Trump is running for president again

185,791 Views | 2558 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by sycasey
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Republicans have murdered yet another woman. They call themselves pro life but these forced birthers are really pro death. Roevember is here.
https://www.threads.net/@propublica/post/DB04z85CS8P?xmt=AQGzdyJoQtC6uOjFSDe2q09qCYG1AB2uL-55w8I9tiAr2w
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Let's go Catturd!

But then again....

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Unique Danger of a Trumpist Oligarchy


https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/11/trumpist-oligarchy-big-tech-takeover-musk-bezos/680503/?utm_source=msn

"The Trumpist oligarchy that is taking shape is far different from the post-Soviet strain. What makes it distinct is that Trump is entering into a partnership with the most powerful technologists in the world. But the core problem of oligarchy is the same. The symbiotic relationship between a corrupt leader and a business elite always entails the trading of favors. The regime does the bidding of the billionaires and, in turn, the billionaires do the bidding of the regime. Power grows ever more concentrated as the owners and the corrupt leaders conspire to protect their mutual hold on it. In short order, this arrangement has the potential to deliver a double blow to the American system: It could undermine capitalism and erode democracy all at once.

….. Every oligarchical system writes its own informal rules, arriving at its own set of furtive understandings. In contrast to Putin, Trump is aligning with genuinely creative entrepreneurs. Yet that doesn't make the American model better, just uniquely dangerous. Trump's transactionalism will be tethered to people driven by greed, but also by messianic fervor, and the result will be like nothing you've ever seen."

Bonus read:

Inside the Ruthless, Restless Final Days of Trump's Campaign - The Atlantic


https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/11/trump-2024-campaign-lewandowski-conway/680456/
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But Biden-Harris actually flying in illegal immigrants, and allowing 10-15 million to flood in, is OK?
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Make up even bigger numbers, and clutch your pearls a bit harder.

You are too gullible for your own good. Apparently you believe everything you read- as long as it confirms your most cherished biases.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Yes, even little kids know the 2020 election was stolen.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
President Biden will have the Insurrection Act available to deal with nonsense like this. Hopefully Dementia Donold will be put in prison on November 26.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

President Biden will have the Insurrection Act available to deal with nonsense like this. Hopefully Dementia Donold will be put in prison on November 26.

Jamie Raskin already said on one of the cable news shows that the Democrats will not certify the election if Trump wins.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This week's psyops:

Monday: A roast comic's joke will decide the election.

Tuesday: Phantom apostrophe.

Wednesday: "I will protect women" referred to abortion instead of keeping killers from pouring across the border.

Thursday: Trump wants to put Liz Cheney in front of a firing squad.

Friday: "Undecideds" breaking for Kamala by double digits.

Saturday: Kamala is winning Iowa.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
U mad, bro?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

U mad, bro?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

This week's psyops:

Monday: A roast comic's joke will decide the election.

Tuesday: Phantom apostrophe.

Wednesday: "I will protect women" referred to abortion instead of keeping killers from pouring across the border.

Thursday: Trump wants to put Liz Cheney in front of a firing squad.

Friday: "Undecideds" breaking for Kamala by double digits.

Saturday: Kamala is winning Iowa.

You should have just quoted David Sacks rather than plagiarizing.

dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Reminder - The earlier Dementia Donold declares victory on Tuesday the greater his margin of loss
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

This week's psyops:

Monday: A roast comic's joke will decide the election.

Tuesday: Phantom apostrophe.

Wednesday: "I will protect women" referred to abortion instead of keeping killers from pouring across the border.

Thursday: Trump wants to put Liz Cheney in front of a firing squad.

Friday: "Undecideds" breaking for Kamala by double digits.

Saturday: Kamala is winning Iowa.

You should have just quoted David Sacks rather than plagiarizing.




Did you hear about New Year's Eve in Times Square? Aaron Judge will drop the ball.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

This week's psyops:

Monday: A roast comic's joke will decide the election.

Tuesday: Phantom apostrophe.

