standing in a parking spot, my mistake. He's still on their property and subject to what he received.

Yeah, that guy posed such a threat to the property. I totally understand the response.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 8:54p, 10/8/25
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point




Reply Quote
3
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 9:05p, 10/8/25
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!
Reply Quote
3
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 9:20p, 10/8/25
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning
Reply Quote
3
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 9:21p, 10/8/25
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point



Okay so he's standing in a parking spot, my mistake. He's still on their property and subject to what he received.

Yeah, that guy posed such a threat to the property. I totally understand the response.


I agree
Reply Quote
3
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 9:27p, 10/8/25
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.
Reply Quote
1
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 9:46p, 10/8/25
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned
Reply Quote
3
Eastern Oregon Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 9:52p, 10/8/25
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point



Okay so he's standing in a parking spot, my mistake. He's still on their property and subject to what he received.

Yeah, that guy posed such a threat to the property. I totally understand the response.

He was standing there and yelling stuff at the troops on the roof. Obviously they were seriously irked and inconvenienced at being kept from their coffee and donuts, so they were fully justified in inflicting non-lethal injuries from the safety of the rooftop. /s
Reply Quote
3
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 9:54p, 10/8/25
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned

1. You don't know who was warned about what and when. That is taking the government at their word.

2. Further images of the scene already put lie to one of the claims the government made: that the protesters were interfering with vehicles entering the property. They were not in the driveway. Why trust anything else?
Reply Quote
2
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:02p, 10/8/25
Antifa funding exposed.




Reply Quote
3
1 edit
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 10:14p, 10/8/25
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned

1. You don't know who was warned about what and when. That is taking the government at their word.

2. Further images of the scene already put lie to one of the claims the government made: that the protesters were interfering with vehicles entering the property. They were not in the driveway. Why trust anything else?


Okay sure, then you're taking the crazy "priest's" word. You think they are going to open the gate when crazies are on the property? No, hence impeding. Lefties have already shown they will rush the gates once opened.
Reply Quote
2
concordtom
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Eastern Oregon Bear • 6:02a, 10/9/25
These initial troops Trump is sending are canon fodder. Trump HOPES some of them get attacked by radicals. Hopefully LOTS of them.

If it doesn't happen organically, he will find some Brooks Brothers to muck things up so that the escalation of disturbances can occur.




Reply Quote
MinotStateBeav
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:28a
Special church NGO's have been fomenting the resistance for awhile now. We know that Catholic Charities Org was literally paying people across Mexico and Central America to drive illegal immigration to the United States and they spent tens of millions of dollars to do it.

https://catholicvote.org/usccb-catholic-charities-usa-under-federal-investigation-regarding-immigration-assistance/
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 8:06a
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned

1. You don't know who was warned about what and when. That is taking the government at their word.

2. Further images of the scene already put lie to one of the claims the government made: that the protesters were interfering with vehicles entering the property. They were not in the driveway. Why trust anything else?


Okay sure, then you're taking the crazy "priest's" word. You think they are going to open the gate when crazies are on the property? No, hence impeding. Lefties have already shown they will rush the gates once opened.

Not taking anyone's "word." I saw the video, in which a guy is just standing on the sidewalk with his arms up and gets shot in the head. At that point the onus is on the shooter to prove why they weren't in the wrong.
Reply Quote
2
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 8:22a
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned

1. You don't know who was warned about what and when. That is taking the government at their word.

2. Further images of the scene already put lie to one of the claims the government made: that the protesters were interfering with vehicles entering the property. They were not in the driveway. Why trust anything else?


Okay sure, then you're taking the crazy "priest's" word. You think they are going to open the gate when crazies are on the property? No, hence impeding. Lefties have already shown they will rush the gates once opened.

Not taking anyone's "word." I saw the video, in which a guy is just standing on the sidewalk with his arms up and gets shot in the head. At that point the onus is on the shooter to prove why they weren't in the wrong.


Oh now he's on the sidewalk? Try again bro
Reply Quote
3
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 8:51a
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned

1. You don't know who was warned about what and when. That is taking the government at their word.

2. Further images of the scene already put lie to one of the claims the government made: that the protesters were interfering with vehicles entering the property. They were not in the driveway. Why trust anything else?


Okay sure, then you're taking the crazy "priest's" word. You think they are going to open the gate when crazies are on the property? No, hence impeding. Lefties have already shown they will rush the gates once opened.

