Trump is running for president again

185,808 Views | 2558 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by sycasey
The Ghoul
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit
Whoops!

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.

Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

bearister said:

I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.

Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?

How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.

Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?

How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.

Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.

Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?

How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.

Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?

I noticed that, from 2016 to 2020, the Democratic Party emerged as the party of those with college degrees. Now why do you suppose that is?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.

Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?

How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.

Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?

Like tRump, if you ever end up as a defendant in criminal action, your lawyer won't let you testify because you can't process a question and formulate a responsive answer. You are stuck in non sequitur non responsive world.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.

Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?

How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.

Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?

I noticed that, from 2016 to 2020, the Democratic Party emerged as the party of those with college degrees. Now why do you suppose that is?

I don't know, is this true? Outside of STEM majors isn't college more worthless now than ever especially since tuition has skyrocketed to astronomical levels?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.

Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?

How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.

Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?

Like tRump, if you ever end up as a defendant in criminal action, your lawyer won't let you testify because you can't process a question and formulate a responsive answer. You are stuck in non sequitur non responsive world.

It's not Trump's lawyer than won't let him testify, it's the corrupt judge. You know this.
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.

Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?

How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.

Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?

Like tRump, if you ever end up as a defendant in criminal action, your lawyer won't let you testify because you can't process a question and formulate a responsive answer. You are stuck in non sequitur non responsive world.

It's not Trump's lawyer than won't let him testify, it's the corrupt judge. You know this.


I'm not a lawyer and I would never let Trump speak in a trial unless opposing counsel was me! I assume any competent lawyer could make Trump look like a bigger narcissistic idiot than he already is.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She will be the "pretend wife" based on the elasticity of the compensation clause, but when it comes to her pride and joy, it's HANDS OFF, ORANGE LUCIFER!

"While Barron is honored to have been chosen as a delegate by the Florida Republican Party, he regretfully declines to participate due to prior commitments," former first lady Melania Trump's office said in a statement to media.

Melania Trump's office and the RNC did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment."

Barron Trump declines to serve as Florida delegate to RNC


https://www.axios.com/2024/05/10/barron-trump-florida-delegate-rnc

*One has to wonder if tRump not knowing his son's age was a triggering event with regard to Barron's withdrawal.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

She will be the "pretend wife" based on the elasticity of the compensation clause, but when it comes to her pride and joy, it's HANDS OFF, ORANGE LUCIFER!

"While Barron is honored to have been chosen as a delegate by the Florida Republican Party, he regretfully declines to participate due to prior commitments," former first lady Melania Trump's office said in a statement to media.

Melania Trump's office and the RNC did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment."

Barron Trump declines to serve as Florida delegate to RNC


https://www.axios.com/2024/05/10/barron-trump-florida-delegate-rnc

*One has to wonder if tRump not knowing his son's age was a triggering event with regard to Barron's withdrawal.



I occasionally mix up my kids' ages, by a year. It is unusual, but it happens. I think we all do.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.

Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?

How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.

Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?

Like tRump, if you ever end up as a defendant in criminal action, your lawyer won't let you testify because you can't process a question and formulate a responsive answer. You are stuck in non sequitur non responsive world.

It's not Trump's lawyer than won't let him testify, it's the corrupt judge. You know this.


I'm not a lawyer and I would never let Trump speak in a trial unless opposing counsel was me! I assume any competent lawyer could make Trump look like a bigger narcissistic idiot than he already is.

Well, here's their chance but so far, they haven't. Why? Because Trump's testimony would wreck their chances of getting Trump. Communists don't allow others to speak, that's what they do.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MEGA MAGA rally in New Jersey, dajo9 territory.

President Trump Speaks to MASSIVE Crowd of Estimated 80,000 in Wildwood, NJ "LARGEST POLITICAL RALLY IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY HISTORY"
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Big C said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.

Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?

How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.

Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?

I noticed that, from 2016 to 2020, the Democratic Party emerged as the party of those with college degrees. Now why do you suppose that is?

I don't know, is this true? Outside of STEM majors isn't college more worthless now than ever especially since tuition has skyrocketed to astronomical levels?

A college education, outside of STEM majors, is worthless (or "more worthless")? It's funny that you have almost 10k posts on a college sports website, all this stuff being so worthless.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

bear2034 said:

Big C said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.

Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?

How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.

Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?

I noticed that, from 2016 to 2020, the Democratic Party emerged as the party of those with college degrees. Now why do you suppose that is?

I don't know, is this true? Outside of STEM majors isn't college more worthless now than ever especially since tuition has skyrocketed to astronomical levels?

A college education, outside of STEM majors, is worthless (or "more worthless")? It's funny that you have almost 10k posts on a college sports website, all this stuff being so worthless.

My take is: don't bother with expensive private colleges, who are the primary culprits of this rise in tuition (unless you get a full scholarship or something). Just go to a state school and get your diploma. Mostly it just matters that you have one.
The Ghoul
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

bear2034 said:

Big C said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.

Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?

How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.

Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?

I noticed that, from 2016 to 2020, the Democratic Party emerged as the party of those with college degrees. Now why do you suppose that is?

I don't know, is this true? Outside of STEM majors isn't college more worthless now than ever especially since tuition has skyrocketed to astronomical levels?

A college education, outside of STEM majors, is worthless (or "more worthless")? It's funny that you have almost 10k posts on a college sports website, all this stuff being so worthless.
He actually makes a good point and one that has been made by many others.


Many jobs that before the 70's wouldn't have required a college degree now do, even though the tasks required by the job don't require any advanced knowledge. And given how ridiculously expensive college is now, when you compare the wage of many of the jobs those graduates well get compared to how much money plumbers, electricians, etc. make, is college really worth the cost? Just another way that the system has been screwing us since the Clinton years, which is about the time the cost of college started spiraling out of control.