Wednesday: "I will protect women" referred to abortion instead of keeping killers from pouring across the border.

Thursday: Trump wants to put Liz Cheney in front of a firing squad.

Friday: "Undecideds" breaking for Kamala by double digits.

Saturday: Kamala is winning Iowa.

You should have just quoted David Sacks rather than plagiarizing.




Did you hear about New Year's Eve in Times Square? Aaron Judge will drop the ball.
that's a good line

VOTE BLUE
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

This week's psyops:

Monday: A roast comic's joke will decide the election.

Tuesday: Phantom apostrophe.

Wednesday: "I will protect women" referred to abortion instead of keeping killers from pouring across the border.

Thursday: Trump wants to put Liz Cheney in front of a firing squad.

Friday: "Undecideds" breaking for Kamala by double digits.

Saturday: Kamala is winning Iowa.

You should have just quoted David Sacks rather than plagiarizing.



bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

Nah, her team was right to keep her off the Rogan show, she would have been torn apart and completely unraveled. She is not capable of holding a long session with a critical interviewer.

Rogan is not a critical interviewer.

Far more critical than the MSM interviewers who give her the questions in advance and steer clear of controversial issues.

If Harris already survived a Fox News interview, she shouldn't be worried about Joe Rogan.

Kamala's handlers who were in the same room with her cut the interview with Baeir short. Rogan's main condition was no one else would be in the room with them but the campaign declined.

SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

Nah, her team was right to keep her off the Rogan show, she would have been torn apart and completely unraveled. She is not capable of holding a long session with a critical interviewer.

Rogan is not a critical interviewer.

Far more critical than the MSM interviewers who give her the questions in advance and steer clear of controversial issues.

If Harris already survived a Fox News interview, she shouldn't be worried about Joe Rogan.

Kamala's handlers who were in the same room with her cut the interview with Baeir short. Rogan's main condition was no one else would be in the room with them but the campaign declined.


Yeah, I've worked in politics. His condition is a no-go for any candidate of any party. Not a newsworthy note on this one.

VOTE BLUE
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interestingly, both Trump and Vance agreed to Rogan's conditions and Rogan was never known to be a supporter of either of them.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Interestingly, both Trump and Vance agreed to Rogan's conditions and Rogan was never known to be a supporter of either of them.
I call BS on that

VOTE BLUE
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You can watch both podcasts and make your own determination.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

You can watch both podcasts and make your own determination.
NOPE, watching SNL from last night.

VOTE BLUE
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Kamala's appearance on SNL this close to election day is a violation of the Communications Act of 1934
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


Kamala's appearance on SNL this close to election day is a violation of the Communications Act of 1934
Go ahead prosecute it with your great knowledge of election laws

VOTE BLUE
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SNL could have invited Trump to play Alec Baldwin.
Alkiadt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

SNL could have invited Trump to play Alec Baldwin.


Yeah they have indictments in common!
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Alkiadt said:

bear2034 said:

SNL could have invited Trump to play Alec Baldwin.
Yeah they have indictments in common!

Alec is innocent, they put his gun behind bars.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


Kamala's appearance on SNL this close to election day is a violation of the Communications Act of 1934


That's crazy but not surprising.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrat Onions said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

Nah, her team was right to keep her off the Rogan show, she would have been torn apart and completely unraveled. She is not capable of holding a long session with a critical interviewer.

Rogan is not a critical interviewer.

Far more critical than the MSM interviewers who give her the questions in advance and steer clear of controversial issues.

If Harris already survived a Fox News interview, she shouldn't be worried about Joe Rogan.

Kamala's handlers who were in the same room with her cut the interview with Baeir short. Rogan's main condition was no one else would be in the room with them but the campaign declined.





I thought Trump was killing it with Musk interviews on Truth Social?

Sorry Orange Small Hands. VOTE BLUE
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She was black last night?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Orthodox Jews for Trump.

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Voting for Trump is like getting 6 Presidents.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.