Not taking anyone's "word." I saw the video, in which a guy is just standing on the sidewalk with his arms up and gets shot in the head. At that point the onus is on the shooter to prove why they weren't in the wrong.


Oh now he's on the sidewalk? Try again bro

It's frightening if you think an unarmed person in that instance deserves to be shot like that. If that is the case, you grew up without any moral Christian values. Shameful

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever
Reply Quote
2
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 8:56a
SBGold said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned

1. You don't know who was warned about what and when. That is taking the government at their word.

2. Further images of the scene already put lie to one of the claims the government made: that the protesters were interfering with vehicles entering the property. They were not in the driveway. Why trust anything else?


Okay sure, then you're taking the crazy "priest's" word. You think they are going to open the gate when crazies are on the property? No, hence impeding. Lefties have already shown they will rush the gates once opened.

Not taking anyone's "word." I saw the video, in which a guy is just standing on the sidewalk with his arms up and gets shot in the head. At that point the onus is on the shooter to prove why they weren't in the wrong.


Oh now he's on the sidewalk? Try again bro

It's frightening if you think an unarmed person in that instance deserves to be shot like that. If that is the case, you grew up without any moral Christian values. Shameful

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


The guy purposely got shot so easily duped morons could put forward your arguments.
Reply Quote
3
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 8:58a
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned

1. You don't know who was warned about what and when. That is taking the government at their word.

2. Further images of the scene already put lie to one of the claims the government made: that the protesters were interfering with vehicles entering the property. They were not in the driveway. Why trust anything else?


Okay sure, then you're taking the crazy "priest's" word. You think they are going to open the gate when crazies are on the property? No, hence impeding. Lefties have already shown they will rush the gates once opened.

Not taking anyone's "word." I saw the video, in which a guy is just standing on the sidewalk with his arms up and gets shot in the head. At that point the onus is on the shooter to prove why they weren't in the wrong.


Oh now he's on the sidewalk? Try again bro

If your argument is "he took one step too far onto the empty parking spot in front of the building, therefore he deserved to be shot," then I'll just leave you to it.
Reply Quote
2
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 8:58a
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned

1. You don't know who was warned about what and when. That is taking the government at their word.

2. Further images of the scene already put lie to one of the claims the government made: that the protesters were interfering with vehicles entering the property. They were not in the driveway. Why trust anything else?


Okay sure, then you're taking the crazy "priest's" word. You think they are going to open the gate when crazies are on the property? No, hence impeding. Lefties have already shown they will rush the gates once opened.

Not taking anyone's "word." I saw the video, in which a guy is just standing on the sidewalk with his arms up and gets shot in the head. At that point the onus is on the shooter to prove why they weren't in the wrong.


Oh now he's on the sidewalk? Try again bro

It's frightening if you think an unarmed person in that instance deserves to be shot like that. If that is the case, you grew up without any moral Christian values. Shameful

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


The guy purposely got shot so easily duped morons could put forward your arguments.

If that's the case, the ICE guys should not have taken the bait. They are bad at their jobs.
Reply Quote
1
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 9:06a
sycasey said:
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned

1. You don't know who was warned about what and when. That is taking the government at their word.

2. Further images of the scene already put lie to one of the claims the government made: that the protesters were interfering with vehicles entering the property. They were not in the driveway. Why trust anything else?


Okay sure, then you're taking the crazy "priest's" word. You think they are going to open the gate when crazies are on the property? No, hence impeding. Lefties have already shown they will rush the gates once opened.

Not taking anyone's "word." I saw the video, in which a guy is just standing on the sidewalk with his arms up and gets shot in the head. At that point the onus is on the shooter to prove why they weren't in the wrong.


Oh now he's on the sidewalk? Try again bro

It's frightening if you think an unarmed person in that instance deserves to be shot like that. If that is the case, you grew up without any moral Christian values. Shameful

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


The guy purposely got shot so easily duped morons could put forward your arguments.

If that's the case, the ICE guys should not have taken the bait. They are bad at their jobs.


Sometimes when you draw a line, you have to enforce it.
Reply Quote
4
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 9:24a
oski003 said:
sycasey said:
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned

1. You don't know who was warned about what and when. That is taking the government at their word.

2. Further images of the scene already put lie to one of the claims the government made: that the protesters were interfering with vehicles entering the property. They were not in the driveway. Why trust anything else?