And the best part, as demonstrated on a daily basis on this board, is that the people with the degrees aren't even any smarter than those without.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Ghoul said:

Big C said:

bear2034 said:

Big C said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.

Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?

How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.

Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?

I noticed that, from 2016 to 2020, the Democratic Party emerged as the party of those with college degrees. Now why do you suppose that is?

I don't know, is this true? Outside of STEM majors isn't college more worthless now than ever especially since tuition has skyrocketed to astronomical levels?

A college education, outside of STEM majors, is worthless (or "more worthless")? It's funny that you have almost 10k posts on a college sports website, all this stuff being so worthless.
He actually makes a good point and one that has been made by many others.


Many jobs that before the 70's wouldn't have required a college degree now do, even though the tasks required by the job don't require any advanced knowledge. And given how ridiculously expensive college is now, when you compare the wage of many of the jobs those graduates well get compared to how much money plumbers, electricians, etc. make, is college really worth the cost? Just another way that the system has been screwing us since the Clinton years, which is about the time the cost of college started spiraling out of control.

And the best part, as demonstrated on a daily basis on this board, is that the people with the degrees aren't even any smarter than those without.


LOL, except for we'd need to conduct an experiment by having a similar board populated by posters primarily without college degrees. You might come away being surprised that it could get even dumber. I dunno, maybe not. Worth a try.
The Ghoul
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Ghoul said:


LOL at the arrogance shown here.

82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

82gradDLSdad said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

bear2034 said:

bearister said:

I assume you agree that tRump's tax cuts for the wealthy are a significant cause of the deficit and that you don't believe in the nonsense of the Trickle Down Theory and that you don't support his bought and paid for SCOTUS custom built by the Federalist Society.

Aren't most of the wealthy elite, Democrats?

How is that relevant unless you have proof that they secretly vote for tRump to get tax cuts? Otherwise they are voting against their best financial interests by voting Democrat.

Isn't the Democratic Party now the party of the very rich and the very poor?

Like tRump, if you ever end up as a defendant in criminal action, your lawyer won't let you testify because you can't process a question and formulate a responsive answer. You are stuck in non sequitur non responsive world.

It's not Trump's lawyer than won't let him testify, it's the corrupt judge. You know this.


I'm not a lawyer and I would never let Trump speak in a trial unless opposing counsel was me! I assume any competent lawyer could make Trump look like a bigger narcissistic idiot than he already is.

Well, here's their chance but so far, they haven't. Why? Because Trump's testimony would wreck their chances of getting Trump. Communists don't allow others to speak, that's what they do.


Then a lot of defense attorneys are Communists by having their client plead the 5th.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?



America is back.
The Ghoul
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Ghoul said:

The Ghoul said:


LOL at the arrogance shown here.


AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Copying from Minot, or he from you (I don't care really and can't be bothered to look who was first):

Can't decide if this is an example of the blind leading the blind, or stupid is as stupid does…

Maybe both?
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

Copying from Minot, or he from you (I don't care really and can't be bothered to look who was first):

Can't decide if this is an example of the blind leading the blind, or stupid is as stupid does…

Maybe both?
Forgetting which burner account he logged in with.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As you know, I believe tRump will absolutely win….but what I will say is that I think cranky old Republicans are the only ones that respond to pollsters. Most people I know consider them spammers wasting their time.

If that ends up being the case, and tRump loses, he will sell it as Stolen Election II. The Deplorables will be worked up good and plenty with chubby chafed inner thighs. But maybe if they act up again, this statement will apply:

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

As you know, I believe tRump will absolutely win….but what I will say is that I think cranky old Republicans are the only ones that respond to pollsters. Most people I know consider them spammers wasting their time.

If that ends of being the case, and tRump loses, he will sell it as Stolen Election II. The Deplorables will be work up good and plenty with chubby chafed inner thighs. But maybe if they act up again, this statement will apply:




And if trump wins??
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He has mentally degraded to cray cray which weaponizes Narcissistic personality disorder, so methinks the military will have to intercede either for him or agin him.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I can't imagine he could be sworn in on January 20.
I can't fathom it.

But neither do I believe anyone would stop it.
Our powers that be are feckless. And as much as I fantasize, any physical or illegal action against him would be an utter disaster for the nation.

The GOP is batnuts
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

bearister said:

As you know, I believe tRump will absolutely win….but what I will say is that I think cranky old Republicans are the only ones that respond to pollsters. Most people I know consider them spammers wasting their time.

If that ends of being the case, and tRump loses, he will sell it as Stolen Election II. The Deplorables will be work up good and plenty with chubby chafed inner thighs. But maybe if they act up again, this statement will apply:




And if trump wins??

Russia
Russia
Russia
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What's wrong with being a Russian asset if Russia isn't that bad? For some reason Russia is only considered unsavory when it is pointed out that tRump is a Russian asset and then tRump and has to vehemently deny it.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

I can't imagine he could be sworn in on January 20.
I can't fathom it.


I can.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

concordtom said:

I can't imagine he could be sworn in on January 20.
I can't fathom it.


I can.


Great video!

And you're one of the white racists laughing along with it.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

bear2034 said:

concordtom said:

I can't imagine he could be sworn in on January 20.
I can't fathom it.
I can.
Great video!

And you're one of the white racists laughing along with it.

lol.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If trump loses in November, his delay delay delay pass will expire. He won't be able to run again again in 2028. He will face multiple jailable cases.

That's when he flees to Dubai.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

If trump loses in November, his delay delay delay pass will expire. He won't be able to run again again in 2028. He will face multiple jailable cases.

That's when he flees to Dubai.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.