Okay sure, then you're taking the crazy "priest's" word. You think they are going to open the gate when crazies are on the property? No, hence impeding. Lefties have already shown they will rush the gates once opened.

Not taking anyone's "word." I saw the video, in which a guy is just standing on the sidewalk with his arms up and gets shot in the head. At that point the onus is on the shooter to prove why they weren't in the wrong.


Oh now he's on the sidewalk? Try again bro

It's frightening if you think an unarmed person in that instance deserves to be shot like that. If that is the case, you grew up without any moral Christian values. Shameful

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


The guy purposely got shot so easily duped morons could put forward your arguments.

If that's the case, the ICE guys should not have taken the bait. They are bad at their jobs.


Sometimes when you draw a line, you have to enforce it.


Absolutely this.
Reply Quote
3
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 9:25a
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned

1. You don't know who was warned about what and when. That is taking the government at their word.

2. Further images of the scene already put lie to one of the claims the government made: that the protesters were interfering with vehicles entering the property. They were not in the driveway. Why trust anything else?


Okay sure, then you're taking the crazy "priest's" word. You think they are going to open the gate when crazies are on the property? No, hence impeding. Lefties have already shown they will rush the gates once opened.

Not taking anyone's "word." I saw the video, in which a guy is just standing on the sidewalk with his arms up and gets shot in the head. At that point the onus is on the shooter to prove why they weren't in the wrong.


Oh now he's on the sidewalk? Try again bro

If your argument is "he took one step too far onto the empty parking spot in front of the building, therefore he deserved to be shot," then I'll just leave you to it.


No, my argument is that he disobeyed a lawful order and the consequences were seen.
Reply Quote
3
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 9:29a
SBGold said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned

1. You don't know who was warned about what and when. That is taking the government at their word.

2. Further images of the scene already put lie to one of the claims the government made: that the protesters were interfering with vehicles entering the property. They were not in the driveway. Why trust anything else?


Okay sure, then you're taking the crazy "priest's" word. You think they are going to open the gate when crazies are on the property? No, hence impeding. Lefties have already shown they will rush the gates once opened.

Not taking anyone's "word." I saw the video, in which a guy is just standing on the sidewalk with his arms up and gets shot in the head. At that point the onus is on the shooter to prove why they weren't in the wrong.


Oh now he's on the sidewalk? Try again bro

It's frightening if you think an unarmed person in that instance deserves to be shot like that. If that is the case, you grew up without any moral Christian values. Shameful

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


First of all, it's frightening that you think people can do whatever they want with no consequences.

Secondly, lmao you have no idea how I grew up and for the "tolerant" left to lecture me about morals is comical. What if I grew up with Islamic morals? Buddhist? Seems weird that you automatically go to Christian morals first when the left spouts blasphemy every chance they get.

You think that "priest" has Christian values? Screaming "God d*mn you"…. Yeah real Christian like of him.

You should change your signature. You don't promote unity, you promote conformity.
Reply Quote
3
3 edits
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 10:03a
BearlySane88 said:
SBGold said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned

1. You don't know who was warned about what and when. That is taking the government at their word.

2. Further images of the scene already put lie to one of the claims the government made: that the protesters were interfering with vehicles entering the property. They were not in the driveway. Why trust anything else?


Okay sure, then you're taking the crazy "priest's" word. You think they are going to open the gate when crazies are on the property? No, hence impeding. Lefties have already shown they will rush the gates once opened.

Not taking anyone's "word." I saw the video, in which a guy is just standing on the sidewalk with his arms up and gets shot in the head. At that point the onus is on the shooter to prove why they weren't in the wrong.


Oh now he's on the sidewalk? Try again bro

It's frightening if you think an unarmed person in that instance deserves to be shot like that. If that is the case, you grew up without any moral Christian values. Shameful

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


First of all, it's frightening that you think people can do whatever they want with no consequences.

Secondly, lmao you have no idea how I grew up and for the "tolerant" left to lecture me about morals is comical. What if I grew up with Islamic morals? Buddhist? Seems weird that you automatically go to Christian morals first when the left spouts blasphemy every chance they get.

You think that "priest" has Christian values? Screaming "God d*mn you"…. Yeah real Christian like of him.

You should change your signature. You don't promote unity, you promote conformity.


So if you want consequences, why not arrest him instead of blowing his head off?

You're a scary character, my goodness

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever
Reply Quote
2
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 10:08a
SBGold said:
BearlySane88 said:
SBGold said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned

1. You don't know who was warned about what and when. That is taking the government at their word.

2. Further images of the scene already put lie to one of the claims the government made: that the protesters were interfering with vehicles entering the property. They were not in the driveway. Why trust anything else?


Okay sure, then you're taking the crazy "priest's" word. You think they are going to open the gate when crazies are on the property? No, hence impeding. Lefties have already shown they will rush the gates once opened.

Not taking anyone's "word." I saw the video, in which a guy is just standing on the sidewalk with his arms up and gets shot in the head. At that point the onus is on the shooter to prove why they weren't in the wrong.


Oh now he's on the sidewalk? Try again bro

It's frightening if you think an unarmed person in that instance deserves to be shot like that. If that is the case, you grew up without any moral Christian values. Shameful

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


First of all, it's frightening that you think people can do whatever they want with no consequences.

Secondly, lmao you have no idea how I grew up and for the "tolerant" left to lecture me about morals is comical. What if I grew up with Islamic morals? Buddhist? Seems weird that you automatically go to Christian morals first when the left spouts blasphemy every chance they get.

You think that "priest" has Christian values? Screaming "God d*mn you"…. Yeah real Christian like of him.

You should change your signature. You don't promote unity, you promote conformity.


So if you want consequences, why not arrest him instead of blowing his head off?

You're a scary character, my goodness

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


Did you take peyote and see his head roll to the ground? Did you just come back from a spiritual trip?
Reply Quote
3
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 10:37a
SBGold said:
BearlySane88 said:
SBGold said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:


Watch the video of the "priest" getting hit in the head and listen to what the "priest" says after being hit. "God d*mn you, God d*mn you." Sounds legit to me….

Oh so it was just fine to shoot that guy then.


With non lethal or less than lethal rounds, absolutely. He's standing in the driveway knowing full well he's subject to force at that point





Dude, I already responded to this point. They were not in the driveway!


She doesn't claim they were in the driveway, he still was impeding based on her claim. Either way, he was trespassing and was warned. Seems like a really simple way to avoid it would have been to listen to their warning

Taking the government's word for everything is your right.


You missed the part where I said either way he was trespassing and warned

1. You don't know who was warned about what and when. That is taking the government at their word.

2. Further images of the scene already put lie to one of the claims the government made: that the protesters were interfering with vehicles entering the property. They were not in the driveway. Why trust anything else?


Okay sure, then you're taking the crazy "priest's" word. You think they are going to open the gate when crazies are on the property? No, hence impeding. Lefties have already shown they will rush the gates once opened.

Not taking anyone's "word." I saw the video, in which a guy is just standing on the sidewalk with his arms up and gets shot in the head. At that point the onus is on the shooter to prove why they weren't in the wrong.


Oh now he's on the sidewalk? Try again bro

It's frightening if you think an unarmed person in that instance deserves to be shot like that. If that is the case, you grew up without any moral Christian values. Shameful

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


First of all, it's frightening that you think people can do whatever they want with no consequences.

Secondly, lmao you have no idea how I grew up and for the "tolerant" left to lecture me about morals is comical. What if I grew up with Islamic morals? Buddhist? Seems weird that you automatically go to Christian morals first when the left spouts blasphemy every chance they get.

You think that "priest" has Christian values? Screaming "God d*mn you"…. Yeah real Christian like of him.

You should change your signature. You don't promote unity, you promote conformity.


So if you want consequences, why not arrest him instead of blowing his head off?

You're a scary character, my goodness

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


Blowing his head off?? You're unintentionally funny.

I like that you ignored the rest of what I said because it doesn't fit your narrative.
Reply Quote
3
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:43a
He is an Orangeman, not a priest:

The person who was recently and widely reported as being hit by a pepper ball fired by federal agents during a protest was a minister, specifically a Presbyterian pastor, not a Catholic priest.

The minister is identified as Reverend David Black, a pastor at the First Presbyterian Church in Chicago.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Reply Quote
1
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:34a
Aren't the sons of Democrat House Whip Katherine Clark and Virginia governor, Tim Kaine, both Antifa?
Reply Quote
3
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:33p
Chicago Black resident speaks Insider view.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1103103005369047?mibextid=9drbnH&s=yWDuG2&fs=e
Reply Quote
1
Refresh
Page 2 of 2 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.